Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC - Politics (3) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC (21574 Views)
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by lastpage: 3:55pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
thefakestan:The Judiciary IS COMPROMISED..... and that is not just mere sentiments. Judges have been disciplined by the Judicial Council Remember that Judge that sat over the Aregbe case and how his phone records show how he was "negotiating how much he wants to be paid to dabaru the case? (I know it was on Sahara reporters then... and the Judge was disciplined) Remember that criminal attorney general of the federation: Adoke or what is his name sef? He is the most corrupt SAN that ever graced the bench! What about that Judge in Ibori's case? ![]() What about the Judge that told us that "16 is greater than 19" What about the UPN Vs. NPN Judge of the 2/3 of 19 fame? ![]() and many more like that whose cases are not even exposed at all because they are not "political in nature". Most Nigerian Judges are criminals, safe for a very few of them Lastpage! |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by clintwine(m): 3:59pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
malton:Let me help you understand. You come home one night and police are in your house waiting for you and your best friend FEMI is in handcuffs Now femi says the £2000 that was spent from his account was actually money meant for you that you asked him to collect it from someone and give it to you and you sent him messages to action this instruction. The police now asks femi, where is your phone and where is the proof that Malon asked you to do this and femi says I don't have any of these, no email, no phone records, no one was there when you asked femi to collect illegal £2000 from you Is it right for the police to pick you as an accomplice because of the evidence femi has just given? A lot of these issues can be dealt with by common sense and doing a bit of thinking, not everything is worth moaning about. Bear in mind, I am not saying this didn't happen, but simply if we start arresting everyone because of what someone said , then what kind of system is that |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by youngpablo(m): 4:11pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
Sure, the evidence is not sufficient enough. Wailers should see beyond been partisan |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by shidof(m): 4:24pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
MathsChic:no concrete evidence to nab him. In btw , au a mathematician damsel ? |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by shidof(m): 4:24pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
MathsChic:no concrete evidence to nab him. In btw , au a mathematician damsel? |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by Nobody: 4:48pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
bashydemy:It hurts! |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by Dandeson1(m): 4:49pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
free2ryhme:out of insecurity ![]() who is this low level 2timing jobless attention-seeking oversabi bastard masturbator no future poverty stricken hyaena busy body,, , is the girl Ur sis, or Ur boo, is she ur daughter or related to you in anyway. why are you taking it personal, you pretend to be upright, but your type are actually worse in the dark... you are the sick one here,. bastard child.. |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by Dandeson1(m): 4:54pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
Frankiss44:Lol... burst my brain iffa hear, everything just go well... |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by Dandeson1(m): 5:35pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
MathsChic:there's nothing sexier than confident damsel. ignore the niggga |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by free2ryhme: 5:35pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
Dandeson1:You childhood must be very rough. It is a pity ur parents threw you out early. You are bitter human worth not hanging around. Chai, you reek with curse and negativity. Tufiakwa |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by free2ryhme: 5:38pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
MathsChic:You can even be proud of being a Kardashian na btw you and the mumu wey wan die becos of pisure |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by Dandeson1(m): 5:40pm On Nov 12, 2015*. Modified: 8:02pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
[quote author=free2ryhme post=39951924]I understand that you are quiet a useless fellow, so I won't respond to you again.. . . |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by free2ryhme: 5:44pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
Dandeson1:How much do you earn in a creek infested bayelsa state is never compared to the amount I spend on fuelling car to work in a MNC in lagos Come and see your fellow charge and bail lawyers at igbosere and ikeja high court begging for peanuts Is it the file you carry from one flying boat to another thru the creek that's makes u lawyer? Mention the name of the fake chamber You still dey suffer. Okponu ogogoro man |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by MathsChic(f): 6:02pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
free2ryhme:Okay ![]() |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by MathsChic(f): 6:02pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
Dandeson1:I'm actually not fazed ![]() |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by miqos02(m): 6:49pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
senatorbayor:if the efcc knows that they cant win a case based on the evidences before them, do you think it is advisable for them to file charges when they know the possible outcome, it will be a waste of public funds |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by senatorbayor(m): 7:28pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
miqos02:While I agree with your submissions on waste of public fund for unsubstantiated cases, this particular case has been substantiated with the acceptance of the PA that he actually collected that sum from the accused standing trial. The EFCC should also add it to its law that whoever come up with frivolous allegations will be prosecuted. Allowing EFCC to determine the substance of a case if not well checked might lead to selective of judgement on their part. I would rather advised the petitioners whose case was not admitted to approach the court for redress |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by miqos02(m): 7:48pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
is there any proof that teh PA represented the CCT chairman? we dont know, neither has he confessed, it is also possible that the PA did every thing on his own senatorbayor: |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by senatorbayor(m): 7:55pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
clintwine:In that case, let Femi (P.A to danladi) be charged for that crime, am sure he will provide evidence to link that his friend when he discovered he will be going to jail for an offence he is only running errand for with little benefits. The point is this, it has been established that "Femi" collected that money, hence why say the case is not substantial and what was the reaction of Danladi to such weighty allegations that his P.A had so admitted. If such case is brought before him, will he excuse himself as the judge base on morality. So many posers. |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by senatorbayor(m): 8:05pm On Nov 12, 2015 |
miqos02:Bro, my point was hinge on EFCC saying the whole case was not substantial to effect a trial despite the admittance of the P.A to have collected some cash. The proof of linking the CCT chairman can only be substantiated in court if the EFCC charged the PA for his crime, but killing the case without further charges will raise suspicion which may hunt mr Danladi |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by COCKCROW: 9:39am On Nov 13, 2015 |
Why will there be any evidence as former CCT chairman? Is he not a northern, a moslem, is his name not Umar Danladi? Have you ever seen or heard of any moslem northern prosecuted for corruption? The information on Umar D. is not complete in law. They are always satanic saints or saintly satanic. |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by clintwine(m): 11:26am On Nov 13, 2015 |
senatorbayor:NOw we are on the same page. Charge the guy that the money was found on, seize all his properties and make sure he goes away for a long time when people know that fronting is a crime, they will think twice |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by senatorbayor(m): 12:29pm On Nov 13, 2015 |
clintwine:YES BRO, WE MAY BE ON SAME PAGE BUT NOT ON SAME LINE earlier, cos you never said "Femi" (PA To Danladi) should be charged to court to prove Danladi links with the said fraud. More so, EFCC is yet to make statement that Danladi's P.A will be charged to court having made confessional statement that he actually had a deal with the accused (Mr Rashid) If EFCC had said they will be charging him to court, it would not have generated such reaction as witnessed on this thread. In all, both of us want justice to be seen to have been done to this case, and every one who have direct or indirect links with such case no matter highly placed should not be spared. with this, we are on same page ![]() Am yet to read where CCT chairman condemned the action of his P.A, hope he does not want to get the TAFA Balogun treatment where his aides was used as witness against him ![]() kudos bro. |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by clintwine(m): 8:40pm On Nov 19, 2015 |
senatorbayor:ok I agree with most of your suggestions, but in the real world you don't take someone to court without enough evidence to prove it, it is called waste of public funds. the person that was caught needs to be charged with evidence and a watch would be placed on the second, he is sure to make a mistake and he also would be charged to court with the evidence they have |
| Re: Why We Won't Prosecute CCT Chairman - EFCC by senatorbayor(m): 9:30pm On Nov 19, 2015 |
clintwine:God will help our leaders bro. Kudos |
How Saraki Bribed CCT Chairman To Dismiss CCT Charges - Sahara Reporters • Why We Won't Protest Against The Fuel Price Hike - PIC • Mohammed Adoke Recommends CCT Chairman’s Removal, Prosecution - Thisday • 2 • 3 • 4
See The Houses I Saw In A Village In Imo State Today - Photos • INEC Delists 1.1 Million Voters Over Double Registration, Ineligibility • States, Police Clamp Down On Traders Rejecting Old Notes
If this isn't sufficient evidence, what then is? 



