₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,059 members, 8,424,763 topics. Date: Thursday, 11 June 2026 at 03:12 PM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (288) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1163339 Views)

1 2 3 ... 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:25pm On Nov 03, 2017
tdayof:
I still love this jet. Wish we could get a squadron.
2 squadrons should be optimal

whats is the official strength for a naf squadron along with attrition / replacement if any
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:26pm On Nov 03, 2017
American KKV no pics available for drdo KKV

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:30pm On Nov 03, 2017
IAF SU30K in america during red flag ex.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:31pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
2 squadrons should be optimal

whats is the official strength for a naf squadron along with attrition / replacement if any
Odunayaw, jakesporeshenko come and answer.


To me, I feel having 24 + 12 J10 will be a good combination.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:31pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
don't angry me grin grin grin
I heard this in a Bollywood movie grin (Although I wasn't seeing it per se)
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:31pm On Nov 03, 2017
................

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:32pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
IAF SU30K in america during red flag ex.
Seems there was an ex where you guys landed on highway? Alot of aircrafts was in for the ex
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:32pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
one reason why fighter aircraft's should land in airfields only grin
shocked Machine porn
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:34pm On Nov 03, 2017
....

Someone once wrote an article and tagged it "NOT YOUR FATHER'S FLANKER"

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:34pm On Nov 03, 2017
tdayof:
, come and answer.

To me, I feel having 24 + 12 J10 will be a good combination.
Read a NAF PDF file dating back to 2004 which give it at between 12-16
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:35pm On Nov 03, 2017
Odunayaw:
I heard this in a Bollywood movie grin (Although I wasn't seeing it per se)
if thats true bleeping bollywood must have stolen the line from me grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
IA T90

note the tool boxes on the ERA panels grin grin grin

it will fun if an enemy ATGM got defeated by the tool boxes ,

the enemy gunner will be really pissed

lol might even end up dead in bargain due to the flying tools knocking him out grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:39pm On Nov 03, 2017
tdayof:
Seems there was an ex where you guys landed on highway? Alot of aircrafts was in for the ex
and from the pics it seemed half of indi.a turned up to watch it grin

whoa whoa what do u mean by you guys

how many times do i have to prove my alien credentials angry
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:44pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
and from the pics it seemed half of indi.a turned up to watch it grin

whoa whoa what do u mean by you guys

how many times do i have to prove my alien credentials angry
Anil Dhasmana is that you grin grin


Been getting error trying to submit your full name. grin


I hereby declare you MR Kumar
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:54pm On Nov 03, 2017
tdayof:
Anil Dhasmana is that you grin grin


Been getting error trying to submit your full name. grin


I hereby declare you MR Kumar
to defend by alien name

i hereby declare you MR mumu grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:56pm On Nov 03, 2017
.................

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:58pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
dont angry me angry grin
Someone should add his favorite pictures.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:58pm On Nov 03, 2017
....


B-2 bomber

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:59pm On Nov 03, 2017
........

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:01pm On Nov 03, 2017
tdayof:
....


B-2 bomber
grin grin grin

ur enemies r going to sue ur ass
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:04pm On Nov 03, 2017
CE2F Chariot

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:26pm On Nov 03, 2017
copy paste.....

DRDO Electro Magnetic Rail Gun

DRDO's 12 mm square bore electro-magnetic railgun (EMRG) has been tested. Another 30 mm square bore EMRG is also ready for tests. According to DRDO, their target is to accelerate a 1 kg projectile to a velocity of more than 2000 m/s with a capacitor bank of 10 MJ.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 6:58pm On Nov 03, 2017
tdayof:
....

B-2 bomber
grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:02pm On Nov 03, 2017
SUBATOMIC EVENT MORE POWERFUL THAN A HYDROGEN BOMB shocked shocked shocked shocked

Two teeny tiny particles can theoretically collide to create a "quarksplosion" with eight times more energy than the reaction that powers hydrogen bombs, according to a new paper published in the journal Nature. In fact, the paper's co-authors told Live Science, they very seriously considered not publishing the discovery, since the collision creates so much energy.

Let's make one thing very clear: This is all theoretical work, although it's based on real experimental results from the Large Hadron Collider, a particle-smashing machine in Europe. And while it's a pretty cool discovery to think about, there's no way anyone can harness these powerful explosions to do any harm—they're simply too tiny.

"If I thought for a microsecond that this had any military applications, I would not have published it," Marek Karliner, a particle physicist at Tel Aviv University in Israel, told Live Science.

Large Hadron Collider on display at London's science museum.PETER MACDIARMID/GETTY IMAGES

The new paper was inspired by a discovery at the Large Hadron Collider earlier this year of what scientists call a "doubly-charmed" particle. Charmed doesn't mean it was blessed by a fairy godmother—it actually refers to one of the six different types of quarks. Quarks are a fundamental ingredient of matter that can't be broken down any further. But the six different types are all different sizes, and scientists hadn't realized that two charm quarks, which are relatively big, could be stuck together in the same particle. The doubly-charmed discovery made them reconsider that belief.

When Karliner and his co-author read about the Large Hadron Collider discovery, they wondered what sort of energy flow was involved when two charm quarks merged. Pieces of matter merge all the time: the same sort of phenomenon among four hydrogen atoms is what powers our sun, some power plants, and parts of modern nuclear bombs.

The interaction uses some energy to link the two quarks but also results in some energy being produced: about 12 megaelectronvolts (that's pretty tiny, about two-thirds the energy produced by an individual pair of hydrogen atoms fusing) for pairs of charm quarks, the scientists found.

Then, they decided to run the numbers with a different kind of large quark, bottom quarks, which are even heavier than charm quarks. And here's where the fireworks really went off: According to their calculations, two merging bottom quarks should release 138 megaelectronvolts of energy.

But unlike the hydrogen atoms found in bombs, bottom quarks are highly unstable, so it would be impossible to gather enough of them to create the chain reactions that allow bombs to harness fusion so dramatically. A bottom quark becomes a much less interesting, much less powerful up quark within a tiny fraction of a second. Not so explosive after all.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:41pm On Nov 03, 2017
it seems PAKFA program suffered a data breach , test data relating to PAKFA has been stolen and sold ,

anyways the person who did this has been caught
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:44pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
it seems PAKFA program suffered a data breach , test data relating to PAKFA has been stolen and sold ,

anyways the person who did this has been caught
big question is who got the data

americans ,europeans or the chinese grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 8:47pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
it seems PAKFA program suffered a data breach , test data relating to PAKFA has been stolen and sold ,

anyways the person who did this has been caught
James bond
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:49pm On Nov 03, 2017
Odunayaw:
James bond
the old one r the new one huh
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:29pm On Nov 03, 2017
frumentius:
Ah! There you are. To ease you gently into your lone sleep, and because you have such a fine appreciation of...erm...aviation beauty:
ok, i go to sleep now with these ladies in my dreams grin

sweet dreams to me cool cool cool

that lady is wow smiley smiley smiley

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:45pm On Nov 03, 2017
nemesis4u:
big question is who got the data

americans ,europeans or the chinese grin
For decades now, such things have been known to fall off a truck in Pretoria or Johannesburg. Wait, we don't have the funds to implement. Maybe thrown in as a sweetener to your wannabe/lesser rivals & neighbours seeing we're trying to sell them a whole bunch of stuff? grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 4:46am On Nov 04, 2017
frumentius:
For decades now, such things have been known to fall off a truck in Pretoria or Johannesburg. Wait, we don't have the funds to implement. Maybe thrown in as a sweetener to your wannabe/lesser rivals & neighbours seeing we're trying to sell them a whole bunch of stuff? grin grin grin
Business booming!!!

maybe that's the reason people don't wanna close shop. grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by overhypedsteve(m): 5:49am On Nov 04, 2017
nemesis4u:
one reason why fighter aircraft's should land in airfields only grin
what are you talking about? All I see here is a plane forcing itself on an underage bus.
1 2 3 ... 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .

Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)