₦airaland Forum

Which day is he going to be in Georgia? I'm heading down to Miami in a three weeks so would love to meet that nigga. Georgia is not far from Miami thus would really love to know the date. I got some questions and hopefully he's open to listening to advice as well

J111333:
Who dey give these scammers US visa? The visa that genuine hardworking people seek daily without success.

HE is a British Citizen, he don't need visa for a short visit to US.

Ikechu12:
Which day is he going to be in Georgia? I'm heading down to Miami in a three weeks so would love to meet that nigga. Georgia is not far from Miami thus would really love to know the date. I got some questions and hopefully he's open to listening to advice as well

This excuse you gave is not sufficient.

Travel down to the remembrance venue to see him.

Warship:
This excuse you gave is not sufficient.

Travel down to the remembrance venue to see him.

I'm going to be in Miami on May 30. Do you know how long of a drive that is to Washington DC? Heck even if I do take a flight there, it's counter productive because then I have to fly back to Miami instead of heading home. I live in Virginia. It's best to meet him in Georgia since that's closer to where I'm going to be at during his stay in USA

Ikechu12:
I'm going to be in Miami in May 30. Do you know how long of a drive that is to Washington DC? Heck even if I do take a flight there, it's counter productive because then I have to fly back to Miami instead of heading home. I live in Virginia. It's best to meet him in Georgia since that's closer to where I'm going to be at during his stay in USA

Then try and meet him a day or 2days to the gathering before heading to Miami

Ikechu12:
I'm going to be in Miami on May 30. Do you know how long of a drive that is to Washington DC? Heck even if I do take a flight there, it's counter productive because then I have to fly back to Miami instead of heading home. I live in Virginia. It's best to meet him in Georgia since that's closer to where I'm going to be at during his stay in USA

my brother, don't waste your energy talking to the godforsaken afonja. The ewedu decimated brain can never understand you.

Warship:
Then try and meet him a day or 2days to the gathering before heading to Miami

So let me get it right, the only time to meet him is DC? I don't get it. Why then is he going to other states then? But fine. Starting this week, I'm going to be on vacation anyway so whatever I'll meet him wherever.

frankdoz24:
my brother, don't waste your energy talking to the godforsaken afonja. The ewedu decimated brain can never understand you.

Oh he's an Afonja. Just wasted my time

Ikechu12:
So let me get it right, the only time to meet him is DC? I don't get it. Why then is he going to other states then? But fine. Starting this week, I'm going to be on vacation anyway so whatever I'll meet him wherever.

When you meet him ask him his view about calls by some Biafrans for military preparation.

Find out tactically if he has any interest in preparing for an armed confrontation in the event of an invasion of Biafran land by terrorists.

Donelli:
So, you and your fellow cone-headed headslammers that know what you want, hope your lives are filled with bliss?



Failed attempt at reverse psychology

ours is better we are valuable politically than you .that is why you specialising and resulted in political sabotages simply because nothing work for you .Mind you !!!!!!! You plan for what you get. it is not as if somebody put you there .why are you always blame others for your personally planed misfortunes in politic?? .you believe something must be achieved on just mar sentiment and propaganda without proper planning and focus.You can't win just by playing a game of victim . politic is what one need to lean and understand .if you can't do that stay with what you know which I think is comers .

frankdoz24:
The supreme leader and crown prince of Biafra maazi Nnamdi kanu arrived united state of america earlier today. This was confirmed through his Twitter handle shared on radio Biafra Facebook page. He will be joining biafrans in states of Texas, Georgia, California, Pennsylvania, and Philadelphia. The major event is scheduled on may30th at freedom square, Washington D.C. He will also unite with teaming biafran community in Canada; touring major Canadian provinces to strengthen biafra-canadian diplomatic relation.

Honouring Biafra's fallen heros all the way from faraway America

Onye 'a wu nnor onye Apari!

adekolaelect:
ours is better we are valuable politically than you .that is why you specialising and resulted in political sabotages simply because nothing work for you .Mind you !!!!!!! You plan for what you get. it is not as if somebody put you there .why are you always blame others for your personally planed misfortunes in politic?? .you believe something must be achieved on just mar sentiment and propaganda without proper planning and focus.You can't win just by playing a game of victim . politic is what one need to lean and understand .if you can't do that stay with what you know which I think is comers .

Stale words of comfort @bolded.

Every other thing is just a bunch of incoherent rant which you lot use to cover your state of hunger and want, just because you're too embarrassed to accept that you've been making wrong choices back-to-back.

Most valued submissive political pawns.
*Spits*

wirinet:
Since Kanu is supreme leader and crown prince, who is the Crown King of Biafra?

Lord Lugard

dacanv:
I can't believe this man still running around freely.

for wanting his people out of the shit whole country. . If he was wrong USA or Britain would have arrested him . Nigeria is a jungle that uses jungle justice

gidgiddy:
Lord Lugard

Why don't you guys try and make sense once in a while. You just say senseless meaningless terms all the time. It makes a joke of your so called agitation. That's why not one takes you guys serious.
Do you know what crown prince means? Igbos societies do not have crown princes, the Kings are chosen by a council of King makers.

Then do you understand what it means by already declaring kanu a crown prince of your proposed country to be comprised of other tribes and other igbo clans. It will look like kanu and you are attempting to build a monarchical Kingdom like Saudi's Arabia.

I am certain all these are beyond your intellectual capacity.

wirinet:
Why don't you guys try and make sense once in a while. You just say senseless meaningless terms all the time. It makes a joke of your so called agitation. That's why not one takes you guys serious.
Do you know what crown prince means? Igbos societies do not have crown princes, the Kings are chosen by a council of King makers.

Then do you understand what it means by already declaring kanu a crown prince of your proposed country to be comprised of other tribes and other igbo clans. It will look like kanu and you are attempting to build a monarchical Kingdom like Saudi's Arabia.

I am certain all these are beyond your intellectual capacity.

People like want to deliberately twist the narrative. Nnamdi Kanus father is the king of their community and Nnamdi Kanu, as first son, is a crown prince. So when someone calls Nnamdi Kanu a crown prince of Biafra, that's what he is.

gidgiddy:
People like want to deliberately twist the narrative. Nnamdi Kanus father is the king of their community and Nnamdi Kanu, as first son, is a crown prince. So when someone calls Nnamdi Kanu a crown prince of Biafra, that's what he is.

You are maybe not igbo or you are deliberately spreading falsehood. Your narrative is false on so many levels, or don't know where to start.
First Kanu's father is not a king, he is simply a community leader. He is the leader of Afaraukwu- Ibeku community in Umuahia North Local Government Area of Abia. He is like what the yorubas call bale or beale.

You need to read up on how the colonial administration created kings (ezes) out of warrant chiefs for colonial administrative purposes.

The idea of crown prince is very alien to igbo culture. There are usually 3 or 4 ruling families and the council of chiefs pick one candidate out of the ruling families. I wonder where you got the idea of kanu being a crown prince from. Apart from the Benin monarchy, I don't know any other monarch in Nigeria that has a crown prince.

Kanu to me is a typical example of a butterfly that think himself an eagle. Crown prince of Biafra Kwa?

wirinet:
You are maybe not igbo or you are deliberately spreading falsehood. Your narrative is false on so many levels, or don't know where to start.
First Kanu's father is not a king, he is simply a community leader. He is the leader of Afaraukwu- Ibeku community in Umuahia North Local Government Area of Abia. He is like what the yorubas call bale or beale.

You need to read up on how the colonial administration created kings (ezes) out of warrant chiefs for colonial administrative purposes.

The idea of crown price is very alien to igbo culture. There are usually 3 or 4 ruling families and the council of chiefs pick one candidate out of the ruling families. I wonder where you got the idea of kanu being a crown prince from. Apart from the Benin monarchy, I don't know any other monarch in Nigeria that has a crown prince.

Kanu to me is a typical example of a butterfly that think himself an eagle. Crown prince of Biafra Kwa?

HRM Israel Kanu, the Eze Ikputu of Afaraukwu is not a king? A man that was coronated in front of his people and is a member of Abia traditional rulers council is who you call a community leader?

The idea of crown prince is alien to Igbos? So is Nigeria. Whether crown prince or "Nigeria", both are imported ideas from Britain. In fact, Nigeria is an even bigger fraud than crown price because while any community can choose their kings, the idea of Nigeria was foisted upon the people without choice and enforced by the gun since the days of Lugard to the present.

gidgiddy:
HRM Israel Kanu, the Eze Ikputu of Afaraukwu is not a king? A man that was coronated in front of his people and is a member of Abia traditional rulers council is who you call a community leader?

Who dash am member of Abia traditional rulers council? This is a list of member of Abia traditional rulers council - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abia_State

Every hamlet in the south east has a traditional ruler, in fact Aba alone has over 400 royal fathers. That why there was rancour in abia state when HRM Eze Isaac Ikonne, The paramount ruler of Aba, conferred a chieftaincy title on Buhari.

The paramount ruler of Aba, the commercial capital of Abia State, HRM Eze Isaac Ikonne, has come under the hammer from the Abia State Council of Traditional Rulers for conferring a chieftaincy title on the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress, Maj.-Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (retd).

Ikonne had conferred on Buhari the chieftaincy title of Ogbuagu 1 (Killer of Tiger) of Aba Kingdom at the weekend when he paid homage to the monarch during an APC campaign rally in Aba.

Chairman of the council of traditional rulers in the state, Eze Eberechi Dick, said Ikonne lacked the powers to confer such title on Buhari on behalf of Aba monarchs as he (Ikonne) is only in charge of his Eziama autonomous community.

According to Dick, Aba had 400 autonomous communities, wondering why Ikonne alone would confer on Buhari a chieftaincy title on behalf of the other traditional rulers without their consent.
https://www.informationng.com

Furthermore, Abia State alone has over 1000 Traditional Rulers - http://saharareporters.com/2014/09/09/abia-state-has-over-1000-traditional-rulers-claims-obi-onitsha

The idea of crown prince is alien to Igbos? So is Nigeria. Whether crown prince or "Nigeria", both are imported ideas from Britain. In fact, Nigeria is an even bigger fraud than crown price because while any community can choose their kings, the idea of Nigeria was foisted upon the people without choice and enforced by the gun since the days of Lugard to the present.

For a people that only recently came to know monarchy, you people seem obsessed it, without a full understanding of what it entails.

Quit that stale story of "Nigeria was foisted upon the people without choice and enforced by the gun since the days of Lugard to the present". Yes the concept of Nigeria was foisted on us without our consent, but when we decided to fight for independence, that we don't want to remain under British rule, we were given the option of going our separate ways, your people people chose to remain with Nigeria.

BuhariAdvocate:
But Which of biafran heroe was buried in those countries he is going to visit? I'm expecting him to come Nigeria and visit grave of biafran heroe and so some respect.

When he was didon't your people try to take his life, he will come later ,if you are not OK with that u go and hug a transformer

wirinet:
Who dash am member of Abia traditional rulers council? This is a list of member of Abia traditional rulers council - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abia_State

Every hamlet in the south east has a traditional ruler, in fact Aba alone has over 400 royal fathers. That why there was rancour in abia state when HRM Eze Isaac Ikonne, The paramount ruler of Aba, conferred a chieftaincy title on Buhari.



Furthermore, Abia State alone has over 1000 Traditional Rulers - http://saharareporters.com/2014/09/09/abia-state-has-over-1000-traditional-rulers-claims-obi-onitsha


For a people that only recently came to know monarchy, you people seem obsessed it, without a full understanding of what it entails.

Quit that stale story of "Nigeria was foisted upon the people without choice and enforced by the gun since the days of Lugard to the present". Yes the concept of Nigeria was foisted on us without our consent, but when we decided to fight for independence, that we don't want to remain under British rule, we were given the option of going our separate ways, your people people chose to remain with Nigeria.

So you are going to wikipedia and saharareporters to tell the Afaraukwu people who their king is? A man is chosen by a community and coronated as their king and you coming to tell the community that the person they coronated is not their king. What a joker

The concept of Nigeria was foisted on us by the British and never have the people been giving any right choose if they want to carry on with the British invention called Nigeria, or something else. That some nationalist united to fight British rule does not mean that the people agreed to be one country. The proper way to offer people choice between Nigeria and something else is referendum, which is what Kanu wants. I never heard the British offered anybody the right to choose between Nigeria through a referendum

In 1709, Scotland, England and Wales came together and agreed to become the "United Kingdom". Yet Scotland was given a referendum in 2014 to allow them to choose between staying part of the UK, or exiting and becoming a separate independent country

If the UK, the very people who created Nigeria, can give their own constituent area, Scotland, the choice to remain with them or to go, then Nigerians like you should stop the noise of "one Nigeria" and support referendum for whoever is tired of Nigeria

Ikechu12:
So let me get it right, the only time to meet him is DC? I don't get it. Why then is he going to other states then? But fine. Starting this week, I'm going to be on vacation anyway so whatever I'll meet him wherever.

How far.?

Did you meet Kanu as planned.?

gidgiddy:
So you are going to wikipedia and saharareporters to tell the Afaraukwu people who their king is? A man is chosen by a community and coronated as their king and you coming to tell the community that the person they coronated is not their king. What a joker

The concept of Nigeria was foisted on us by the British and never have the people been giving any right choose if they want to carry on with the British invention called Nigeria, or something else. That some nationalist united to fight British rule does not mean that the people agreed to be one country. The proper way to offer people choice between Nigeria and something else is referendum, which is what Kanu wants. I never heard the British offered anybody the right to choose between Nigeria through a referendum

In 1709, Scotland, England and Wales came together and agreed to become the "United Kingdom". Yet Scotland was given a referendum in 2014 to allow them to choose between staying part of the UK, or exiting and becoming a separate independent country

If the UK, the very people who created Nigeria, can give their own constituent area, Scotland, the choice to remain with them or to go, then Nigerians like you should stop the noise of "one Nigeria" and support referendum for whoever is tired of Nigeria

The question is, Are Nigerians Politically Civilized.?

gidgiddy:
So you are going to wikipedia and saharareporters to tell the Afaraukwu people who their king is? A man is chosen by a community and coronated as their king and you coming to tell the community that the person they coronated is not their king. What a joker

Debating with you is like arguing with the wind, no direction or purpose. You called someone a crown prince of Biafra, I educated you that apart from the fact that succession is not hereditary in igboland, the father of the person you are calling crown prince of biafra is only a chief (if you prefer king) in one of the seven communities of Ibeku, which in itself is one of the two clans in Umuahia north local government area. You are now arguing that Afaraukwu people chose their king, agreeing that kingship is not hereditary but chosen. So where did your idea of Crown prince of Biafra come from.

Here is how Kanu's father HRH Eze Isreal O. Kanu became king of Afaraukwu;

Until recently, AFARAUKWU was governed by one of the chiefs in the council of Eze Ogurube of IBEKU known as Egwukwu of AFARAUKWU IBEKU. Based on a recent political realignment, AFARAUKWU was recognized as an autonomous community by the Abia state government of Nigeria. Following this recognition Eze Patrick Obike was crown the Egwukwu 1 of AFARAUKWU IBEKU. Upon his death HRH Eze Isreal O. Kanu was crowned the Egwukwu 2 of AFARAUKWU IBEKU. Still in his tenure as Egwukwu 2, the sub clan of Ibeku went through another political realignment that created the three mentioned autonomous communities of Okwulaga, Ohokobe na Umuokeyi, and Isiama.
http://www.afaraukwu.org/about-afara-1.html

In effect during kanu's father's reign, Afaraukwu Ibeku has been further divided into 3 autonomous communities.

The concept of Nigeria was foisted on us by the British and never have the people been giving any right choose if they want to carry on with the British invention called Nigeria, or something else. That some nationalist united to fight British rule does not mean that the people agreed to be one country. The proper way to offer people choice between Nigeria and something else is referendum, which is what Kanu wants. I never heard the British offered anybody the right to choose between Nigeria through a referendum

In 1709, Scotland, England and Wales came together and agreed to become the "United Kingdom". Yet Scotland was given a referendum in 2014 to allow them to choose between staying part of the UK, or exiting and becoming a separate independent country

If the UK, the very people who created Nigeria, can give their own constituent area, Scotland, the choice to remain with them or to go, then Nigerians like you should stop the noise of "one Nigeria" and support referendum for whoever is tired of Nigeria

You guys just continue spewing meaningless rubbish. If you guys tell us your tribe wants to come together to form it's own country, as you do not feel comfortable with other tribes, that make up Nigeria, you have to start the political process. It's a long and arduous way, except you want to take the quicker route of war. But to continuously blame the British that left over 60 years ago is lame.
As I said your people had the opportunity to opt out of the union before independence, you guys voted for one Nigeria, not only one Nigeria, but rejected the secession clause. Now you are the ones crying.

Nigeria was not the only country the British colonised, in fact the British colonised over half the countries of the world, so how come others have chosen to move on and take their destinies in their hands, and you guys are stuck in the some sort of utopia.

The British conquered each community at different times. They did not find huge organised political units. Are you now suggesting each tribe or sub tribe conquered should be put to a referendum? For example, the itsekiris, the Ijaws and Urhobos should carry a referendum if they want to form a country, remain in Nigeria or join a new country of numerous tribes. What of the ijebus, the egbas and the eguns, they each too should be given their referendum, since they were conquered at different times.

dacanv:
I can't believe this man still running around freely.

I cant believe you are still being ruled by a old sickly COUP PLOTER

[s]

wirinet:
Debating with you is like arguing with the wind, no direction or purpose. You called someone a crown prince of Biafra, I educated you that apart from the fact that succession is not hereditary in igboland, the father of the person you are calling crown prince of biafra is only a chief (if you prefer king) in one of the seven communities of Ibeku, which in itself is one of the two clans in Umuahia north local government area. You are now arguing that Afaraukwu people chose their king, agreeing that kingship is not hereditary but chosen. So where did your idea of Crown prince of Biafra come from.

Here is how Kanu's father HRH Eze Isreal O. Kanu became king of Afaraukwu;

In effect during kanu's father's reign, Afaraukwu Ibeku has been further divided into 3 autonomous communities.


You guys just continue spewing meaningless rubbish. If you guys tell us your tribe wants to come together to form it's own country, as you do not feel comfortable with other tribes, that make up Nigeria, you have to start the political process. It's a long and arduous way, except you want to take the quicker route of war. But to continuously blame the British that left over 60 years ago is lame.
As I said your people had the opportunity to opt out of the union before independence, you guys voted for one Nigeria, not only one Nigeria, but rejected the secession clause. Now you are the ones crying.

Nigeria was not the only country the British colonised, in fact the British colonised over half the countries of the world, so how come others have chosen to move on and take their destinies in their hands, and you guys are stuck in the some sort of utopia.

The British conquered each community at different times. They did not find huge organised political units. Are you now suggesting each tribe or sub tribe conquered should be put to a referendum? For example, the itsekiris, the Ijaws and Urhobos should carry a referendum if they want to form a country, remain in Nigeria or join a new country of numerous tribes. What of the ijebus, the egbas and the eguns, they each too should be given their referendum, since they were conquered at different times.

[/s]

On Biafra we stand

wirinet:
You guys just continue spewing meaningless rubbish. If you guys tell us your tribe wants to come together to form it's own country, as you do not feel comfortable with other tribes, that make up Nigeria, you have to start the political process. It's a long and arduous way, except you want to take the quicker route of war. But to continuously blame the British that left over 60 years ago is lame.
As I said your people had the opportunity to opt out of the union before independence, you guys voted for one Nigeria, not only one Nigeria, but rejected the secession clause. Now you are the ones crying.

Nigeria was not the only country the British colonised, in fact the British colonised over half the countries of the world, so how come others have chosen to move on and take their destinies in their hands, and you guys are stuck in the some sort of utopia.

The British conquered each community at different times. They did not find huge organised political units. Are you now suggesting each tribe or sub tribe conquered should be put to a referendum? For example, the itsekiris, the Ijaws and Urhobos should carry a referendum if they want to form a country, remain in Nigeria or join a new country of numerous tribes. What of the ijebus, the egbas and the eguns, they each too should be given their referendum, since they were conquered at different times.

You want us to start a political process to leave Nigeria even though we never agreed to be part of Nigeria in the first place? And you are saying that we had the option to opt out of Nigeria but voted to part of Nigeria. When and where did we have this option to be independent but chose Nigeria? I would be very interested to know this part of Nigerian history that I never heard of before

Also, this talk of secession clause is baseless. If it never entered the constitution, then it means majority of Nigerians reps did not vote for it. But it is important to note that Nigeria is signatory to the UN and AU charters on self determination and this allows any group, to agitate to leave Nigeria

As an Igbo man, I can only speak for my tribe, and the right thing is to give all Igbo/Igboids a referendum for them to determination if they want to part of the British colonial creation called Nigeria

Nigeria may not be the only country that the British created but it is wrong to say that they all moved on. Britain created India, but out of India came Pakistan.

Malaysia was a British colony, but after Malaysian independence in 1963, Singapore left it in 1965

Even South Africa that was a British colony, Namibia left it in the 90's

So what is this shocking thing about people seeking independence when there are many examples out there?


The important thing to note is that if the creators of Nigeria, the UK, could offer Scottish people a referendum in 2014, then there no reason why Nigeria cannot give Igbos a referendum