Hotfreeze:

I mentioned hoes with infinitely elastic punna and you promptly answered.
Be kiaful o.

Same with your anus hole.

ceyrahtlk:
In medical meetings, I can always discuss patients by giving bogus names and aliases without being held liable. For example, Patient X was admitted on so and so date with history of so and so. A third party will not know the particular person. How can I breach confidentiality if the third party doesn't have an idea of who I am referring to?
OK, in this particular case, do you know the mother and child in question just from the limited data the doctor provided? Even if the mother 'thinks' it is her daughter that is being discussed, she has no proof because she cannot say with all confidence that the there was no other case similar to her daughter's.

Ah, thank you, o! That is what I have been trying to tell him since. Still, he keeps arguing blindly, and insisting one confidential information has been breached. If the patient's medical examination took place in a govt-owned teaching hospital, where a consultant surrounded by different medical students, would take turns in poking and prodding the patient, what kind of 'confidentiality' would he be talking about here? Would the patient's confidentiality be breached, by the doctor discussing the patient's medical history, with his students, or by the doctor showing slides of the operation at an healthcare conference, without showing the patient's face or mentioning her identity?

Becoming a qualified doctor requires discipline not just your ability to pass physics and chemistry at a single sitting, this smart Alec failed woefully in this regard. The best I can see in her is a potential entertainer who can't be trusted with private words, so wrong to go making an online report with the health situation of your patient who pay you for the service been rendered. Someday if she decides to let the cat out of her little basket all those who are well informed about this news will quickly jump at the possible conclusion of her being the lady with such rare health condition. Dr. Chioma please learn to keep your patient's secret otherwise you have no business been in that profession, entertainment Industry will instead be a best, as this kind of attitude has potential of keeping her at a dis-vintage position where people will find it difficult entrusting her with their private or personal secret since her mouth cannot be kept shut for too long.

Apina:
Total rubbish! The court would not ask if her name was called or not if she decides to sue. She gave the age of the girl involved, the comments made by the woman in question and the procedure in terms of operation carried out, What other proof do you think the court would ask for if the said woman goes on to sue? What she did what a breach of confidentiality, she had no right to discuss specifics about any medical case brought to her.

No judge will entertain such a frivolous case. Names were not mentioned, and identities were not disclosed....so why waste the court's time? And what reputational damage was caused to the patient? On admission forms, there are little clauses inserted in fine print, that sometimes state that a patient's medical case can be reviewed by other external parties, for purposes of education or further treatment. If the patient signed off on one of those forms, she has no case. Any lawyer that takes up such a case, just wants to fleece the patient, because he would lose big time, in court!

LaudableXX:

No judge will entertain such a frivolous case. Names were not mentioned, and identities were not disclosed....so why waste the court's time? And what reputational damage was caused to the patient? On admission forms, there are little clauses inserted in fine print, that sometimes state that a patient's medical case can be reviewed by other external parties, for purposes of education or further treatment. If the patient signed off on one of those forms, she has no case. Any lawyer that takes up such a case, just wants to fleece the patient, because he would lose big time, in court!

Since when did twitter become a research institute or medical center?

Apina:

Total rubbish! The court would not ask if her name was called or not if she decides to sue. She gave the age of the girl involved, the comments made by the woman in question and the procedure in terms of operation carried out, What other proof do you think the court would ask for if the said woman goes on to sue? What she did what a breach of confidentiality, she had no right to discuss specifics about any medical case brought to her.

OK

Apina:
Since when did twitter become a research institute or medical center?

Twitter is a medium of communication. Such info does not have to be shared only at a research institute or a medical centre....

Deltatoto:
thar u lost it’s at primary 5 does not mean it’s no longer a treasure

All of you disturbing my mention, did i tell you I'm not a virgin

harriet412:



All of you disturbing my mention, did i tell you I'm not a virgin

if u be virgin make I naked baf

oluwasegun007:
Imagine peson disvergin that kind girl na gallon of blood go flow comot....

You are right. Such should not have sex on the bed. It is better to do it in the bathroom.

cococandy:



You guys are actually trying to slut-shame me? Hilarious

Which one of you is a Virgin? Or it only matters when it’s a woman. Two faced assholes

Hehehehehe
Na joke o abeg. Anyways, you are so pretty

oh please! many of you did not take your time to read the thread. you guys just read one or two lines and conclude immediately. ignorance is a disease they say.