PDPGuy:


The Chelsea v Barca matches are on February 20 and March 14.

For fun dear

diggz:


Ajuju....ibere....ask me again oga!! Keep creating excuses.....maybe if cfc kept Costa,bought sandro, naingollan instead of bakayoko or a world-class rwb we will be topping the league now OR if mourinho was able to ship out darmain,luke Shawn, had Sanchez instead of rashford etc he will be winning the epl by now or arsenal or spurs or liverpool.....all teams can submit useless excuses like what you just did above.....please make we hear word already with your excuses bros!

18match winning run in a useless epl local league abi? When he surpasses pelligrinis record by getting to ucl final or win the ucl with city, then you can come back here to vibrate like Nokia 3310.

Post. Successfully. Shifted.

Leyqute:


Post. Successfully. Shifted.

Bwuahahahaha

I dey learn work from Raumdeuter

Ibime:


Conte was out the moment he refused to extend his contract. It's only right for the board to shop for a replacement for Business Coninuity.

For a Chelsea fan to call for Contes head though, that fan needs his head checked.

i tire for some so called Chelsea fans.

Precisely two-thirds of the way through the Premier League season, Antonio Conte’s men deserve credit for achieving 14 victories from the 22 games today – the second highest in the top flight.

diggz:


Bwuahahahaha
I dey learn work from Raumdeuter

you dey learn well well

spartacus11:
Feb 13th: Chelsea vs Barcelona

Feb 24th: Man United vs Chelsea

Mar 3rd: Man City vs Chelsea

Mar 6th: Barcelona vs Chelsea

Mar 8th:Chelsea sacks Antonio Conte.

Lol

From twitter?

eph12:

From twitter?

Yes boss, laugh wan finish me

MoR2:
why you think say max allegri better pass Luis enrique

Aside Italian manager been naturally successful at chelsea, allegri comes as a better tactician than enrique whose exploit with MSN hasn't changed his status as a mediocre coach to me.

Greatihex:
i tire for some so called Chelsea fans.

They are disguising as chelsea fans, we know them. They are dayo's disciples.

Who agrees with this post below. The nigga spoke what i have been thinking for some time now.


[b]#SarriBall. I’m all up for it. Quick, brilliant, direct attacking play. That’s what we and Roman want. Don’t we? He’s done brilliantly with Insigne, Mertens and Callejon, imagine what he’d do with a significant upgrade with Hazard, Morata and Pedro (or maybe even Lemar/Fekir/Griezmann or someone of that calibre). The midfield is there with Kante, Barkley (he’d do well in this system rather then asked to defend first) and someone of the calibre of Arthur or Saul whom are also incredible in linkup play and quick transition, and a supporting cast of Bakayoko, Loftus Cheek/Drinkwater and Cesc and a back four of LB (preferably Shaw for me, quick, direct and sound defensively)- Christensen- Rudi- Azpi.

I love Conte but his decision making + style of play with his defence first mentality is draining especially with the attacking players we have. We have one the best players in football in Hazard yet we appoint defensive coaches, like why? He be a proper baller under an attacking coach and who else is available than Sarri? I get that the board ain’t supporting Conte in the market, but in reality I wouldn’t when his shopping list contains 60% defensive players and wants them at high prices!. Our defence is fine, the attack in toothless yet he wants Sandro and openly admitted he wanted VvD! When we have Christensen, Cahill, Zouma and Rudiger! In fact through the 3 and a half windows he’s had, we have signed 3 attacking players! whilst signing 4 defenders (Luiz, Alonso, Zappa and Rudi), calling back another two defender-ish (Christensen and Moses) whilst losing only three players in (Terry, Ivanovic and Ake). Adding three defensive midfielders to a very limited creative one, in Baka, Drinkwater and Kante. In fact we only spent money on two effing forwards! Morata and Michy! Two. In 3 and a half windows he recommends. Pre-Conte it was obvious we needed attacking players yet his list of recommendations had VvD and Sandro high up, another two defensive players! Yet Pedro and Willian who are creeping into their 30’s are yet to be replaced. I don’t blame the board at all when I see that much defensive players on the list when our problem isn’t defence.

Rant over. Get Sarri and I hope Conte resigns rather then gets the sacked, because I thoroughly thank him for last season, I hope he walks out with dignity, but his style of football is holding us back like Jose is holding United back[/b]

popizaino:
Aside Italian manager been naturally successful at chelsea, allegri comes as a better tactician than enrique whose exploit with MSN hasn't changed his status as a mediocre coach to me.

We are tired of defensive coaches like simeone, allegri, mou, conte.

Our team need an attacking evolution to move to the next level. And only unrepentant attacking managers can convince the board to take that next step as the only possible way.

Conte openly wanted VVD even with the overload of defenders we have, when the chelsea attack bar Hazard is a complete shit-show. You don't need a prophet to tell you that his player preferences are defensively minded.


And allegri is like a more flexible version of conte but still defensively minded.

Get sarri.

cstr1001:
Who agrees with this post below. The nigga spoke what i have been thinking for some time now.


[b]#SarriBall. I’m all up for it. Quick, brilliant, direct attacking play. That’s what we and Roman want. Don’t we? He’s done brilliantly with Insigne, Mertens and Callejon, imagine what he’d do with a significant upgrade with Hazard, Morata and Pedro (or maybe even Lemar/Fekir/Griezmann or someone of that calibre). The midfield is there with Kante, Barkley (he’d do well in this system rather then asked to defend first) and someone of the calibre of Arthur or Saul whom are also incredible in linkup play and quick transition, and a supporting cast of Bakayoko, Loftus Cheek/Drinkwater and Cesc and a back four of LB (preferably Shaw for me, quick, direct and sound defensively)- Christensen- Rudi- Azpi.

I love Conte but his decision making + style of play with his defence first mentality is draining especially with the attacking players we have. We have one the best players in football in Hazard yet we appoint defensive coaches, like why? He be a proper baller under an attacking coach and who else is available than Sarri? I get that the board ain’t supporting Conte in the market, but in reality I wouldn’t when his shopping list contains 60% defensive players and wants them at high prices!. Our defence is fine, the attack in toothless yet he wants Sandro and openly admitted he wanted VvD! When we have Christensen, Cahill, Zouma and Rudiger! In fact through the 3 and a half windows he’s had, we have signed 3 attacking players! whilst signing 4 defenders (Luiz, Alonso, Zappa and Rudi), calling back another two defender-ish (Christensen and Moses) whilst losing only three players in (Terry, Ivanovic and Ake). Adding three defensive midfielders to a very limited creative one, in Baka, Drinkwater and Kante. In fact we only spent money on two effing forwards! Morata and Michy! Two. In 3 and a half windows he recommends. Pre-Conte it was obvious we needed attacking players yet his list of recommendations had VvD and Sandro high up, another two defensive players! Yet Pedro and Willian who are creeping into their 30’s are yet to be replaced. I don’t blame the board at all when I see that much defensive players on the list when our problem isn’t defence.

Rant over. Get Sarri and I hope Conte resigns rather then gets the sacked, because I thoroughly thank him for last season, I hope he walks out with dignity, but his style of football is holding us back like Jose is holding United back[/b]

am with you my nigga,I just need a coach DAT won't play 5 defenders(because they rarely attack anyway),we are already being branded dayo's disciple.

atheist5:
am with you my nigga,I just need a coach DAT won't play 5 defenders(because they rarely attack anyway),we are already being branded dayo's disciple.

It is tiring, man.

Look at Napoli. They play beautiful attacking football even with relatively inferior players to chelsea.

How can we ever become elite when we keep employing defensive-minded managers.?

How can a coach be asking for VVD when his attacking play is teetering on average.

Conte wants sandro, vidal- all of them though world class are defensive players and it shows the mindset of our manager.

We need to start chasing the lemars, greizmann, fekirs, verratis of this world as our manager's first priority, not sandro, VVD or vidal. We can't even dominate possession against any decent team and we want to be elite.

How a proper attacking team like NAPOLI with an attacking manager works.
And they didn't have to spend hundreds of millions in a single transfer window either like mancity

https://www.theringer.com/platform/amp/2017/10/17/16487210/soccer-napoli-maurizio-sarri-dries-mertens-jorginho-exciting-serie-a

cstr1001:

It is tiring, man.

Look at Napoli. They play beautiful attacking football even with relatively inferior players to chelsea.

How can we ever become elite when we keep employing defensive-minded managers.?

How can a coach be asking for VVD when his attacking play is teetering on average.

Conte wants sandro, vidal- all of them though world class are defensive players and it shows the mindset of our manager.

We need to start chasing the lemars, greizmann, fekirs, verratis of this world as our manager's first priority, not sandro, VVD or vidal. We can't even dominate possession against any decent team and we want to be elite.

I just tire, imagine 5 defenders?,na that wan dey bust my head pass,his tactics leave just morata and hazard,make them just dey hustle on their own,I even think 4-3-3 would have suited this Chelsea side,but my guy just dey do rubbish

snowstormm:


chelsea fans plenty pass psg fan na...almost all barca wont vote for him

Lies

"Overrated IndecentStar Stormy Daniels begged me for sex in 2006. I said "NO" and gave her $130k a month before election for no reason" - from twitter.

Emaprince:
Mumu dey worry you.

If pep is such a magician, why was he scared of taking over a dead Chelsea team...which he even recommended 10 new players for.

Abeg with link show me where pep guardiola said that?

cstr1001:

We are tired of defensive coaches like simeone, allegri, mou, conte.

Our team need an attacking evolution to move to the next level. And only unrepentant attacking managers can convince the board to take that next step as the only possible way.

Conte openly wanted VVD even with the overload of defenders we have, when the chelsea attack bar Hazard is a complete shit-show. You don't need a prophet to tell you that his player preferences are defensively minded.


And allegri is like a more flexible version of conte but still defensively minded.

Get sarri.

I agree with you on everything except allegri been defensive.

cstr1001:
Who agrees with this post below. The nigga spoke what i have been thinking for some time now.


[b]#SarriBall. I’m all up for it. Quick, brilliant, direct attacking play. That’s what we and Roman want. Don’t we? He’s done brilliantly with Insigne, Mertens and Callejon, imagine what he’d do with a significant upgrade with Hazard, Morata and Pedro (or maybe even Lemar/Fekir/Griezmann or someone of that calibre). The midfield is there with Kante, Barkley (he’d do well in this system rather then asked to defend first) and someone of the calibre of Arthur or Saul whom are also incredible in linkup play and quick transition, and a supporting cast of Bakayoko, Loftus Cheek/Drinkwater and Cesc and a back four of LB (preferably Shaw for me, quick, direct and sound defensively)- Christensen- Rudi- Azpi.

I love Conte but his decision making + style of play with his defence first mentality is draining especially with the attacking players we have. We have one the best players in football in Hazard yet we appoint defensive coaches, like why? He be a proper baller under an attacking coach and who else is available than Sarri? I get that the board ain’t supporting Conte in the market, but in reality I wouldn’t when his shopping list contains 60% defensive players and wants them at high prices!. Our defence is fine, the attack in toothless yet he wants Sandro and openly admitted he wanted VvD! When we have Christensen, Cahill, Zouma and Rudiger! In fact through the 3 and a half windows he’s had, we have signed 3 attacking players! whilst signing 4 defenders (Luiz, Alonso, Zappa and Rudi), calling back another two defender-ish (Christensen and Moses) whilst losing only three players in (Terry, Ivanovic and Ake). Adding three defensive midfielders to a very limited creative one, in Baka, Drinkwater and Kante. In fact we only spent money on two effing forwards! Morata and Michy! Two. In 3 and a half windows he recommends. Pre-Conte it was obvious we needed attacking players yet his list of recommendations had VvD and Sandro high up, another two defensive players! Yet Pedro and Willian who are creeping into their 30’s are yet to be replaced. I don’t blame the board at all when I see that much defensive players on the list when our problem isn’t defence.

Rant over. Get Sarri and I hope Conte resigns rather then gets the sacked, because I thoroughly thank him for last season, I hope he walks out with dignity, but his style of football is holding us back like Jose is holding United back[/b]

funny. Who is this sarri? Is it the one that Pep's team beat home and away few months ago and was told that his team is the best to make his shame less for him?

Greatihex:
funny. Who is this sarri? Is it the one that Pep's team beat home and away few months ago and was told that his team is the best to make his shame less for him?

They ran city ragged attacking wise, but with a fraction of the attacking talent city has.

Imagine what sarri could do at chelsea.

cstr1001:

It is tiring, man.

Look at Napoli. They play beautiful attacking football even with relatively inferior players to chelsea.

How can we ever become elite when we keep employing defensive-minded managers.?

How can a coach be asking for VVD when his attacking play is teetering on average.

Conte wants sandro, vidal- all of them though world class are defensive players and it shows the mindset of our manager.

We need to start chasing the lemars, greizmann, fekirs, verratis of this world as our manager's first priority, not sandro, VVD or vidal. We can't even dominate possession against any decent team and we want to be elite.

can you show us the possession stats in our last match against arsenal, against atletico and against man united.

cstr1001:

They ran city ragged attacking wise, but with a fraction of the attacking talent city has.

Imagine what sarri could do at chelsea.

you mean he is even more attacking than the so all attacking Pep? Even with what Pep has at his disposal?

What did they have to show for the ragging man City attacking wise?

He will do nothing at Chelsea until he finish doing what he is doing at napoli.

Greatihex:
can you show us the possession stats in our last match against arsenal, against atletico and against man united.

United under Mou and atletico are ultra-defensive teams. Dominating possession against them is nothing special.

Arsenal is far from what i will call a decent team. If Chelsea had a truly attacking mindset against arsenal, we should have gotten atleast 4 points from them in the league.

Our last game against Arsenal, a 4-3-3 attacking formation would be the obvious choice for any decent attacking manager which would have been far productive, but no, our coach had to stick to his defensive formation, even with the obvious players arsenal were missing.

Look at our game against Roma in the UCL, home and away.

We played against a decent midfield and got blown away. We couldn't even string passes together for any long period.

And to make it worse, even Arsene Wenger the tactical dinosaur now knows how to counter the 3-4-3 and the 3-5-2 effectively.

Greatihex:
you mean he is even more attacking than the so all attacking Pep? Even with what Pep has at his disposal?

What did they have to show for the ragging man City attacking wise?

He will do nothing at Chelsea until he finish doing what he is doing at napoli.

Napoli have been the only team to give City a game this season. And with a fraction of the attacking talent city has, A FRACTION.
Even Pep had to anoint Sarri with his royal scepter.

Ofcourse, it would take a serious addition of talent for NAPOLI to win city in any given game.

Most teams including Chelsea not only lost against city but got thoroughly overplayed. That didn't happen against Napoli. They lost, but they went toe-toe against city.

Chelsea with far better and more expensive players than Napoli , but had to result to coward tactics against city all through the game and still lost.

cstr1001:

Napoli have been the only team to give City a game this season. And with a fraction of the attacking talent city has, A FRACTION.
Even Pep had to anoint Sarri with his royal scepter.

Ofcourse, it would take a serious addition of talent for NAPOLI to win city in any given game.

Most teams including Chelsea not only lost against city but got thoroughly overplayed. That didn't happen against Napoli. They lost, but they went toe-toe against city.

Chelsea with far better and more expensive players than Napoli , but had to result to coward tactics against city all through the game and still lost.

you get sense abeg,I.just tire for people,how many Chelsea fans can't see Conte's flaw just tire me,play azpi as the fifth defender against city still lost,if not for hazard people would realize Chelsea play stale football, no good team is reliant on one player to create a simple move,I just tire my brother

cstr1001:

United under Mou and atletico are ultra-defensive teams. Dominating possession against them is nothing special.

Arsenal is far from what i will call a decent team. If Chelsea had a truly attacking mindset against arsenal, we should have gotten atleast 4 points from them in the league.

Our last game against Arsenal, a 4-3-3 attacking formation would be the obvious choice for any decent attacking manager which would have been far productive, but no, our coach had to stick to his defensive formation, even with the obvious players arsenal were missing.

i was hoping to see this from you. Arsenal, Atm and man United are not decent teams.

Your problem is that you are frustrated that man City are top of the league and not Chelsea and you think conte is the convenient person to blame.

cstr1001:

Napoli have been the only team to give City a game this season. And with a fraction of the attacking talent city has, A FRACTION.
Even Pep had to anoint Sarri with his royal scepter.


Ofcourse, it would take a serious addition of talent for NAPOLI to win city in any given game.

Most teams including Chelsea not only lost against city but got thoroughly overplayed. That didn't happen against Napoli. They lost, but they went toe-toe against city.


Chelsea with far better and more expensive players than Napoli , but had to result to coward tactics against city all through the game and still lost.

the bolded are lies and show that you didn't watch the Chelsea vs City match.

Greatihex:
i was hoping to see this from you. Arsenal, Atm and man United are not decent teams.

Your problem is that you are frustrated that man City are top of the league and not Chelsea and you think conte is the convenient person to blame.

Unietd and atletico are decent. I didn't say otherwise, but their style of play makes it easy for any decent team to dominate possession against them.

My frustration is beyond City topping the league. It is a problem i have noticed for a long time now even before Pep came.

Chelsea have always hanged on that next tier level to elite status. We just need a little bit of attacking revolution to become elite and play like a Big club.

The likes of conte, simeone will not get us there.