Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (256) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Foreign Affairs › Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1165742 Views)
1 2 3 ... 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:10pm On Sep 12, 2017 |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:11pm On Sep 12, 2017 |
nemesis4u:Will these be replaced by the P-8 Poseidon? |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:32pm On Sep 12, 2017 |
jakeporeshenko:yes already done they could have used it for longer but spares/support/maintenance was getting too costly/difficult |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:56am On Sep 13, 2017 |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:56am On Sep 13, 2017 |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:30am On Sep 13, 2017 |
drdo fully Integrated EMP Hardened Missile Control Centre (MCC) for Interceptor Missile (Programme AD).
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:34am On Sep 13, 2017 |
Looking elegant
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:39am On Sep 13, 2017 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9VN4sXJbTo old video of NAG atgm testfire lol the missile is big relative to the tank and the hit at 90 degree as shown at 1.45s is really good a top attack mode does not necessarily mean capability to hit at 90 degree or so therefor 90 degree hit is a good capability to have considering nag is a Lock-On-Before-Launch LOBL atgm without operator guidance ie fire and forget while HELINA is a Lock-on-After-Launch LOAL atgm which allows the operator to choose the point of impact on the target via the 2-way RF command-and-video data link. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 9:01am On Sep 13, 2017 |
nemesis4u:Dah fuq!? India doesn't have the tech to manufacture their own? I don't think so. Nemesis4u,what's the real deal? |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 9:26am On Sep 13, 2017 |
The Beretta 92 on the way out-finally! This 9 milly replaced the 7 decade long .45 for political reasons. Italy insisted it was their price for continued US bases on their land. Frankly,the pistol also had shocking reliability issues: In a 2006 report on U.S. infantry weapon reliability, the M92 scored at the bottom compared to the M4 carbine, M16 rifle, and M249 squad automatic weapon. In every category, from handling to accuracy to maintainability, the M92 came in dead last—or tied for last. Twenty-six percent of soldiers polled reported their weapon jammed while shooting at the enemy. Forty-six percent reported they didn't have confidence in their pistol's reliability.http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a21102/army-air-force-closer-to-selecting-new-handgun/ Dayummmmm..you literally take your life in your hands shooting at bad guys with a 92. Its no surprise Deltas,SEALS and Marine force recon still use the original 1911 .45 The modular Sig 320 will now be the US armed forces side arm. It can be interchanged with 9mm and .40.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:44am On Sep 13, 2017 |
Vietnam Highspeed transport vessel, 25m long, 26 knots, manufactured by 189 shipyard, can be used as troop transporter
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:52am On Sep 13, 2017 |
..........................hawk i
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:58am On Sep 13, 2017 |
hawk i with locally upgraded systems
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:35pm On Sep 13, 2017 |
kikuyu1:1.does not have all the tech and the infrastructure like test ranges etc required to build a predator type drone 2.u cannot leap technology , it is progressive , every bit of existing technology has to be tested operationally on a existing platform and this takes lot of time before jumping up the next tech scale. 3.experience and confidence to built high performance drones is inherent to a high tech military civilian industrial complex capability spanning various specialized domains. without it nobody can indigenously build drones . 4.almost all the components systems sub systems of a drone must adhere to mil spec standards ie nato/us standards/certifications . this requires extensive knowledge testing, facilities and experience. 5.unless u develop a drone approaching the capability range of a predator (some of the parameters atleast) and operationalize it , it will be very difficult to develop go forth to design a predator type drone. 6.shoestring budgets and political apathy will always hamper development 7.immediate user requirements will sometimes necessitate import of drones , so no other alternative as local products developed first time will always take time. etc there r alternate ways to leap frog technology eg. china -cloning / stealing which in turn requires massive budget and resources and not feasible for most of the countries like ind... therefor u got to import and maybe if somebody is smart , he will examine one of the imported drones little to closely and then hopefully gain enough insight to expedite their own drone development. ![]() drdo lab was budgeted only 50 million dollars to develop ATGMs ![]() no point guessing how much was budgeted for drone development ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:45pm On Sep 13, 2017 |
India finally to buy the Japanese ShinMaywa US-2i amphibious aircraft in a deal worth $1.30 billion for the Navy
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 1:32pm On Sep 13, 2017 |
nemesis4u:I thought the Japanese sell no military equipment |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:10pm On Sep 13, 2017 |
Tdayof
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:11pm On Sep 13, 2017 |
Wing long-II assembly
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 7:19pm On Sep 13, 2017 |
jakeporeshenko:Nigeria should have gone for this aircraft. The Pakistanis are making issues annoying. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:03pm On Sep 13, 2017 |
tdayof:Do you think there’s still hope for this aircraft in NAF service ? Before the mig29 story I thought there was hope. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:27pm On Sep 13, 2017 |
jakeporeshenko:That mig-29 story sounds like a future project to me. To me any news from DHQ or NAF shouldn't be considered serious except if there's an official report on it. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:30am On Sep 14, 2017 |
Odunayaw:they changed their policy to some extent they offered their sub in the Australian tender might do the same in the Indian tender japan in my opinion must militarize this will lead to much greater stability in Asia |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:52am On Sep 14, 2017 |
Gripen turns aggressor Saab has unveiled a new Gripen concept at the ongoing DSEI 17 in London. The Gripen Aggressor, is based on the Gripen C airframe, with a Gripen D-based two-seater an option. The Aggressor proposal is optimised for its mission and would not have live weapons capability. Instead, it would have a simulation-based capability to fire air-to-air missiles, and its gun. The aircraft would also gain Saab's PS-05 Mk IV radar and an air combat manoeuvring instrumentation pod, while retaining its intra-Gripen fighter link and Link 16 functionality. The program is aimed at getting rid of ‘‘negative-value’’ air combat training, in which modern aircraft fight against either the same type of aircraft, or against older and less-capable types. By offering dissimilar-type training against modern aircraft, it gives maximum training value, allowing pilots to ‘‘train as they fight’’. The Gripen Aggressor proposal is being aimed at providing a high-end ‘Red Air’ adversary aircraft and proposed as a solution for the UK's air support to defence operational training (ASDOT) requirement, and part of the US Air Force's adversary air (ADAIR) opportunity.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:01am On Sep 14, 2017 |
DRDO Trawl during trials
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:23am On Sep 14, 2017 |
DRDO new armor solutions involving Metal-Ceramic Sandwich Armor. The ballistic experiment will consist of 0.5m x 0.5m Metal-Ceramic Armor Panels. Metal = High Nitrogen Steel (HNS) recently developed by DRDO Ceramic = Silicon Carbide (SiC)
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:32am On Sep 14, 2017 |
drdo modular charges flexible linear shaped charges rigid cutting charges
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:45am On Sep 14, 2017 |
it seems india will procure total of 30 of US 2i amphibious aircraft ShinMayWa 12 of these aircrafts in flyaway condition. Another 18 will be produced in India via TOT damn 30 of these for SAR only or will it be retrofitted with weapons/EW equipment's locally these aircraft have a range of 4,500km the Japanese cut down the price of the aircraft's due to reluctance from the Indians over its high cost each costs around 100+ million dollars
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:57am On Sep 14, 2017 |
Ukraine Debuts «Fantom» Unmanned Tactical Vehicle with Anti-tank Missile System at IDEX 2017
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:49am On Sep 14, 2017 |
IAF MIG21 BISON
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:49am On Sep 14, 2017 |
...........
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:56am On Sep 14, 2017 |
.........................
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:57am On Sep 14, 2017 |
rajput class destroyers
|
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump • Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. • @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday • 2 • 3 • 4
Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live • American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! • Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)


