Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (54) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Foreign Affairs › Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1161827 Views)
1 2 3 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:52pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
Henry240:lol truth is elusive do u know in the past Chinese universities students used to get projects to reverse engineer weapons etc. dont know if the trend is still on. reverse engineering is their USP. but i give credit to them because in reality reverse engineering is very hard to do for most of the systems. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:04pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
LCA in Bahrain airshow
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:04pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
tdayof:It's unfortunate. This was what i was saying to Nemesis2u about the traits i've observed with the Chinese guy. At-least i follow Sinodefence forum, i know they got thousands of amazing equipment, why he always chooses to post knock offs eludes me. If Nigeria had the sort of Defence industry the Chinese have, this forum would not be enough to hold my post of high quality content. Restricting my posts to Nemesis's thread would have burnt down Seun's server, or maybe caused a WWW welt-down in west-africa. I have never seen him post one thing on the J-20 or Type99 or DF-15 or Song class Submarines or the HQ-9. I remember when the South-Africans were attacking him, he just kept apologising to them, i mean, it was hopeless. Most of the Chinese Defence enthusiasts i see Online wouldn't have accepted that. Man, Chinese, you gotta quite posting contents that make you seem inferior. This is the World Wide Web, everybody is King in it. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:10pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
nemesis2u:That's not the point. Besides, everybody reverse engineers, steal, copy, download, ask for assistance. It's a fact of the world we live in. I'm most concerned about the quality of chinese8107's posts. They always seem to exude and aura of inferiority. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:13pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
Composites for LCA Mk1 airframe
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 3:19pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
Henry240:I am not saying there is no original equipment from China. no embarrassement. because China has been embargoed for decades by NATO. There is no place to buy a weapon sometimes. .Even Russia or Ukriane is not always willing to sell everything. Any other chioce? look at Iran and North Korea, they can't even make a knockoff. making an original is good but not always necessery,and could be" not easy". |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:22pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
Henry240:hehehe ![]() everybody steals that is a different issue because not everybody have the talent to reverse engineer products spread across multiple fields. example : i steal a T/R module of an AESA radar . very good ![]() next what ![]() if i don't have atleast credible expertise on fabricating / designing a T/R module of an AESA radar on my own than trying to reverse engineering a stolen T/R module of an AESA radar is surely going to end in failure. u need credible expertise on the said technology before u can reverse engineer a stolen product based on the same technology, otherwise it is an effort doomed to failure most of the time. ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:30pm On Oct 04, 2016*. Modified: 4:05pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
Henry240:sinodefence forum i visited it few times . good i only visited 2 or 3 threads. do u know jeffhead in that forum ? also sinodefence is owned by an american , not too sure though. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:59pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
OBOGS on board oxygen generating system for LCA.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:11pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
LCA MK2 cockpit display in a stimulator
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:29pm On Oct 04, 2016*. Modified: 4:51pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
Henry240:as I explained ,making some knockoff doen not nececerily inferior,sometimes countries making knockoff against each others,especially in high tech field. In stealth aircraft industry for example,korea,japan,turkey.ect...can you expect everything be original no knockoff or borrowing or cooperation ? Can they design it independently ? As I rember I only posted 3-4 knockoff,does that make me look inferior? The reason I don't post some amazing equipment is because there are online everywhere.anyone can find and post.And this is african forum I posted something related |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:42pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
nemesis2u:Pass me the transmitter and receiver module lol. We need some for our Gulma. We should reverse something too. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:46pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
nemesis2u:Im guessing this is just for show?? Not very impressive in IMO! |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:49pm On Oct 04, 2016*. Modified: 6:53pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
OICW Objective Individual Combat Weapon
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:00pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
nemesis2u:Nope, i usually just follow the US navy thread created by BDPopeye, it's regularly updated. Since Militaryphotos.net died off, everybody just went their separate ways to their respective regional or country forums. A central site no longer exists. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:04pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
India rifle
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 7:14pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 7:42pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
off topic rumour says The Indian Air Force lost a tandem-seat Jaguar IB fighter on Oct. 3 in Jaisalmer. Both pilots managed to eject safely. http://alert5.com/2016/10/04/iaf-jaguar-ib-crashes/ looks not credible source |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:01pm On Oct 04, 2016 |
giles14:USA has been cooperated with india in defence industry for decades.this harpoon is aleady obsole weapon for USA as it aleady equipted with new concept weapon. however it's still not obsole for most of developing country. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:39am On Oct 05, 2016 |
Henry240:Although just a pipe-dream, it would be awesome if you guys can partner-up with Denel on the development of the Bateleur UAV as @frumentius previously pointed out!! SAAF has been interested in a male UAV since 2008 but due to the projected cost of the project and budget cuts led to the cancellation of project Itambo! anyway a few specs about the Bateleur: ( I know it's copied from wiki, unfortunately the Denel brochure doesn't exist anymore) speed: 250 km/h Range: 750 km- 3500km(Data-link enabled) Endurance:24 hours Service ceiling: 8,000 m Load Capacity: 200kg The Bateleur could potentially be armed with either Ingwe or Mokopa ATGMs
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:15am On Oct 05, 2016*. Modified: 3:20am On Oct 05, 2016 |
jln115:it is an iron bird for the naval lca mk2 where flight control laws are tested and validated . i posted it to show the configuration of the SMFDs. anyways 2 Indian companies design and make all kinds of airborne display system etc.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:21am On Oct 05, 2016 |
giles14:lol ![]() how is it a milestone order? when india already has harpoon missiles equipped to her jaguars (those configured for marine strike role) for a long time. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:37am On Oct 05, 2016 |
nemesis2u:aaahhh!! Thanks!! actually thought it was a flight simulator(as in the one pilots use to train) |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:46am On Oct 05, 2016*. Modified: 3:04am On Oct 05, 2016 |
x |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 2:47am On Oct 05, 2016*. Modified: 12:44pm On Oct 09, 2016 |
type-81 rifle 7.62x39 it's longer more accurate than AK-47 simply and rubust.tested in sino-vietnamese war, sri-lanka civil war.still can see in southeast asia ,
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 3:04am On Oct 05, 2016*. Modified: 3:22pm On Oct 05, 2016 |
x pic 1 modified type-81 rifle pic 2 modified type-81 rifle with 7.62x51 NATO ammo version called CS/LR14
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:09am On Oct 05, 2016*. Modified: 5:03am On Oct 05, 2016 |
EL/M 2032 RADAR which fitted with Indian back-end processors r installed in LCA 80 nm = 150 km 160 nm = 300 km
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:12am On Oct 05, 2016 |
MIG 21 BISON
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:16am On Oct 05, 2016 |
Saab BAMSE SR-SAM
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:28am On Oct 05, 2016 |
samyukta integrated electronic warfare system. Chinese hackers tried to hack into the developers computers to steal it, weather they were successful or not is not know. but what is interesting is that soon after that, development of a more potent and advanced version of this system was announced.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:33am On Oct 05, 2016 |
Skjold class stealth vessels
|
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump • Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. • @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday • 2 • 3 • 4
Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live • American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! • Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)


