₦airaland Forum

MaziOmenuko:
The term 'saved' means by his actions, 15bil was not spent on subsidy, not that the money was existing and was supposed to be used for subsidy but was not used again.

mrvitalis:
Lol
They don't have the money number one
Two they can't channel money they don't have to other places



Oh my ur IQ is supper low

Emekamex:
You aren't making any sense, how can one save what he doesn't have?

Emekamex:
You aren't making any sense, how can one save what he doesn't have?

mrvitalis:
If u eat Turkey every day then u lose ur job and start to eat fish that's 1000 less the price can't u say by eating fish u are saving 1000?? Which means u have saved ur self 365k u would have spent

Rilwayne001:
Shut up! So what's the difference? They didn't spend 15bn on subsidy, then on what did they channel it to

If actually they have as much as 15bn reservation, then why the need for 29bn loan?

IBBG:
abeg help ask am wey the money dey? and yet we want borrow

MaziOmenuko:
The term 'saved' means by his actions, 15bil was not spent on subsidy, not that the money was existing and was supposed to be used for subsidy but was not used again.

mrvitalis:
Just look at Nigerians commenting rubbish

The term saved here means we prevented us from spending 15bn dollars which we didn't have actually

Just looking above and the lilw they get i wonder if it just hatw or bad education or both

softMarket:
U pple will just be calling amount of money anyhow


so u mean that bubu saved 15bn dollars from fuel subsidy and still wants to borrow?

Ayam not just understanding Bubu at all !!!

mykeljosef:
ma fren shatap dere


the government would have one way or another gotten the $15b if the subsidy wasnt increased

the main ish here is if 15bil was not wasted on the subsidy where/what sector was it diverted to...N where r the improvement to show for it

dont tell me the money wasnt there in the first place.....or better still dont use the word SAVED


YOU CANT SAVE WHAT YOU DON'T HAVE

darknetcom:
normaly they borrow to subsidy..
that is a difference..

mykeljosef:
ma fren shatap dere


the government would have one way or another gotten the $15b if the subsidy wasnt increased

the main ish here is if 15bil was not wasted on the subsidy where/what sector was it diverted to...N where r the improvement to show for it

dont tell me the money wasnt there in the first place.....or better still dont use the word SAVED


YOU CANT SAVE WHAT YOU DON'T HAVE

mykeljosef:
n you think they still don't borrow on small scale....
if yes you're a clueless zombie

its not a problem if you borrowp money but rather than use it for subsidy invested it in social infrastructure


do you know what pumping the entire 15 billion into agriculture would have brought us by now...

it would have brought in more billions or at least between now n july 2017 we would have realized more money as a country



also with the additional #47 they make per litre you have any idea how much they realize daily... considering they wont have gotten that if we still operated under the previous subsidy

darknetcom:
and do know that we use about 80% of our money to maintain this useless democratic system??..

MaziOmenuko:
The term 'saved' means by his actions, 15bil was not spent on subsidy, not that the money was existing and was supposed to be used for subsidy but was not used again.

agabusta:
Thank u for this apt explanation.

mykeljosef:
useless Democratic system


imagine having buhari as our president ,vp, senate n speaker.... that should resolve the statement you made

Atiku2019:
Savings that's not reflecting positively on the Economy of this Great Nation.




#Atiku