₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,331,042 members, 8,448,343 topics. Date: Monday, 20 July 2026 at 08:39 AM

Toggle theme

Analysts Downplay Effectiveness Of MOAB Strike - Foreign Affairs - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsAnalysts Downplay Effectiveness Of MOAB Strike (367 Views)

1 Reply

Analysts Downplay Effectiveness Of MOAB Strike by Streetcurb(op): 6:05pm On May 07, 2017
The “mother of all bombs” dropped on Islamic State militants in Afghanistan last month may not have been as effective as U.S. military officials have led on, analysts studying the airstrike said.


Alcis, an institute for geographical analysis, surveyed the targeted area in the Nangarhar province where the largest non-nuclear bomb ever used in combat was used, The Guardian reported Friday. The group determined that 38 buildings and 69 trees were destroyed in a near 500-foot radius, which contradicts statements made by residents who told local media the bomb damages houses up to two miles away.


The group added that the imagery shows no 1,000-foot crater and that much of the damage done appeared to be caused by ground fighting....

http://www.streetcurb.com/2017/05/07/analysts-downplay-effectiveness-of-moab-strike/
Re: Analysts Downplay Effectiveness Of MOAB Strike by Aphrygian(m): 8:16am On May 08, 2017
Streetcurb:
The “mother of all bombs” dropped on Islamic State militants in Afghanistan last month may not have been as effective as U.S. military officials have led on, analysts studying the airstrike said.


Alcis, an institute for geographical analysis, surveyed the targeted area in the Nangarhar province where the largest non-nuclear bomb ever used in combat was used, The Guardian reported Friday. The group determined that 38 buildings and 69 trees were destroyed in a near 500-foot radius, which contradicts statements made by residents who told local media the bomb damages houses up to two miles away.


The group added that the imagery shows no 1,000-foot crater and that much of the damage done appeared to be caused by ground fighting....

http://www.streetcurb.com/2017/05/07/analysts-downplay-effectiveness-of-moab-strike/
Multiple Afghanistan military and government officials told Fox News last week that there simply was no other solution but to opt for the MOAB, as the vast array of planted landmines was making it next to impossible to effectively clear ISIS from the area without enduring severe soldier casualties.
"This bomb was a good thing. It destroyed everything. ISIS can't use that area anymore, so that is the success," said Maj. Abadullah Karimi, spokesperson for the 202nd Shamshad Police Corps, which is operating in those ISIS-infiltrated areas of Nangahar Province.
Capt. William Salvin, a U.S. military spokesman in Kabul, defended the use of the MOAB saying it was used for a “specific tactical purpose on the battle field. Is it only me that feels this op didnt read the article he was quoting cos by this article the MOAB was very effective.
1 Reply

Bernie Sanders Denies Gender Downplay StatementTrump: US 'Targeting' 52 Iranian Sites, To Strike If Iran Attacks US AssetsTime Is Running Out For Trump’s North Korean Diplomacy, Analysts Say234

Triangle Of Terrorism And The #manchesterbombing:Nigeria Take Note: Pakistani PM Resigns Over S’ Court VerdictTension As North Korea Fires Ballistic Missile Over Japan