₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,327,020 members, 8,429,072 topics. Date: Thursday, 18 June 2026 at 11:43 AM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (456) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1166545 Views)

1 2 3 ... 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 9:10am On Jul 31, 2018
A successful X 31 hypersonic Ashm on a ship in the Caspian left splinters,steam and smoke!

https://youtu.be/KYGxmCcMI-E

Fyi,Russia cornered the market on fast heavy weight missiles decades ago.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:00am On Jul 31, 2018
A pair of J-10s

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:01am On Jul 31, 2018
grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 1:45pm On Jul 31, 2018
jakeporeshenko:
A pair of J-10s
wished we went this aircraft instead
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:32pm On Jul 31, 2018
giles14:
wished we went this aircraft instead
I’ve had this same opinion for the past 2 years but let’s five NAF benefit of doubt, that know what they’re doing I guess... it might have something do with the Chinese after sales support we experienced after purchasing the F-7.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:12pm On Jul 31, 2018
yusuff4u2c:
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21FL?
Bison is the name for the Ind... upgrade

It consists of Ind.. Russian and Israeli systems
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:14pm On Jul 31, 2018
jakeporeshenko:
I’ve had this same opinion for the past 2 years but let’s five NAF benefit of doubt, that know what they’re doing I guess... it might have something do with the Chinese after sales support we experienced after purchasing the F-7.
If that's the case how does jf17 fit in ?

Given that spares and LRUs will be coming from Chinese production lines via pak......

Won't the after sales service be more affected now ?

Also J-10 was never cleared for export
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:16pm On Jul 31, 2018
grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:17pm On Jul 31, 2018
grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:17pm On Jul 31, 2018
grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:18pm On Jul 31, 2018
Marcos diver

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:26pm On Jul 31, 2018
nemesis8u:
If that's the case how does jf17 fit in ?

Given that spares and LRUs will be coming from Chinese production lines via pak......

Won't the after sales service be more affected now ?

Also J-10 was never cleared for export
It’s not just about the parts, support services in terms of technicians and trainers, I have pictures in *akistani service men (trainers and technicians) working on our C-130s, F7s and super Mushak as far back as 2012 and they still have a sizable presence here, you can’t compare them to the Chinese who couldn’t help us fix a screen on a trainer f7 aircraft which led to the aircraft being grounded for several years.


That’s the only thing I could think of on the spot it’s all speculation though, at the end of the day NAF knows what’s best for them and what they want and what they can afford to procure and maintain. All these things factor in.

It’s also possible that the contract was signed before this present administration came into power.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:10am On Aug 01, 2018
jakeporeshenko:
It’s not just about the parts, support services in terms of technicians and trainers, I have pictures in *akistani service men (trainers and technicians) working on our C-130s, F7s and super Mushak as far back as 2012 and they still have a sizable presence here, you can’t compare them to the Chinese who couldn’t help us fix a screen on a trainer f7 aircraft which led to the aircraft being grounded for several years.


That’s the only thing I could think of on the spot it’s all speculation though, at the end of the day NAF knows what’s best for them and what they want and what they can afford to procure and maintain. All these things factor in.

It’s also possible that the contract was signed before this present administration came into power.
U guys had super mushak in 2012 ?

Well the guys were involved in MRO but all spares were coming from the respective OEMs be it China or US.

Naf imo wanted to keep safe by going for a sanction proof aircraft but even than that's a tough ask becz if western avionics r included in the same there will be inherent risks wrt sanctions.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:12am On Aug 01, 2018
IAF Mi 26

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:36am On Aug 01, 2018
grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:37am On Aug 01, 2018
smiley

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:38am On Aug 01, 2018
INS chakra SSN

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:40am On Aug 01, 2018
INS shishumar class 209 SSK

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:42am On Aug 01, 2018
INS Sindhurakshak class kilo SSK

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:43am On Aug 01, 2018
grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:43am On Aug 01, 2018
smiley smiley

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:44am On Aug 01, 2018
smiley smiley smiley

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:44am On Aug 01, 2018
grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:45am On Aug 01, 2018
cool

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:46am On Aug 01, 2018
wink

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:07am On Aug 01, 2018
nemesis8u:
U guys had super mushak in 2012 ?

Well the guys were involved in MRO but all spares were coming from the respective OEMs be it China or US.

Naf imo wanted to [b]keep safe by going for a sanction proof aircraft [/b]but even than that's a tough ask becz if western avionics r included in the same there will be inherent risks wrt sanctions.
that makes sense considering the fact that during the early stages of this procurement process, Nigeria was under some kind of covert arms embargo, anyways what are the main western parts on the J10?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:13am On Aug 01, 2018
Nem i really got curious as to how NAF managed to tip a helicopter over during taxing/ground run and then i did a little research, the exact same thing happened to a Norwegian SAR AW101 within a week of delivery, could there be a link or some kind of defect from the manufacturer ?


both helicopters have main fuselage, tail boom and tail rotors intact but main rotors completely destroyed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_rollover

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
jakeporeshenko:
that makes sense considering the fact that during the early stages of this procurement process, Nigeria was under some kind of covert arms embargo, anyways what are the main western parts on the J10?
I was talking about jf17

J-10 does not have export clearance from Chinese govt. And I doubt if they will clear it in the near future.
There r no western components in j-10 unless u want to include the western COTS Intel chips GPUs rams etc
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:41am On Aug 01, 2018
jakeporeshenko:
Nem i really got curious as to how NAF managed to tip a helicopter over during taxing/ground run and then i did a little research, the exact same thing happened to a Norwegian SAR AW101 within a week of delivery, could there be a link or some kind of defect from the manufacturer ?


both helicopters have main fuselage, tail boom and tail rotors intact but main rotors completely destroyed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_rollover
Helicopters r temperamental machines grin

Problem kind of lies with the usage of main rotors and tail rotor arrangement. Coaxial helicopters r kind of more forgiving ie they recover faster from aerodynamic instability with better safety margin

Majority of these accidents can be avoided by using helicopter stimulators to train the pilots to all possible emergency scenarios.

Anyways some accidents r unavoidable can't do anything about it. Blame Murphy's law !

If u consider the naf accidents as a bad joke than IAF is a fuccking circus grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:18am On Aug 01, 2018
allexpensive:
Ground direct reception satellite imaging.
Something like these

1. Satellite on the move

2. Transportable satellite terminal communication platform

3. RADSAT rapidly deployable satellite terminal

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:18am On Aug 01, 2018
Old pic of rail based TEL

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:19am On Aug 01, 2018
NBC recce vehicle

1 2 3 ... 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .

Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)