₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,708 members, 8,423,322 topics. Date: Tuesday, 09 June 2026 at 03:22 PM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (49) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1162691 Views)

1 2 3 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:28pm On Oct 02, 2016
Henry240:
Take a look at the T-50. It seems to me like an SU-35 covered in stealth coating.
Yes! i concur!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:28pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
Either way the Gripen is better than the F16 as well!
gringringringringringringringringringringringringringringringringringringringrin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:28pm On Oct 02, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:29pm On Oct 02, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by iblawi(m): 4:33pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
Dude the mk3 upgrade was a software upgrade which we got, the Mk4 will only be available from 2017, and if you read the source you would've seen its 120km for an object the size of 4m2 not 130km and with the new mk4 its 0.1m2 at 120km and with the upgraded mk3 its 0.4m2 at 120km

lastly what does this have to do with South Africa?? this is a Gripen vs JF17 debate
You are still trying to complicate thing when you've actually shot yourself on the foot.

South Africa have nothing like upgrades on their Gripens.

Please just accept that your initial claim was fault cause Mk4 is coming with Gripen E/F in 2017. For now there is nothing like 0.1m2 object detection for gripen.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
iblawi:
You are still trying to complicate thing when you've actually shot yourself on the foot.

South Africa have nothing like upgrades on their Gripens.

Please just accept that your initial claim was fault cause Mk4 is coming with Gripen E/F in 2017. For now there is nothing like 0.1m2 object detection for gripen.
No you dumb fvck the PS/05a Mk4 is not comeing with the Gripen E......The Gripen E comes with the Selex's ES-05 Raven AESA radar

and yes we received the update/upgrade back in 2015 when it was made available, i posted about this 2 years ago!! Thus SAAF Gripens can detect an object 0.4m2 in size from 120km!

And as i said before, what does this have to do with South Africa?? You dumb fvcks always want to compare the JF17 to SAAF Gripens yet you don't even have a single JF17! rather compare your Mig21s to our Gripens then!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:02pm On Oct 02, 2016
The most lethal aircraft on earth for now.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:10pm On Oct 02, 2016
tdayof:
The most lethal aircraft on earth for now.
My fellow countrymen @Patches689 will disagree but personally i feel the F22 is overrated!! In fact most US weapon systems are overrated IMO!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by iblawi(m): 5:23pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
No you dumb fvck the PS/05a Mk4 is not comeing with the Gripen E......The Gripen E comes with the Selex's ES-05 Raven AESA radar

and yes we received the update/upgrade back in 2013 when it was made available, i posted about this 2 years ago!! Thus SAAF Gripens can detect an object 0.4m2 in size from 120km!

And as i said before, what does this have to do with South Africa?? You dumb fvcks always want to compare the JF17 to SAAF Gripens yet you don't even have a single JF17! rather compare your Mig21s to our Gripens then!
You dump fool now know that there is nothing like 0.1m2 detection for gripen you dummy. Am done

Hope you will allow me rest now?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:25pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
My fellow countrymen @Patches689 will disagree but personally i feel the F22 is overrated!! In fact most US weapon systems are overrated IMO!
Actually I don't know if I should say it's overrated or it's capability is overhyped but currently, no other jet can match it in combat.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:34pm On Oct 02, 2016
iblawi:
You dump fool now know that there is nothing like 0.1m2 detection for gripen you dummy. Am done

Hope you will allow me rest now?
Oh my fvcking soul!! the PS/05a Mk4 is already in service with several of Sweden's Gripens......Exports are only scheduled for 2017!

Besides 0.4m2 at 120km vs 3m2 at 110km which is better?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:35pm On Oct 02, 2016
tdayof:
Actually I don't know if I should say it's overrated or it's capability is overhyped but currently, no other jet can match it in combat.
BVR yes.....WVR BIG NOPE!!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:40pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
BVR yes.....WVR BIG NOPE!!
Why no? Support your reasons .
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by iblawi(m): 5:42pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
Oh my fvcking soul!! the PS/05a Mk4 is already in service with several of Sweden's Gripens......Exports are only scheduled for 2017!

Besides 0.4m2 at 120km vs 3m2 at 110km which is better?
Fool keep twisting things up.
It seem you love to argue unnecessarily but i don't have that time.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:56pm On Oct 02, 2016
tdayof:
Why no? Support your reasons .
When Australia was evaluating the F35 they sent several defence personal to Ex Pacific Vision:

in the mock battle there was blue force: F22,F35 and F/A 18 and Red Force:Su27sm and 2 Su30s

And if i remember correctly, the beating blue force took was so severe that one of the Australian defence personal describe it as...and i quote "clubbing baby seals"
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:57pm On Oct 02, 2016
iblawi:
Fool keep twisting things up.
It seem you love to argue unnecessarily but i don't have that time.
What am i twisting bro? Im just stating the facts!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by andrewza: 6:04pm On Oct 02, 2016
iblawi:
You are still trying to complicate thing when you've actually shot yourself on the foot.

South Africa have nothing like upgrades on their Gripens.

Please just accept that your initial claim was fault cause Mk4 is coming with Gripen E/F in 2017. For now there is nothing like 0.1m2 object detection for gripen.
Actually with our support deal with SAAB we get all the upgrades the gripens get as they come out.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by andrewza: 6:08pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
When Australia was evaluating the F35 they sent several defence personal to Ex Pacific Vision:

in the mock battle there was blue force: F22,F35 and F/A 18 and Red Force:Su27sm and 2 Su30s

And if i remember correctly, the beating blue force took was so severe that one of the Australian defence personal describe it as...and i quote "clubbing baby seals"
I highly doubt this took place. The F35 was not operational back then and still is not. The F22 only had issues with the Rafael and even then it won over all but a few where lost in simulated dog fights.


The Quote came from a computer simulations not a red flag style exercise.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:18pm On Oct 02, 2016
andrewza:
I highly doubt this took place. The F35 was not operational back then and still is not. The F22 only had issues with the Rafael and even then it won over all but a few where lost in simulated dog fights.


The Quote came from a computer simulations not a red flag style exercise.
Was quoting an accredited Australian news site......as i said there were definitely Australian defence personal at the exercise and that's what they said.

But yes you make a good point!!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:35pm On Oct 02, 2016
andrewza:
Actually with our support deal with SAAB we get all the upgrades the gripens get as they come out.
Evidence or into the trash can this comment goes, along with your 3rd rate Gripen?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:59pm On Oct 02, 2016
Henry240:
Evidence or into the trash can this comment goes, along with your 3rd rate Gripen?
Dude i posted a defenceweb article regarding the SAAB contract and the upgrades that are included in the contract 2 years ago!!! consult the archives!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:05pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
Dude i posted a defenceweb article regarding the SAAB contract and the upgrades that are included in the contract 2 years ago!!! consult the archives!
Trash.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by iblawi(m): 7:15pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
Dude i posted a defenceweb article regarding the SAAB contract and the upgrades that are included in the contract 2 years ago!!! consult the archives!
You posted it two years ago while it was available only last year according to your source.



You claimed you posted something about upgrades two years ago but SAAB claims upgrades of MK3 was available only in 2015.

This is what we know you have
PS-05A (JAS-39 A/B/C/D)

For RCS 0.0001 m2 class target: 5~6 km+
For RCS 0.001 m2 class target: 9~10 km+
For RCS 0.1 m2 class target: 27~32 km+
For RCS 1.0 m2 class target: 48~56 km+
For RCS 5.0 m2 class target: 72~84 km+
For RCS 10.0 m2 class target: 85~100 km+

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 7:29pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln...its enough...u r looking like a dummy already
anyway...I like when y'all argue ..we learn a bit now can we post on topic
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:43pm On Oct 02, 2016
iblawi:
You posted it two years ago while it was available only last year according to your source.



You claimed you posted something about upgrades two years ago but SAAB claims upgrades of MK3 was available only in 2015.

This is what we know you have
PS-05A (JAS-39 A/B/C/D)

For RCS 0.0001 m2 class target: 5~6 km+
For RCS 0.001 m2 class target: 9~10 km+
For RCS 0.1 m2 class target: 27~32 km+
For RCS 1.0 m2 class target: 48~56 km+
For RCS 5.0 m2 class target: 72~84 km+
For RCS 10.0 m2 class target: 85~100 km+
I know!!!!! i was talking about the SAAB contract fvcknut the fvcking contract......wake the fvck up please! The contract includes all upgrades when they are made available....and we singed the contract in 2013!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:44pm On Oct 02, 2016
Odunayaw:
jln...its enough...u r looking like a dummy already

anyway...I like when y'all argue ..we learn a bit
now can we post on topic
So i look dumb yet im the only one posting legitimate sources and not gibberish from other forums?? Cool story bro!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 7:54pm On Oct 02, 2016
jln115:
So i look dumb yet im the only one posting legitimate sources and not gibberish from other forums?? Cool story bro!
oh...legitimate grin
anyway...let's keep shit real Ok?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:56pm On Oct 02, 2016
Odunayaw:
oh...legitimate grin
anyway...let's keep shit real Ok?
Yes i consider SAAB and Janes to be pretty legit sources! dont you?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 8:13pm On Oct 02, 2016
tdayof:
The most lethal aircraft on earth for now.
Only truly lethal when part of a system

It's called the Joint Strike Fighter for a reason
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 8:14pm On Oct 02, 2016
Henry240:
Keep acting stupiid.

A plane that is to replace an F4 Phantom, F-5, MIG-23, Mirage and MIG-29 is what?
A replacement for second gen aircraft

Thus third gen

Duh
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 8:17pm On Oct 02, 2016
Henry240:
No dufus, the Gripen does not out maneuver the JF-17. It's not even possible.


The fact is your Gripen according to SAAB is on the same level as the F-16 Block 40, when when all factors come into consideration, the Gripen is also lower than the JF-17.


So much for $65 million. What Mbeki did, was he got petrol and burnt $35 million per plane. To think it was all borrowed money makes it all the more sorrowful.
Better wing loading, more powerfull engine, better climb and higher G rating all say more manuverable. Fact.

SAAB did not say that, stop stooping to such pathetic lows as to lie. Sad!

80v2O, you get what you pay for
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 8:20pm On Oct 02, 2016
Henry240:
Which include F4, F5, Mirage, MIG-23, MIG-21.


I provided a comment of a PAC executive explicitly following the Chinese designation.
Western analysts describe it as "a day time interceptor"

Which generation is that?
1 2 3 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .