₦airaland Forum

The "super fool" in the picture below tried to eat the woman's hair because he heard that there was food in the woman's hair!!! To what religion does this fool belong?

A:Ariosophy

B:Buddhism

C:Christianity

D:Druze

CLUE: If you pick option "A", you are a bigger fool!!

@MJBOLT,

Correct!!! WOW!!! You are so intelligent!!! I must really commend your parents!!! They obviously fed you with a lot of Vitamin B2 fortified OATMEAL!!!...………………………………….Unlike the Christian child in the picture below, whose parents obviously encouraged her to feast on [/b]Vitamin F9 fortified GOATMEAL!!![b]

The religion of the hair eater is just plain stupidity and ignorance. Christianity does not advocate hair eating and anyone who thinks it does is ignorant about Christianity or just stupid.

But how do you think we can stop these "thick skulled believers" from repeating such imbecilities? I love them so much and I don't want to see them hurt themselves!!!

Niflheim:
But how do you think we can stop these "thick skulled believers" from repeating such imbecilities? I love them so much and I don't want to see them hurt themselves!!!

By having a proper understanding of that which we criticise for starts, and not mistaking what some call Christianity for actual Christianity itself. Unfortunately atheists base their opinion of Christianity on believers and Christians, and not on their own study and understanding of the text itself and what Christianity actually is. Indoctrinated atheists, is a better description for them, for they too appear to believe just like the believers do.

The current attitude of atheists is that of throwing away the baby, the bathwater and the bathbasin itself when it is only the water that might be dirty, or the bathbasin that might be faulty. It's a great pity, for in my opinion, it is atheists, and those who have not been indoctrinated, that ought to have the ability to understand the philosophy of Christianity, and not mindless believers who have not bothered to consider that which they believe.

You might understand the ridiculousness of believing if I asked you to believe Pythagoras Theorem, Evolution, or that your parents gave birth to you. I'm sure there's a difference of attitude in understanding and knowing the implications of those examples instead of just believing them.

If atheist could read the text without the preconceived beliefs, they'd understand how Jesus was the atheist of his day. It was for that that he was crucified. Study Socrates and you might understand what I mean if I said Jesus went out of Plato's cave and they bashed his head in when he returned to tell what he had seen. Recognition of their error is what made them deify him, but which believers have no clue about. It is a great pity that this is not understood or we would be studying Christianity as a philosophy and not as a belief.

The way to stop people "repeating such imbecilities" and "hurting themselves" is to first remove the forest from one's own eyes by getting a proper understanding, for only then can you help those with twigs in their own eyes to see. But mind not to be crucified like Jesus was for noone will deify you after we crucify you!

That said, rejoice that NL exists where we get to challenge erroneous beliefs by philosophising as we do here. We would be stupider without it and you.