₦airaland Forum

Good morning

Oga , it was declared in his asset



and it's his entitlement as ex president, Every other ex president got bullet proof cars as well ,

DaBullIT:
Oga , it was declared in his asset



and it's his entitlement as ex president, Every other ex president got bullet proof cars as well ,

As usual, PDP is looking for dirt in distilled water.

Buhari has triumphed once again.

He got his as normal entitlement. The mud slinging by uncle J's PDP faction is expected.

To me,dokpesi was paid for a job done.but i don't know who was right to pay him but his money was paid.also buhari was compensated,i do see compensation as crime.

Very dumb analysis.

1st the vehicle's are not Buhari's property but the property of the FG.

It is constitutionally right for an ex-president to get such gifts and the law is silent about which of the offices is to make such procurement.. Moreover it is not out of place for the ONSA to make procurement for security of past presidents.

As for Dokpesi...

How can u explain how the officse of the NSA is the one responsible for paying political parties.?

The money is also paid to Dokpesi was mostly in raw cash.... Which automatically ia money laundering.

This comparison is baseless and dumb....

Next try plz...

DaBullIT:
Oga , it was declared in his asset



and it's his entitlement as ex president, Every other ex president got bullet proof cars as well ,

Do they get their entitlements through the Office of the Secretary of Government of the Federation or Office of the National Security Adviser? The country can only move foward when we do away with sentiments and call a spade what it is.

We should not forget the fact that PMB is a retired General, such a compensation for his destroyed cars from the office of the National Security Adviser could only be seen as an entitlement due to him. How many of our public office holders have collected cars from politicians for no work done at all outside the monetization policy? Let sleeping dogs lie.

Brozo1:
We should not forget the fact that PMB is a retired General, such a compensation for his destroyed cars from the office of the National Security Adviser could only be seen as an entitlement due to him. How many of our public office holders have collected cars from politicians for no work done at all outside the monetization policy? Let sleeping dogs lie.

It is the Office of the Secretary of Government of the Federation that takes care of such compensations or entitlements as u may call it. Now I do not see anything wrong with the office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) replacing such vehicles or even giving him a new car without the attack since it has to do with security and the office of NSA just like many high positions like the Central bank governor's have what is called 'intervention funds' which they can use their discreation in applying. It is also the discreation Dasuki applied when he compensated the newspaper houses when their publications were seized my the army.The problem now is that the present government has made it seem like every money coming from the office of the NSA was meant for arms purhase and many people are swallowing the dummy. Money for security purpose is not neccessarily money to buy arms.

I think I understand what you trying to say now Tranquill.

bravado90:
By Achilleus Chud-Uchegbu


“There was therefore nothing untoward, illegal or tending to corruption in former Head of State Buhari and Presidential aspirant, as he then was, receiving vehicles, to which he was statutorily entitled , from the Federal Government of Nigeria” -Femi Adesina.



Some of the questions being asked publicly is: Was it right for the ONSA to pay DAAR Communications for media campaign purposes -though the sort of ‘media campaign’ was not explicitly disclosed. If ONSA was wrong in the payment, how come Buhari’s acceptance of SUVs that statutorily, ought to have reached him from office of SGF, but was delivered by ONSA, is right?



If it did not matter to the President that the delivery of the SUVs did not follow the due process he so likes, and he accepted same and refused to declare same in his asset form, then, he acquiesced and is as guilty as all others who accepted payments from the ONSA when the service for which they were being paid for did not fall within purview of arms purchase.

Source http://scannewsnigeria.com/news/if-dokpesi-is-guilty-so-is-buhari/

Oga, you can continue defending nonsense tull tomorrow. In fact you should take you president to court. The fact remains, money that was meant for arms purchased was shared by your paymaster and it was very wrong.


By the way, dasuki should have mentioned PMB if he felt he took part in it. Stop talking nonsense. What is wrong is wrong.

bravado90:
By Achilleus Chud-Uchegbu


“There was therefore nothing untoward, illegal or tending to corruption in former Head of State Buhari and Presidential aspirant, as he then was, receiving vehicles, to which he was statutorily entitled , from the Federal Government of Nigeria” -Femi Adesina.



Some of the questions being asked publicly is: Was it right for the ONSA to pay DAAR Communications for media campaign purposes -though the sort of ‘media campaign’ was not explicitly disclosed. If ONSA was wrong in the payment, how come Buhari’s acceptance of SUVs that statutorily, ought to have reached him from office of SGF, but was delivered by ONSA, is right?



If it did not matter to the President that the delivery of the SUVs did not follow the due process he so likes, and he accepted same and refused to declare same in his asset form, then, he acquiesced and is as guilty as all others who accepted payments from the ONSA when the service for which they were being paid for did not fall within purview of arms purchase.

Source http://scannewsnigeria.com/news/if-dokpesi-is-guilty-so-is-buhari/

Nice one