₦airaland Forum

I think the judges have spoken, but let wait and see what will happen with all this allegations labelled against the judges

Dagah2:
.

till next edition....

You guys are doing a great job here..keep it up

Joejonah:
Honestly I'm tired of all these abnormalities.
Why this list even when some debaters and their school were not judged??

Don't you know that if your opponent team Do not show up, it presupposes that such match didn't hold, we do ask you to post your argument to prevent discouragement.... So?

sammyscholar:
Overall score shouldn't be the criteria for judging the best essays. I guess you know what I'm saying, finestboi.

I don't think I know what you are saying...

What then do you think we can use?

Nice one....I like the last debater's essay,it was soo easy to understand...

sammyscholar:
Overall score shouldn't be the criteria for judging the best essays. I guess you know what I'm saying, finestboi. You look at what our presentations garnered. I only had low scores in my rebuttals which I still find shocking. Essay wise, you and I know whose essays is the best in the intellectual fiasco between TPI and OAU. That said, I will nominate Abuklaw's essay anytime, any day for the best essay.

I am highly honoured by your words. It gives me a special motivation that make people want to do more. I really appreciate this gesture. Nevertheless, you also deserve special recognition for bold front you put when the odds are against you. You are maturity, ethic and intellect in one body.

I will like to meet you when I am ibadan around March.

sammyscholar:
Overall score shouldn't be the criteria for judging the best essays. I guess you know what I'm saying, finestboi. You look at what our presentations garnered. I only had low scores in my rebuttals which I still find shocking. Essay wise, you and I know whose essays is the best in the intellectual fiasco between TPI and OAU. That said, I will nominate Abuklaw's essay anytime, any day for the best essay.

I was so much impressed by your performance, it was but a little slip, you would have carried the day.

Fynestboi:
Don't you know that if your opponent team Do not show up, it presupposes that such match didn't hold, we do ask you to post your argument to prevent discouragement.... So?

Can we say same for futminna and delsu? Why were they scored?

Is the scores in relation to that of the opponents? I thought those ones above are individual performance? What is worth doing is worth doing well....

fflamingo:
I still reserve that the mod were very biased with the scripting of Oau vs Polyobadan.
I suspect the third judge was j.arus,
Through I think sammyschola.r did not reply one of his question..

I took time to go through both debaters reference, their composition and their flow. Sammyschola.r shud have won.

I followed the debate till the end and observed the flow from the beginning to the end, I was anticipating you winning only to be deflated by the delay of the 3rd judge.

Joejonah:
Can we say same for futminna and delsu? Why were they scored?

Is the scores in relation to that of the opponents? I thought those ones above are individual performance? What is worth doing is worth doing well....

They were score because I disturbed the judges, but in case the judges didn't respond...

I stopped reading when I saw someone cited Wikipedia, an online encyclopaedia with unrestricted access to content editing. I guard what I input into my system.
Please for educational purpose, refrain from citing wikipedia. A tosser can wake up and upload any crap there!!!! Thorough research is exhausting but at the same time fulfilling and rewarding.

ikbnice:
I followed the debate till the end and observed the flow from the beginning to the end, I was anticipating you winning only to be deflated by the delay of the 3rd judge.

truth will always remain sacrosanct.

Cc: finestboi.

fflamingo:
I still reserve that the mod were very biased with the scripting of Oau vs Polyobadan.
I suspect the third judge was j.arus,
Through I think sammyschola.r did not reply one of his question..

I took time to go through both debaters reference, their composition and their flow. Sammyschola.r shud have won.

the truth will always remain sacrosanct, finestboi.

sammyscholar:
truth will always remain sacrosanct.

Cc: finestboi.

I want to believe, you saw the grading, the only objective part of the grading are 5 the 6th one which is Rebuttal as response to judges is subjective as your response to the judges mostly will determine your score.. .. You lose out with a very funny interval 0.5, and yet you feel it wasn't bias free? Well as far as am concern the three judges that judged your debate are personalities that treat cause without been bias. No truth is remaining sacrosanct, the only sacrosanct truth is that judges were not bias...... I implore you to take this in good faith, and desist from the mindset that you were robbed the first spot.....