Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA - Satellite TV Technology (312) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Entertainment › TV/Movies › Satellite TV Technology › Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA (3423454 Views)
1 2 3 ... 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 ... 2399 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by mank1234(m): 10:02pm On Nov 22, 2017 |
makavele:What I posted has been proven scientifically and not guess work. Recheck your physics or electrical theories. The net current is independent of the charge rate so long as there's a difference in current drawn and current put in. So no need to mention C10 or C20. In retrospect, your assumptions is more of guess work. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by kiekie1(m): 10:02pm On Nov 22, 2017 |
NiyiOmoIyunade:Please YOHAKO solar charge controllers have various specs & ratings ... I believe all mppt device comes with a user manual , he can simply send the nameplate/sticker of his own to ascertain further solutions here ! |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by makavele: 10:12pm On Nov 22, 2017 |
mank1234:People that know me know I am more of a practical man .. I will post a video tomorrow concerning this; at least not to argue but for knowledge purposes |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by mank1234(m): 10:22pm On Nov 22, 2017 |
makavele:Ok. Tomorrow will be here soon. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by Dam5reey(m): 11:22pm On Nov 22, 2017 |
makavele: Una don make me laugh tire... You are very correct ... The current flow at the cc is what the battery gets... The best way to divert load is connecting the load to the load side of the CC.. then there will be an aggregate Current going to be battery Cheers... ![]() |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by Dam5reey(m): 11:24pm On Nov 22, 2017 |
mank1234:Please show us the physics/scientific proof for your conclusion as well.. link/videos if possible.. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by zeestone99(m): 11:35pm On Nov 22, 2017 |
NiyiOmoIyunade:The controller is a funny controller... |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by zeestone99(m): 11:41pm On Nov 22, 2017 |
fernado56: |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by NiyiOmoIyunade(m): 1:41am On Nov 23, 2017 |
No magic in this thing - the OP can't have MPPT like performance with a 48v nominal battery bank if he has his panels setup as two 24v nominal panels in series - he needs a minimum of three 24v nominal panels in series to get sufficient array voltage to drive the controller's MPPT function - except his panels are the on-grid type with VmP & VoC above 40v and even then two panels would be a stretch. The best the user manual can tell us now is that he has a 150v or 180v capable controller and he can then simply change his panel config to 3 panels in series and begin to enjoy. ![]() kiekie1: |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by kiekie1(m): 2:58am On Nov 23, 2017 |
makavele:Lol , Oga u dey observe this thread too ? See link below ;https://www.nairaland.com/4166130/infinitikoncept-refused-released-goods/16 You must really be a practical man. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by kiekie1(m): 3:00am On Nov 23, 2017 |
NiyiOmoIyunade:Yeah, I stated same earlier ... Let's not totally ignore a clear snapshot of the mppt nameplate for technical reasons . shikena ! |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by JUO(m): 7:28am On Nov 23, 2017 |
some people are just bad from the womb. imagine selling 40a epever cc to someone, after receiving it he decided he doesn't want it again. I refunded him only him swap the cc I sent him and sent me scrap/dead cc.
|
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by JUO(m): 7:32am On Nov 23, 2017 |
Other sellers be wise |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by NiyiOmoIyunade(m): 7:46am On Nov 23, 2017 |
This is an interesting argument - much akin to three men feeling an elephant by touch and one who felt the sides decides the elephant is much like a wall, the one who felt the leg decides the elephant is like a tree while the guy who felt the tail decides the elephant is much like a rope. I think it's all a matter of perspective but I will wait to see how things pan out. mank1234: |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by NiyiOmoIyunade(m): 8:40am On Nov 23, 2017 |
So sorry bro! There will always be bad eggs like these whose wicked actions will want to make someone unnecessarily harsh on other good people. Just see if you can get him to send back the real thing peacefully and subsequent transactions only make refunds as seller after you have received your goods back in perfect condition. Your current model of trusting people and sending refunds ahead may be too good for the current Nigeria. JUO: |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by DUNKA(m): 9:17am On Nov 23, 2017 |
JUO:so ssd Please out the person so that other dealers do not fall into the same trap |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by DUNKA(m): 9:20am On Nov 23, 2017 |
House please a silly question If you go into float everyday on your system can one automatically assume that your batteries are being fully recharged everyday? |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by zeestone99(m): 9:37am On Nov 23, 2017 |
NiyiOmoIyunade:U r very correct @ bolded |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by makavele: 9:53am On Nov 23, 2017 |
kiekie1:Lol, i dey observe all ooo. That Subomi guy ehn, i no really understand am ... even people don offer to help him dey reject help ... na so I waka ohhh |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by makavele: 9:57am On Nov 23, 2017 |
DUNKA:You can assume so; yes; but do not be decieved by what the charge controller is telling you. . . The only way to know a battery's true state of charge is to check its S.G. ( specific gravity) This is why i want to delve into flooded batts now as against SMF batts |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by NiyiOmoIyunade(m): 10:14am On Nov 23, 2017 |
Yes you can assume so. However the reality in my experience is very different especially if you have your battery bank setup in series. All will be going well for a year or two and then bam!!! suddenly backup time drops and you check and realise one or two batteries are failing and weaker than the rest. This is the reason why when one changes out a battery bank of say four 12v batteries you will usually find two batteries that are still very good in the bank and one or two that are average/bad. Here is the thing - there is a fundamental assumption that when you receive say 4 brand new batteries of a given brand X they were all manufactured at about thesame time and from thesame batch, are all at the exact same state of charge and of roughly the exact same capacity - the reality is different with manufacturer variations within and across different batches, time in transit and storage with the attendant self discharge/loss of some charge or capacity, batteries from different batches and ages mixed together at the warehouse and then shipped to you when you purchase. The net effect is that the those four brand new batteries you receive are all very different internally and are at different chemical and electrical states. Assuming good manufacturer process quality and all are roughly thesame capacity, you may receive one battery at 97% state of charge, one at 89%, one at 92% and the last one at 80%. If you checked the voltage of all these batteries they would all test between 12.8 and 13.1 indicating a 'full charge' Cobble all these batteries together in series and fire up your inverter and the slow death begins. The battery with the highest state of charge gets full first and maybe the next highest, at this point your inverter senses the set absorb point is reached and shifts into float. In reality the two batteries with the lowest state of charge never get a full charge - when you discharge them, the fully charged ones give up their power and say you cutoff at 50%, the undercharged ones will cutoff more deeply discharged at say 30% power left - with each charge and discharge cycle the gap widens and the undercharged batteries get less and less of a full charge and sulfation slowly strangles them until when you realise that these batteries aren't performing as expected at which time it's usually too late. The answer is to charge each new battery fully before you put it into service especially in a series config. A 48v inverter thinks it is seeing one huge 48v battery and not four 12v batteries so the installer has to work to make sure the four 12v batteries are fully charged and are as closely matched to each other in capacity as possible. Every six months or so, isolate each battery again and give it the treatment > fully charge each battery > test capacity and select those batteries with capacity within thesame range > put back into service. According to the research done by Victron Energy for their battery balancers, a 2% variation in initial battery capacity and/or state of charge is sufficient to slowly kill the weaker batteries from undercharging and sulfation and the stronger ones from overcharging . These days I have gotten lazy as I grow into my old age so I would just occasionally switch my batteries from 4 in series to 4 in parallel and use a 12v inverter to charge and discharge them for like a week because I believe the batteries get closer to an equal charge in parallel. Where I wanna move to which is what I do now when clients have battery issues before warranty expiry is to clap a cheapo chinco 12v smart battery charger (Suoer) on each individual battery in a bank and let each one do it's work of giving a full charge to the battery it is connected to. No time to spend the whole day or pay multiple visits to any client ![]() At under 20k each I now have 4 of these chargers - may do more as time goes - so we can move to site and provide the treatment quickly without changing anything in the client's setup. Yes you can have a 48v inverter charging four batteries in series and still clamp on a 12v charger to each battery without issues so long as you do not mixup polarity. The Souer's absorb setpoint is 14.8volts so I just reduce the inverter setpoint to say 14.1 or 14.4volts during the treatment period so that the Souer does most of the charging and topping off. So that is how I do it! I am sure by now its obvious if you go through my posts that I have pretty strange ideas about how batteries behave and should be maintained. These are the conclusions I reached based on careful study and hands on experience with various battery banks. DUNKA: |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by NiyiOmoIyunade(m): 10:31am On Nov 23, 2017 |
Yes this is correct Boss. But you only have access to SG readings with flooded batteries and even then you go tire to dey check SG on a regular basis - all the hand flushing and equipment washing to rinse off the corrosive acid can become annoying Again SG and voltage measurements are indicators that your state of charge is within a particular range. They cannot tell you the exact state of each cell e.g on my US battery L16 flooded bank I get temperature adjusted SG readings between 1.275 and 1.295 across all cells when my batteries are fully charged. Yet if I run say my 2hp AC for like 8 hours its the battery with one cell at 1.295 that collapses first ![]() With all the charge in this world (my array can generate a max 75amps into a 360AH bank if I don't cap the output) I have not gotten the SGs to converge. In a moment of madness I even started siphoning electrolyte from the 1.295 cell into the weaker ones yet no joy ![]() So I settled for simply clapping an individual charger on each battery on a regular basis and keeping the water topped up. Flooded is good but as you would have seen from people's experiences on here with their Trojans and my own US Battery L16s, after a while things start to go south and they need ever more and more babysitting to keep them healthy. As it stands now, I have given up on lead acid, our salvation now seems to be Lithium with the promise of negligible or zero sulfation/loss of capacity even at 80% depth of discharge. makavele: |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by DUNKA(m): 11:11am On Nov 23, 2017 |
NiyiOmoIyunade: |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by DUNKA(m): 11:11am On Nov 23, 2017 |
NiyiOmoIyunade:thanks |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by bigrovar(m): 11:12am On Nov 23, 2017 |
makavele:This assumption is wrong in theory and in practise. Electricity flows from high potential to low potential. Scenario 1 If say your PV is producing 1000w and your load is using 1200w, 1000w goes from your CC to your load, and the reminder 200w is taken from the battery. Scenario 2 If your battery is full and your PV can potentially produce 1000w and your load is 1000w, the load from the PV goes straight to the inverter (Your battery is completely ignored.) Scenario 3 If your PV can potentially produce 1000w and your load is using 500w then 500w goes from PV to load and unused 500wh would become potentials. Scenario 4 if your battery is low and your PV is producing 800w but your load is using 800w,all 800w produced by the PV goes to the load. Non is left for the battery. Remember like I said, electricity moves from high potential to low potential.. The lowest potential in all the above scenario is the load, not the battery. The battery always has a higher potential than the load, The battery charger in this case the PV/CC has the highest potential (so long as we are using a proper charger with the right voltage) Its just against physics for a battery to draw electricity more than the load. The above is the theory. For the practical, I have a Victron Battery Monitor BMV 700 the BMV comes with a current shunt which is connected to negative of the battery, inverter DC input negative cable and Controller dc output negative cable. The positive cable of the BVM connects to the battery. The BMV monitors currents going into and out of the battery from the Inverter and CC. The BMV display shows gross net input and output to the battery hence 1 if my charge controller shows it is producing 24A and my load is 10A, the victron battery monitor shows 14A going into the battery. and this is confirmed by the battery voltage. If I turn off the 10A load, I see the BMV showing 24A going into the battery. If I turn off the CC, the BMV will show -10A being drawn from the battery. If my load is say 24A and CC is pulling 20A, the BMV shows -4A leaving the battery. This idea that all power from the cc first goes to the battery and the load pulls it from the battery is false and against the principle of how electricity works. when I have time over the weekend I will demonstrate the truth of this. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by bigrovar(m): 11:30am On Nov 23, 2017 |
NiyiOmoIyunade:The above is why I love flooded batteries. The ability to send equalising voltage cross all the batteries in the bank forcing all the cells to get higher voltage charge until you ensure (with the help of an hydrometer) that their voltage has been brought to an equilibrium, the ability to do this once a month means battery will never be allowed to be stuck in voltage imbalance for a long time. If you use a Valve regulated battery than your best bet is a battery balancer. And it is better to have batteries in series connections than parallel. Parallel connection are generally less efficient, more expensive to setup and are more prone to imbalance, even with the best battery to charge/load connection the different internal resistance of batteries are more pronounced with parallel than with series. With series connection you are dealing mostly with voltage imbalance, which can be dealt easily with battery balancer, with parallel imbalance is more current.. some batteries would do more of the work and get more of the charge (thanks to internal resistance) you can try to fix this using battery connection but it only mitigate the problem. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by makavele: 11:50am On Nov 23, 2017 |
NiyiOmoIyunade:FLA requires more babysitting and can tolerate more abuse . . and quite fortunately for me . . i love doing both !!! I am thinking Lithium too but I need to see more of it in action (live) and not hearsay before I even start to lose sleep over it. Our merciful colleague hasn't given us an in-depth review so far to enable me make a decision. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by jazzman2(m): 11:52am On Nov 23, 2017 |
bigrovar:This is the most practical and theoretically correct answer to the argument.! If you are into solar DIY and you don't have a basic electrical or electronics background ( either thru formal or informal learning), you will most definitely fail. There are tons of "electricity-for-dummys" books and materials online if you need help. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by Chuckdee(m): 11:52am On Nov 23, 2017 |
bigrovar:You are absolutely correct and I agree with all you wrote above and you are correct in each case scenario too. I hv Trimetric Battery monitor connected via a shunt that shows parameters such as Volt, AMPs in (+), AMPs out (-) and % full. Now when for example total AMP coming in from CC is showing 50Amps, and the load being consumed is about 20amps as shown on the magnum Inverter Monitor display, the amps in on the trimetric will be +30 Amps. |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by Chuckdee(m): 11:58am On Nov 23, 2017 |
makavele:The bolded is soo wrong and misleading. Please how do you then explain how people in advanced countries like US and Europe that are on reliable grid that almost never goes down but have Solar setups without a single battery bank and yet make use of energy generated by those panels??... lets not BOLDLY mislead newbies that come to this thread to learn ![]() |
| Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by makavele: 12:09pm On Nov 23, 2017 |
Chuckdee:Are you talking grid tie generation .. ? explain well, i dont understand you. |
UPS Back-up, Also A Complement To FTA • FTA Frequency • Cctv Installation A Complement To Fta And Solar Energy • 2 • 3 • 4
Free To Air Satellite Tv General Thread
Viewing this topic: saint2ace(m), twinskenny(m)

Please out the person so that other dealers do not fall into the same trap