Silentscreamer:
bloggers and their lies.
Btw mbappe is good, but after playing for 10-15 years, he still would not be able to tie messi's shoe lace.

Just like Messi cannot tie CR7's shoe-laces either .... level pass level: CR7 >> Messi >> Mbappe >> Ahmed Musa >> Kelechi Iheanacho

DonPiiko:
You mailed me?

Yap

I honestly do not like to reply messages if we don't discuss here, my email contains my government name and I value my privacy you can always mention me on an inactive thread I will read and respond if it's worth a reply.

Addme:
Yes bro.I copied you in one of my posts in the betting thread not knowimg it was the parody account.Pls can you reply the Pm?

bilo1:
I doubt that,henry is a great player,he won the world cup too(France 1998).

What he's saying is that at that time Henry wasn't in any way pivotal to France winning the world cup which is absolutely correct. Mbappe a better player.

Oegbeyem:
Disagree. Winning the world cup doesn't make him better. Griezmann too has won the world cup. Pele won World Cup thrice and in my eyes Maradona was much better. He was even a drug user. Imagine if Messi was using drugs. The highlight of Maradona's career was 1986, Ronaldo and Messi have many highlights. Week in week out they dazzle

Baba diego started using coke in naples after the world cup
Drugs never made maradona
Infact there was a public call for maradona to join the 78 winning team after he shone at the 77 youth world cup but menotti refused
The highlight of maradona's career was in naples

chiboy1116:
u don't need to be insultive to pass across an info. Please . Pls tell me, how is hazard better than neymar ...neymar has more goals , more recognition , more titles , has competed with the best there is . Hazard is still local . Neymar has more assists . Don't just argue with sentiments ...hate neymar for his antics but it doesn't change the fact that he's the third best player in the world after Messi and Ronaldo . I for one don't like his antics either , but he's still a better player than hazard .

Sorry I insulted u

Bt dat boy neymar played sh1t in d world cup


Hazard outshine him bro

Brazil va Belgium

Wat did your so called neymar played, forget all those goals and asssit

Obagoal4u:
bro i disagree with u... At age 19 henry was also a world champ and moreover, he was more technical, accurate passer and has the edge in taking d defenders for granted(dribbles). Though mbappe is Can run faster.

Where was Henry playing at 19? When did he win the World Cup? He made his international debut at 20 and was 21/22 years old when he won the World Cup with France. After signing with juventus, he wasn't a regular starter until he moved to Arsenal. At 19,henry was nowhere near what mbappe is now, at 19.

Doesn't mean he will be better than henry at 29

This is an insult to igwe

czarina:
I'm beginning to believe it's impossible to do without comparison in football. Savor your victory and keep calm coach. Quit creating animosity where there isn't

Check my profile

He said the truth.

Mbappe is already established in this French squad and a key player at 19 but Henry and Trezequet were squad players and substitutes at 19.

chronique:


Where was Henry playing at 19? When did he win the World Cup? He made his international debut at 20 and was 21/22 years old when he won the World Cup with France. After signing with juventus, he wasn't a regular starter until he moved to Arsenal. At 19,henry was nowhere near what mbappe is now, at 19.

Nice comment, this is what the coach meant, but trust Nairalanders, as soon as they see the title they jump to conclusions.

Oegbeyem:
you're partially drunk. Ronaldo zidane and Pele are better than Messi? Cristiano is better than these three. Maradona was just like Messi but Messi is a faster, more consistent and better goal-scoring version of Maradona. In the end they are all great players. It's left for you to choose who you liked the most. Messi/Ronaldo rivalry has helped to motivate the two of them hence their consistency over the years. Would Ronaldo have been this consistent if Messi wasn't around and vice versa. It's all subjective

Sometimes i wonder how we see and watch football and how we analyze it too.
Messi is a great player no doubt but the above players are very much ahead of him and.

Maradona, messi, delima, zidane pele are great and special players, but for u to be considered the greatest, you have to not only win the world cup, but lead your country to win it with your performance.

The world cup is the biggest stage and messi has never had an outstanding world cup of his own talk less of winning the biggest football tournament. You may say he won the golden ball 4years ago but you and i know messi only had a good group stage performance at that world cup.

The above players has done so. They shone on the biggest stage. they were the best players most of the world cup they played. You may argue that players like griezman, ozil, muller iniesta has won the world cup, but these players are not the very special players like the zidane, delinma, pele, maradona and Pele, messi, cruff, c ronaldo, de stefano, eusobio, pukas, best.

You may want to say messi has been consistent in the champions league, but so was alfredo de stefano, pukas, eusobio, cruff. And that is the reason why i mentioned messi in that category of players. They didnt win football biggest price or lead their country to winning it. but they are great players anyway.

Bitchiamjay:
A psg player and he's french..


#YOLO


Well, i dont think KyKy plays for the money.. When you see him play, you see he got that love for the game.. He's so passionate.
Dude gave out his world cup earning^ to charity ...
He' got potentials and might go higher than his idols .


#YOLO

you are right bro.. but the coach should stop all those childish talk..

xtervaganza:
passion.


That's why he was the highest paid player at arsenal then

that's right

olafunny:
Mbappe is unarguably a very good player, but can never be compared with Igwe henry. The era of football has changed really. Henry shined and played at best when football was not really celebrated. Yet, he triumphed.

Henry is still Igwe of football

Oga,nobody said Mbappe is better than Henry.
The coach simply said at his age that is, when Henry was the same age as Mbappe:he was better than Henry; and every sincere sports analyst has to agree to this.
It is just a matter of comprehension.

If Mbappe continues it is just a matter of time.

Nigerians are absurdly poor in comprehension.

The coach is specifically comparing them in AGE while some funny people here are talking about career.
When did Mbappe start playing football that would warrant Deschamps to compare a player whose professional career barely started 3-4 years ago.
People should stop misquoting the coach.
I agree with him.

olafunny:
Mbappe is unarguably a very good player, but can never be compared with Igwe henry. The era of football has changed really. Henry shined and played at best when football was not really celebrated. Yet, he triumphed.

Henry is still Igwe of football

Please don't be offended, but;

This is the problem with Nigerians.
And and its even more amazing that you got up to over hundred fellow illiterates to like your post.

Who compared Mbappe to Henry here now in totality??

The coach is comparing Mbappe to henry when Henry was 19years old.

And I can tell you, henry didn't come near his peak till his second season at arsenal.

There are not up to 5 teenagers as good as Mbappe ever in the world of football.
Especially one being a direct striker or playing off the main-striker as Mbappe did for France at the very last world cup.


Messi is my greatest player ever, but he was never subjected to the task of being a striker or off-the striker till be was around 22years old, when Guadiola took charge.

GisthoodBlog:
France Coach, Didier Deschamps believes Kylian Mbappe at 19 is better than Thierry Henry at 19.

Mbappe proved crucial, scoring in the 4-2 final win against Croatia as France won the 2018 World Cup in Russia.

He scored a total of four goals in the tournament including two important goals which secured a 4-3 win over Argentina in the quarter-finals.

The PSG Star is just 19-year-old but already has achieved so much at the biggest level of football and his national team manager Didier Deschamps believes he's one step ahead of previous greats.

“He knows he does things others don’t. He’s intelligent, he listens,” Deschamps told Le Parisien.

“I tell him when he does things well, but so many people say that.

“I’m also there to tell him what’s not good, even if that represents only five percent of his game. He corrects it and he listens.

“In 1998, David Trezeguet and Thierry Henry were his age but didn’t have the same role. Kylian is already grown up.

“I have played with very good players. I have also coached them. But him, it’s not only the quality. In terms of his age…With what he does now and what he should do in the future, I have always said, I’m very happy he’s French.

Source:>>SPORTDAB
http://www.sportdab.com.ng/2018/07/kylian-mbappe-better-than-thierry-henry.html

This is true. I was about to say otherwise. But I do no think Henry was playing at this level when he was 19. Henry was must have been 20 or 21 when French won worldcup.

LZAA:

Maradona was consistent from 1977-1992
Maradona was the reason argentina won the wc in 86 and reached the final in 1990
He is also the person argies want messi to emulate and lead them to WC glory
Messi is a phenomenon but come on maradona was better

he

LZAA:

Maradona was consistent from 1977-1992
Maradona was the reason argentina won the wc in 86 and reached the final in 1990
He is also the person argies want messi to emulate and lead them to WC glory
Messi is a phenomenon but come on maradona was better

I didn't watch maradona but those that watched both of em said messi

LZAA:

Maradona was consistent from 1977-1992
Maradona was the reason argentina won the wc in 86 and reached the final in 1990
He is also the person argies want messi to emulate and lead them to WC glory
Messi is a phenomenon but come on maradona was better

I didn't watch maradona but those that watched both of em said messi is a better player ...more talented ...maradona was just more vocal Nd is more of a leader .

kallmemrB:
go check record...start from 78 to 90 u will be amazed

1976–1981
Argentinos Juniors
167
(116)
1981–1982
Boca Juniors
40
(28)
1982–1984
Barcelona
36
(22)
1984–1991
Napoli
188
(81)

since we are going with stats ,, Messi then is not on maradona level ...hes a beter goals scorer ,a better playmaker , a better dribbler .

KazeemIbrahim1:

Watched him from Germany. I didn't say he isn't good. He's overrated.
He's Walcott that is good with both feet.
He should have benched Mbappe at Russia..

Walcott was never like dembele ,which Walcott did u watch ? Walcott was just a speed merchant , dembele is a fantastic dribbler , a good play maker . He has a higher ceiling than mpabbe if he can be matured like him . SOMEONE that had more than 30goals/assist in Dortmund at 19/20 ...I don't think he's overrated . Yea mpabbe is a better player now but who knows, maybe in the next 5yrs things could change . Evn mpabbe said so himself. Dembele is the best talent in the world . Though that was just him being modest and humble .

chiboy1116:
I didn't watch maradona but those that watched both of em said messi is a better player ...more talented ...maradona was just more vocal Nd is more of a leader .

Exactly bro u didn't
Messi is very talented but diego had that edge
I assure u that very few ppl and players from watching maradona think messi is better
Lemme give u an example
I think cr7 was better in man u than madrid yet a huge volume of his fans(who became madrid fans because of him and are now juve fans(same club they were calling cheats a decade ago(lol) will disagree
Maradona was voted the best player of the last century
Fifa didnt like it and made him share the award with pele
He simply left it for them

LZAA:

Exactly bro u didn't
Messi is very talented but diego had that edge
I assure u that very few ppl and players from watching maradona think messi is better
Lemme give u an example
I think cr7 was better in man u than madrid yet a huge volume of his fans(who became madrid fans because of him and are now juve fans(same club they were calling cheats a decade ago(lol) will disagree
Maradona was voted the best player of the last century
Fifa didnt like it and made him share the award with pele
He simply left it for them

yea I believe Ronaldo was better at man utd , for me though maradona is only behind Messi , cos he wasn't as consistent as him .just d way I believe ronaldinho and Ronaldo delima at their prime were at the same level as Messi but they weren't as consistent as him....lolx
Let's just agree to disagree

chiboy1116:
yea I believe Ronaldo was better at man utd , for me though maradona is only behind Messi , cos he wasn't as consistent as him .just d way I believe ronaldinho and Ronaldo delima at their prime were at the same level as Messi but they weren't as consistent as him....lolx
Let's just agree to disagree

Aiiii aiiii

ashacot:


Sometimes i wonder how we see and watch football and how we analyze it too.
Messi is a great player no doubt but the above players are very much ahead of him and.

Maradona, messi, delima, zidane pele are great and special players, but for u to be considered the greatest, you have to not only win the world cup, but lead your country to win it with your performance.

The world cup is the biggest stage and messi has never had an outstanding world cup of his own talk less of winning the biggest football tournament. You may say he won the golden ball 4years ago but you and i know messi only had a good group stage performance at that world cup.

The above players has done so. They shone on the biggest stage. they were the best players most of the world cup they played. You may argue that players like griezman, ozil, muller iniesta has won the world cup, but these players are not the very special players like the zidane, delinma, pele, maradona and Pele, messi, cruff, c ronaldo, de stefano, eusobio, pukas, best.

You may want to say messi has been consistent in the champions league, but so was alfredo de stefano, pukas, eusobio, cruff. And that is the reason why i mentioned messi in that category of players. They didnt win football biggest price or lead their country to winning it. but they are great players anyway.

The team you play for plays a role and the world cup is a short tournament. It's too short, just seven matches for the finalists, every other team plays less. The best of football is seen when the biggest European clubs clash, because that's where we see the most balanced teams face each other. Some players are unlucky and come from weak/unbalanced teams. Bale is one of the best 5 players in the world but he didn't make the world cup because of his team. Or do you think Griezmann is better than Bale. It's all subjective. The world cup is not all that matters. It's not absolute. Messi didn't have a bad knock out stage in 2014, Messi can play well without scoring. Some of his best matches in his career were matches he didn't score in. Messi was unlucky, a 113th minute Gotze goal denied him a gold medal when they had easy chances to kill the game before that. All in all Maradona has had the best world cup performance and was an extraordinary talent but all-round in football Messi has done more than him individually. Messi has played many positions, he has played 9, played 7 and played 10. He's a better goal scorer than Maradona. Dribbling they are both superb.

Oegbeyem:
The team you play for plays a role and the world cup is a short tournament. It's too short, just seven matches for the finalists, every other team plays less. The best of football is seen when the biggest European clubs clash, because that's where we see the most balanced teams face each other. Some players are unlucky and come from weak/unbalanced teams. Bale is one of the best 5 players in the world but he didn't make the world cup because of his team. Or do you think Griezmann is better than Bale. It's all subjective. The world cup is not all that matters. It's not absolute. Messi didn't have a bad knock out stage in 2014, Messi can play well without scoring. Some of his best matches in his career were matches he didn't score in. Messi was unlucky, a 113th minute Gotze goal denied him a gold medal when they had easy chances to kill the game before that. All in all Maradona has had the best world cup performance and was an extraordinary talent but all-round in football Messi has done more than him individually. Messi has played many positions, he has played 9, played 7 and played 10. He's a better goal scorer than Maradona. Dribbling they are both superb.

Well, everyone is entitled to his opinion. i have giving u reasons why messi can never be mentioned in that categories of players. Club football is great, but the world cup is the greatest. bale is not in the world cup of which some of the faults are his. Shevshenko was able to help Ukraine qualify for the world cup wiyh a relatively weaker team compared to present wales team with ramsey, bale and other premier league stars. Maradona won the world cup with a relatively less quality players. Zidane led an unfancied french team to world cup glory. Ronaldo delima led a brazilian team that struggled to qualify for the world cup to win it in 2002.

Messi has been unbelievable, but he is still behind those guys

many football championships started!!

100% WINNING TIPS last days!!

download it for ANDROID:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.suretips.bettingtips

ashacot:


Well, everyone is entitled to his opinion. i have giving u reasons why messi can never be mentioned in that categories of players. Club football is great, but the world cup is the greatest. bale is not in the world cup of which some of the faults are his. Shevshenko was able to help Ukraine qualify for the world cup wiyh a relatively weaker team compared to present wales team with ramsey, bale and other premier league stars. Maradona won the world cup with a relatively less quality players. Zidane led an unfancied french team to world cup glory. Ronaldo delima led a brazilian team that struggled to qualify for the world cup to win it in 2002.

Messi has been unbelievable, but he is still behind those guys

why do you say zidane led the team to victory. Deschamps led the team. Zidane scored only in the final. And France won because they had a great defense and because they hosted. Ronaldo's impact in 2002 was much greater than Zidane's in 98 though he had the support of fantastic teammates like ronaldinho, Rivaldo etc. But it's all subjective and I respect your opinion

Oegbeyem:
why do you say zidane led the team to victory. Deschamps led the team. Zidane scored only in the final. And France won because they had a great defense and because they hosted. Ronaldo's impact in 2002 was much greater than Zidane's in 98 though he had the support of fantastic teammates like ronaldinho, Rivaldo etc. But it's all subjective and I respect your opinion

.
When i say zidane led france to world cup glory, i mean he was the the player much of their play was built around.

Thanks anyway.

ashacot:
.
When i say zidane led france to world cup glory, i mean he was the the player much of their play was built around.

Thanks anyway.

yeah just like Griezmann too this time around. 98 was also the first time he won the balon de oro