₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,331,203 members, 8,449,128 topics. Date: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 at 10:52 AM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (127) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1177567 Views)

1 2 3 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:40pm On Feb 15, 2017
AMCA MODEL during aeroindia 2017

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
fuuking designs from the villains of madmax grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
that is one courageous lady grin shocked grin

why do i have a feeling that the pilot seat is empty embarassed

if i was the pilot i would fly / crash land it near my house grin

and personally supervise all medical care one to one grin , provided i dont need medical care myself grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 9:17pm On Feb 15, 2017
nemesis2u:
Poeir Jets Indian pvt company portfolio of micro and small jet engines
Reminds me of how the US took the miniature jet engine technology from a scrapped human jet pack project and integrated it into an unmanned platform and BOOM! ...the Tomahawk cruise missile was born

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:27am On Feb 16, 2017
grin Mi-8 pilot and crew lands on highway in Kazakhstan to ask for directions.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:44am On Feb 16, 2017
Seened:
Reminds me of how the US took the miniature jet engine technology from a scrapped human jet pack project and integrated it into an unmanned platform and BOOM! ...the Tomahawk cruise missile was born
thanks for this interesting info
did not know about it grin

real world human jet pack project.
really interesting , wonder if any country is still interested in it ? grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
jakeporeshenko:
grin Mi-8 pilot and crew lands on highway in Kazakhstan to ask for directions.
hehehe grin

maybe they wanted to borrow toilet paper grin grin grin grin
we will never know grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:27am On Feb 16, 2017
HTT 40

this one got the potential to end up as a good COIN aircraft

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:38am On Feb 16, 2017
pair of army RUDRA performing salsa in the sky grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:02am On Feb 16, 2017
DRDO AWACS Model on airbus 330

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:05am On Feb 16, 2017
Unmanned Chetak model

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 9:20am On Feb 16, 2017
nemesis2u:
thanks for this interesting info
did not know about it grin

real world human jet pack project.
really interesting , wonder if any country is still interested in it ? grin
Private individuals are the current drivers of this technology. Of course governments, like the US government, invested substantially in jet pack technology but its inherent limitations still restricted its application. I mean you can only load so much fuel/propellant on a jet pack attached to a human which consumes fuel/propellant fast.

To even get concentrated Hydrogen Peroxide for the Hydrogen Peroxide powered packs is a major headache.

On a side note; may the memory of Wendell Moore be blessed for his contributions to this and other Aerospace technologies.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened:
Yves Rossy doing what he is good at...

PS: Congratulations to India for putting into space 104 satellites with a single rocket launch...with just 1 rocket. This is no small feat. (3rd image).

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 10:25am On Feb 16, 2017
Some interesting spin-offs of the jet pack concept wink...

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 11:55am On Feb 16, 2017
Seened:
Some interesting spin-offs of the jet pack concept wink...
what I'd give to be in pic 2-4 undecided
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:25pm On Feb 16, 2017
Odunayaw:
what I'd give to be in pic 2-4 undecided
and in pic 1 ?? grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened:
Odunayaw:
what I'd give to be in pic 2-4 undecided
cheesy cheesy I know you'll be doing stunts like these...

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 8:05pm On Feb 16, 2017
chkil:
and in pic 1 ?? grin
The balls it takes to do an EVA with a Manned Maneuvering Unit. You don't even want to think of what could go wrong cool
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 10:45pm On Feb 16, 2017
chkil:
and in pic 1 ?? grin
I'd prefer rapture
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 10:47pm On Feb 16, 2017
Seened:
cheesy cheesy I know you'll be doing stunts like these...
you know wam saying cheesy
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:55pm On Feb 16, 2017
this video never gets old, rocket artillery is awesome. Огонь


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dg-kVWPw-Qg
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 1:33am On Feb 17, 2017
nemesis2u:
HTT 40

this one got the potential to end up as a good COIN aircraft
but how much is it.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
avic

little eagle LE500

grin armed version
modified from civilian plane.. grin. AVIC obviously wants to make an air toyota so that everybody even a air taxi driver can buy grin.needs to improve its reliablity.last year 1 crashed during an air show

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 9:43am On Feb 17, 2017
@nemesis any news on the FGFA in the expo
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
giles14:
@nemesis any news on the FGFA in the expo
Russia has said that the fifth generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) program that is being planned with India would be a 'completely new aircraft' and is not linked to Moscow's own new generation fighter, the Sukhoi T 50. In a detailed discussion, Russia's largest state holding company in the defence sector, Rostec has said that it is worrying that faster progress has not been made by the Indian side to finalise the project.

Russia is keen to differentiate the Indian project with its ongoing T 50 fighter jet program. "The Indian FGFA is not a copy cat of the T 50, it will be a new aircraft that will also have some technologies from the T 50. If India had wanted the T 50, we would not be working on a new aircraft (FGFA) program," Kladov (Director, International Cooperation, Rostec) said.

negotiations r now happening on Indian rights to IPR of FGFA or any of its derivatives and share from all possible export variants either from Russia or India.

India lost a great deal when Indian contribution/investment to SU30MKI had gone waste when all the subsequent variants of SU30 which Russia sold and which were based on the experience of developing SU30MKI did not help India gain any monetary benefits.

so this time India will make sure all ends r tied before committing to joint development of FGFA.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4DzTJpfLVc


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvJYSmplzXc

ISRO Rocket PSLV C37 Releasing 104 Satellites in space (recorded through onboard camera)




@Seened
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 12:32pm On Feb 17, 2017
nemesis2u:
Russia has said that the fifth generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) program that is being planned with India would be a 'completely new aircraft' and is not linked to Moscow's own new generation fighter, the Sukhoi T 50. In a detailed discussion, Russia's largest state holding company in the defence sector, Rostec has said that it is worrying that faster progress has not been made by the Indian side to finalise the project.

Russia is keen to differentiate the Indian project with its ongoing T 50 fighter jet program. "The Indian FGFA is not a copy cat of the T 50, it will be a new aircraft that will also have some technologies from the T 50. If India had wanted the T 50, we would not be working on a new aircraft (FGFA) program," Kladov (Director, International Cooperation, Rostec) said.

negotiations r now happening on Indian rights to IPR of FGFA or any of its derivatives and share from all possible exports either from Russia or India.

India lost a great deal when Indian contribution/investment to SU30MKI had gone waste when all the subsequent variants of SU30 which Russia sold and which were based on the experience of developing SU30MKI did not help India gain any monetary benefits.

so this time India will make sure all ends r tied before committing to joint development of FGFA.
the russians must be high on Volka.
why the u-turn.
every detail on the FGFA places it as a version of PAKFA.
the Russians are really confused
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:42pm On Feb 17, 2017
giles14:
the russians must be high on Volka.
why the u-turn.
every detail on the FGFA places it as a version of PAKFA.
the Russians are really confused
who would u believe online sources or people involved in PAKFA/FGFA ?

IAF was unhappy with some of the feature of PAKFA , they wanted radical changes plus incorporation of indian and israeli / french technology.

so only way to do that would be is to take the base structural design and adapt it to requirements.

another thing PAKFA is already developed , indians would learn jack shit from it, only way india can build on her expertise would be by building a new version from scratch , which will then contribute to AMCA and maybe LSA.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 12:49pm On Feb 17, 2017
nemesis2u:
CSIR and NAL developed HANSA3

does this remind anybody of another similar aircraft ? grin
any information about the specs and price?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:52pm On Feb 17, 2017
chinese8107:
any information about the specs and price?
dont have info on price / specs at the moment.

will post if i come across
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 1:01pm On Feb 17, 2017
AVIC

Leadair AG150/300

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:39pm On Feb 17, 2017
AESA radar UTTAM under development

1 2 3 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .