₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,329,193 members, 8,439,237 topics. Date: Saturday, 04 July 2026 at 07:56 PM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (53) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1171463 Views)

1 2 3 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 3:15pm On Oct 03, 2016
Guys please stop these argument, it's like u r bringing back the old traits of the former thread to these thread again.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 3:19pm On Oct 03, 2016
all u dick measuring expert,
pls pack ur bags to d African strongest military thread afterall u pple destroyed it .
pls leave dis thread alone.
was thinking d thread had been rescued but I was wrong

all u pple from rand nation hope u pple got my message.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 4:50pm On Oct 03, 2016
Henry240:
The MK1A well surpasses the Gripen. I wonder how the Pakistanis would respond.


The Gripen is just a pampered plane that should ordinarily not cost more than half it's current value. I was reading the RAND report on Gripen operations in Libya as against those conducted by F-16s, F-15s and Tornados, i couldn't phantom what the hullabola about the plane is. Granted it carried out 30% of all ISR mission, but that was the job of the RECON pod it carried, not the plane itself. A western plane which was having compatibility issues with other western planes.
Nigerians butthurt they cannot afford the Gripen

Ps: Thai and Botswanan air forces disagree with you grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 4:51pm On Oct 03, 2016
Henry240:
I have no doubt in my mind, the LCA MK1 would defeat the Gripen. I'm talking about European piloted Gripen C/D, not even South-Africa. Beautiful plane, in performance, however, i find the LCA to be quite ugly aesthetically.
How?

Substantiate your reasoning
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 4:56pm On Oct 03, 2016
iblawi:
Gripens, JF17 thunder and Tejas are all light multi-role fighters with similar capabilities. The only difference is that Tejas and Jf17 thunder are still under development and when completed, they will be competing with Gripen E/F not Gripen C/D.

The existing versions are already comparable to Gripen C/D.
1. "Light multi-role" is a class you just made up

2. Gripen is swing role

3. Gripen is superior in every single way, how is a thing that is better comparable?

No, they are not a match for the c/D and no there is nothing in the development schedule to suggest it will compare to the E/F

The fatal flaw of your argument is that you say it is too expensive, yet people keep buying it (80) despite the existence of your "cheaper and just as good" JF-17

This is a childish argument, why are certain people obsessed with comparing two fighters that will never combat each other?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 4:57pm On Oct 03, 2016
Henry240:
South-African butt-hurt.
The only butt hurt here is yours

You make statements but cannot prove them

This shows that you are in an emotional state of mind.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 4:58pm On Oct 03, 2016
Henry240:
I would try to continue to be the man cause of South-African pain and frustration.
So you essentially confirm that you are not making a rational argument and are instead now just trolling?

Enjoy your 3 third gen bottom shelf fighters.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Patchesagain: 4:59pm On Oct 03, 2016
giles14:
all u dick measuring expert,
pls pack ur bags to d African strongest military thread afterall u pple destroyed it .
pls leave dis thread alone.
was thinking d thread had been rescued but I was wrong

all u pple from rand nation hope u pple got my message.
Direct your comments at Henry120

He is responsible for the most recent flare up
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:40pm On Oct 03, 2016
the operationalization of LCA did not take over three decades as some critics maintain.

they incorrectly cite august 22 1983 as the start of the LCA project when GOI allocated Rs. 560 crores for feasibility studies and project definition only.

infact it was only in april 1993 when the GOI sanctioned full scale engineering development (FSED) of LCA and provided funds to build two fighters as technology demonstrators.

A SERIOUS BUT HILARIOUS READ BEHIND THE TRIALS AND TABULATIONS OF THE CLAW TEAM WHICH DEVELOPED THE LCA FLY BY WIRE CONTROL LAWS (CLAW).


First they were denied technology by the West. angry

They took it in their stride and decided to go the desi way. cool

Then came the mother of all shocks. wink

Some of them wanted to get married, but the prospective brides ran away, thanks to their plight. Marriage proposals vanished from the radar at supersonic speeds.
grin grin grin

Down, but not out, they stuck as one team chasing a national dream set by A P J Abdul Kalam in 1992. Their mission: To build fly-by-wire flight Control Laws (CLAW) for the Light Combat Aircraft (Tejas) programme.

In 1992, ADA floated a global tender seeking consultancy for developing six critical technologies, including developing CLAW for Tejas. They got responses for all five technologies, barring CLAW, which nobody was willing to part with India due to its strategic nature,” recalls NAL's acting director, Shyam Chetty.

It was on June 2, 1992, when Dr. APJ Kalam had his first meeting of the CLAW clan in Bangalore, with CSIR-NAL as the nodal centre. “We started everything from ground zero and Dr Kalam had a huge impact on us. Most of the team members worked for close to 18 hours every day. We are delighted that today our CLAW is one of the successful part of Tejas that is getting into the Indian Air Force's inventory. We have completed all parameters for the initial operational clearance (IOC) phase,” said Shyam.

In the process, the CLAW team also mastered Wake Encounter Simulation – a critical area for the Tejas programme. “Wake simulation is a very complicated and challenging modelling control problem. Aerodynamics is simulated by splitting the aircraft into seven components and computing forces and moments on each component,” said NAL sources.

ADA sources told that the CLAW team has made the life of pilots simpler. “He is fed only what he needs. The HOTAS (Hands on Throttle-And-Stick) ensures that the pilot is at absolute ease during his mission,” sources said, adding, “Tejas is an unstable platform and it is CLAW that acts as its brain.”

The success story of CLAW did not come easy for those involved.

The bad publicity that Tejas got in early days and low salaries ensured that most of the team members (men) had a tough time in finding suitable brides. shocked shocked shocked

“Yes. It's true and many of our team mates faced this problem. Our job profile was such that no father dared to give her daughter. Some of my colleagues even had to undergo counselling. All that is past and we are all happily married now. But can't believe how 20 years flew past,” said a senior NAL scientist. grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 11:41pm On Oct 03, 2016
shocked Beautiful and lethal.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 11:42pm On Oct 03, 2016
grin grin here's nemesis.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 11:59pm On Oct 03, 2016
Random

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:11am On Oct 04, 2016
induction ceremony of LCA into the ‘Flying Daggers’ 45, the name of the first squadron of the LCA.


picture 3
invocation of the gods for good luck.

guess they wanted just to be safe just incase grin
and ensure multi-layered, redundant, fail-safe , 100% certain all mighty divine blessing mechanism in place tongue tongue tongue

and for that they decided to go for all the gods
Hindu Muslim Christian Sikh and Buddhist grin grin grin

grin i guess somebody was thinking along these lines...............
1.what if only christian god exists
2.what if only muslim god exists
3.what if only hindu god exists
4.what if only buddhist god exists
5.what if none of them exists
6.what if all of them exists
7.what if all of them are fighting among themselves wink

darn it !

grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:26am On Oct 04, 2016
tdayof:
grin grin here's nemesis.
if u meant me grin

then the only commonality between that fellow and me which i can claim to with 100 % conviction would be that god-damm SLIPPERS that fellow in the pic is wearing grin grin grin

and maybe the underwear, but not too sure about it grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:07am On Oct 04, 2016
The RPO-A Shmel (Russian: RPO-A Bumblebee) is a man-portable rocket launcher, although it is classified as a flamethrower by the manufacturer, KBP, Tula.

The RPO-A is a single-shot, self-contained tube shaped launcher that operates much like some RPG and LAW rocket launchers. The launcher is a sealed tube, carried in a man-pack in pairs. The same person can remove the tube, place it in firing position, and launch the weapon without assistance. After launch, the tube is discarded. All models are externally similar.

Ammunition
Each weapon contains a single rocket, of which there are three varieties. The basic rocket is the RPO-A, which has a thermobaric warhead and is designed for attacking soft targets under moderate cover. The RPO-Z is the incendiary warhead designed to spread fire and ignite targets. Finally, there is a smoke-producing warhead offered, the RPO-D.

A recent development is the improved RPO-M "Shmel-M" that was shown for the first time at Eurosatory 2006. This version is quite similar to the original weapon, but has a calibre of 90 mm and a weight of 8.8 kg. Its launcher is reusable. The system has better ergonomics and uses an improved rocket with better ballistics and terminal effect and with a maximum range of 1,700 m. The "Shmel-M" is also known as RPO PDM-A.

a good weapon to toast terrorists . it was used recently to great effect.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 2:56am On Oct 04, 2016
L-15

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:11am On Oct 04, 2016
https://www.wearethemighty.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/WATM_remington-CSR-sniper_cal0916-1024x536.jpg

The Remington Defense Concealable Sniper Rifle system was developed for top secret commando units to be able to slip into a hide without being noticed.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:13am On Oct 04, 2016
https://www.wearethemighty.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/WATM_remington-CSR-parts_cal0916-1024x536.jpg

The entire Concealable Sniper Rifle system breaks down into three parts that are no more than 16 inches long.

CSR breaks down into three pieces no longer than 16 inches and can be assembled and shot in less than 60 seconds.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:22am On Oct 04, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
Patchesagain:
Direct your comments at Henry120

He is responsible for the most recent flare up
rader are upgradeable on both planes,it just matter of time.who upgrade first.some specs information are classified
.probably only pilot or top official knows.open source may not be credible.
meteor missle seems an advantage over current JF-17's untill PL-15 upgrade.

JF-17 was not likely designed to encouter Gripen by now

So it's meanless an argument on them
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 7:39am On Oct 04, 2016
Eastern Ukraine

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
China made CQ-A rifle
M4 knock-off

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 12:56pm On Oct 04, 2016
AAM-4B Japan

Meteor NATO

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by andrewza: 1:08pm On Oct 04, 2016
chinese8107:
rader are upgradeable on both planes,it just matter of time.who upgrade first.some specs information are classified
.probably only pilot or top official knows.open source may not be credible.
meteor missle seems an advantage over current JF-17's untill PL-15 upgrade.

JF-17 was not likely designed to encouter Gripen by now

So it's meanless an argument on them
it was likely built to compete with them for sales though
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by andrewza: 1:14pm On Oct 04, 2016
chinese8107:
China made CQ-A rifle
M4 knock-off
the Namibian navy guys I spoke to says he hates it
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 1:28pm On Oct 04, 2016
andrewza:
the Namibian navy guys I spoke to says he hates it
that's probably an earlier m16 knockoff
This is latest version m4
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by andrewza: 1:34pm On Oct 04, 2016
chinese8107:
that's probably an earlier m16 knockoff
This is latest version m4
Still an AR15 rip off
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 2:36pm On Oct 04, 2016
CS/LM6

M2 Browning knockoff

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:42pm On Oct 04, 2016
chinese8107:
CS/LM6

M2 Browning knockoff
Is there a knockoff for everything in China?


Don't you feel embarrassed at the multiple knockoffs you post, are you saying there's no original equipment in China?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 2:45pm On Oct 04, 2016
Henry240:
Is there a knockoff for everything in China?


Don't you feel embarrassed at the multiple knockoffs you post, are you saying there's no original equipment in China?
Exactly. He types like he's inferior.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:46pm On Oct 04, 2016
Su-30MKI buddy refueling a Mirage-2000TH using a Cobham 754 buddy refueling pod

1 2 3 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .

Viewing this topic: 2 guest(s)