₦airaland Forum

bykebyke:
Everybody "Louis is starting to give in,Louis is starting to give in"

Give in to what exactly??..He prolly collected her card to call her after Mike wins the case and ask if she wants to celebrate or not.

you need to watch they trailer of they next episode....then,u will know it's d opposite....guess Harvey n Mike will be on there own in the next episode...

tollyB:
you need to watch they trailer of they next episode....then,u will know it's d opposite....guess Harvey n Mike will be on there own in the next episode...

Trailer-20seconds
The Real Thing-42minutes


Trailers don't show the whole thing,they only show the enticing parts.

I doubt Louis will give in. He is an emotional person but the writers will like to twist the story.. Just Negodu Donna. With her Awesomeness!!!

The drama is interesting but in my opinion Trevor testifying against Mike was enough to kill the case. He testified that Mike never got a college degree so how could he have even gotten into Harvard? A statement from the Dean of his college where he got expelled from would just kill the case and prove his guilt, plus in reality the Harvard admissions board would have come in with enough evidence to prove he never got in. Suits is an interesting series no doubt but right now I think this Mike's trial shouldn't last past another season ,otherwise it would just start looking stupid. I just hope they end it on a high note, I think somebody has to go to jail because the show cant afford to send out a message that you can escape with fraud in the US no matter how good a cause you used it for.

AdeLaNa1:
Louis will eventually give in. I ve a feeling som1 will go to prison at the end of all this. And Louis might be that person who eventually turns dem in. Louis is a very terrible team player. Afterall, its not the first time he's turned on dem....

As for Dona, for all her awesomeness, she's still human. All she had to say was "Yes. Mike went to law school". And she couldn't. Was kinda disappointing seeing her mess up like dat....

I don't think Louis would give in. He's a loyalist. Remember what he told Sheila? That law firm is all he has going for him. its no longer just about Mike Ross, its about the company. Thats where hefinds his relevance and He would protect it with his life.

brainiac007:
I don't think Louis would give in. He's a loyalist. Remember what he told Sheila? That law firm is all he has going for him. its no longer just about Mike Ross, its about the company. Thats where hefinds his relevance and He would protect it with his life.

Lool!! Louis a loyalist?? When he stupîdly got himself fired(i agree Jessica was a little bit harsh at firing him), and Mike(or was it Harvey? Cant remember) was tryna get him a job at Rachel's dad's firm, he was busy using Mike's secret to blackmail the firm into getting his name on the wall. And even after that, he kept on behaving like an âss towards everybody.

And even after that he was siding with Jack Solov(or watever his name is) to unseat Jessica. Later again his allegiance changed and he was siding with Jessica against Jack.

Louis is an opportunist. The only person he's loyal to is himself. And the moment it gets down to it, he'll sell out anybody just to save himself.

"Well they find me guilty and they send my friends to Prison anyways".

What are u thinking Mike?? Are u planning on turning on Harvey?? Or are u planning on taking the bullet just to save everyone else??

Next week's season finale go hot die!!




As for Louis, i really really hate dat guy.....

AdeLaNa1:
"Well they find me guilty and they send my friends to Prison anyways".

What are u thinking Mike?? Are u planning on turning on Harvey?? Or are u planning on taking the bullet just to save everyone else??

Next week's season finale go hot die!!




As for Louis, i really really hate dat guy.....

I just watched it. He is going to take Gibbs' first deal; plead guilty and do 2 years. That way, everyone else is safe

Harvey just realized it too, so he's trying to stop him before he does. I think Harvey suspects Gibbs' deal is a trap. Either that or he just doesn't want Mike to give up yet. Mike will never turn on his friends and Harvey knows this.

Patiently waiting for the season finale..... My favorite TV series

Favolly:
I just watched it. He is going to take Gibbs' first deal; plead guilty and do 2 years. That way, everyone else is safe

Harvey just realized it too, so he's trying to stop him before he does. I think Harvey suspects Gibbs' deal is a trap. Either that or he just doesn't want Mike to give up yet. Mike will never turn on his friends and Harvey knows this.

Harvey feels its his fault which is kinda of true anyway, so harvey with his principles wouldnt want mike to take the fall.

Mike is going to prison guys.

laperson:
Mike is going to prison guys.

D director is on ur bbm list??

eniolaamoda:
D director is on ur bbm list??

eniolaamoda:
D director is on ur bbm list??

No gainsaying the fact that Mike is my guy, I think he needs to do the time. Please watch Gibson's closing statement again- you will understand why I said so. Gracias!

you cracked me up

eniolaamoda:
D director is on ur bbm list??

laperson:
No gainsaying the fact that Mike is my guy, I think he needs to do the time. Please watch Gibson's closing statement again- you will understand why I said so. Gracias!

Baba dis is not osofia in London
Na suits b dis
Not predictable
Until he goes to jail first before ur talk go hold water

are u guys seeing this law series"how to get away with murder?"

eniolaamoda:
Baba dis is not osofia in London
Na suits b dis
Not predictable
Until he goes to jail first before ur talk go hold water

Okay Mama... I will exercise patience till tomorrow to find out more. However, Mike self know say him deserve the time. If not, why e go meet Gibson now.

laperson:
Okay Mama... I will exercise patience till tomorrow to find out more. However, Mike self know say him deserve the time. If not, why e go meet Gibson now.

Guilty conscience

eniolaamoda:
Guilty conscience

Mama I don hear you o. What are your expectations for the season finale?

laperson:
Mama I don hear you o. What are your expectations for the season finale?

Honestly I think something will.comeup and dey will have something against that woman

eniolaamoda:
Baba dis is not osofia in London
Na suits b dis
Not predictable
Until he goes to jail first before ur talk go hold water

Fine Mike might not go to jail we dont know yet but lots of american series can be predictable even suits it aint gods dat are making them.

sifo:
The drama is interesting but in my opinion Trevor testifying against Mike was enough to kill the case. He testified that Mike never got a college degree so how could he have even gotten into Harvard? A statement from the Dean of his college where he got expelled from would just kill the case and prove his guilt, plus in reality the Harvard admissions board would have come in with enough evidence to prove he never got in. Suits is an interesting series no doubt but right now I think this Mike's trial shouldn't last past another season ,otherwise it would just start looking stupid. I just hope they end it on a high note, I think somebody has to go to jail because the show cant afford to send out a message that you can escape with fraud in the US no matter how good a cause you used it for.

Trevor's testimony was flagged down after Harvey exposed it as purely motivated by jealousy.
His testimony was blown to smithereens & it couldn't have sealed the case. He is a 2-timing son of a bïtch by the way. Mike should have adhered when Harvey advised him to cut all ties with Trevor. He is no friend at all - just a parasitic leech

•Mike Ross has got a certificate from Harvard & has his name in the bar. He also had that black dude vouch for him in the witness box that he attended Harvard.
Anita Gibbs has no proof. All she has are speculations & abstract theories. There are many people that don't have their faces in the year book of so many colleges- either they don't give a flying fück or for other personal reasons.
Besides, do you think it's possible to know all of your classmates in Harvard Law? Some students attend lectures only about four times in an entire semester & still come up trumps with a 3.7-4.0 GPA.

It's not even possible to be familiar with all the faces in your class in common U.I or UNILAG, not to talk of Harvard.

Abeg, if I was in that jury, I would pass judgment in Mike's favour, because Anita hasn't been able to convince me beyond reasonable doubt.

darkenedrebel:
Trevor's testimony was flagged down after Harvey exposed it as being motivated by jealousy.
His testimony was blown to smithereens & it couldn't have affected the case. He is a 2-timing son of a bïtch by the way. Mike should have adhered when Harvey advised him to cut all ties with Trevor. He is no friend at all - just a parasitic leech.

@bolded...you don't need a college degree to get into Harvard.
A college degree is equivalent to the one you receive in Harvard
College = University

•Mike Ross has got a certificate from Harvard & has his name in the bar. He also had that black dude vouch for him in the witness box that he attended Harvard.
Anita Gibbs has no proof. All she has are speculations & abstract theories. There are many people that don't have their faces in the year book of so many colleges- either they don't give a flying fück or for other personal reasons.
Besides, do you think it's possible to know all of your classmates in Harvard Law? Some students attend lectures only about four times in an entire semester & still come up trumps with a 3.7-4.0 GPA.

It's not even possible to be familiar with all the faces in your class in common U.I or UNILAG, not to talk of Harvard.

Abeg, if I was in that jury, I would pass judgment in Mike's favour, because Anita hasn't been able to convince me beyond reasonable doubt.

I know college = university ,You need a college degree to get into Law school bro. Plus like i said b4 getting evidence to support Trevor's statement shouldn't be hard at all, a mail or phone call to his university and they would be glad to provide evidence that he never graduated, if you've followed through from season one, you would remember the dean at the college he got expelled from swore he would make sure mike didn't get into havard for cheating. In reality that man would have voluntarily come forward to testify against mike and Havard university wont sit silent while one of the world's most prestigious law schools gets its name dragged into the mud .

I've been a suits fan since season 1, but right now it's becoming stale abeg. For me the supense isn't high anymore because you know no matter how serious the situation is at the end of the episode harvey would find a way to get him out with one funny story, I mean how do you dispel a testimony like what Trevor gave on just emotional sentiments plus i think Anita gibbs proved that black guy had ulterior motives for testifying in Mike's favour, i mean if you want to prove innocence calling ur ex-work colleague whose mum you helped get a huge settlement to testify for you get comma na .

From what i've watched in the past episodes the writers better find away to end the series on a high note soon. I don't see how they would continue this till season 7 without making it a lot more silly

sifo:
I know college = university ,You need a college degree to get into Law school bro. Plus like i said b4 getting evidence to support Trevor's statement shouldn't be hard at all, a mail or phone call to his university and they would be glad to provide evidence that he never graduated, if you've followed through from season one, you would remember the dean at the college he got expelled from swore he would make sure mike didn't get into havard for cheating. In reality that man would have voluntarily come forward to testify against mike and Havard university wont sit silent while one of the world's most prestigious law schools gets its name dragged into the mud .

I've been a suits fan since season 1, but right now it's becoming stale abeg. For me the supense isn't high anymore because you know no matter how serious the situation is at the end of the episode harvey would find a way to get him out with one funny story, I mean how do you dispel a testimony like what Trevor gave on just emotional sentiments plus i think Anita gibbs proved that black guy had ulterior motives for testifying in Mike's favour, i mean if you want to prove innocence calling ur ex-work colleague whose mum you helped get a huge settlement to testify for you get comma na .

From what i've watched in the past episodes the writers better find away to end the series on a high note soon. I don't see how they would continue this till season 7 without making it a lot more silly

You couldn't have said this any better

sifo:
I know college = university ,You need a college degree to get into Law school bro

That college degree prerequisite is not as rigid as depicted in the show. If you attended a polytechnic or any recognized tertiary institution similar to a college, you can take the LSAT exam. It all boils down to the exceptionality of your grades. Besides, Mike didn't need a college degree to get into HLS. He had already been accepted mid-session as a transfer student to HLS before he got himself expelled by selling answers to a Math test to the Dean's daughter. I think he also said in his defense, that he applied to the University of Maryland school of law - which was where he bagged a Baccalaureate.
That's not the crux of the discourse anyway.

sifo:
Plus like i said b4 getting evidence to support Trevor's statement shouldn't be hard at all, a mail or phone call to his university and they would be glad to provide evidence that he never graduated

They cannot provide any evidence that he did not graduate from HLS.

1. That hacker chick already inputted his bio in HLS logbook, register & in all other vital documents.

2. She also fixed his name in the bar.

So what thread of evidence can they possible salvage to sledge a nail in Mike's half-shut coffin?.

sifo:
If you've followed through from season one, you would remember the dean at the college he got expelled from swore he would make sure mike didn't get into havard for cheating

Yes, I remember. It still doesn't prove anything. The Dean of that college is not the Prince of Saudi Arabia - so how can he possibly prevent Mike from gaining admission into HLS, especially if he passes the LSAT exam?
Over there is not like Nigeria where corruption thrives & strings can be pulled.
Making a one-time mistake by selling math tests to a Dean's daughter does not mar you from gaining entry into HLS for life. Petitions can be written and undertakings can be signed.

The Dean just made empty threats jare. In legal parlance, it could be branded as a blackmail, which is also a criminal act.

sifo:
In reality that man would have voluntarily come forward to testify against mike and Havard university wont sit silent while one of the world's most prestigious law schools gets its name dragged into the mud

What would he come to say against Mike? That he expelled him for selling tests results to his daughter? That won't be taken with a cubic metre of salt.
If anything, it would only implicate him(The dean) for threatening to deter Mike from gaining entry into HLS based on personal vendetta. That's an encroachment on Mike's fundamental rights(right to education), and the (former) Dean would be thoroughly sanctioned.
Trust me, he wouldn't want to take the stand if it were reality.

sifo:
I've been a suits fan since season 1, but right now it's becoming stale abeg. For me the supense isn't high

Then stop watching it all together. That's why we have thousands of shows to choose from.

sifo:
because you know no matter how serious the situation is at the end of the episode harvey would find a way to get him out with one funny story, I mean how do you dispel a testimony like what Trevor gave on just emotional sentiments

When a detective is faced with a murder case - the first thing he tries to pinpoint before fishing for suspects is " motive for murder". The suspect with the highest motive is usually labelled as the likeliest to have committed the homicide.
In Trevor's case, the "motive for testimony" was what Harvey used in cross examining him and in winning the jury over.
Harvey made it crystal clear that Trevor had always been envious of Mike's mind since childhood. On top of that, he(Trevor) found out Mike had been sleeping with his ex. He(Harvey) told the jury, that Trevor deep down always knew Mike was his superior, which made him hate Mike, albeit he never showed it. Now, what jury wouldn't raise an eyebrow to this?

It obvious you have never been in a courthouse before. The best Lawyers are not necessarily those with a truckload of facts to back up their arguments, but those that can manipulate basic human feelings & emotions to their advantage.

sifo:
plus i think Anita gibbs proved that black guy had ulterior motives for testifying in Mike's favour, i mean if you want to prove innocence calling ur ex-work colleague whose mum you helped get a huge settlement to testify for you get comma na

Anita Gibbs did nowt. What do you mean by she shed light on the black guy's ulterior motive? Ludicrous nonsense.
She claimed Mike had no correspondence from HLS and the black dude coming to court to testify in Mike's favour squashed that angle of hers. Why should it matter if the black dude was fücking Mike's sister or if they were in a consanguineous relationship?. The fact remains that Mike Ross proved to the jury that he had an Alibi

sifo:
From what i've watched in the past episodes the writers better find away to end the series on a high note soon. I don't see how they would continue this till season 7 without making it a lot more silly

The show is under the genres - ''Comedy & Drama".
Comedies ends on a high note.

darkenedrebel:
That college degree prerequisite is not as rigid as depicted in the show. If you attended a polytechnic or any recognized tertiary institution similar to a college, you can take the LSAT exam. It all boils down to the exceptionality of your grades. Besides, Mike didn't need a college degree to get into HLS. He had already been accepted mid-session as a transfer student to HLS before he got himself expelled by selling answers to a Math test to the Dean's daughter. I think he also said in his defense, that he applied to the University of Maryland school of law - which was where he bagged a Baccalaureate.
That's not the crux of the discourse anyway.

To get into Harvard Law School ? lol. He got expelled and there is evidence to prove that and if he didn't need that degree he would have just gone to havard na. Can't remember the maryland school of law part but if he said that then in reality anita gibbs can get enough evidence to prove he didn't go there becos he never did. And thats my point, the case is not looking real anymore, Anita gibbs has access to so much evidence to put mike behind bars which is why i think they want to go down the path of "She doesnt have authorisation to be working on this case"

darkenedrebel:
They cannot provide any evidence that he did not graduate from HLS.

1. That hacker chick already inputted his bio in HLS logbook, register & in all other vital documents.

2. She also fixed his name in the bar.

So what thread of evidence can they possible salvage to sledge a nail in Mike's half-shut coffin?.

There is no application record, no admission record, no project thesis to show for it, no course registers and exam scripts and i'm sure Harvard university keeps those records. How did louis begin to suspect Mike didnt graduate from Havard? He got into the Harvard Law file room and discovered Mike didnt have any record there. All He has is his name in their database , no hardcopy record anywhere. Plus like I said b4, in reality a reputable university like harvard wont sit quiet and watch their name get dragged into the mud like this, by now they would have started investigations to find out who Mike is and If all this is true and they would discovere he has his name in their database but no physical record anywhere else.

darkenedrebel:
Yes, I remember. It still doesn't prove anything. The Dean of that college is not the Prince of Saudi Arabia - so how can he possibly prevent Mike from gaining admission into HLS, especially if he passes the LSAT exam?
Over there is not like Nigeria where corruption thrives & strings can be pulled.
Making a one-time mistake by selling math tests to a Dean's daughter does not mar you from gaining entry into HLS for life. Petitions can be written and undertakings can be signed.

The Dean just made empty threats jare. In legal parlance, it could be branded as a blackmail, which is also a criminal act.
What would he come to say against Mike? That he expelled him for selling tests results to his daughter? That won't be taken with a cubic metre of salt.
If anything, it would only implicate him(The dean) for threatening to deter Mike from gaining entry into HLS based on personal vendetta. That's an encroachment on Mike's fundamental rights(right to education), and the (former) Dean would be thoroughly sanctioned.
Trust me, he wouldn't want to take the stand if it were reality.


Then stop watching it all together. That's why we have thousands of shows to choose from.

He was caught cheating bro, thats enough to have HLS turn down his admission even with a perfect LSAT score and its not like the Deans daughter walked free after getting caught. Well I am a suits fan and i've been following for all five seasons. I followed because the show was really intelligent but the last episodes haven't been that smart to me

darkenedrebel:
When a detective is faced with a murder case - the first thing he tries to pinpoint before fishing for suspects is " motive for murder". The suspect with the highest motive is usually labelled as the likeliest to have committed the homicide.
In Trevor's case, the "motive for testimony" was what Harvey used in cross examining him and in winning the jury over.
Harvey made it crystal clear that Trevor had always been envious of Mike's mind since childhood. On top of that, he(Trevor) found out Mike had been sleeping with his ex. He(Harvey) told the jury, that Trevor deep down always knew Mike was his superior, which made him hate Mike, albeit he never showed it. Now, what jury wouldn't raise an eyebrow to this?

It obvious you have never been in a courthouse before. The best Lawyers are not necessarily those with a truckload of facts to back up their arguments, but those that can manipulate basic human feelings & emotions to their advantage.

Anita Gibbs did nowt. What do you mean by she shed light on the black guy's ulterior motive? Ludicrous nonsense.
She claimed Mike had no correspondence from HLS and the black dude coming to court to testify in Mike's favour squashed that angle of hers. Why should it matter if the black dude was fücking Mike's sister or if they were in a consanguineous relationship?. The fact remains that Mike Ross proved to the jury that he had an Alibi

Yes I have never been in a law court and i dont need to be in one to say what am saying. With a truckload of facts manipulating their emotion wont be an issue.
Bro I have no idea where mikes sister sleeping with the black dude came from oh but what i said was That guy is mikes Former work colleague whose mum he helped get a huge settlement and also left Pearson Hardman for leaking a witness list.

darkenedrebel:
The show is under the genres - ''Comedy & Drama".
Comedies ends on a high note.

Wrong Its Drama only.

U guys r quite articulate n radical with ur points
In fact I Dont think I can argue with u guys bcus ur knowledge superceeds mine

But I support darkenredrebel

I hope u know if u kill a man u can win in court sonfar u can manipulate things

Secondly Louis only got to know that mike don't really go to Harvard bcus of d key stuff

It like some one who claimed to live in Nigeria and says he is not familiar with the term "Agege bread" or "if I wozz u" or "no look uche face"

So that is how Louis caught him bcus all Harvard student must know that key n mike didn't

Secondly I hope u know once ur database is in a system u have a strong case

So far his data base is there that is still what is giving mike power over everything

He can claim not to like class much but does that change the fact that he is a student after all his name was in d database and Harvard itself gave him a degree

So Harvard has already fuckup

And Harvard will not want to tarnish their image by coming out to say it was a default on their own detriment

So let's just say mike is winning

He will only loose bcus of guilty conscience nothing else

quite as expected...

eniolaamoda:
U guys r quite articulate n radical with ur points
In fact I Dont think I can argue with u guys bcus ur knowledge superceeds mine

But I support darkenredrebel

I appreciate the support.

eniolaamoda:
I hope u know if u kill a man u can win in court sonfar u can manipulate things

Exactly - The courtroom is not necessarily a house of justice, but rather a bold where the man with the best debate is guaranteed to troop out victorious.

eniolaamoda:
Secondly Louis only got to know that mike don't really go to Harvard bcus of d key stuff.
It like some one who claimed to live in Nigeria and says he is not familiar with the term "Agege bread" or "if I wozz u" or "no look uche face"

That 'key' was the tragic flaw of that season - like the "handkerchief of death" that Elisia stole for Iago in Othello.

eniolaamoda:
Secondly I hope u know once ur database is in a system u have a strong case
So far his data base is there that is still what is giving mike power over everything
He can claim not to like class much but does that change the fact that he is a student after all his name was in d database and Harvard itself gave him a degree
So Harvard has already fuckup
And Harvard will not want to tarnish their image by coming out to say it was a default on their own detriment
So let's just say mike is winning
He will only loose bcus of guilty conscience nothing else

Well said, Mike would only lose out of voluntary surrender & in order to prevent any other person for taking the rap in his stead which is a noble virtue on its own.