₦airaland Forum

In a victory for the Trump administration, the Supreme Court on Monday lifted key components of an injunction against President Trump's proposed ban on travel from six majority-Muslim nations, reinstating much of the policy and promising to hear full arguments as early as this fall.

The court's decision means the justices will now wade into the biggest legal controversy of the Trump administration — the president's order temporarily restricting travel, which even Trump has termed a "travel ban."

The court made clear that a limited version of the policy can be enforced for now.

Protesters opposed to President Trump's travel ban wave signs during a demonstration. (AP)



An American individual or entity that has a bona fide relationship with a particular person seeking to enter the country as a refugee can legitimately claim concrete hardship if that person is excluded,” the court wrote. “As to these individuals and entities, we do not disturb the injunction. But when it comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance tips in favor of the Government’s compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.”






http://www.streetcurb.com/2017/06/26/breaking-news-high-court-reinstates-key-parts-of-trump-travel-ban-to-rule-on-case-in-october/

Streetcurb:
In a victory for the Trump administration, the Supreme Court on Monday lifted key components of an injunction against President Trump's proposed ban on travel from six majority-Muslim nations, reinstating much of the policy and promising to hear full arguments as early as this fall.

The court's decision means the justices will now wade into the biggest legal controversy of the Trump administration — the president's order temporarily restricting travel, which even Trump has termed a "travel ban."

The court made clear that a limited version of the policy can be enforced for now.

Protesters opposed to President Trump's travel ban wave signs during a demonstration. (AP)



An American individual or entity that has a bona fide relationship with a particular person seeking to enter the country as a refugee can legitimately claim concrete hardship if that person is excluded,” the court wrote. “As to these individuals and entities, we do not disturb the injunction. But when it comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance tips in favor of the Government’s compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.”






http://www.streetcurb.com/2017/06/26/breaking-news-high-court-reinstates-key-parts-of-trump-travel-ban-to-rule-on-case-in-october/

Supreme Court, not high court.

Bad News For Yoruba Muslim's...
Dan Iskas