₦airaland Forum

updates (AKWA IBOM) :
"The so called security reports alleging
pockets of violence, were dumped at the
tribunal and the makers of the exhibits
were never invited to be cross examined
in line with the Evidence Act.
They didn’t call witnesses polling unit by
polling unit.
MY LORD FROM WHICHEVER WAY YOU
LOOK AT IT , THEY HAVE FAILED AND WE
URGE THEIR LORDSHIPS TO ALLOW
THEM TO FAIL .”
-Counsel to PDP

"They (APC) also alleged that there was
no voting, yet they tendered ballot
papers as exhibits.
Form EC8A(result sheets) used
throughout the state was tendered by
the petitioner (APC) yet he said there was
no collation of results.
No explanation was given for this
contradiction.
That “No voting” was used by the tribunal
to nullify elections in 18 local
governments while the appeal court ruled
that there was over voting and nullified
the elections in the entire state, relying
on the information gathered through the
card reader "
-Counsel to PDP


“The petitioner (APC) alleged that no
accreditation took place in the Akwa
Ibom governorship elections, but the
judgement of the appeal court had it that
there was over voting.
It is illogical that over voting could be
realise in an election where there was
disenfranchisement ".
-Lawyer to PDP


"The court of Appeal refered to 448,307
As the number Of Accredited Voters and
used that to declare that there was over
voting. It did not refer In Its Judgement
were It got that figure. No one knows the
source. It was the evidence of a pw49.
The tribunal had rejected the evidence of
Pw49 and all the evidences tendered by
him... The court of appeal overlooked the
decision of the lower court. PW 49 did
not prove that 448,307 represented the
total number of accredited voters in the
state.
The court of appeal did a grave injustice
to us by using a simple fraction of the
total number of voters to nullify the
result in the state. My lord please correct
this injustice and uphold the result as
announced by INEC”
_Counsel to PDP.

pdp lawyer sabi book jare

Nothing floor dem jare. They are congenital failures.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) and International
Diabetes Federation (IDF) have in a global report given
estimate of 347 million people as living with diabetes, with
19.8 million from Africa.

According to IDF 2013 report, Nigeria has the highest
number of people with diabetes in Africa, with 3.9 million
cases and 4.9 per cent national prevalence rate.

The reports show that more than 80 per cent of diabetes
deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries and that
diabetes will be the 7th leading cause of death by 2030, but
you can visit http://www.haveamazinghealth.com/diabetes.html
to see HOW to naturally manage diabetes

Politics!!!!!!!!!

upper cut!

"MY LORD FROM WHICHEVER WAY YOU LOOK AT IT , THEY HAVE FAILED AND WE URGE THEIR LORDSHIPS TO ALLOW THEM TO FAIL .”

BADA$$ LAWYER

Law is sweet!

bnovative:
updates (AKWA IBOM) :
"The so called security reports alleging
pockets of violence, were dumped at the
tribunal and the makers of the exhibits
were never invited to be cross examined
in line with the Evidence Act.
They didn’t call witnesses polling unit by
polling unit.
MY LORD FROM WHICHEVER WAY YOU
LOOK AT IT , THEY HAVE FAILED AND WE
URGE THEIR LORDSHIPS TO ALLOW
THEM TO FAIL .”
-Counsel to PDP

"They (APC) also alleged that there was
no voting, yet they tendered ballot
papers as exhibits.
Form EC8A(result sheets) used
throughout the state was tendered by
the petitioner (APC) yet he said there was
no collation of results.
No explanation was given for this
contradiction.
That “No voting” was used by the tribunal
to nullify elections in 18 local
governments while the appeal court ruled
that there was over voting and nullified
the elections in the entire state, relying
on the information gathered through the
card reader "
-Counsel to PDP


“The petitioner (APC) alleged that no
accreditation took place in the Akwa
Ibom governorship elections, but the
judgement of the appeal court had it that
there was over voting.
It is illogical that over voting could be
realise in an election where there was
disenfranchisement ".
-Lawyer to PDP


"The court of Appeal refered to 448,307
As the number Of Accredited Voters and
used that to declare that there was over
voting. It did not refer In Its Judgement
were It got that figure. No one knows the
source. It was the evidence of a pw49.
The tribunal had rejected the evidence of
Pw49 and all the evidences tendered by
him... The court of appeal overlooked the
decision of the lower court. PW 49 did
not prove that 448,307 represented the
total number of accredited voters in the
state.
The court of appeal did a grave injustice
to us by using a simple fraction of the
total number of voters to nullify the
result in the state. My lord please correct
this injustice and uphold the result as
announced by INEC”
_Counsel to PDP.

I love that part. That's a TKO

[size=15pt]Ka Chineke mezie okwu[/size]

Nothing like a Good lawyer.

STFUareyouGod:
I love that part. That's a TKO

Yes, it's the best part

God bless Supreme Court!