raumdeuter:


Hazard isnt going anywhere. No top team will want him

when Zidane and pep fights for his signature during the summer and he chooses where will suit him, then you can as well block him from moving.

Eruditor:


But that 29th game is against United? If they draw the 29th game, they win the league, no?

If, if, if

Ibime:


If, if, if

Is it not "if" we did to get a 34 game schedule?

When we remove 3pts from City for WBA should we not remove 3 too from United then because Swansea were the 2nd worst team by then?

You would see that at the times of removing points, the 2 worst teams will change which could even make United more than 16pts behind.

And all that is because you want to claim that Pep did not walk the EPL whereas he did and could have done so 6 games to spare which was not possible in Germany.

THE END.

This thread never fails to crack me up.

bigkesh:

What is "Morita"??

The ninny madrid happily sold to us.....the useless striker you were busy celebrating is oriyomi goals by disturbing those who weren't in support of his purchase....

I'm not gonna lie, I couldn't follow all those calculations these fùckers have been doing since yesterday...

Ibime:


If, if, if

Just leave am. When we were using actual match results, he was talking about 'if they draw'.

lordfalcao:
don't come back and start displaying ignorance all over this place.

Man city have aguero yet they bought g.jesus. arsenal have lacazette and added aubameyang in their attacking options.

Laca just back from injury have scored 4 goals over 5matches.

Read his line again, and delete the emboldened asap.

Someone like you, encourages people like eLLruditor to come and spew rubbish here. Was Jesus bought few months after city bought Aguero as we have in your lacasera situation?

bigkesh:


If a Club buys another CF for 60m few months after paying 50m for you....You are useless and foolish.

Nihilstjnr:
I'm not gonna lie, I couldn't follow all those calculations these fùckers have been doing since yesterday...

Bwuahahahaha


I can see some guy is definitely trying to turn amala but e hard am well well.....as mathematics and oyinbo no be the same thing you can twist oyinbo anyhow you like but you cannot try it with maths

Meanwhile, Southampton manager Mark Hughes was unhappy that Marcos Alonso had escaped a red card after a high boot caught Shane Long on the back of his calf at the end of the first half.
The Southampton manager faces Chelsea again next Sunday in the FA Cup and has called for the player to receive a retrospective ban, after referee Mike Dean appeared to miss the incident.
"It was a poor challenge, a really poor challenge," Hughes said. "It should have been a red card, clearly. I am disappointed that the officials didn't see it. They were all within a 10 or 15 metre radius. I think between the referee, linesman or fourth official that one of them should have seen it.
"It was a poor tackle, it was a tackle that thankfully had no drastic consequences for Shane. Thankfully he is okay, he just got a rake down the calf. Clearly, with Chelsea down to 10 men and us in first half on the ascendancy, it is a slant on the game really.
"Those are key moments and referees have got to get them right, maybe that's why the [Premier League] referees are not at the World Cup this year."

Guardiola has only one year remaining on his current contract at Manchester City, but Pochettino believes continued success at the Etihad is not solely down to the manager.
"Manchester City is a club that provided everything for him to win," said Pochettino, who congratulated City on their title victory.
"But Man City in the last 10 years won with different managers.
"He is a great manager and if the club help him to be stronger every season I'm sure he'll be close every season. That is no doubt.
"For me, he deserves full credit, the players, the coach and the staff."

airmark:


Read his line again, and delete the emboldened asap.

Someone like you, encourages people like eLLruditor to come and spew rubbish here. Was Jesus bought few months after city bought Aguero as we have in your lacasera situation?

what is his point?

Simple that arsenal bought another striker to add to lacazette. I am giving him instances where man city bought g.jesus to add to aguero.. a club can have two good strikers at once and rotates them evenly like pep does.

it still didn't stop laca from scoring 4 in 5matches after a 6 weeks injury without having to recover from relapse like belotti everyweek

Eruditor:


Is it not "if" we did to get a 34 game schedule?

When we remove 3pts from City for WBA should we not remove 3 too from United then because Swansea were the 2nd worst team by then?

You would see that at the times of removing points, the 2 worst teams will change which could even make United more than 16pts behind.

And all that is because you want to claim that Pep did not walk the EPL whereas he did and could have done so 6 games to spare which was not possible in Germany.

THE END.

Stop trying to be slippery nigga.

We gave you percentage completeness which is the correct method and should end there.

You wanted to see what would happen "if" the league was 34 matches.

We gave you criteria of comparing top 18 teams in Germany vs top 18 teams in England. . . you accepted the criteria and fücked up the JSS 2 mathematics in front of you.

In order to wiggle out, you started adding "if" City had beat Utd just to cover the fact you mishandled some simple problem solving.

Now you have opened more ifs to escape. . . "if" Crystal Palace were in the bottom two. . . if Swansea were bottom. . .bla bla bla

If I ask you now to revert and show working of how you boldly claimed City would be 15 points ahead by GW29 if we excluded West Brom and Stoke, you would start shaking like a fish. You did not mention Palace and Swansea then, only now you have been caught, you want obfuscate.

Eruditor:

I have already cut Stoke and Westbrom and City are still at least 15points ahead of United and LFC.
.

And don't think you will escape your faux-pas by reverting back to the original argument of Bundesliga being more competetive than EPL just to escape your poor mathematics.

Even at that, Bundesliga is a yearly cakewalk for Bayern while EPL has changed hands every year since 2009. Even the last bastion of Bundesliga resistance aka UEFA COEFFICIENT has fallen into the hands of EPL.

We're not interested in that argument anymore, we only want to see your workings to finish the league in GW29 by excluding West Brom and Stoke.

Good Lord.

Ibime:


Stop trying to be slippery nigga.

We gave you percentage completeness which is the correct method and should end there.

You wanted to see what would happen "if" the league was 34 matches.

We gave you criteria of comparing top 18 teams in Germany vs top 18 teams in England. . . you accepted the criteria and fücked up the JSS 2 mathematics in front of you.

In order to wiggle out, you started adding "if" City had beat Utd just to cover the fact you mishandled some simple problem solving.

Now you have open more ifs to escape. . . "if" Crystal Palace was in the bottom two. . . if Swansea were bottom. . .bla bla bla

If I ask you now to revert and show working of how you boldly claimed City would be 15 points ahead by GW29 if we excluded West Brom and Stoke, you would start shaking like a fish. You did not mention Palace and Swansea then, only now you have been caught, you want obfuscate.



And don't think you will escape your faux-pas by reverting back to the original argument of Bundesliga being more competetive than EPL just to escape your poor mathematics.

Even at that, Bundesliga is a yearly cakewalk for Bayern while EPL has changed hands every year since 2009. Even the last bastion of Bundesliga resistance aka UEFA COEFFICIENT has fallen into the hands of EPL.

We're not interested in that argument anymore, we only want to see your workings to finish the league in GW29 by excluding West Brom and Stoke.

I am exhausted.

I told him timeline had to fluctuate. I said so because I knew removing those points now will be to City's disadvantage.

To further buttress my point, I removed the same points from City and United even after City had secured the league but it showed them 4pts behind United. That should already tell you something was wrong.

To elucidate further, I showed you that City won all games against the current last 2 teams so they will have 12pts to lose should we remove them. United picked only 7 so would lose only that number. This is a loss of 5pts which when added to your 11 gives the 16pts that City currently leads by. This again shows how time has skewed the maths.

Lastly, I used the fact that the last 2 teams could change. United picked more points from Swans and Crys than City. Use them as the last 2 teams City 87-10=77 Utd 71-12= 59. Now City are 18pts ahead.

I just estimated that ceteris paribus City should maintain the same 15+ points that they are currently ahead by. That is the only way to compare if City would have won the league before or on the same time as Bayern - which was my claim.

Ibime:

We gave you percentage completeness which is the correct method and should end there.

You wanted to see what would happen "if" the league was 34 matches.

We gave you criteria of comparing top 18 teams in Germany vs top 18 teams in England. . . you accepted the criteria and fücked up the JSS 2 mathematics in front of you.

% completeness is cold zobo
You gave me your interpretation of the %: City won the league with 13% to go whilst Bayern won it with 15% to go.

I told you the difference between the 2 figures is negligible.

.13(38) = 4.94 .14(34)= 5.1 the diff is .16(of a match)

That is like saying City won the league in the 14th min of the next match day after Bayern won it. That is laughable yet you keep shouting %completeness like Archimedes was yelling "eureka".

I concede I asked for 34 games because the maths is basic. If City won at 87% of the league then 87% of 34 is 29.5 so City won the league at half time of the game 30. LOL. These are estimates. The table shows 5 matches to go for both.

If that is how more difficult the "hard" EPL is...I agree. You are right.

Nihilstjnr:
I'm not gonna lie, I couldn't follow all those calculations these fùckers have been doing since yesterday...

You are not alone.

Greatihex:
Guardiola has only one year remaining on his current contract at Manchester City, but Pochettino believes continued success at the Etihad is not solely down to the manager.
"Manchester City is a club that provided everything for him to win," said Pochettino, who congratulated City on their title victory.
"But Man City in the last 10 years won with different managers.
"He is a great manager and if the club help him to be stronger every season I'm sure he'll be close every season. That is no doubt.
"For me, he deserves full credit, the players, the coach and the staff."

Raumdeuter is this true?

And here I was..thinking Raumdeuter was the LAST Airbender Amala Turner on earth

PlainJAY:
And here I was..thinking Raumdeuter was the LAST Airbender Amala Turner on earth

but he's the only Amala turner in the whole South Pole.

obainojazz:

Rumdeuter is this true?

A coach that is salty about being 20 points behind Guardiola after losing home and away.

Lets hear what a journalist who is also an ex player who didnt even play for Man City has to say
==
The seriously interesting thing is how Guardiola has improved so many footballers. Not footballers who are really young, but players like Kyle Walker, Fernandinho and even Kevin de Bruyne.

I think that's where his levels of management are above everyone else's, certainly this season.

I think Guardiola is great for the English game. So many people said he couldn't play his style of football in the Premier League.

I'm glad he's stuck with his principles, that he came through and his style of football which he has not only proved you can win with it, but it's so beautiful to watch at times.

We'll always be grateful in the Premier League and English football because we all know that success is copied and imitated by other teams, other coaches and children playing the game.

I think unquestionably Guardiola will influence the style of football in this country, because not only is it pleasing on the eye, but it's bringing success.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/43789027

PlainJAY:
And here I was..thinking Raumdeuter was the LAST Airbender Amala Turner on earth

Even raumdeuter has been looking at that guy with left eye.

Meanwhile Roy Hodgson spitting some truth

Crystal Palace manager Roy Hodgson has stated that Wilfried Zaha is capable of becoming a better player than Eden Hazard

Hazard from comparison with Messi and ROnaldo to Neymar to Alexis now to his real level Zaha

Nihilstjnr:
I'm not gonna lie, I couldn't follow all those calculations these fùckers have been doing since yesterday...

On top fraudiola

sleekdot:


A coach that is salty about being 20 points behind Guardiola after losing home and away.

Lets hear what a journalist who is also an ex player who didnt even play for Man City has to say
==
The seriously interesting thing is how Guardiola has improved so many footballers. Not footballers who are really young, but players like Kyle Walker, Fernandinho and even Kevin de Bruyne.

I think that's where his levels of management are above everyone else's, certainly this season.

I think Guardiola is great for the English game. So many people said he couldn't play his style of football in the Premier League.

I'm glad he's stuck with his principles, that he came through and his style of football which he has not only proved you can win with it, but it's so beautiful to watch at times.

We'll always be grateful in the Premier League and English football because we all know that success is copied and imitated by other teams, other coaches and children playing the game.

I think unquestionably Guardiola will influence the style of football in this country, because not only is it pleasing on the eye, but it's bringing success.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/43789027

de Bruyne, bundesliga player of the season

Kyle walker, one of epl best right backs

Fernandinho was already good. But I've got to give it to pep though, he really tried. Next season will tell, CL or we will continue our no Messi, no CL for pep agenda.

obainojazz:
de Bruyne, bundesliga player of the season

Kyle walker, one of epl best right backs

Fernandinho was already good. But I've got to give it to pep though, he really tried. Next season will tell, CL or we will continue our no Messi, no CL for pep agenda.

Pogba FifPro 11, Alexis and Lukaku 2 of the 3 top scorers last season.

Nihilstjnr:
I'm not gonna lie, I couldn't follow all those calculations these fùckers have been doing since yesterday...

baba Na so. statisticians full here. I just couldn't comprehend all those stuff

classicview:
I'm watching replay of Torino Vs inter. I think Chelsea should get Mario icardi or bellotti. I'm fed up seeing Morata upfront. Giroud would do well as back up

I read lewandoski is linked with a move to Chelsea.

Eruditor:


I am exhausted.

You should be because you claimed you have workings that would show us City 15 points ahead and now you can't produce them.

Eruditor:

To further buttress my point, I removed the same points from City and United even after City had secured the league but it showed them 4pts behind United. That should already tell you something was wrong.

We are not responsible for your stüpidity, excuse my rudeness. Of course if City are leading by 11 points in GW 29 when we exclude West Brom and Stoke, and you try to make City lose their next 5 matches while Utd win theirs, Utd will win by 4 points. You just corroborated our 11 point gap figure with that foolish projection.

Eruditor:

I just estimated that ceteris paribus City should maintain the same 15+ points that they are currently ahead by. That is the only way to compare if City would have won the league before or on the same time as Bayern - which was my claim.

What is this? We asked you to show working of your 15 point gap, you are now speaking latin.

We saw you calculating results against Sheffield Wednesday and all sorts, now it's turned to an estimation. It's OK to admit your calculation was wrong and let's leave it there, but you wanted to do agidi when Airmark was correcting your calculation having already accepted the terms of comparison.

Ibime:


You should be because you claimed you have workings that would show us City 15 points ahead and now you can't produce them.

We are not responsible for your stüpidity, excuse my rudeness. Of course if City are leading by 11 points in GW 29 when we exclude West Brom and Stoke, and you try to make City lose their next 5 matches while Utd win theirs, Utd will win by 4 points. You just corroborated our 11 point gap figure with that foolish projection.

What is this? We asked you to show working of your 15 point gap, you are now speaking latin.

We saw you calculating results against Sheffield Wednesday and all sorts, now it's turned to an estimation. It's OK to admit your calculation was wrong and let's leave it there, but you wanted to do agidi when Airmark was correcting your calculation having already accepted the terms of comparison.

Eruditor:

You are just forming activity. The person I am posting at understands the estimations.

Eruditor:

We are past that type of argument because time of losing will make points diff to fluctuate.

Before he rolled out the calculators I already told him I made estimates because going exact will bring some of these issues I am now dousing.

You just got excited because you saw 11pts gap and you are not trying to justify why that is so.

I am 16pts ahead of someone, you decide to deduct 12 from me and 7 from him of course I will only be ahead by 11 now. Duuuh?

Yes I agreed to remove WBA and Stoke after stating more than once that I would adjust the timeline. Is that not what I am doing now?

I can adjust the timeline back to WBA game in week 25, if I remove those points from City I have to remove Swansea for United because at that point they were the 2 worst teams and both City and United will lose equal points.

Not this voodoo maths where you want to do 87-12 for city but 71-7 for United. How will you give me your condition without subscribing to my own? That is fa fa fa foul!

Eruditor:

ceteris paribus City

A Levels Economics 101!!!