₦airaland Forum

Ibime:
When we discuss elite AMs, we have to look at the full package. Hence they are ELITE.

Iniesta gives me more than what I need in terms in terms of controlling the nitty gritty of midfield play, but he does not give me what I need in terms of the business end.

Mata gives me what I need in terms of goals and assists but does not give me anything in the nitty gritty of midfield.

It is no secret that that is why I love Lampard and that is why I love Muller. They are my standard for an AM. They bring what I need in an AM to the table. Simples.

Dadehmola:
Aside stats, what exactly does Muller bring to the table and how is he a "full package"??

Dadehmola:
Luis Figo failed as a player - yay or nay??

Obere4u:
Mr. Can't you differentiate between being productive and being a passenger being.?

Mata is productive but a passenger while Iniesta is not productive nor a passenger......

When comparing Hazard and Nyemar with stats, same goes for Lamps and Iniesta...

#LeaveSentiment #TalkFootball

Ibime:
When we discuss elite AMs, we have to look at the full package. Hence they are ELITE.

Iniesta gives me more than what I need in terms in terms of controlling the nitty gritty of midfield play, but he does not give me what I need in terms of the business end.

Mata gives me what I need in terms of goals and assists but does not give me anything in the nitty gritty of midfield.

It is no secret that that is why I love Lampard and that is why I love Muller. They are my standard for an AM. They bring what I need in an AM to the table. Simples.

sleekdot:
You said Iniesta had no goal and no assist in 2014/15

I am asking you to stake $1000 and let me show you that you are wrong as usual

Deal or no deal

sleekdot:
Luis Figo was a midfielder in a 4-4-2. Figo and his figures are similar to other elite midfielders who played 4-4-2 in his generation like Zidane

Greatihex:
these are things should know if actually know the two players. Hazard is a better passer of the ball, he keeps the ball better, he is more brilliant in creating something with the ball especially when playing against defensive teams(that is, creating chances.) Hazard is also a better dribbler.

diggz:
In a bid to win arguements or make a point I see loads of people displaying heavy double standards

diggz:
In a bid to win arguements or make a point I see loads of people displaying heavy double standards but,wetin concern me? When person claim say fernadud score 38goals for world cup just to rubbish Rooney..... then to further buttress same point said, ronaldos 60plus goals compared to Suarez 25goals last season is inferior because saurez sabi draw map of Nigeria pass then I give up

Dadehmola:
As In ehn. ..

The double standards for the section has to be the worst on NL!!

sleekdot:
Iniesta plays behind 3 strikers, Does hazard play behind 3 strikers?

Prove to us that Iniesta was not productive despite dropping over 150 assists for Barcelona

150 in 13 seasons thats an average of 12 assists perseason

Is that what you term unproductive? now tell us 5 midfielders who delivered over 10 assists per season for 6 years straight

Sone of you just jump into anything without giving it a thought of your own

thats how some were here shouting Iniesta didnt score or assist for a whole season now we ask them when and to put their money where their mouth is they fled

Ibime:
When is Muller ever dominated in a match?

If things go sour, Muller pulls his weight and more.

sebod:
Who said Tores scored 38 goals in world cup? It's obvious you didn't get the point and you could have asked for clarification rather than concluding.

diggz:
Oh! I get your point clearly.....but,I ain't buying it sorry.

Nihilist:
Kids, don't do drugs

Dadehmola:
Haba Ibime - what is this biko??

Aside his goals (and maybe assists ), when has Muller ever "dominated" a match??

Muller - "perfect" package of an AM??

Even Dayo no go follow you bandy this kinda argument.

Nihilist:
Kids, don't do drugs

sebod:
Before the final against Manchester United in the UCL final, this was what the legendry SirAlex Ferguson said.
"I'm not obsessed with Messi, Iniesta is the danger. He's
fantastic. He makes the team work. The way he finds
passes, his movement and ability to create space is
incredible. He's so important for Barcelona."
And after the match, Waney Rooney quipped "Iniesta is the best player in the world"
And for the innocent ones who really don't know much about the don, just go to you tube and check Iniesta's performance in the latest el classico. Check his work rate, assist and goal and tell me the definition of vision and productivity. For Madrid fans to applaud a Barca player (their eternal enemy), there must be something special about him. Iniesta was the 1st player after Maradona in 1983 and Ronaldinho in 2005 to be applauded by Madrid fans after orchestrating their demolition.
Everyone has his favourites anytime any day. Down grading a player who has won it all all out of hatred is the height of hypocrisy.

sebod:
Who said Tores scored 38 goals in world cup? It's obvious you didn't get the point and you could have asked for clarification rather than concluding.

dmcdad:
Well said bruv. But walai you get time sha. You dey try oooooo. Na mainly waste of time.

Even god-Messi never get a standing ovation for Bernabéu, not even Cristiano, albeit Modric was once given that honour. Yet, the illusionista is just a passenger / an unproductive player.

dmcdad:
Well said bruv. But walai you get time sha. You dey try oooooo. Na mainly waste of time.

Even god-Messi never get a standing ovation for Bernabéu, not even Cristiano, albeit Modric was once given that honour. Yet, the illusionista is just a passenger / an unproductive player.

airmark:
Its what it is. When one useless ramuzaki would be saying hazard was useless, waste of space, last season . all you barca mumus would be buttressing it with stats and senseless memes , now you are served your own dose , you are crying foul. I will just be watching. The day you tell me rodriguez didnt deserve his la liga award last season i will declare fatwa on that your yeye thread.

sleekdot:
Iniesta plays behind 3 strikers, Does hazard play behind 3 strikers?

Prove to us that Iniesta was not productive despite dropping over 150 assists for Barcelona

150 in 13 seasons thats an average of 12 assists perseason

Is that what you term unproductive? now tell us 5 midfielders who delivered over 10 assists per season for 6 years straight

Sone of you just jump into anything without giving it a thought of your own

thats how some were here shouting Iniesta didnt score or assist for a whole season now we ask them when and to put their money where their mouth is they fled

Obere4u:
Where did Lamp play? Infront of the 3 strikes eeh kwa?... So stats can be used for hazard and not for Iniesta?....

Nihilist:
Mullah Airmark has spoken

airmark:
Its what it is. When one useless ramuzaki would be saying hazard was useless, waste of space, last season . all you barca mumus would be buttressing it with stats and senseless memes , now you are served your own dose , you are crying foul. I will just be watching. The day you tell me rodriguez didnt deserve his la liga award last season i will declare fatwa on that your yeye thread.

hensben:
No Hazard play behind 1 striker. Remember Chelsea formation is 4-2-3-1. I.e, they are using five midfielders and 1 striker.

Greatihex:
these are things should know if actually know the two players. Hazard is a better passer of the ball, he keeps the ball better, he is more brilliant in creating something with the ball especially when playing against defensive teams(that is, creating chances.) Hazard is also a better dribbler.

Greatihex:
these are things should know if actually know the two players. Hazard is a better passer of the ball, he keeps the ball better, he is more brilliant in creating something with the ball especially when playing against defensive teams(that is, creating chances.) Hazard is also a better dribbler.