₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,756 members, 8,423,605 topics. Date: Wednesday, 10 June 2026 at 12:37 AM

Toggle theme

Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsIs It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? (5552 Views)

1 2 3 Reply (Go Down)

Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by academics1(op): 6:20pm On May 21, 2016
when will nigeria ever have common sense?
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by olorunda68: 6:28pm On May 21, 2016
explain sir!grin
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Nobody: 6:28pm On May 21, 2016
Where did you get that from?
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Horus(m): 6:31pm On May 21, 2016
Source?
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Sctests:
The Imperialist British have ZERO resources but use their house niggars in the colonies and ex-colonies to control the resources there.
That's why they always recognise those ex-colonies the way they left it anytime the liberators and seccesionists wants to change geo-political map of those ex-colonies.

Go and read the book- Biafra: Britain's shame by Auberon Waugh a journalist who was on ground and about wrote for The spectator, a British tabloid. He documented the evil that Britain represented in Biafra and the British government engineered his sack from his job.
Him and his pro-Biafran colleagues took it up and won damages for unfair dismissal.

His book on British evil in Biafra was even banned from being sold for sometime. That book cannot be SHIPPED to Nigeria as we speak.

In the eyes of the British, Nigeria still remains the Royal Niger Company-their war booty, (Today, even the US cannot interfere in Nigeria matters without British consent) and the British sponsored the war against Biafrans so that companies like shell can have 40% of your resources while their good hausa and fulani house niggars take the rest.


It's simple logic but can the 'One Nigerianist' buffoons in the south especially understand?
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by CACAWA(m): 6:38pm On May 21, 2016
Explain
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Nobody: 6:53pm On May 21, 2016
I hope this is not another musiwa thread?
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Nobody: 6:54pm On May 21, 2016
Sctests:
The Imperialist British have ZERO resources but use their house niggars in the colonies and ex-colonies to control the resources there.
That's why they always recognise those ex-colonies the way they left it anytime the liberators and seccesionists wants to change geo-political map of ex-colonies.

Go and read the book- Biafra: Britain's shame by Auberon Waugh a journalist who was on ground and about wrote for The spectator, a British tabloid. He document the evil that Britain represented in Biafra and the British government engineered his sack from his job.
Him and his pro-Biafran colleagues took it up and won damages for unfair dismissal.

His book on British evil in Biafra was even banned from being sold for sometime. That book cannot be SHIPPED to Nigeria as we speak.

In the eyes of the British, Nigeria still remains the Royal Niger Company-their war booty, (Today, even the US cannot interfere in Nigeria matters without British consent) and the British sponsored the war against Biafrans so that companies like shell can have 40% of your resources while their good hausa and fulani house niggars take the rest.
You have a copy of the book? I need one.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by buharisbae(f): 6:54pm On May 21, 2016
op stop misleading people Nigeria is not that dumb
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by MrKong: 6:55pm On May 21, 2016
Sctests:
The Imperialist British have ZERO resources but use their house niggars in the colonies and ex-colonies to control the resources there.
That's why they always recognise those ex-colonies the way they left it anytime the liberators and seccesionists wants to change geo-political map of ex-colonies.

Go and read the book- Biafra: Britain's shame by Auberon Waugh a journalist who was on ground and about wrote for The spectator, a British tabloid. He document the evil that Britain represented in Biafra and the British government engineered his sack from his job.
Him and his pro-Biafran colleagues took it up and won damages for unfair dismissal.

His book on British evil in Biafra was even banned from being sold for sometime. That book cannot be SHIPPED to Nigeria as we speak.

In the eyes of the British, Nigeria still remains the Royal Niger Company-their war booty, (Today, even the US cannot interfere in Nigeria matters without British consent) and the British sponsored the war against Biafrans so that companies like shell can have 40% of your resources while their good hausa and fulani house niggars take the rest.
Mtcheeeeeeeeeew
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by babyfaceafrica: 6:58pm On May 21, 2016
This Op sef
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Sctests: 7:04pm On May 21, 2016
Reyginus:
You have a copy of the book? I need one.
I have one I bought through a friend in the Uk while I was back home in nigeria. If you have someone in the UK, he can buy and send it down to you.

Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Nobody: 7:14pm On May 21, 2016
Sctests:
I have one I bought through a friend in the Uk while I was back home in nigeria. If you have someone in the UK, he can buy and send it down to you.
Okay. I'm searching online for it already.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by academics1(op): 8:47pm On May 21, 2016
Sctests:
The Imperialist British have ZERO resources but use their house niggars in the colonies and ex-colonies to control the resources there.
That's why they always recognise those ex-colonies the way they left it anytime the liberators and seccesionists wants to change geo-political map of ex-colonies.

Go and read the book- Biafra: Britain's shame by Auberon Waugh a journalist who was on ground and about wrote for The spectator, a British tabloid. He document the evil that Britain represented in Biafra and the British government engineered his sack from his job.
Him and his pro-Biafran colleagues took it up and won damages for unfair dismissal.

His book on British evil in Biafra was even banned from being sold for sometime. That book cannot be SHIPPED to Nigeria as we speak.

In the eyes of the British, Nigeria still remains the Royal Niger Company-their war booty, (Today, even the US cannot interfere in Nigeria matters without British consent) and the British sponsored the war against Biafrans so that companies like shell can have 40% of your resources while their good hausa and fulani house niggars take the rest.
Thanks for throwing more light on this
I saw the book on amazon http://www.amazon.com/Biafra-Britains-shame-Auberon-Waugh/dp/0718107438
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by 989900B: 9:40pm On May 21, 2016
Sctests:
[s]The Imperialist British have ZERO resources but use their house niggars in the colonies and ex-colonies to control the resources there.
That's why they always recognise those ex-colonies the way they left it anytime the liberators and seccesionists wants to change geo-political map of ex-colonies.

Go and read the book- Biafra: Britain's shame by Auberon Waugh a journalist who was on ground and about wrote for The spectator, a British tabloid. He document the evil that Britain represented in Biafra and the British government engineered his sack from his job.
Him and his pro-Biafran colleagues took it up and won damages for unfair dismissal.

His book on British evil in Biafra was even banned from being sold for sometime. That book cannot be SHIPPED to Nigeria as we speak.

In the eyes of the British, Nigeria still remains the Royal Niger Company-their war booty, (Today, even the US cannot interfere in Nigeria matters without British consent) and the British sponsored the war against Biafrans so that companies like shell can have 40% of your resources while their good hausa and fulani house niggars take the rest. [/s]
The moment ^^ when you mix Oshogbo weed with kingston's.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Sctests: 9:56pm On May 21, 2016
989900B:
The moment ^^ when you mix Oshogbo weed with kingston's.
Check very well. You are a muslim pro-fulani. Am I wrong? grin
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by ericuzor(m): 10:06pm On May 21, 2016
Mmmmmmm speechless
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by 989900B: 10:11pm On May 21, 2016
Sctests:
Check very well. You are a muslim pro-fulani. Am I wrong? grin
Wrong, my name is Shekau, Grand commander of Boko Haram,
VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the
Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the
Seas and Conqueror of the Nigerian Government in General, and IPOB retards in particular.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by cocoduck: 10:48pm On May 21, 2016
989900B:
Wrong, my name is Shekau, Grand commander of Boko Haram,
VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the
Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the
Seas and Conqueror of the Nigerian Government in General, and IPOB retards in particular.
What the guy siad, is it a lie? is it a lie that the great US cannot intervene in Nigeria without the British consent?
Oh how I wish Trump wins.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by cocoduck: 10:49pm On May 21, 2016
MrKong:
Mtcheeeeeeeeeew
Slave
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by 989900B: 10:59pm On May 21, 2016
cocoduck:
What the guy siad, is it a lie? is it a lie that the great US cannot intervene in Nigeria without the British consent?
Oh how I wish Trump wins.
ROFLMAO!

Keep them jokes coming, I'm loving it.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by cocoduck: 11:31pm On May 21, 2016
989900B:
ROFLMAO!

Keep them jokes coming, I'm loving it.
I asked you two questions, answer them or I will assume you are a house niggar
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by 989900B: 11:33pm On May 21, 2016
cocoduck:
[s]I asked you two questions, answer them or I will assume you are a house niggar[/s]
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by academics1(op): 11:37pm On May 21, 2016
And Britain even has the guts to create a common wealth of ex-slave nations of which Nigeria is a proud member of and America is not.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Volksfuhrer(m): 2:04am On May 22, 2016
989900B:
Wrong, my name is Shekau, Grand commander of Boko Haram,
VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the
Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the
Seas and Conqueror of the Nigerian Government in General, and IPOB retards in particular.
Nairaland doesn't disappoint...this post is one of the craziest I've seen on nairaland.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by mikolo80: 2:40am On May 22, 2016
that's what happens to lazy ppl (nations)
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by WhoRUDeceiving: 2:49am On May 22, 2016
Sctests:
The Imperialist British have ZERO resources but use their house niggars in the colonies and ex-colonies to control the resources there.
That's why they always recognise those ex-colonies the way they left it anytime the liberators and seccesionists wants to change geo-political map of ex-colonies.

Go and read the book- Biafra: Britain's shame by Auberon Waugh a journalist who was on ground and about wrote for The spectator, a British tabloid. He document the evil that Britain represented in Biafra and the British government engineered his sack from his job.
Him and his pro-Biafran colleagues took it up and won damages for unfair dismissal.

His book on British evil in Biafra was even banned from being sold for sometime. That book cannot be SHIPPED to Nigeria as we speak.

In the eyes of the British, Nigeria still remains the Royal Niger Company-their war booty, (Today, even the US cannot interfere in Nigeria matters without British consent) and the British sponsored the war against Biafrans so that companies like shell can have 40% of your resources while their good hausa and fulani house niggars take the rest.
This is the truth, written in easy English for buffoons and those of the N.igga area to read and understand. You forgot to add that Britain came here to this part of Africa, to Ibadan, Owerri, Kano, Calabar, Jos, Sokoto, and slapped the people, and then told those they slapped to call themselves and their mothers b.itches (Nigerians), hence the name of the "nation"

Guess what, they accepted lol. Fools will cross out what you wrote because they are ashamed of the truth, or are agents of the powers that be.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Nobody: 6:51am On May 22, 2016
989900B:
The moment ^^ when you mix Oshogbo weed with kingston's.
You seem to be the one under the influence. Dispute him with a rational argument and not some irrational emotional one liner.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Nobody: 6:53am On May 22, 2016
academics1:
And Britain even has the guts to create a common wealth of ex-slave nations of which Nigeria is a proud member of and America is not.
Exactly. The fact Americans do not participate in the madness tells a lot about the motive. An intelligent president will stop the madness. We are yet to have one.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Nobody: 6:55am On May 22, 2016
WhoRUDeceiving:
This is the truth, written in easy English for buffoons and those of the N.igga area to read and understand. You forgot to add that Britain came here to this part of Africa, to Ibadan, Owerri, Kano, Calabar, Jos, Sokoto, and slapped the people, and then told those they slapped to call themselves and their mothers b.itches (Nigerians), hence the name of the "nation"

Guess what, they accepted lol. Fools will cross out what you wrote because they are ashamed of the truth, or are agents of the powers that be.
That's very appalling. Imagine Nig'ger Area! And our dumb leaders have not thought of changing the nonsense. The prefer the lie Niger Area to sail.
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by Sctests:
Reyginus:
Exactly. The fact Americans do not participate in the madness tells a lot about the motive. An intelligent president will stop the madness. We are yet to have one.
Right, the US is a British colony but you will never find them in that gathering of British slaves called 'Commonwealth'. Should tell you a lot but will buffoons in Nigger area understand?
Re: Is It Fair For Britain To Still Be Taking 40% Of Nigeria's Crude Oil Revenue? by 989900B: 7:44am On May 22, 2016
Reyginus:
You seem to be the one under the influence. Dispute him with a rational argument and not some irrational emotional one liner.
Oh really? If you have any idea about rationality, then you'll know the onus is on him . . . any sane or senile individual can make any claim, hell, even write a book about it, but then you'd still have to back it up with verifiable facts/instances to sell your 'opinions' or 'claims' to a 'rational' mind -- you see, that's how 'facts' work 'hombre'.
1 2 3 Reply

$600m Jets’ Deal Raises US Imports Of Nigeria’s Crude"Oloibiri" Where Nigeria's Crude Oil Was 1st Discovered And Drilled(photos)Foreign Refineries To Stop Buying Nigeria’s Crude Oil Due To NDA Attacks234

And Like In 1984, Nigerians Queue Again To Buy Essential Food Commodity(pics)"We Are Yet To Generate Electricity To Roast Boli" - TinubuPresidential Election Results (as It Stands)