₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,568 members, 8,422,603 topics. Date: Monday, 08 June 2026 at 02:10 PM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (147) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1162497 Views)

1 2 3 ... 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:41pm On Apr 05, 2017
nemesis2u:
what is this ? grin grin grin grin
it is a hydro-acoustic noise maker to deter underwater "undesirables" can also kill divers at full power and short ranges it so configured cool
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 8:05am On Apr 06, 2017
nemesis2u:
shocked

india is reportedly seeking access to yasen technologies
Typical Ivan weapons system design philosophy:
-heavy missile load,those 8 missile silos each carrying 4 Kalibris comes to 32 missiles! I doubt any other sub comes close.
-the double hull vastly improves survivability and imo this thing can go deeper than official depth
-the mast housing the escape chamber

All these exemplify the combi of toughness and tech found in all Russian weapons from the Su 25 to the Ka 50
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:00pm On Apr 06, 2017
SR-10 Low Cost Jet Trainer from Russian KB-SAT design bureau

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:02pm On Apr 06, 2017
conti...................

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:10pm On Apr 06, 2017
DRDO on Wednesday successfully test-fired an anti-tank weapon CLGM having a strike range of 5 km from arjun tank at a defence test facility off Odisha coast.

The high explosive anti-tank weapon was fired from the indigenously developed Arjun tank in salvo mode against a decommissioned tank.

CLGM cannon launched guided missile


the box with a hole on the frontal armour contains the designation and guidance equipment

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
MRSAM a joint development between IAI and DRDO

it is a derivative of LRSAM which again is a joint development between IAI and DRDO

LRSAM is for navy

MRSAM is for army and airforce

MRSAM Design And Features
Each MRSAM weapon system comprises of one command and control system, one tracking radar, missiles, and mobile launcher systems. The mobile launcher is used to transport, emplace and launch up to eight canisterised missiles in two stacks. It can fire the missiles in single or ripple firing modes from the vertical firing position.
The combat management system simplifies the process of engaging a variety of threats. It identifies and tracks the threat using tracking radar. The system calculates the distance between the target and the launcher, and then determines if the identified target is a friend or a foe. The target information is, then, transmitted to the mobile launcher.
The weapon is 4.5m-long, weighs approximately 276kg, and is equipped with canards and fins for control and manoeuvrability.
Guidance And Warhead
The MRSAM missile is equipped with an advanced active radar radio frequency (RF) seeker, advanced rotating phased array radar and a bidirectional data link. The RF seeker, located in the front section of the missile, is used to detect moving targets in all weather conditions.
"The missile's explosive warhead, featuring a self-destruct fuse, provides high-probability of kill against enemy targets with minimal collateral damage."

The phased array radar provides a high-quality air situation picture, while the bidirectional data link is used for relaying midcourse guidance and target information to the missile. The missile's explosive warhead, featuring a self-destruct fuse, provides high-probability of kill against enemy targets with minimal collateral damage.
Performance of MRSAM Weapon
The MRSAM surface-to-air missile is powered by a dual-pulse solid propulsion system developed by DRDO.
The propulsion system, coupled with a thrust vector control system, allows the missile to move at a maximum speed of Mach 2. The weapon has the ability to engage multiple targets simultaneously at ranges of 70km.
Variants of DRDO's Surface-To-Air Missile
The MRSAM is a land-based configuration of the long-range surface-to-air missile (LRSAM) or Barak-8 naval air defence system, which is designed to operate from naval vessels.
The Indian Ministry of Defence is procuring an undisclosed number of MRSAM air defence systems to replace the Indian Army's ageing air defence systems.
Contractors Involved
Under a contract with DRDO, TATA Advanced Systems designed and manufactured combat management systems for the MRSAM programme at its research and development (R&D) facility in New Delhi, India.
Bharat Dynamics (BDL) was the lead integrator for the MRSAM missile systems. BDL established a new production facility in Hyderabad with an investment of $100m to manufacture both MRSAM and LRSAM missiles. When operational, the facility will have the capacity to produce 100 missiles a year.
Other contractors involved in the development of the MRSAM include Bharath Electronics (BEL), L&T, Elta, Rafael, and other private industries.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:39pm On Apr 06, 2017
kikuyu1:
Typical Ivan weapons system design philosophy:
-heavy missile load,those 8 missile silos each carrying 4 Kalibris comes to 32 missiles! I doubt any other sub comes close.
-the double hull vastly improves survivability and imo this thing can go deeper than official depth
-the mast housing the escape chamber

All these exemplify the combi of toughness and tech found in all Russian weapons from the Su 25 to the Ka 50
agree with u

though i have doubts with the double hull concept , single hull offer comparable performance at lower costs , i think its got to do more with the legacy of the design bureau
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:43pm On Apr 06, 2017
nemesis2u:
Bhim Tracked SPH

really fuuking shame angry angry angry

only SPH in the world to have advanced hydro pneumatic gas suspension

but no point in crying over spilled milk
Well, I know people who still cry as if the milk were spilt 2 seconds ago. And to then have their good name besmirched for over a decade! grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 3:12pm On Apr 06, 2017
nemesis2u:
LOOK AT THE ARMAMENTS OF of King Sejong the Great class South Korean destroyer


1 x 127 mm Mk45 main gun
1 x 30 mm Goalkeeper CIWS
1 x RAM (Rolling Airframe Missile) CIWS with 21 missiles
80 cell Mk41 VLS for SM-2 Blk III surface to air missiles with 150+ km range
16 x SSM700K anti-ship missiles with 150+ km range
48 cell K-VLS cells for a mixture of 32 Hyunmoo III land attack cruise missiles with 1000+ km range and 16 Red Shark anti-submarine rockets
2 x triple launchers for Blue Shark lightweight torpedoes

lol thats a fuuking loadout grin
putting Ticonderoga,Aegis DDG,Otago load out to shame
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:27pm On Apr 06, 2017
frumentius:
Well, I know people who still cry as if the milk were spilt 2 seconds ago. And to then have their good name besmirched for over a decade! grin grin grin
cool

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:37pm On Apr 06, 2017
General Dynamics European Land System's SIAC 155/52 caliber towed howitzer

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:45pm On Apr 06, 2017
atmos

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:48pm On Apr 06, 2017
L129A1 Sharpshooter Rifle

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:05pm On Apr 06, 2017
mig31 cockpit grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:06pm On Apr 06, 2017
T90 grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:08pm On Apr 06, 2017
iraqi take on MADMAX weaponry grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 8:11pm On Apr 06, 2017
nemesis2u:
LOOK AT THE ARMAMENTS OF of King Sejong the Great class South Korean destroyer


1 x 127 mm Mk45 main gun
1 x 30 mm Goalkeeper CIWS
1 x RAM (Rolling Airframe Missile) CIWS with 21 missiles
80 cell Mk41 VLS for SM-2 Blk III surface to air missiles with 150+ km range
16 x SSM700K anti-ship missiles with 150+ km range
48 cell K-VLS cells for a mixture of 32 Hyunmoo III land attack cruise missiles with 1000+ km range and 16 Red Shark anti-submarine rockets
2 x triple launchers for Blue Shark lightweight torpedoes

lol thats a fuuking loadout grin
who doesn't love big ships heh?? if you want something that destroys get a DESTROYER!!!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:28pm On Apr 06, 2017
lionel4power:
who doesn't love big ships heh?? if you want something that destroys get a DESTROYER!!!
Odunayaw:
putting Ticonderoga,Aegis DDG,Otago load out to shame
one important thing missing from this ship is the secondary volume search radar.

this means this ship will be dependent on external sources be it other naval ships fitted with the above or UAVs or AWACS for sniffing out targets.

looks like the south koreans gave a deep thought about this , swapping the secondary radar space for another VLS pack for land attack missiles and destined to operate optimally near the korean peninsular region only.

it will never venture on a expeditionary mission on a standalone basis that much is given, unless accompanied by the above mentioned assets.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:25pm On Apr 06, 2017
Pentagon officials have begun preparing for possible military strikes inside Syria as President Donald Trump has steadily ramped up rhetoric against Syrian President Bashar Assad in recent days.
So US can attack any country ?

http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/trump-says-assad-may-have-to-step-down-after-chemical-attack
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:34pm On Apr 06, 2017
tdayof:
So US can attack any country ?

http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/trump-says-assad-may-have-to-step-down-after-chemical-attack
I pray Amerika invades Syria “officially” so that ww3 can also become official grin cheesy grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 9:54pm On Apr 06, 2017
tdayof:
So US can attack any country ?

http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/trump-says-assad-may-have-to-step-down-after-chemical-attack
wot do u expect when the Russians are acting stupid in Syria
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:09am On Apr 07, 2017
just saying the chemical attack might be a ruse to invade syria same as the iraq invasion to remove iraqi WMD which never existed in the first place.

fuuking assholes r only going to strengthen the hand of jihadis worldwide.

look at the mess in iraq and libya and the Frankenstein they produced due to western intervention , America remains safe while the rest of the world suffers.

if assad falls ,jihadis will win the moral high ground worldwide, allowing them to assert more strongly.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:26am On Apr 07, 2017
grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:03am On Apr 07, 2017
nemesis2u:
just saying the chemical attack might be a ruse to invade syria same as the iraq invasion to remove iraqi WMD which never existed in the first place.

fuuking assholes r only going to strengthen the hand of jihadis worldwide.

look at the mess in iraq and libya and the Frankenstein they produced due to western intervention , America remains safe while the rest of the world suffers.


if assad falls ,jihadis will win the moral high ground worldwide, allowing them to assert more strongly.
Safe?
we're all suffering, just varying magnitude
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:09am On Apr 07, 2017
nemesis2u:
just saying the chemical attack might be a ruse to invade syria same as the iraq invasion to remove iraqi WMD which never existed in the first place.

fuuking assholes r only going to strengthen the hand of jihadis worldwide.

look at the mess in iraq and libya and the Frankenstein they produced due to western intervention , America remains safe while the rest of the world suffers.

if assad falls ,jihadis will win the moral high ground worldwide, allowing them to assert more strongly.
You think Russia will allow this? They don't seem to be on a particular side. Read somewhere that Russia gave out Syrian S300 IFF code to Israel grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:52am On Apr 07, 2017
nemesis2u:
just saying the chemical attack might be a ruse to invade syria same as the iraq invasion to remove iraqi WMD which never existed in the first place.

fuuking assholes r only going to strengthen the hand of jihadis worldwide.

look at the mess in iraq and libya and the Frankenstein they produced due to western intervention , America remains safe while the rest of the world suffers.

if assad falls ,jihadis will win the moral high ground worldwide, allowing them to assert more strongly.
I read 60 tomahawks Cruise missiles have been fired on Syrian government bases.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:27am On Apr 07, 2017
Zoharariel:
I pray Amerika invades Syria “officially” so that ww3 can also become official grin cheesy grin
One U.S. official told NBC that the Russians were warned ahead of the strike. Additionally, no Russian assets were targeted, according to the report

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/06/us-military-has-launched-more-50-than-missiles-aimed-at-syria-nbc-news.html
Russia has been lost in action for sometime now. Only issuing warning with zero action.

Even tho US dare not target Russian assets in Syria, her presence there makes no difference on Assad regime.

Giles14
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 5:59am On Apr 07, 2017
tdayof:
One U.S. official told NBC that the Russians were warned ahead of the strike. Additionally, no Russian assets were targeted, according to the report

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/06/us-military-has-launched-more-50-than-missiles-aimed-at-syria-nbc-news.html
Russia has been lost in action for sometime now. Only issuing warning with zero action.

Even tho US dare not target Russian assets in Syria, her presence there makes no difference on Assad regime.

Giles14
i read the second palmyra battle wey sponsored by Iran.

the Russians are too dull for my liking.
their aim na to only advertise their weapons.

if Assad fall Russia will be biggest n greatest loser not Iran or Hezbollah.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 6:05am On Apr 07, 2017
tdayof:
You think Russia will allow this? They don't seem to be on a particular side. Read somewhere that Russia gave out Syrian S300 IFF code to Israel grin grin
leave the Russians their are just irritating.it seems the mantle for the battle for Syria will be passed to Iran. but is Assad falls Russia loses big time.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 6:06am On Apr 07, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
I read 60 tomahawks Cruise missiles have been fired on Syrian government bases.
if it's true then let's wait for Russians response if it will every come
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 6:16am On Apr 07, 2017
giles14:
if it's true then let's wait for Russians response if it will every come
It's actually true. They launched tomahawks on Syrian base.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/tomahawk-missiles-explainer/http://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/06/us-military-has-launched-more-50-than-missiles-aimed-at-syria-nbc-news.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/07/donald-trump-launches-us-air-strikes-against-assad-regime-syria/#update-20170407-0606



As usual, Russia response goes thus :
A senior Russian politician has stated that military cooperation with the US could end as a result of this morning's air strikes.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:17am On Apr 07, 2017
darn got hauled up.....still


i may not be here 2 years from now,

but i would like u to remember my opinion that many in Africa, Asia will be fighting street to street with jihadists/fundamentalists as a direct/indirect fallout if assad goes down.

i will no longer comment on this issue......



remember big countries play big games embarassed
1 2 3 ... 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .