safarigirl:




Nothing about flings, one night stands etc....and the ACT mentions public show of such.....if some nitwit decides to release a video of 2 people doing their business in private, the court can't prosecute the individuals with illegally obtained evidence.


We can take this further by posting any court cases to back up this talk....or have there been no homosexuals arrested since the establishment?


You people need to leave gay people and fpcus on things that matter like ra-pe....

I've got nothing against gay people. I'm just trying to enlighten you 'cos of ur earlier post.

safarigirl:
there is no law that states that homosexual intercourse will attract a 14-year jail term. Where do you guys get such jargons from?

If you've read section 7 of that Act and you are intelligent and u understand English, you wouldn't still be arguing.

Iv done my bit dear. Ta-ta

Every tom dik and harry wan blog by force. video evidence is not admissible as evidence in Nigeria

safarigirl:
there is no law that states that homosexual intercourse will attract a 14-year jail term. Where do you guys get such jargons from?

The law says that 14-years goes to those who enter into a homosexual UNION....ie, one has to be MARRIED to someone of the same sex to go to jail, not just shag someone of the same sex

Anything Homosexual, attracts the jail term. Either marriage or public display of homosexuality. You sure you aint one sef?

The law says that 14-years goes to those who enter into a homosexual UNION....ie, one has to be MARRIED to someone of the same sex to go to jail, not just shag someone of the same sex[/quote]

Fool...you be gay

safarigirl:
which prosecution? Where?

Show me one case of homosexuals having intercourse that have been prosecuted. You think the court processes occur on the internet?

This is the same ignorant jargons most of you asking for the heads of Denrele and co spew

just enter nairaland and start spittin ruɓbish...

Kingsley1000:
what did the law say about the politicians that looted the nations' treasury?




why will ones sexual preference affect you?in contrast to rape or theft case the inflicts untold pain to people

i just saw the biggest fool on nairaland....Obsesed bout her country

Kingsley1000:
what did the law say about the politicians that looted the nations' treasury?




why will ones sexual preference affect you?in contrast to rape or theft case the inflicts untold pain to people

i just saw the biggest fool on nairaland....Obsesed with her country

Dharneehell:
Anything Homosexual, attracts the jail term. Either marriage or public display of homosexuality. You sure you aint one sef?

lol....well, we'll have to wait for a video to confirm that, right?

Fornicators coming online to slam fellow fornicators, brilliant!

ednut1:
Every tom dik and harry wan blog by force. video evidence is not admissible as evidence in Nigeria

don't mind the idiots.

Nigeria's constitution on rape is one of the most backward on earth and some idiots are raising hell over two consenting adults doing whatever in private


Misplaced priorities everywhere

LeviiWesT:
i just saw the biggest fool on nairaland....Obsesed bout her country i just saw the biggest fool on nairaland....Obsesed with her country

my brother we have more pressing issues in this nation,very soon they will say masturbation is illegal ......ones sexuality isn't worth being in the law as long as its not constituting public nuisance and not inflicting pains to the general public

they've found the cucumber now ...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5YE4i6n11I

SafariGirl, the law is very clear on this, 14 years if you are caught practicing same sex engagement. Whether those of us calling for her head are fornicatora or not, or whether we are sinful as well isn't the topic at hand. Did she go break a law? Yes? Should she be punished for it? Yes. Is the evidence admissible enough to send her to jail? No.

We shouldn't let sentiments cloud our thinking, that one person hasn't been punished doesn't make it a lesser law or a breakable one.

safarigirl:
lol....even if someone bleached your brain, you still won't be bright.

If posting something to dispel an erroneous thought translates to being 'suspect' in your opinion, it just goes to show how underdeveloped your thinking process is.


Yes, there are much smarter people in Cape Verde

Ol'boy. Really can't help you: your thought process is already skewed towards Cape Verde. Let's just hope you'll wake up to reality once your Nani fantasy goes poof!! And for the sake of your mental health, I really hope it happens ASAP.

safarigirl:
lol....even if someone bleached your brain, you still won't be bright.

Good luck with a brain transplant

You sound harsh.

Learn HOW I MAKE $500 WEEKLY ONLINE for free no PDF download all free. http://makereal-dollars..com.ng/2016/11/make-money-online-with-these-methods.html?m=1

plavic:

You sound harsh.

photoshoot:
SafariGirl, the law is very clear on this, 14 years if you are caught practicing same sex engagement. Whether those of us calling for her head are fornicatora or not, or whether we are sinful as well isn't the topic at hand. Did she go break a law? Yes? Should she be punished for it? Yes. Is the evidence admissible enough to send her to jail? No.
We shouldn't let sentiments cloud our thinking, that one person hasn't been punished doesn't make it a lesser law or a breakable one.

Learn HOW I MAKE $500 WEEKLY ONLINE for free no PDF download all free. http://makereal-dollars..com.ng/2016/11/make-money-online-with-these-methods.html?m=1

Another lesbian spotted!!!

just a shag abi issoryt kuntunue.

safarigirl:
lol....well, we'll have to wait for a video to confirm that, right?

Fornicators coming online to slam fellow fornicators, brilliant!

Well there is the normal fornication and the ABNORMAL fornication!

No one is slamming them 'cause they are fornicators, but 'cause they're involved in the ABNORMAL one. Which just makes everything worse.

photoshoot:
SafariGirl, the law is very clear on this, 14 years if you are caught practicing same sex engagement. Whether those of us calling for her head are fornicatora or not, or whether we are sinful as well isn't the topic at hand. Did she go break a law? Yes? Should she be punished for it? Yes. Is the evidence admissible enough to send her to jail? No.

We shouldn't let sentiments cloud our thinking, that one person hasn't been punished doesn't make it a lesser law or a breakable one.

Those sentences are contradicting.


If the evidence is not admissible to send her to jail, it makes it useless, therefore; the law was not broken, so she shouldn't be punished.