Eruditor:

Yes I agreed to remove WBA and Stoke after stating more than once that I would adjust the timeline. Is that not what I am doing now?

I can adjust the timeline back to WBA game in week 25, if I remove those points from City I have to remove Swansea for United because at that point they were the 2 worst teams and both City and United will lose equal points.

Ibime:


Stop lying. You only started talking timeline long after Airmark exposed your goof and you knew you were on the back foot. Look at you busy calculating points against Burnley and others, when Airmark warned you that the first thing a smart person would do is go and check the exceptions - West Brom and Stoke. You only started talking of timeline after cornering yourself.

Eruditor:

LOL. Still forming activity.

We are past that type of argument because time of losing will make points diff to flunctuate.

For e.g United losing today made it go back to 16 whereas it was 13 just before and 16 before they played themselves (City vs United).

That is why even if the points lost from both teams is 2more for City. It does not matter.

Eruditor:

Don't lie that it was long after. The post is there for all to see. I mentioned timeline because I knew even when you choose to remove the points will affect the gap by that game 29.

Eruditor:


LOL.

United played Stoke twice and WestBrom twice.

They took 4 from stoke and 3 from Westbrom before today. So remove 7 before today. Which means City are ahead with 14pts with 29games played (in a 34game season).

Eruditor:


Edit: if you just do your 87-12/71-7 maths, you will only see 11pts. So in the same way, the points diff between City and Utd will fluctuate if we are removing those games you want in the way the league season panned out.

The maths involved is not the rubbish you or him tried to force down my throat and I said it from inception[/b]

afrodoc2:

Amoebic straw clutching at its most despicable worst.
This is what happens when you try to write a literary essay in a further mathematics test.

Cruxifizio:

PlainJAY:
Knock Knock

- Who's there?

L

- L...who?

ELRUDITOR

afrodoc2:


Abi how you see am? This is like trying to use Shakespeare's sonnets to prove Fermat's Last Theorem.

TLona1:
They said he'll find it hard in the EPL. Now that he has convincingly conquered the league, their new excuse is "he spent a lot"



Nonsense

Nihilstjnr:
Though if im going to be objective, I do not think Elruditor actually earned the L on this particular issue.

He has argued his case logically(at least to me)

That been said, he already has enough Ls from his past misdemeanours, so what's one more L to a cool J?

Eruditor take this honorary L for your colllllllection bro..

You probably didnt earn it, but it's probably still well deserved...

Nihilstjnr:
Though if im going to be objective, I do not think Elruditor actually earned the L on this particular issue.

He has argued his case logically(at least to me)

That been said, he already has enough Ls from his past misdemeanours, so what's one more L to a cool J?

Eruditor take this honorary L for your colllllllection bro..

You probably didnt earn it, but it's probably still well deserved...

Nihilstjnr:


This man...

You are just too learned

Salut

sleekdot:
WHile Mourinho is getting worse and attacking players getting worse under him

Ibime this is what players are doing under Fraudiola

Ibime:


While I wont argue the point, this is you adding maggi to an article that never mentioned Mourinhos record. Lampard, Sneijder, Ozil, Ronaldo and the whole Real Madrid that broke La Liga scoring record can also put up records similar to the article.

sleekdot:


Facts only None of these players you listed above had their highest scoring returns under Mourinho

Ozils highest scoring returns was 11 in 2009/10 under Thomas Schaf
Lampard highest scoring return was 27 in 2009/10 Under Ancelotti
Ronaldo highest scoring returns was 61 in 2014/15 under Ancelotti
Sneijder highest scoring returns was in Ajax where he scored 22 in 06/07 and If you are talking about a top 4 league Sneijder highest return was in Madrid 07/08 under Schuster

Ibime:


But his Real team hold the Laliga goals record which trumps all of that.

If you check well, you will see that your favourite striker Benzema achieved his highest scoring season under Mourinho

sleekdot:


Then you should list Benzema and not Lampard, Sneijder Ronaldo or Ozil. That's trying to lie

Eruditor:


Look on the bright side. In 3 more pages, the argument will be about a team scoring 121 goals. Not about the goal tally of the individuals involved. And you will be accused of Amala-turning.

sleekdot:


Then you should list Benzema and not Lampard, Sneijder Ronaldo or Ozil. That's trying to lie

Ibime:
Chai! Na me do myself.
I should have known you are mentioning me upandan to bait me so you can label me a liar to get back for your boy Elruditor who was caught lying for 2 days to cover up his stupidity.

It will not work with me.

sleekdot:


I know ibime can try to be mischievous like in the above scenario[b]but a large number of Chelsea fans are genuinely dull.[/b] and cant cope/keep pace with logic

If you say 6 is less than 10 that means 10 is greater than 6. Thats too complex for them to handle and they tag it amala turning

obainojazz:
Nhilist, airmark and diggz is this true?

Nihilstjnr:


Amala turning as a phrase was invented by Scummies.

So it must be you guys the professor of amalanomics is referring to.