JeromeBlack right now......

TheKingIsHere:


Shut the fvck up mor0n and don't ever quote me again if you don't have any sensible thing to say.

KoiceReloaded:

Bro, it's far more easy to land a manned/unmanned module on Mars than attempting a similar feat with a manned module on a gravity pulled object orbiting the Earth. There are a lot of variables that could go wrong, the pull of earth's gravity being one of the variables. An Isreali mission had to be called off recently because they were unable to land on the moon.


@the bolded, don't be so sure, bro. It could just be the United States consolidating on their propaganda. It's hard to believe that a manned spacecraft using analogue technology could be sent to the moon, when the feat hasn't been repeated since technology went digital more than 3 decades ago.

the moon landing wasn't a one time thing. they carried out several landing after the first. Apollo 13 was a failure because of an oxygen thank explosion and the mission was aborted and the whole world was washing. the united state can't fool the whole world, there several relay satellites in different countries used during missions.

also the urgent need to place man on the moon was fuel by the cold war between USA and Russia, and do you the USA can fake a landing with Russia watching? do you know the Russian failed mission was secretly recorded and the info released some few years back? so you do think the Russians wasn't watching the even closely and that was during the high of inter country infiltration by government secret agents.

the second mission Apollo 12 landed safely and even brought back pieces of a crash craft that was sent to survey the suppose landing site of Apollo 11 for research.

and also like I told you remotely control craft is important but sometimes realtime decision is important. the first moon landing similar problem. a sensor went rogue during decent but Armstrong have to maneuver manually.

TheKingIsHere:


Yeah I know. Just seeing James wan gives me joy.

Also, his name is highly known unlike the director and cast for this film. So it is understandable

Yeah, I feel you. He's an A-lister/headliner for sure.

armadeo:
Guess who's gonna be Bruce Wayne in the upcoming " the batman" flick

he looks more of the joker, no physique or macho statue

Blakjewelry:

the moon landing wasn't a one time thing. they carried out several landing after the first. Apollo 13 was a failure because of an oxygen thank explosion and the mission was aborted and the whole world was washing. the united state can't fool the whole world, there several relay satellites in different countries used during missions.

also the urgent need to place man on the moon was fuel by the cold war between USA and Russia, and do you the USA can fake a landing with Russia watching? do you know the Russian failed mission was secretly recorded and the info released some few years back? so you do think the Russians wasn't watching the even closely and that was during the high of inter country infiltration by government secret agents.

the second mission Apollo 12 landed safely and even brought back pieces of a crash craft that was sent to survey the suppose landing site of Apollo 11 for research.

and also like I told you remotely control craft is important but sometimes realtime decision is important. the first moon landing similar problem. a sensor went rogue during decent but Armstrong have to maneuver manually.

Like mekaprime would say, let's agree to disagree. You will never convince me without a definitive proof that NASA moon landings happened, and obviously, you will never change your stance either. So, let's call it a wrap, shall we?

armadeo:
Guess who's gonna be Bruce Wayne in the upcoming batman flick .....

oh my not this joker. DC shouldn't do this to us Abeg.

armadeo:
Guess who's gonna be Bruce Wayne in the upcoming " the batman" flick

He will have to bulk up, but I can see why they chose him.

Ehmmmm....

Bros no vex, since it is obvious that you were there.


Na Omo detergent them use or Good Mama detergent?

Blakjewelry:

the moon landing wasn't a one time thing. they carried out several landing after the first. Apollo 13 was a failure because of an oxygen thank explosion and the mission was aborted and the whole world was washing. the united state can't fool the whole world, there several relay satellites in different countries used during missions.

also the urgent need to place man on the moon was fuel by the cold war between USA and Russia, and do you the USA can fake a landing with Russia watching? do you know the Russian failed mission was secretly recorded and the info released some few years back? so you do think the Russians wasn't watching the even closely and that was during the high of inter country infiltration by government secret agents.

the second mission Apollo 12 landed safely and even brought back pieces of a crash craft that was sent to survey the suppose landing site of Apollo 11 for research.

and also like I told you remotely control craft is important but sometimes realtime decision is important. the first moon landing similar problem. a sensor went rogue during decent but Armstrong have to maneuver manually.

sod09:
he looks more of the joker, no physique or macho statue

J2381:
oh my not this joker. DC shouldn't do this to us Abeg.

[img]https://pmcvariety.files./2019/05/robert-pattinson-batman-2.jpg?w=1000&h=563&crop=1[/img]

Robert Pattinson on a normal day.

He will make a commendable Bruce Wayne since he has a square jaw and brooding features like Bruce Wayne from the comics.

KoiceReloaded:


Like mekaprime would say, let's agree to disagree. You will never convince me without a definitive proof that NASA moon landings happened, and obviously, you will never change your stance either. So, let's call it a wrap, shall we?

I think we should but I think maybe you are thinking the landing was done only once.
just take out your time do more research each on Apollo 12, 13 to 16.
11 was the first successful one and the first for man hence its the most mentioned but that doesn't mean they did it only.
an action which has been repeated severally without any dispute from any other country in the world then I don't know what more to say

KoiceReloaded:

[img]https://pmcvariety.files./2019/05/robert-pattinson-batman-2.jpg?w=1000&h=563&crop=1[/img]

Robert Pattinson on a normal day.

He will make a commendable Bruce Wayne since he has a square jaw and brooding features like Bruce Wayne from the comics.

still the same. I just don't like him. His acting and foolery left a lasting not so good impression after I watched him in Twilight.

KoiceReloaded:

"I am inevitable"

"I am IRON MAN!"

Endgame may have shamelessly pandered to fan service, but it did so very artfully, that I can only applaud. It's such a memorable movie. The moment Tony met Peter in the battlefield after watching him disintegrate into ash on Titan five years ago, gave me the feels. A very powerful moment right there, but only to be surpassed by Tony knowingly sacrificing himself to erase Thanos and his minions. Or when Tony met his Dad when he time traveled back to the past with Steve Rogers. There are so many emotional moments...

"I love you 3000"

Tony Stark is my MVP. Steve Rogers too.



I'm not too hyped on X-Men: Rise of The Phoenix... not a fan of Jean Grey.

Too many emotional moments all the through the movie. Russo brothers were more focused on the storytelling of the movie rather than the usual too many action scenes associated with movies of the genre. They even started the movie without a fight scene unlike the other Avengers. It gave a Endgame a different but interesting outlook and feel, the kind I saw in TDK.

Whether it's emotional or inspirational speeches, the dialogues stood out. I found myself paying very rapt attention in the middle of the occasional jokes just to hear speeches like -

'No amount of money ever bought a second of time.'

'I think you look great, Cap. As far as I'm concerned, that's America's ass.'

'I keep telling everybody they should move on and grow. Some do. But not us.'

Rocket's speech to Thor at Asgard was emotional and funny as hell too.

Russo brothers just brought out the human/emotional side of the superheroes. And the movie ended on a emotional tone as well. It felt different from your regular MC superhero movie, a worthy end to an Avenger journey.

I'm not a fan of Jean Grey too, but the X-men trailer in general impressed me. The CGI and some of the action shown were breathtakingly fantastic. And it's assemblage of top casts like James McAvoy , Michael Fassbender , Jennifer Lawrence , Nicholas Hoult , Sophie Turner, Tye Sheridan , Alexandra Shipp , and Jessica Chastain, make for a promising fun ride. I'm particularly looking forward to see Chastain's act. Have always been a huge fan of hers.

J2381:
still the same. I just don't like him. His acting and foolery left a lasting not so good impression after I watched him in Twilight.

HA! He has since moved on from that career killer. He was stellar in Good Times, and High Life.

alexistaiwo:
Ehmmmm....

Bros no vex, since it is obvious that you were there.


Na Omo detergent them use or Good Mama detergent?

Mr Johnny English swear on your damn life that you haven't made any typing mistake here on nairaland before.
Lol I don't know which proof you want again, if non of the scientific nations or even the USA greatest rival back then Russia did not dispute the claim then what is there to prove to people like you who may likely be a believer of conspiracy theories.
you want hard evidence? go to NASA headquarters and request for raw data that is if you will understand a thing there

MJBOLT:

there's nothing special about kratos,he doesnt deserve any movie.if he gets one,i hope it bombs at the box office

You are...
kidding right?

KoiceReloaded:

Another flop in the making.

True, it'll flop just like its predecessors.

Beorn:


Too many emotional moments all the through the movie. Russo brothers were more focused on the storytelling of the movie rather than the usual too many action scenes associated with movies of the genre. They even started the movie without a fight scene unlike the other Avengers. It gave a Endgame a different but interesting outlook and feel, the kind I saw in TDK.

Whether it's emotional or inspirational speeches, the dialogues stood out. I found myself paying very rapt attention in the middle of the occasional jokes just to hear speeches like -

'No amount of money ever bought a second of time.'

'I think you look great, Cap. As far as I'm concerned, that's America's ass.'

'I keep telling everybody they should move on and grow. Some do. But not us.'

Rocket's speech to Thor at Asgard was emotional and funny as hell too.

Russo brothers just brought out the human/emotional side of the superheroes. And the movie ended on a emotional tone as well. It felt different from your regular MC superhero movie, a worthy end to an Avenger journey.

I'm not a fan of Jean Grey too, but the X-men trailer in general impressed me. The CGI and some of the action shown were breathtakingly fantastic. And it's assemblage of top casts like James McAvoy , Michael Fassbender , Jennifer Lawrence , Nicholas Hoult , Sophie Turner, Tye Sheridan , Alexandra Shipp , and Jessica Chastain, make for a promising fun ride. I'm particularly looking forward to see Chastain's act. Have always been a huge fan of hers.

I know why you're a fan of Chastain.

KoiceReloaded:


HA! He has since moved on from that career killer. He was stellar in Good Times, and High Life.

haven't see those movies. After watching Twilight, I deliberately avoid anything that has Rob Patterson in it.

armadeo:
Guess who's gonna be Bruce Wayne in the upcoming " the batman" flick

This is laughable. DC can't seriously use Pattison as Bruce Wayne. He's better off as a villain than Batman. I won't be surprised if it flops.

J2381:
haven't see those movies. After watching Twilight, I deliberately avoid anything that has Rob Patterson in it.

He's a talented actor. He cut his acting teeth playing Cedric Diggory in the Harry Potter movies. Give him another chance.

I am not disputing or saying that it is true.


Just know that the intentional Community is a minefield of blackmail and cover-up.

All America needed was leverage over top Russian officials at the time and Russia will even look the other way if America had said Armstrong had a chat with Angels on the moon.
Which will cause the ripple effect of other countries believing since Russia is not disputing.


No be America again ni?

Besides I was just kidding you with the typo

Blakjewelry:

Mr Johnny English swear on your damn life that you haven't made any typing mistake here on nairaland before.
Lol I don't know which proof you want again, if non of the scientific nations or even the USA greatest rival back then Russia did not dispute the claim then what is there to prove to people like you who may likely be a believer of conspiracy theories.
you want hard evidence? go to NASA headquarters and request for raw data that is if you will understand a thing there

Octopusssy:
Oh, Lucy-

Oh boy. Best movie I've watched in a long time.

9.5/10

Then your next stop should be Ghost In The Shell, same babe, nice adaptation. They did not stray too far from the original idea of the character, i wasn't disappointed.

KoiceReloaded:

He's a talented actor. He cut his acting teeth playing Cedric Diggory in the Harry Potter movies. Give him another chance.

ah yes. Cedric, the bloke the dark lord smoked. Lol. Never liked his acting in Harry Potter either.

I'll see what I can do. May be I'll download Good Time Or High Life just to see if the dude still suck in acting.

Bruce Wayne shouldn't be played by a mediocre actor bro. That's just how I feel.

Blakjewelry:

Lol this comment is even more funny than the first. the first lunar lander's computer is less powerful than your smart phone today and you are talking about today with more advancement in science and technology.
for your information NASA did more successful landing after the first Apollo 11 eleven landing

you mean on the moon?

TheKingIsHere:


Shut the fvck up mor0n and don't ever quote me again if you don't have any sensible thing to say.

Calm down. Let's examine why you are so pained.

TheKingIsHere:
Get ready Mortal Kombat fans and gamers!! The movie is now in production

I have waited so looonngg for this.

get ready for another shiit storm.
they should give up already, not everything is meant to be.

JeromeBlack:



I don't believe it. How can they use this metrosexual looking bitch-boy as batman?

Batman is a hard character. Full of pain, brooding, violence and darkness....and they want this sissy to play him?

Thats batman under the hood. But as Bruce Wayne without the favepakmt of twilight and a little beard. I think hes not too bad.

He would need to go on a rigourous work out though to improve his physique.

J2381:
haven't see those movies. After watching Twilight, I deliberately avoid anything that has Rob Patterson in it.

He has acted other good movies that has gone unnoticed after twilight.

He also matches the features of Batman needed including the age

KoiceReloaded:


[img]https://pmcvariety.files./2019/05/robert-pattinson-batman-2.jpg?w=1000&h=563&crop=1[/img]

Robert Pattinson on a normal day.

He will make a commendable Bruce Wayne since he has a square jaw and brooding features like Bruce Wayne from the comics.

Bruce Wayne look.


Nice

THE WARRIORS WAY..5.3/10
GENRE:Action, Fantasy, Western

The plot was simple with some decent enough characters, there was a large amount of CG, especially when it comes to the backdrops. A Quentin Tarantino styled flick with some cool action scenes, but after a few lethargic twists it fails to deliver its true premise .The concepts was good though,it had a smooth cool effects & some cinematography reminiscent of the 300 flick. Download at your own peril.

KoiceReloaded:

I know why you're a fan of Chastain.

I'm innocent of your unknown accusation.