₦airaland Forum

zeemahn:
The universe is not a human so it cannot 'decide'.
Any better question?

Hahaha

So tell me , since you became an atheist , you haven't thought of that ?

vooks:
Science can explain 'everything' but it can't change simple facts such as 1+1=2 or the fact that it is IMPOSSIBLE for any natural and random process give an infinite amount of time to generate a Subaru!

Give science a trillion years and 1+1=2 and a Subaru design will never show up in nature.

Like wise, no amount of knowledge changes the fact that life is irreducibly complex and ordered, too complex and ordered for chance

Soooo...how do you feel now?

KingEbukasBlog predicted that I will "RIP' for quoting you but it appears that your evading the points I raised.

Who told you that science is contending that 1+1=2?

About the Volcano and Subaru,,, If we applied your logic of a volcano producing a car then we can safely say that the car is made of volcanic ash and rocks and gases and other volcanic things. But this is not the case. Your logic is flawed sire.

Again, A subaru is inanimate and is not evolving and did not evolve. There is a variety of organisms ranging from extremely simple cells to complex organisms like us each representing the different stages of evolution and complexity.

We have different body structures that can be anatomically compared to structures in other animals closer to us in the evolutionary tree.

Wait... Did you thought that humans just popped up the way you are illustrating with a volcanic subaru?

Andddd finallly, you keep contradicting yourself. You easily explained how survival and complexity can be accounted for with natural selection(though you disagree with natural selection) and yet you keep chanting that atheist believe that complexity arose by chance.
Life is not irreducibly complex. Nothing is. Your giving me reasons to conclude that youre confused o. honestly.

Im getting bored mehn

zeemahn:
Soooo...how do you feel now?

KingEbukasBlog predicted that I will "RIP' for quoting you but it appears that your evading the points I raised.

Who told you that science is contending that 1+1=2?

About the Volcano and Subaru,,, If we applied your logic of a volcano producing a car then we can safely say that the car is made of volcanic ash and rocks and gases and other volcanic things. But this is not the case. Your logic is flawed sire.

Again, A subaru is inanimate and is not evolving and did not evolve. :DThere is a variety of organisms ranging from extremely simple cells to complex organisms like us each representing the different stages of evolution and complexity.

We have different body structures that can be anatomically compared to structures in other animals closer to us in the evolutionary tree.

Wait... Did you thought that humans just popped up the way you are illustrating with a volcanic subaru?

You just dont know where to start tidying this garbage

zeemahn:
Soooo...how do you feel now?

KingEbukasBlog predicted that I will "RIP' for quoting you but it appears that your evading the points I raised.

Negro you won't die, I pray you live longer than me.

Who told you that science is contending that 1+1=2?

Point is it is established FACT that 1+1=2. All the knowledge we have even if it is not total knowledge is enough to rule out as IMPOSSIBLE 1+1 being anything else other than 2. So I can say 1+1=2 and 1 trillion years from now, 1+1=2. Comprende?

Some basic facts simply don't change with increased knowledge.

About the Volcano and Subaru,,, If we applied your logic of a volcano producing a car then we can safely say that the car is made of volcanic ash and rocks and gases and other volcanic things. But this is not the case. Your logic is flawed sire.

Please don't be silly. We are not looking at the raw materials of a Subaru but the Subaru itself and its creation/manufacture process. We can with the present information rule out formation of a Subaru by random processes can't we?

Again, A subaru is inanimate and is not evolving and did not evolve. There is a variety of organisms ranging from extremely simple cells to complex organisms like us each representing the different stages of evolution and complexity.

The Subaru is an example to illustrate the stupidity of claiming random processes can generate such highly complex and ordered stuff. I wish to inform you that the 'simplest' organism is a million times more complex than the Subaru. So if random processes can't generate such a complex device, is it not silly to believe that the same processes FORMED life?

We have different body structures that can be anatomically compared to structures in other animals closer to us in the evolutionary tree.

This simply points to a single DESIGNER

Wait... Did you thought that humans just popped up the way you are illustrating with a volcanic subaru?

Sharrap

KingEbukasBlog:
You just dont know where to start tidying this garbage

**In Shao Khans Voice** IS THIS YOUR BEST?

KingEbukasBlog:
Hahaha

So tell me , since you became an atheist , you haven't thought of that ?

Thought of what?
Be yourself. Stop trying to sound intelligent.

zeemahn:
Thought of what?
Be yourself. Stop trying to sound intelligent.

I asked you a simple question pillock ! As someone who peddles godless ideologies and concepts like BB and ET , will science ever unravel the true purpose of the universe .

You are the one that insisted science can answer everything - whatever that means

zeemahn:
**In Shao Khans Voice** IS THIS YOUR BEST?

Well you challenged uncle vooks not me ... looking forward to your rebuttal tho

KingEbukasBlog:
Well you challenged uncle vooks not me ... looking forward to your rebuttal tho

My broda, no need rubbing it in, let him meditate on the wisdom you have dispensed. May the Lord Jesus Christ open his eyes. Amen

vooks:

Negro you won't die, I pray you live longer than me.

Dont waste your time. your concern is appreciated but I should be more concerned for you.

Point is it is established FACT that 1+1=2. All the knowledge we have even if it is not total knowledge is enough to rule out as IMPOSSIBLE 1+1 being anything else other than 2. So I can say 1+1=2 and 1 trillion years from now, 1+1=2. Comprende?

Some basic facts simply don't change with increased knowledge.

Ohhhhhhh. I get it. Creation is a basic fact. No. Creation is contentious belief. There a difference between facts and belief. If I say an Invisible kettle created the universe=contentious belief. If I say 1-1=0 =established proven fact.

Direct me to any renowned science source that says creation is a fact.

Please don't be silly. We are not looking at the raw materials of a Subaru but the Subaru itself and its creation/manufacture process. We can with the present information rule out formation of a Subaru by random processes can't we?

Wrong. we are looking at every detail including the environment and processes involved. I repeat YOUR LOGIC IS FLAWED

The Subaru is an example to illustrate the stupidity of claiming random processes can generate such highly complex and ordered stuff. I wish to inform you that the 'simplest' organism is a million times more complex than the Subaru. So if random processes can't generate such a complex device, is it not silly to believe that the same processes FORMED life?

First your illustration with the subaru has been wrong and inconsistent, still I was patient enough to offer some explanation in my previous replies. Your repetetive.
Second your filling gaps with A designer again.

This simply points to a single DESIGNER

It doesnt. On the contrary, It points to a common ancestor



Sharrap

YES SA

zeemahn:
YES SA

Please you replies are mashed up and I have no time to untangle them for you.

Abiogenesis is IMPOSSIBLE and that's a fact. Come up with another alternative to Origins and you will be worth my while

KingEbukasBlog:
I asked you a simple question pillock ! As someone who peddles godless ideologies and concepts like BB and ET , will science ever unravel the true purpose of the universe .

You are the one that insisted science can answer everything - whatever that means

Yes, If the universe has a 'true purpose'

vooks:
Please you replies are mashed up and I have no time to untangle them for you.

Abiogenesis is IMPOSSIBLE and that's a fact. Come up with another alternative to Origins and you will be worth my while

and again let me repeat as you have forced me to continue doing
I dont subscribe to the present theory of how life originated even though it is convincing.
and again again all atheists, agnostics, etc do not agree to the same things. stop forcing me to repeat.
Creation myths are LAUGHABLE

I will like to improve my replies...can you send me the format please?

zeemahn:
and again let me repeat as you have forced me to continue doing
I dont subscribe to the present theory of how life originated even though it is convincing.

Tell me what you subscribe to, not what you don't negro

and again again all atheists, agnostics, etc do not agree to the same things. stop forcing me to repeat.
Creation myths are LAUGHABLE

Nothing is as asinine as NOTHING in and of itself making SOMETHING which in turn makes SOMEBODY. Not even deranged m0rons can conceive such nonsense

I will like to improve my replies...can you send me the format please?

Do it in a format that implies you need not more than 1 million years of accelerated evolution to be a homo sapien

vooks:
Tell me what you subscribe to, not what you don't negro


Nothing is as asinine as NOTHING in and of itself making SOMETHING which in turn makes SOMEBODY. Not even deranged m0rons can conceive such nonsense


Do it in a format that implies you need not more than 1 million years of accelerated evolution to be a homo sapien

Emotion. Emotion can ruin the logic in any argument. Vooks. You are overrated and I think I have given you so much attention. Attention you dont desrve.
Can you understand what you typed?
The best thing for me is to stop taking you seriously so that I wont start using words that are not pleasing to the tympanic membrane.

zeemahn:
Emotion. Emotion can ruin the logic in any argument. Vooks. You are overrated and I think I have given you so much attention. Attention you dont desrve.
Can you understand what you typed?
The best thing for me is to stop taking you seriously so that I wont start using words that are not pleasing to the tympanic membrane.

Scampering for safety. Good for you

You killed it! You came saw and conquered. With one single phrase, you have set everything to rest and send everybody on a quest of knowledge. That is to those who are wise enough.
The phrase or Phrasal question was an I quote "will science ever unravel the true purpose of the universe?" I don't know where that came from, but that is the master of all question and It is Divine! You should find the source of that particular moment you thought of this, because it is power and wisdom.

The single powerful word in the question is PURPOSE.

KingEbukasBlog:
I asked you a simple question pillock ! As someone who peddles godless ideologies and concepts like BB and ET , will science ever unravel the true purpose of the universe .

You are the one that insisted science can answer everything - whatever that means

vooks:
Scampering for safety. Good for you

It pays to be safe from irrationality

gatiano:
You killed it! You came saw and conquered. With one single phrase, you have set everything to rest and send everybody on a quest of knowledge. That is to those who are wise enough.
The phrase or Phrasal question was an I quote "will science ever unravel the true purpose of the universe?" I don't know where that came from, but that is the master of all question and It is Divine! You should find the source of that particular moment you thought of this, because it is power and wisdom.

The single powerful word in the question is PURPOSE.

purpose is relative

To what?

zeemahn:
purpose is relative

zeemahn:
It pays to be safe from irrationality

If you can be safe from yourself,mother you have a point. Cheers mate

vooks:
If you can be safe from yourself,mother you have a point. Cheers mate

The thing have turn to quarrel. Emotion again

gatiano:
To what?

When I say it is relative I mean it can mean something different to different people eg a cake is good-For a 5 yr old it means it has so much sugar, for a 19 yr old it means it looks nice to the eye, for a 58 yr old it means it doesn't have too much sugar.

Im not talking about family 'relatives'

You said Purpose is relative. Do you what it is to be relative? Whenever you mention anything in relative it mean that, there is more than one stuff or thing involved whether in a seperate state or unified state.

It is the same as that of a family structure, infact that is where they got or coined the world from.

Purpose is relative to what? or does Purpose have a formular?

zeemahn:
When I say it is relative I mean it can mean something different to different people eg a cake is good-For a 5 yr old it means it has so much sugar, for a 19 yr old it means it looks nice to the eye, for a 58 yr old it means it doesn't have too much sugar.

Im not talking about family 'relatives'

winner01:
In Nigeria, Ive seen a man turn to a goat in a village i went.

You provably have. I've seen several people turn to goats. I've turned to goats myself.

What neither of us have seen though is a person turn into a goat.

KingEbukasBlog:
I should start looking for someone from my friend's village miles away - from the other side of Nigeria - to please you ?

So clearly you didnt witness the event but for some reason you trump it as truth. You take it on faith. Familiar.

The purpose isnt to please Mr dalaman, but to win some cool cash (I learned the challenge has been discontinued though, with Randi's retirement) and to finally prove the existence of the supernatural.

zeemahn:
The thing have turn to quarrel. Emotion again

You are one emotional freak

jayriginal:
So clearly you didnt witness the event but for some reason you trump it as truth. You take it on faith. Familiar.

The purpose isnt to please Mr dalaman, but to win some cool cash (I learned the challenge has been discontinued though, with Randi's retirement) and to finally prove the existence of the supernatural.

No one saw dinosaurs transforming into birds but for some reason you peddle it as truth . You take it on faith . Familiar

The purpose isn't to please atheists but to win creationists over and to finally prove the infallibility of science

jayriginal:
You provably have. I've seen several people turn to goats. I've turned to goats myself.

What neither of us have seen though is a person turn into a goat.

Anything to make you feel safe man.

winner01:
Anything to make you feel safe man.

Lol . So true . When they get overwhelmed by reality , they look for any means to sustain their unbelief

KingEbukasBlog:
Lol . So true . When they get overwhelmed by reality , they look for any means to sustain their unbelief

Im sure if he watched a clip of chrisangel turning into a leopard(which he did), he'll believe.

KingEbukasBlog:
No one saw dinosaurs transforming into birds but for some reason you peddle it as truth . You take it on faith . Familiar

The purpose isn't to please atheists but to win creationists over and to finally prove the infallibility of science

Who says I believe evolution? Stop assuming. Besides, evolution has provided it's own proof. You aren't asked to take anything on faith.

In your haste to mirror my post, you have conveniently ignored the fact that a million dollars is at stake. You really can't think of anything to do with a million dollars?