Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (513) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Foreign Affairs › Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1162382 Views)
1 2 3 ... 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 9:12am On Apr 12, 2019 |
kabe1:Nigga,you were tld twice to kill this ishyt! What's wrong with you? |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 9:15am On Apr 12, 2019 |
nemesis8u:Give us some info on how it works. Is it differential fusing options? |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SuperSixSeven: 12:20pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
The orange speckles in a new image from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory add another dimension to the first-ever image of a black hole.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Xbee007(m): 12:59pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
nemesis8u:Time is the fourth dimension of any body that is used to measure events. The other three dimensions are length, breath and thickness. Time exists to bring orderliness in an otherwise chaotic world. It helps us make sense of the other three dimensions. Perhaps time existed before anything at all, even before Big Bang and the current expansion of the universe. Without time can anything exist at all? *Note I am currently reading "The Time Machine" by H.G Wells. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:58pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
kikuyu1: Multi-Mode Hand Grenade - Shivalik developed by DRDO |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:00pm On Apr 12, 2019*. Modified: 4:48pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
Xbee007:Still does not answer the following questions What is time ? Why does it exist ? How does it exist ? ![]() So u have height , width , length which u can measure , the measurements will hold true anywhere in universe , but will time measurements hold true everywhere ? Answer is no ![]() 99.99 of visible universe is chaotic so......... Time is relativistic which means it depends on the observer so on the contrary it adds to chaos rather than stability. Rate of time varies widely in different planets , stars , galaxies etc across the universe so....... Time cannot exist before big bang because nothing existed then , without light ( space ) time cannot exist and without observer time cannot exist since time is not a concrete universal parameter which exhibits same values across the universe . Time is a abstract construct based on interaction of movement in space so time is not a defining parameter light is , it creates the space where the observer relativistically measures time from his point of reference. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:29pm On Apr 12, 2019*. Modified: 4:56pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
AFAIK 1. TIME came into existence the moment LIGHT came into existence TIME and LIGHT are synonymous if one can grasp the fundamentals. So TIME exists because LIGHT exists , however time values is relativistic but light value is constant 2. LIGHT ( which is basically energy manifestation ) propagated from the first source ( big bang ) ever expanding and without any limitations whatsoever. TIME propagated ( came into existence ) from the big bang ever expanding and without any limitations whatsoever. So as LIGHT exists basically due to the time travelled by the light. Eg events that happened in a star millions of years ago we can still see them , because the light rays from the events of that star is yet to reach us since light takes time to travel which is calculated in light years in astronomy. Basically we can then see millions of years back in time. Eg if we travel faster than light ( which is impossible ) we can jump time ie move into future. However due to conservation of space time continuum , we will end up in a parallel world ( space time continuum ). Existence of Tachyons which are faster than light lends impetus to jump time though in another event space , not in our event space. Another example if we travel close to speed to light which is possible , then we can stop time to certain degree ( dilution of time ) . Time is RELATIVISTIC meaning it depends on the observer / events associated with the observer . So a observer travelling at speeds close to speed of time will age slowly than another observer on earth. 3. What is time TIME is a abstract construct which is a result of relativistic interaction of LIGHT ( movement in space ) and a observer. Note : Movement in space is dependent on light because creation of space is a result of distance traveled by light. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:53pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
Last image from Israeli moon craft.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Xbee007(m): 4:57pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
nemesis8u: ![]() *I can recall we've had a discussion on relativity of time, so I will skip that. Time is what the clock says. ![]() Time exists because we're moving slow enough. If human can create a machine that can travel (perhaps faster than the speed of light) time would freeze and become irrelevant. How does it exist ![]() Because the earth is spinning on its axis. ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:16pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
Xbee007: Xbee007:Time is what the clock says. ![]() Best answer ![]() Traveling equal to speed of light will freeze time for the people inside the machine only. Actually time will not freeze , what will freeze is the machines ( and the people inside it ) speed with respect to the rest of the universe (expansion at speed of light ) . That is relative speed will drop to zero wrt speed of light , which will make the observers feel rest of universe is at standstill however contrary to their observations , events in the universe will move along as usual. ![]() So effect of time stop is localised to the observer in the machine moving at speed of light only . Spin determines the time period of the planet rotation / revolution in concern , not related to time. Different planets stars galaxies have different time periods these r localised effects based on gravity and space interactions. Not related. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:25pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
Wow, I thought the black hole is a myth |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:34pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
kemicalreaction:You better believe it. Yahweh & Allah began sucking on their "alien mother's" breast after the Big Bang. ![]()
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:43pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
Zoharariel: ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by klhazhik(m): 9:25pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
Kind of Lost... What is (a) Black Hole ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:42pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
klhazhik:Simple explanation a star hundred or thousand times bigger than our sun in its dying years collapsed on itself ie the entire mass of the star started compressing onto its centre untill all the stars mass ended up compressed into a point ( imagine the tip of a needle holding all the mass of star ) in space . This results in infinite density in a point in space which inturn results in infinity gravity in and around that point in space , as a result nothing can escape the pull of the infinite gravity in and around that point , including light. Since everything in the vicinity of the point of infinite mass is sucked in including light , that point in space is called a Back hole . A black hole is not visible directly , it can be detected indirectly only via the unusual behaviour of orbit of neighbouring stars or planets etc due to the strong gravitational pull of a black hole but at a safe enough distance not to get pulled in. The point of infinite density is also known as the point of singularity , it is a dimension less point with infinite gravity and density. Our big bang is also hypothesized to have been a singularity when it started. Also surrounding the singularity is the event horizon which is a hypothetical region of no return. We will never know what is beyond the event horizon since nothing can escape from it . Now important thing to realise all these are postulates and theories which gives the best possible explanation of the phenomenon of black holes till date. It will take many more Einstein's etc before we can come up with a solution which gives all answers which can be verified 100% On the hindsight we believe in God without even one shred of evidence ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:46pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
Recent Ind... Japan navy exercise
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:49pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
What is " infinity " ? ![]() Can anything be really infinite in this universe ? ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:33pm On Apr 12, 2019 |
nemesis8u:Samsung infinity display ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Seened: 8:20am On Apr 13, 2019 |
nemesis8u:I hold the opinion that the birth of the universe came into existence with the formation of matter (mass irrespective of its magnitude) at the point of the big bang and that time is what intelligent beings use to measure and grasp the dynamic changes matter undergoes in its interaction with forces like gravity, energy etc. Nemesis8u does this opinion hold water? (I believe even light has mass no matter how miniscule that might be) |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:18am On Apr 13, 2019 |
kemicalreaction:Give this sort of answer in school Ur teacher will gleefully and infinitely spank ur ass ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:30am On Apr 13, 2019 |
Seened:Well regarding Ur believe that light has mass. In classical physics mass of an object is its invariant mass which is zero for a photon. Light is composed of photons and photons are massless. So light has no mass. But thing is experimentally it has been proven that photons have energy and momentum inspite of being massless. U will know e=mc2 which means energy is the same thing as mass except for the conversion factor C2. So wherever there is mass there is energy and wherever there is energy there is mass. That is mass is the same thing as energy. ( Dual nature of matter ) Using that , photons have energy so they have mass which is known as " relativistic mass " . "Relativistic mass " is not the same thing as " mass ". It is mass equivalence of a given amount of energy. One cannot weigh it practically , but they show the effects of mass. A stone has a " rest mass " or " invariant mass " of say 1kg but photons don't have rest mass ( invariant mass ) because they are moving about at speed of light and cannot be brought to rest unlike a stone etc to measure it's mass ( weight ) at rest. Conversely if photons had rest mass / invariant mass of say 1 kg , at speeds of light which photons actually travel the 1 kg mass will become end up increasing infinitely which ain't possible according to e=mc2 , the energy then required to move the 1kg photon ( now increased infinitely ) will be infinite. U might ask if light is massless then why is it affected by gravity ? The answer is because photon though massless ( zero rest mass ) travels at the speed of light , any massless particle if it travels at speed of light , will get effected by gravity , since at speed of light photons or any massless particles behave as having mass due to mass energy equivalence. U see scientists r still confused when it comes to massless particles moving at speed of light, majority consider photon to have no rest mast but some say photons have a small rest mass but that assumption again ends up nullify other established behaviours and leds to breakdown. Irony is scientists have yet to determine weather photon is a wave or a particle , the fucker messes everything up by exhibiting both behaviours much to the dismay of all ![]() I wish the so called alleged god's instead of handing down the so called alleged books of knowledge had atleast the foresight to pass down some light on photons ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:52am On Apr 13, 2019 |
Seened:Just after big bang it was very very hot and there was abundance of radiation with lot of subatomic particles ( which had rest mass ) including light ( photons which don't have rest mass ) , the sub atomic particles inspite of having mass ( rest mass ) was accelerated to speeds close to speed of light , and they cumulatively and primarily were responsible for generating intense gravitational fields then. Later ( short time after ) as everything started to cool , the sub atomic particles came under the influence of the generated gravitational fields to smash into to each other to create elements which again smashed together to create mass or matter , which again based on the mass created their own gravitational fields to form galaxies , stars , planets etc. Interesting point to note at the initial point of big bang gravitational field was to due sub atomic particles accelerated to speed of light together with photons which originally travel at speed of light. Later gravitational effect was predominantly generated by massive coagulation of matter in space. Gravity is still not well understood , different models give different reasons for existence. Latest is the concept of graviton. Best one limits to Newtonian physics , it's simple to understand but limits ones options severely. Once u move to general and special relativity and quantum mechanics and other fuccckery everything gets confusing as hell. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:19pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
Swarming and collaborative ISR ,EI and hardkill capable light weight ground and air launched UAS from a private start up NS
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:23pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
Same start up collaborating with hal for unmanned wingman
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:24pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
Looks like model of P17A IN ships are the most under armed naval vessels in the world.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SuperSixSeven: 5:40pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
Ind.. Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) has approved the USD1.93 billion procurement of 464 Russian-made T-90MS main battle tanks (MBTs) for the IA.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SuperSixSeven: 5:41pm On Apr 13, 2019*. Modified: 8:36pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
This FC-1 / JF-17 is carrying two CM-400AKG standoff supersonic anti-ship missiles. It's the export version of the Chinese YJ-12. Wikipedia: The CM-400AKG is an air-launched supersonic surface attack cruise missile, believed to be the export version of the YJ-12.[19] The 910 kg (2,000 lb) missile is 0.4 m (1.3 ft) in diameter and has a range of between 54–130 nmi (62–150 mi; 100–241 km) while carrying either a 150 kg (330 lb) blast or 200 kg (440 lb) penetration warhead. It has three guidance options, including inertial navigation system (INS) coupled with satellite positioning to get within 50 m, an onboard IR/TV seeker for terminal guidance and 5 m accuracy, and passive radar to supplement the seeker, which delivers (strangely worse) 5–10 m accuracy. One unusual characteristic is that it does not fly at low altitude to avoid detection, but rather uses “high altitude launching” to achieve “higher aircraft survivability.”[20] It may have a top speed of Mach 5.Source: **SNAFU!
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:04pm On Apr 13, 2019*. Modified: 8:17pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
SuperSixSeven:Wikipedia has incorrect information , The CM-400AKG is an air-launched supersonic surface attack ballistic missile not a cruise missile. A cruise missile has a air breathing engine which is not present in CM-400AKG. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:05pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
Copy paste First flight of the worlds largest airplane - Stratolaunch Will be used to carry and launch space rockets while in flight in high altitudes
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:14pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
SuperSixSeven:Personally am not a fan of the IA specific T90s . Hope the morons know what they r doing , inducting T90s stripped of its soft kill defence systems . I don tire of stupidity , penny wise pound foolish |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by SuperSixSeven: 8:34pm On Apr 13, 2019 |
nemesis8u:There were some ideas floating around about the SAAB LEDS 150 active protection system produced by TATA for integration into the T-90S. But it seem this industry proposal never received adequate attention. |
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump • Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. • @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday • 2 • 3 • 4
Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live • American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! • Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .


