₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,072 members, 8,424,866 topics. Date: Thursday, 11 June 2026 at 05:57 PM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (260) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1163416 Views)

1 2 3 ... 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:50pm On Sep 16, 2017
zen technologies training aids

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:53pm On Sep 16, 2017
russian and american ships tango......

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:20pm On Sep 17, 2017
Boeing Defense Leonardo MH-139 N603SH helicopter promoted with FLIR sensor, winch and guns.

Huey Replacement

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 2:16pm On Sep 17, 2017
nemesis4u:
zen technologies training aids
The tin can near the ejector looks like a cartridge catcher! Pls explain the purpose.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:11pm On Sep 17, 2017
kikuyu1:
The tin can near the ejector looks like a cartridge catcher! Pls explain the purpose.
what u said is correct
shell catcher
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:03am On Sep 18, 2017
nemesis4u:
i might have a idea as to how ur UAV will look like grin

Proposed range 1100km
is that ferry range ?

with GCS los range will be always around 300km or so

with satcom / relay uav this will expand to anywhere u want , which satellites will u use, leased terminals ?

should have really stolen that laptop of urs grin grin grin

good luck to u and ur team, doing something like this at such a young age is really commendable cool

and good luck to lionel4power too

lolzzz at ur age i was working as a stone mason/plumber/carpenter grin grin grin
Yes ferry range 1100km with GCS just as mentioned. The satcome stuff is still being reviewed so.bu the end of oct i shoild knpw hpw that will go..data link stuff seems to be expensive imagine something like 10$ per data.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:07am On Sep 18, 2017
UAH by a Chinese company founded Jan 2016.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:12am On Sep 18, 2017
UaV by the same company.

They also showcase 2 UAVs at the Expo.
TA001 MTOW 1200 kg, Endurance 24h,
TB001 MTOW 2800 kg, Endurance 35h.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 5:44pm On Sep 18, 2017
tdayof:
UAH by a Chinese company founded Jan 2016.
In case we get FACs that can't hold helos, this would be a good buy
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:41pm On Sep 19, 2017
guess which country

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 5:59pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
guess which country
I......
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Xbee007(m): 6:05pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
guess which country
North Korea, Indonesia or Japanhuh grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:15pm On Sep 19, 2017
Xbee007:
North Korea, Indonesia or Japanhuh grin grin
they r holding INSAS rifles

it is India
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:41pm On Sep 19, 2017
interesting read.............................

NSA Spying On India’s Ballistic Missile Systems And Nuclear Weapons


Long before India detonated a nuclear device in May 1974, the U.S. Intelligence Community was monitoring and analyzing Indian civilian and military nuclear energy activities as we reported earlier. Unclassified Top Secret documents show that as early as 1958 the CIA was exploring the possibility that India might choose to develop nuclear weapons. The reports focus on a wide range of nuclear related matters – nuclear policy (including policy concerning weapons development), reactor construction and operations, foreign assistance, the tests themselves, and the domestic and international impact of the tests.

Documents from 1974-1975 and 1998 provide assessments of the reason why the U.S. Intelligence Community failed to provide warning of the 1974 and 1998 tests – assessments which are strikingly similar. They also include recommendations to address the deficiencies in performance that the assessments identified.


New documents from the Snowden Archive – The SIDtoday Files recently released by The Intercept give a glimpse into one such NSA interception program. SIDtoday is the internal newsletter for the NSA’s most important division, the Signals Intelligence Directorate. After editorial review, The Intercept is releasing nine years’ worth of newsletters in batches, starting with 2003. The agency’s spies explain a surprising amount about what they were doing, how they were doing it, and why.

A series of nuclear weapons tests conducted by India in the spring of 1998 took the intelligence community by surprise, prompting an internal investigation into why these tests had not been foreseen; a subsequent report was harshly critical of the U.S. intelligence community. A similar lapse in data gathering would not happen again in 2005.

In October 2004, one signals intelligence program, “RAINFALL,” “successfully geolocated signals of a suspected Indian nuclear weapons storage facility.” In response, several other parts of the NSA collaborated to confirm that the signals were related to Indian nuclear weapons, and to begin a new collection effort that revealed “spectacular” amounts of intelligence on India’s nuclear weapons capabilities.


An Australian NSA site, RAINFALL, isolated a signal it suspected was associated with an Indian nuclear facility, according to SIDtoday. Collaboration between RAINFALL and two NSA stations in Thailand (INDRA and LEMONWOOD) confirmed the source of the signals and allowed for the interception of information about several new Indian missile initiatives. Although these missile systems did not come to public attention for several more years (the Sagarika submarine-launched ballistic missile was first tested in 2008), the NSA’s access to these signals gave them foreknowledge of their Third Party SIGINT partner’s actions.

Below is the Top Secret SIDtoday report New Collection Access Yields ‘Spectacular’ Intel.

S3 branch and a field facility achieve breakthrough on Indian net (TS//SI)
One recent SIGINT success against India’s Nuclear Weapons Development Program exemplifies the Agency’s new environment of cross-program collaboration in satisfying intelligence needs. This is a great example of SIGINT programs working together to achieve a common goal. In October 2004, RAINFALL successfully geolocated signals of a suspected Indian nuclear weapons storage facility. This prompted a Foreign Satellite (FORNSAT) collection facility, LEMONWOOD, and the Unidentified Signal and Protocol Analysis Branch (S31124) at NSA to collaborate in isolating these signals and, through signals development, confirm their content as related to Indian nuclear weapons. This breakthrough highlighted the need to deploy additional demodulating equipment to LEMONWOOD in order to expand a modest collection effort undertaken since the signal was discovered in October.

Immediately after fielding this equipment, collection of this new network began to provide what is being called “spectacular” activity. Exploitation of that collection revealed India’s first-ever SAGARIKA Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) launch; DHANUSH sea-launched Short Range Ballistic Missile (SRBM); and pilotless target aircraft.

Collection from this new access has also provided significant intelligence on India’s possession of two different types of airdropped bombs, one believed to be a very large Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) bomb of an unidentified type. The other, not yet confirmed by the analytic community, may be a new generation of airdropped nuclear weapons.

LEMONWOOD has sustained access to satellite communication links : (information blacked out). The FORNSAT Division is working with the site and the Trans-Asia Product Line (S2A4) to expand collection against this high-priority network.

While the collection that resulted from interagency collaboration has been categorized as spectacular, what is most impressive is the growing trend of collaboration seen across the entire Agency. What were once technological challenges are now collaboration opportunities that offer the promise of a seamless, interoperable and responsive National Security Agency.

It should also be remembered that the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States installed a super spy software named APPARITION in New Delhi, as we reported earlier. The APPARITION program pinpoints the locations of people accessing the Internet across sensitive locations. Subsequent actionable intelligence information may lead to sending lethal Reaper drones to eliminate the target. The Top Secret reports speak of an SCS surveillance unit being set up in the embassy campus in New Delhi that operated under the codename DAISY. However, the Indian Government has not responded or is yet to make a statement regarding this Embassy Espionage.

As can be seen from the classified intelligence documents itself that the US Intelligence community was highly concerned about its failure to detect India’s Nuclear tests in advance. The Community after identifying and assessing the deficiencies in performance that led to this failure made recommendations to determine what steps should be taken to reduce the chances of a similar failure in the future.

What were those steps taken by the US Intelligence community to track India’s Nuclear program? The above case is just one such example. Are the ongoing killings of India’s scientists around the country since decades a continuation of such policies? Was the crash of Air India Flight 101 near Mont Blanc in which Homi Bhabha was also travelling a direct result of such steps? Is the Indian Intelligence community aware about those steps? If so, have they prepared a strategy and taken appropriate steps to counter such spying activities and covert operations targeting India’s Nuclear program? If not, a good place to start would be to open a fresh investigation into the assassination of the father of our Nuclear program – Homi Bhabha.

http://www.eurasiareview.com/170920...tic-missile-systems-and-nuclear-weapons-oped/

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
http://greatgameindia.com/embassy-espionage-top-secret-nsa-spy-hub-in-new-delhi/

another interesting website on ci/a ns/a activities all around the world
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:50pm On Sep 19, 2017
reality is always harsh

so any loony bin covert idiot who claims this covert.... that covert.......

feel free to shove his Alice in wonderland shiiiit right on his face
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 6:54pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
reality is always harsh

so any loony bin covert idiot who claims this covert.... that covert.......

feel free to shove his Alice in wonderland shiiiit right on his face
grin grin


Who vex you grin someone help me with his food pictures cheesy
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 7:00pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
reality is always harsh

so any loony bin covert idiot who claims this covert.... that covert.......

feel free to shove his Alice in wonderland shiiiit right on his face
grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:02pm On Sep 19, 2017
tdayof:
grin grin


Who vex you grin someone help me with his food pictures cheesy
grin

i am cool

no wahala

the posts above gives u an idea of the technical superiority of the Americans across the EM spectrum

in today's age the key to victory is information

without fighting u can win wars if u can access the relevant information

the only way is disrupt the American superiority is via quantum mechanics and if ur belligerent via EW not the convention type though
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:09pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
interesting read.............................

NSA Spying On India’s Ballistic Missile Systems And Nuclear Weapons


Long before India detonated a nuclear device in May 1974, the U.S. Intelligence Community was monitoring and analyzing Indian civilian and military nuclear energy activities as we reported earlier. Unclassified Top Secret documents show that as early as 1958 the CIA was exploring the possibility that India might choose to develop nucle/ar weapons. The reports focus on a wide range of nuc/lear related matters – nuc/lear policy (including policy concerning weapons development), reacto/r construction and operations, foreign assistance, the tests themselves, and the domestic and international impact of the tests.


In October 2004, one signals intelligence program, “RAINFALL,” “successfully geolocated signals of a suspected Indian nu/clear weapons storage facility.” In response, several other parts of the NSA collaborated to confirm that the signals were related to Indian nucl/ear weapons, and to begin a new collection effort that revealed “spectacular” amounts of intelligence on India’s nuc/lear weapons capabilities.


Collection from this new access has also provided significant intelligence on India’s possession of two different types of airdropped bombs, one believed to be a very large Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) bomb of an unidentified type. The other, not yet confirmed by the analytic community, may be a new generation of airdropped nucl/ear weapons.

What were those steps taken by the US Intelligence community to track India’s Nu/clear program? The above case is just one such example. Are the ongoing killings of India’s scientists around the country since decades a continuation of such policies? Was the crash of Air India Flight 101 near Mont Blanc in which Homi Bhabha was also travelling a direct result of such steps? Is the Indian Intelligence community aware about those steps? If so, have they prepared a strategy and taken appropriate steps to counter such spying activities and covert operations targeting India’s Nucl/ear program? If not, a good place to start would be to open a fresh investigation into the assassination of the father of our Nuclear program – Homi Bhabha.

http://www.eurasiareview.com/170920...tic-missile-systems-and-nuclear-weapons-oped/
i dont know if u guys realized or not
but i had posted a pic of a ind/ian air dropped nucl/ear bomb here grin

also i know which suspected In.. nucle/ar weapons storage facility they r talking about.

anyways in chess, sometimes to save the king u have to sacrifice the pawn and hope for the best
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:21pm On Sep 19, 2017
@biralee

i see u here often grin

but u dont seem to participate

dont feel shy grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m):
nemesis4u:
i dont know if u guys realized or not
but i had posted a pic of a ind/ian air dropped nucl/ear bomb here grin

also i know which suspected In.. nucle/ar weapons storage facility they r talking about.

anyways in chess, sometimes to save the king u have to sacrifice the pawn and hope for the best
when I play chess I never sacrifice two pawns; The one in front of my rook and that in front of my queen
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:04pm On Sep 19, 2017
it seems XRSAM testfire is slated for end of this year

the system will consist of 2 types of SAM

one with a range of 250km

another one with a range of 400km

these missiles will have active radars as their seekers

concurrently a GaN based UHF radar and a long range FCR radar is being developed to support these systems
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:05pm On Sep 19, 2017
Odunayaw:
when I play chess I never sacrifice two pawns; The one in front of my took and that in front of my queen
what is took huh rook

i play chess in local lingo

anyways first rule of chess

never have any rules wink

u opponent will always figure it out

today maybe, tomorrow maybe, in the future maybe
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:10pm On Sep 19, 2017
Here's an image of the test assembly for the drdo pulse detonation engine which has an operating frequency of 24 hz.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 8:11pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
what is took huh

i play chess in local lingo

anyways first rule of chess

never have any rules wink

u opponent will always figure it out

today maybe, tomorrow maybe, in the future maybe
Rook*

my rule ; Be confident in your defence, the opponent would give you an opening for attack
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:14pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
grin

i am cool

no wahala

the posts above gives u an idea of the technical superiority of the Americans across the EM spectrum

in today's age the key to victory is information

without fighting u can win wars if u can access the relevant information

the only way is disrupt the American superiority is via quantum mechanics and if ur belligerent via EW not the convention type though
No one is stopping the Americans anytime soon.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
drdo latest anti mine trawl

this one also has a electro- magnetic device (EMD)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:27pm On Sep 19, 2017
tdayof:
No one is stopping the Americans anytime soon.
let me tell u this with some degree of conviction

the refugee crisis in Europe, many blame it on me/rkel but she was forced

Europe will spend the next 50 years dealing with the refugee problems

america/n will never tolerate weakening of dollar , hint euro was being propped up as a alternative

u control economy -> u control information -> u control everything

as long as dollar remains the currency of trade , U/S economy will remain strong and hence influensive

only way ame/rica can fall is like that of USSR ie internally

even china is not a option our studies show africa/central asia will suffer most -the long term loans will bite back very hard

very short sighted measures on the part of the African governments

sri lanka , maldives etc r the best case studies of recent days to understand this. ru kidding me 100 years lease to wipe of loan debts , after 100 years what will remain ?

anyways internal matters is not my business , just saying my mind
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:33pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
let me tell u this with some degree of conviction

the refugee crisis in Europe, many blame it on me/rkel but she was forced

Europe will spend the next 50 years dealing with the refugee problems

america/n will never tolerate weakening of dollar , hint euro was being propped up as a alternative

u control economy -> u control information -> u control everything

as long as dollar remains the currency of trade , U/S economy will remain strong and hence influensive

only way ame/rica can fall is like that of USSR ie internally

even china is not a option our studies show africa/central asia will suffer most -the long term loans will bite back very hard

very short sighted measures on the part of the African governments

sri lanka , maldives etc r the best case studies of recent days to understand this. ru kidding me 100 years lease to wipe of loan debts , after 100 years what will remain ?

anyways internal matters is not my business , just saying my mind
Is the US forcing polices on her allies?

Still wonder how these sovereign nations are too clingy onto US rules. Israel seems to be the only one here capable of freeing herself from some US policies.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:35pm On Sep 19, 2017
Odunayaw:
Rook*

my rule ; Be confident in your defence, the opponent would give you an opening for attack
u can be confident in ur defence becz ur just playing a game of chess

will u have the same confidence if ur life and that of ur countrymen r hanging on it ?

u wont........

specifically and not necessarily "a winner is never dependent on the moves of his opponent" grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 8:45pm On Sep 19, 2017
nemesis4u:
u can be confident in ur defence becz ur just playing a game of chess

will u have the same confidence if ur life and that of ur countrymen r hanging on it ?

u wont........

specifically and not necessarily "a winner is never dependent on the moves of his opponent" grin
I was speaking about chess specifically

However I think that thought was from Sun Tzu or so
but who cares about philosophy when shit hits the fan
1 2 3 ... 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .