Russian Military Provides List Of Targets, Details Of ‘repelled'Us-led Strike On Syria. Trump claims It Was ‘perfect

The Russian Defense Ministry says that the Syrian Air Defense Forces shot down 71 of 103 missiles launched by the US, the UK and France last night.

In line with the Russian Defense Ministry, the US and its allies fired cruise missiles, including seaborne Tomahawks and GBU-38 guided bombs from B-1B planes while F-15 and F-16 fighter jets launched air-to-surface missiles. The UK Air Force's Tornado aircraft fired eight Scalp EG air-launched cruise missiles.

The US-led strike was aimed at the following targets:

Four missiles were launched at the area of the Damascus International Airport. All these missiles were intercepted.
12 missiles were launched at the Al-Dumayr Military Airport. All these missiles were intercepted.
18 missiles were launched at the Bley Military Airport. All these missiles were intercepted.
12 missiles were launched at the Shayarat Military Airport. All these missiles were intercepted.
9 missiles were launched at the Mezzeh Military Airport. Five of them were intercepted.
16 missiles were launched at the Homs Military Airport. 13 of them were intercepted.
30 missiles were launched at targets in the areas of Barzah and Jaramani. Seven missiles were launched.

According to the Russian Defense Ministry, the facilities in the areas of Barzah and Jaramani were partly destroyed. The military added that these facilities had been for a long time abandoned and had not been invovled in the production of chemical weapons in contrary to the claims of the US-led coalition.

Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump continued his “smart missiles” story and described the last night strike as “perfectly executed”.
A video from the Mezzeh military airbase:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Srkva9gSxzI

it wasn't repelled. all d missiles struck their target.tune in to cnn right now.don't believe Russians fake news

hupp

Obainoneandonly:
it wasn't repelled. all d missiles struck their target.tune in to cnn right now.don't believe Russians fake news

CNN of all news ? CNN is fake news and even Trump confirmed that so many times. The general said some of the 'Ballistic trajectory' were intercepted and also confirmed that no Russian S-300 or S-400 were fired. Meaning only Syrian S-200 intercepted their missiles in 'ballistic trajectory'

Russian has listed there own side. I believe the Russians more here.

Watch one of the missiles intercepted bellow. This is not a lie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvDEV-4z01I

jnhmaxxwell:


CNN of all news ? CNN is fake news and even Trump confirmed that so many times. The general said some of the 'Ballistic trajectory' were intercepted and also confirmed that no Russian S-300 or S-400 were fired. Meaning only Syrian S-200 intercepted their missiles in 'ballistic trajectory'

Russian side has listed their side. I believe the Russians more here.

CNN fake news?what of BBC,aljazera are they all fake news.tune into any of dem now and watch wats going on

even d general showed satalite feeds,to show d impact of d strike...and for all ave seen,it was a success

Obainoneandonly:
it wasn't repelled. all d missiles struck their target.tune in to cnn right now.don't believe Russians fake news

They only struck facilities in Barzah and Jaramani. Now these supposed chemical facilities have already been evacuated and abandoned preemptively. So of course, they didn't bother to defend it. Most of the others were repelled so the Syrian military is still intact.

These military strikes look like a sham. There have been no casualties for 103 airstrikes.

Mille:


They only struck facilities in Barzah and Jaramani. Now these supposed chemical facilities have already been evacuated and abandoned preemptively. So of course, they didn't bother to defend it. Most of the others were repelled so the Syrian military is still intact.

These military strikes look like a sham. There have been no casualties for 103 airstrikes.

they took precautions to avoid civilian casualties, and generally McKenzie showed a satalite feed showing d damages don.and he said all d missiles they fire hit their intended target

Obainoneandonly:
they took precautions to avoid civilian casualties, and generally McKenzie showed a satalite feed showing d damages don.and he said all d missiles they fire hit their intended target

Did general show any video of the missile strike ?

See the video of one of the missiles shut down by Syrian S-200. I think about Four intercepts in just this one clip.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvDEV-4z01I
See it above yourself without one thing one general said. First was at mark 0.07

Mille:


They only struck facilities in Barzah and Jaramani. Now these supposed chemical facilities have already been evacuated and abandoned preemptively. So of course, they didn't bother to defend it. Most of the others were repelled so the Syrian military is still intact.

These military strikes look like a sham. There have been no casualties for 103 airstrikes.

. Equipment in those facilities and sites are not easily movable. All fighter aircrafts went back to base after successfully hitting their target. This mission was successful.

Obainoneandonly:
they took precautions to avoid civilian casualties, and generally McKenzie showed a satalite feed showing d damages don.and he said all d missiles they fire hit their intended target

What do you expect "them" to say. That they failed? ALL the missiles DIDN'T hit their targets. But of course, some did.

I'm not debating if they hit the targets or not. But something sounds fishy when there are more than 100 airstrikes on MILITARY targets and there are no casualties, either Syrian or Russian at a time when the said military is at war with others.

Or you expect me to believe these sites will just be left unguarded and there won't be any Syrian or Russian military personnel at these MILITARY facilities when they are at war with Terrorists?

It shows these military strikes is a sham.



Conspiracy theorists can help us out.

Mille:


What do you expect "them" to say. That they failed? ALL the missiles DIDN'T hit their targets. But of course, some did.

I'm not debating if they hit the targets or not. But something sounds fishy when there are more than 100 airstrikes on MILITARY targets and there are no casualties, either Syrian or Russian at a time when the said military is at war with others.

Or you expect me to believe these sites will just be left unguarded and there won't be any Syrian or Russian military personnel at these MILITARY facilities when they are at war with Terrorists?

It shows these military strikes is a sham.



Conspiracy theorists can help us out.

if there were Russians or Syrian casualties, will they tell you

Mille:


What do you expect "them" to say. That they failed? ALL the missiles DIDN'T hit their targets. But of course, some did.

I'm not debating if they hit the targets or not. But something sounds fishy when there are more than 100 airstrikes on MILITARY targets and there are no casualties, either Syrian or Russian at a time when the said military is at war with others.

Or you expect me to believe these sites will just be left unguarded and there won't be any Syrian or Russian military personnel at these MILITARY facilities when they are at war with Terrorists?

It shows these military strikes is a sham.



Conspiracy theorists can help us out.

both Syria and Russia knew the target of the strikes and thus evacuated all personnel beforehand. the sites were within areas strongly held by the Syrian government. why the hell would they send soldiers to guard sites that are about to be blown up and within Territory firmly in their control. use common sense please.

according to the u.s. sec of defense, none of the missle fired by the u.s. were intercepted and all hit their targets. can't speak for Britain and France though.
the goal of the operation was to diminish assad's chemical weapon program and avoid any civilian casualties. based on reports, the targeted sites were destroyed or severely damaged and there were no fatalities. I would call that a rousing success.
the u.s. used JASSMs which are smart, stealth missles with range over 300 to 1000 kilometers. none of their planes even needed to get near Syrian airspace.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM

it's called precision, mate.

JUHABACH:


both Syria and Russia knew the target of the strikes and thus evacuated all personnel beforehand. the sites were within areas strongly held by the Syrian government. why the hell would they send soldiers to guard sites that are about to be blown up and within Territory firmly in their control. use common sense please.

according to the u.s. sec of defense, none of the missle fired by the u.s. were intercepted and all hit their targets. can't speak for Britain and France though.
the goal of the operation was to diminish assad's chemical weapon program and avoid any civilian casualties. based on reports, the targeted sites were destroyed or severely damaged and there were no fatalities. I would call that a rousing success.
the u.s. used JASSMs which are smart, stealth missles with range over 300 to 1000 kilometers. none of their planes even needed to get near Syrian airspace.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM

it's called precision, mate.

Please check out the video I have shared above. In the first video I shared above. I don't believe in anything anyone says except it's live. This new video bellow was even taken close to the day break. The strike was a complete sham.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvDEV-4z01I

If 71 missiles could be shut down, fighter jet has zero chance.

jnhmaxxwell:


Please check out the video I have shared above. In the first video I shared above. I don't believe in anything anyone says except it's live. This new video bellow was even taken close to the day break. The strike was a complete sham.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnwR8oA3y6g

If 71 missiles could be shut down, fighter jet has zero chance.

>sends me a video on repeat showing a few missles intercepted
>somehow thinks that equates to 71 missles.

you don't believe anything except it's live right?

why don't you give use live pics of those facilities to prove they are still intact.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/14/footage-shows-destroyed-chemical-weapon-research-facility-syrian/

https://syria.liveuamap.com/en/2018/14-april-more-photos-showing-extent-of-damage-following-strikes


the u s. used bombers to deploy the missles btw (the B1 lancer). not fighter jets. and definitely not their high end stealth jets.

JUHABACH:


>sends me a video on repeat showing a few missles intercepted
>somehow thinks that equates to 71 missles.

you don't believe anything except it's live right?

why don't you give use live pics of those facilities to prove they are still intact.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/14/footage-shows-destroyed-chemical-weapon-research-facility-syrian/

https://syria.liveuamap.com/en/2018/14-april-more-photos-showing-extent-of-damage-following-strikes


the u s. used bombers to deploy the missles btw (the B1 lancer). not fighter jets. and definitely not their high end stealth jets.

You actually expect all the intercepted ones to be on video right ? These videos were uploaded by civilians and you have a lot of them on the net.

You can do the math, it's very simple. 103 -71 = 32 probably were not intercepted by Syrian S-200. Some for sure hit target, no one is disputing that but to say all of the missiles hit target is a pure lie.

Someone said it above and I agree with what he or she says. If all their military industrial complex combined with France and U.K. could be made inefficient by Syrian missile defense system, shooting down 71 illegal Missiles by any international norms then they really need re-consider what they call military industrial complex. It's a Sham ! That is what I am getting at.

Syrian defense forces have repelled the attacks. This is similar to the surprise attack in Iraq that saturated the Iraqi air defense. Syria has repelled these attacks. I think Russian MOD is now considering selling S-300 to Syrians.

jnhmaxxwell:


You actually expect all the intercepted ones to be on video right ? These videos were uploaded by civilians and you have a lot of them on the net.

You can do the math, it's very simple. 103 -71 = 32 probably were not intercepted by Syrian S-200. Some for sure hit target, no one is disputing that but to say all of the missiles hit target is a pure lie.

Someone said it above and I agree with what he or she says. If all their military industrial complex combined with France and U.K. could be made inefficient by Syrian missile defense system, shooting down 71 illegal Missiles by any international norms then they really need re-consider what they call military industrial complex. It's a Sham ! That is what I am getting at.

Syrian defense forces have repelled the attacks. This is similar to the surprise attack in Iraq that saturated the Iraqi air defense. Syria has repelled these attacks. I think Russian MOD is now considering selling S-300 to Syrians.

if it's a sham, then show me the facilities targeted still intact. it's that simple. satellite maps and even Syrian state media shows the facilities were destroyed.
let russia sell s300 or even s400 to the Syrians so that we can finally know how far.
and lol, they couldnt even get their story straight. first they were saying 13. all of a sudden it's 71. lol.

JUHABACH:


if it's a sham, then show me the facilities targeted still intact. it's that simple. satellite maps and even Syrian state media shows the facilities were destroyed.
let russia sell s300 or even s400 to the Syrians so that we can finally know how far.
and lol, they couldnt even get their story straight. first they were saying 13. all of a sudden it's 71. lol.

It was 13 counts and then 21 until this morning that everything was counted. The attack lasted 50minutes. You expect them to have counted it even before the attacks ended ?


The new US concept of a “perfect” mission: 32 out of 103

Yup, he said “mission accomplished“, “perfectly executed” and that he was “so proud” of his “great military“.

That considering that 71 out of 103 missiles were intercepted.
That there were no Syrian (or Iranian or Russian) fatalities.
That not a single airfield was hit.
That the buildings destroyed were empty.
That only Syrian air defense were used.
That Russian air defenses were completely bypassed.
This guy:

Called the strikes “Precise, overwhelming and effective” (does he also look like an alcoholic to you?)

Finally, and this is weird, there is no evidence of the French doing anything at all (go figure?). Oh, speaking of the French, it appears that they warned the Russians about what would happen. So, technically speaking, the US generals are being truthful when they say that they did not warn the Russian but just “deconflict”. The French did all the warning for them.

As for that pathetic scorecard, the Pentagon “spokesperson” said that they had noticed a 2000% increase of “Russian troll” activity over the past 24 hours.

No kidding!

I would think that completely destroying a non-existing Syria chemical warfare capability could even be called a “infinite success”.

Let’s wait for further details (a lot of pro-Syrian outlets did exaggerate the number of missiles shot down) but it appears that the AngloZionist went for the “least bad” option in terms of risk for our planet: a symbolic and completely useless “pretend strike”. And for that I am personally grateful. Let’s hope that, at least for a while, they need to establish their “indispensableness” will be satisfied.

I also think that the Russians need to dramatically increase both the speed and the magnitude of the delivery of their air defense systems to the Syrians. One Russian general remarked this morning that they were considering delivering S-300s to the Syrian. I guess that is better a case of better late than never. But the one system most needed are Pantsirs. The Russians need to built then on an emergency 24/7 schedule and deliver as many and as fast as possible as they are much better suited for the kind of tasks (cruise missile point defense) than the much larger S-300s.

One more thing: all this pathetic Disney-like show is a shame and a disgrace. The USA as truly sunk to the level of the kind of degeneracy shown by Brezhnev in his last years or by Eltsin. Frankly, I think that Trump is even more of a buffoon than these two. What a disgrace!

[Sidebar: as for those bitching about Trump being as bad as Hillary, this is both true and false. Inherently yes, of course, he is. And he is far dumber than her. But getting him in the White House bought Russia (and Syria) about 1 year of time to prepare for what happened yesterday. So, no matter how sub-pathetic Trump is, keeping the Neocons away from power for a year or so bought some very precious time for the rest of the planet. That is a good thing even if Trump himself is a maniacal coward, a narcissistic piece of shit and dangerous buffoon of the worst kind]

Also, I want to comment on one more thing. Even the two arch-villains of our official historiography, that would be Hitler and Stalin, compare favorably to Trump in terms of a) actually using diplomacy and b) trying to build alliances. Yes, I know, both Hitler and Stalin did use force (and even false flags!), but force was ONE of the the tools in their international relations toolkit. At least both Hitler were capable of negotiations and the building of alliances. The clowns in the White House can’t even do that.

Yes, sorry if that offends anybody, but US Presidents have now sunk even lower than Hitler, Stalin, Brezhnev or Eltsin.

So ask yourself: what awaits them and their regime in the future?

The Saker

russian lies and propaganda and russia is scared of providing syria with the S300 because it would fail in battle and nobody would want to buy them.they have never been tested in battle

jnhmaxxwell:


It was 13 counts and then 21 until this morning that everything was counted. The attack lasted 50minutes. You expect them to have counted it even before the attacks ended ?


The new US concept of a “perfect” mission: 32 out of 103

Yup, he said “mission accomplished“, “perfectly executed” and that he was “so proud” of his “great military“.

That considering that 71 out of 103 missiles were intercepted.
That there were no Syrian (or Iranian or Russian) fatalities.
That not a single airfield was hit.
That the buildings destroyed were empty.
That only Syrian air defense were used.
That Russian air defenses were completely bypassed.
This guy:

Called the strikes “Precise, overwhelming and effective” (does he also look like an alcoholic to you?)

Finally, and this is weird, there is no evidence of the French doing anything at all (go figure?). Oh, speaking of the French, it appears that they warned the Russians about what would happen. So, technically speaking, the US generals are being truthful when they say that they did not warn the Russian but just “deconflict”. The French did all the warning for them.

As for that pathetic scorecard, the Pentagon “spokesperson” said that they had noticed a 2000% increase of “Russian troll” activity over the past 24 hours.

No kidding!

I would think that completely destroying a non-existing Syria chemical warfare capability could even be called a “infinite success”.

Let’s wait for further details (a lot of pro-Syrian outlets did exaggerate the number of missiles shot down) but it appears that the AngloZionist went for the “least bad” option in terms of risk for our planet: a symbolic and completely useless “pretend strike”. And for that I am personally grateful. Let’s hope that, at least for a while, they need to establish their “indispensableness” will be satisfied.

I also think that the Russians need to dramatically increase both the speed and the magnitude of the delivery of their air defense systems to the Syrians. One Russian general remarked this morning that they were considering delivering S-300s to the Syrian. I guess that is better a case of better late than never. But the one system most needed are Pantsirs. The Russians need to built then on an emergency 24/7 schedule and deliver as many and as fast as possible as they are much better suited for the kind of tasks (cruise missile point defense) than the much larger S-300s.

One more thing: all this pathetic Disney-like show is a shame and a disgrace. The USA as truly sunk to the level of the kind of degeneracy shown by Brezhnev in his last years or by Eltsin. Frankly, I think that Trump is even more of a buffoon than these two. What a disgrace!

[Sidebar: as for those bitching about Trump being as bad as Hillary, this is both true and false. Inherently yes, of course, he is. And he is far dumber than her. But getting him in the White House bought Russia (and Syria) about 1 year of time to prepare for what happened yesterday. So, no matter how sub-pathetic Trump is, keeping the Neocons away from power for a year or so bought some very precious time for the rest of the planet. That is a good thing even if Trump himself is a maniacal coward, a narcissistic piece of shit and dangerous buffoon of the worst kind]

Also, I want to comment on one more thing. Even the two arch-villains of our official historiography, that would be Hitler and Stalin, compare favorably to Trump in terms of a) actually using diplomacy and b) trying to build alliances. Yes, I know, both Hitler and Stalin did use force (and even false flags!), but force was ONE of the the tools in their international relations toolkit. At least both Hitler were capable of negotiations and the building of alliances. The clowns in the White House can’t even do that.

Yes, sorry if that offends anybody, but US Presidents have now sunk even lower than Hitler, Stalin, Brezhnev or Eltsin.

So ask yourself: what awaits them and their regime in the future?

The Saker

DUDE HAVE YOU TAKEN YOUR MEDICATIONS TODAY

what the US did was, They launched a “small strike without big consequences, because they understood that Russia would not let them crush Syria.” with Russia still firmly in Syria, no strike from The west can affect strike

here you go

trump should know this is not a video game, he wouldn't want russia, iran and Turkey to mix into this mess. The u.s should target only Syrian bases

unknownsolja:
here you go

SATELLITE IMAGERY SHOWS AFTERMAH OF “76 MISSILES” STRIKE ON SYRIA’S BARZEH SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH COMPLEX

Check it out, you need 76 missiles to strike and destroy SYRIA’S BARZEH SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH COMPLEX ?
Please that alone has destroyed the western Narrative! How can you send 76 missiles to destroy what you see in that photo you shared ?

What Russia has detailed above were the real targets those missiles aimed at and they managed to shoot down 71 of those missiles. If SYRIA’S BARZEH SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH COMPLEX was well defended like the bases then the Syrian S-200 would have repelled the SYRIA’S BARZEH SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH COMPLEX attack as well.


ImageSat International released satellite photos showing an aftermath of the April 14 US-led strike on the so-called “Barzah Research and Development Center” in Syria.

According to the Pentagon, the US and its allies launched 76 missiles at this center and all the missiles hit the target.

imagesatintl
@imagesatint
Three main buildings were #destroyed as a result of the #strike at #Barzah #SSRC Research and Development Center #Damascus #Syria #Syriastrikes @FoxNews

22:55 - 14 Apr 2018


According to the photos, all three buildings of the facility were destroyed. According to Syrian sources, this facility has been mostly abandoned before the US-led strike.

Some experts question the need of 76 missiles to destroy three “abandoned” buildings.

The US said that this facility had been an active place where the the Syrian government was recently producing chemical weapons. The Syrian government and Russia reject this claim by saying that chemical stockpiles controlled by the government have been destroyed and the production of chemical weapons has not been resumed.

On April 14, the US, the UK and France launched 105 cruise and air-launched missiles on targets in Syria [According to initial estimates 103 missile]. Currently, there are two conflicting versions of the events:

@jnhmaxxwell - Pls stop replying these kids. Intelligent & enlightened folks worldwide have already analyzed & dissected this event and picked out the lies & the truth from the narrative of both sides.

We have 2 accounts of the attack in Syria, diametrically opposed to each other. Obviously, one side is lying, one is telling the truth, but thanks to the irunmoles, we already know the state that is synonymous with lies & propaganda.

Heck, even the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) - a direct MI6 asset, based in the UK, through their men on ground in Syria - confirmed Russia's claim to have shot down the vast majority of the missiles.

Yesterday, I replied one of Trump's tweets on twitter, calling him a brain-dead, lying, pussy-grabbing nematode for lying to the world. I then included one of the youtube video links showing how the Syrian S-200 were intercepting his "new & smart" useless tomahawk cruise-missiles.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnwR8oA3y6g

Guess what? This morning, that video was removed from Youtube. But unfortunately for them, that video is just one of many videos uploaded on Youtube by Patriotic Syrians to debunk Trump & his war-mongering Generals lies that all their missiles hit the target. Here's another one below:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1EOTIaKwLo

If all the coalition missiles hit all their target as the MSM is touting, then who owns these missiles that were being intercepted by the Syrian Air Defenses as seen in this video above?

Amerika: "All missiles hit their targets".

Common Sense: So, 71 missiles were programmed to hit Syrian Air Defense missiles in the air. And the British missiles were programmed to hit a field in the countryside. Probably the Syrian Government grew "chemical weapons" there - Lying bastards!

Zoharariel:
@jnhmaxxwell - Pls stop replying these kids. Intelligent & enlightened folks worldwide have already analyzed & dissected this event and picked out the lies & the truth from the narrative of both sides.

We have 2 accounts of the attack in Syria, diametrically opposed to each other. Obviously, one side is lying, one is telling the truth, but thanks to the irunmoles, we already know the state that is synonymous with lies & propaganda.

Heck, even the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) - a direct MI6 asset, based in the UK, through their men on ground in Syria - confirmed Russia's claim to have shot down the vast majority of the missiles.

Yesterday, I replied one of Trump's tweets on twitter, calling him a brain-dead, lying, pussy-grabbing nematode for lying to the world. I then included one of the youtube video links showing how the Syrian S-200 were intercepting his "new & smart" useless tomahawk cruise-missiles.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnwR8oA3y6g

Guess what? This morning, that video was removed from Youtube. But unfortunately for them, that video is just one of many videos uploaded on Youtube by Patriotic Syrians to debunk Trump & his war-mongering Generals lies that all their missiles hit the target. Here's another one below:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1EOTIaKwLo

If all the coalition missiles hit all their target as the MSM is touting, then who owns these missiles that were being intercepted by the Syrian Air Defenses as seen in this video above?

Amerika: "All missiles hit their targets".

Common Sense: So, 71 missiles were programmed to hit Syrian Air Defense missiles in the air. And the British missiles were programmed to hit a field in the countryside. Probably the Syrian Government grew "chemical weapons" there - Lying bastards!

YABA LEFT RUNAWAY KID..WELCOME O

unknownsolja:



YABA LEFT RUNAWAY KID..WELCOME O

Gbam.