₦airaland Forum

The role of men and women have been explicitly spelt out in religious books. But that has never sat well with modern women and their avowed apologists.

Over the years, unfulfilled and wandering women have looked onto science and social commentators to redifine the roles of men and women. So far, it is a futile attempt at reinventing the wheel.

Women are inherently multitasking; they can actually do far many more projects simultaneously . But they seldom achieve more; they're often content with tiny results here and there.

Men tend to focus on fewer projects and nearly always see them through. I like to call it the testosterone - drive. (TD). And that's about generally the basic physical and psychological differences between the sexes. Estrogen is passive and testosterone is hyper active.

All over the ages women have laid their marks in various heroics of loyalty, devotion, home makers, love, sacrifice and childbirth. Also these achievements have also been outstripped by gross naivety, emotional instability, physical limitation (in comparison to men) myopic world outlook and lack of an inherent drive for adventure.


Women are created weaker for a definite purpose: they were never meant to carry the weight and burden of the world in the same capacity that God through years of evolution have designed solely for males.

Any means employed by the women folks to subvert this role shall ultimately end in a sadness and unfulfilment that shall defy medical science. All efforts by modern psychologist to make women happy in a role alien to their inherent disposition shall only mire her further and deeper into the pool of her confusion and unfulfilment.


Women should go back to the basis where their strength is unchallenged and pure in a grand, eternal plan of purpose.


Men are burdened with the responsibility of navigating the world and society. How effective this role can be accomplished depends largely, but not entirely on the role women play as his source of strength.

The man is DELIBERATELY made more physically rugged, more emotionally stable with a thick wall of stubbornness that fraudsters, dubious pastors, modern trends find it very difficult to persuade.

Why? Because he has the burden of protecting and leading his family that is comprised of his wife and children.
He himself is responsible for cultural shifts, civilisations, teachings and religions. Women are more apt to follow and adapt. It is their nature.


Sadly today's men have grown weaker both in the quest for knowledge, leadership and spirituality. Often they are intimidated by the intelligent women without knowing that they themselves should be the custodian of wisdom. Men should read more and learn more. It is their responsibility. When left to women , the resultant effects won't be so effective.

The moral decay we witness today is nothing but the effect of men abandoning their roles for women.

g

lezz:
The moral decay we witness today is nothing but the effect of men abandoning their roles for women.

My thoughts exactly. A man needs to man-up & take his responsibilities seriously. No home should have the woman as the bread-winner. Women should support and not take over a home.

Creamish:
My thoughts exactly. A man needs to man-up & take his responsibilities seriously. No home should have the woman as the bread-winner. Women should support and not take over a home.

In a gender equal home no one should be a bread winner. The financial running of the home should be split "equally" for both the husband and the wife. But in a home where the woman still hold the believe that a man is the head and leads then the status quo should stand. Just saying.

Lol, okay na..

Creamish:
My thoughts exactly. A man needs to man-up & take his responsibilities seriously. No home should have the woman as the bread-winner. Women should support and not take over a home.

Aye! It is ironic how men have got lost in the wind of modernity. Some have abandoned their roles as the main bearer of financial and moral responsibility as soon as the wife indicates an eagerness to assert herself.

But then, the number of women who have been hoodwinked into thinking they should be the main breadwinners are directly affecting men's role.

Isn't it ironic most hardworking, financially independent women end up with men who take them for granted and use their finances to woo other less privileged girls?

What I'm trying to put across is a woman who thinks proving her womanhood is by becoming the breadwinner at home will indirectly weaken the zeal and drive of the husband. The first instinct of a man is to protect -if necessary with his life- his wife and family. But this zeal is directly weakened or hightened by the roles played by his woman.


A whole lot of today's men have become intimidated by today's women. It is a complex issue. So many men have been raised by single mothers.

Women are trend followers by nature. Men are trend setters. So few men are ready to set the trend in morality, education and truth at home for their wives to follow.

So you have women falling victims to fake and genuine pastors who run their homes from their churches.

The truth is when a man lacks drive and direction, most intelligent women who are wives to these men take it as an excuse to lead, control and take over. Whilst the most effective thing to do is a gentle nudge of encouragement for the husband to be awakened.

Women are weaker vessels,prove me wrong

Lolzzzz.....

The man was a sole breead winner in the days when women dont work or go to school

If you have the same degrees as your husband have a job like him, then why do you want him to be the sole bread winner again

I don't know where you all keep getting these ideas from.
I don't think any sane woman would like to be the bread winner of her family. Feminism is about equality. Its about equal splitting of the bills or dropping equal percentage of their respective income.
Its about mutual respect. Its about supporting each other. Staying loyal to each other. Protecting each other.

And when we look at it, aside the financial aspects, women has been leading most homes. Over the years, men has redefined and limited their roles to only dropping "chop money". They have left raising of the kids to their wives. The society has limited the role of keeping the home together to the wife alone.