raumdeuter:


The FA can not stand the idea of Pep sodomizing their league they had to invove ojoro.

Clean game no ojoro City wins until won fese le to

answer the question

how many players did norwich or wolves pull before sodomizing your apari just like everton did on his first season?


so you are already making excuse for the bald headed fraud. you can already see failure on the horizon.

the fraud that couldn't get past ucl quarter final with close to a billion dollar team.
same team that was in semis just a year before.

NinjaMetahuman:
answer the question

how many players did norwich or wolves pulled before sodomizing your apari just like everton did on his first season?


so you are already making excuse for the bald headed fraud. you can already see failure on the horizon.

the fraud that couldn't get past ucl quarter final with close to a billion dollar team.
same team that was in semis just a year before.

Did that stop the bald apari fraud from sodomizing your league back to back

Best point haul and second best point haul

raumdeuter:


Did that stop the bald apari fraud from sodomizing your league back to back

Best point haul and second best point haul

local league that local coach like conte won with his hands tied on first try without breaking the bank. the fraud had to spend nigeria's defense budget to win it.

when he is gonna go past quarter final again in the big boys league?

raumdeuter:


I hope you are right

I actually will prefer City going beyond quarters in the CL than winning the league but if City isnt going to win the league let it be a fair contest

I know you have to support Bayern Munich but me tbh I don't care about Valverde winning the UCL as long as CR7 does not win it so he won't win another WPOTY.

I want Pep to win it. But in my heart..I can't say.

I am too sure about the league. Too sure.

patrickmuf:
Since you're so sure of City, why not bet that will hit the 98 pts mark again?

Because points Mark is not the motivation. They only needed to have more points than Liverpool which is why they had 98.

They will have at least 2 more points than Liverpool in May 2020.

raumdeuter:


Ask these same people why they are not complaining about the time Origi scored his winner vs Everton

They hate Pep.

I am not superstitious. I don't do all those getting lucky wins like LFC did last season will mean they will win league which is the same thing people said last season. At 3-0 nobody thought Barca will make the same mistakes of the previous season and crash out to Liverpool but that happened. Then the next day Totttenham did something similar.

Just the way Liverpool have won games they did not deserve to win. They will lose games they don't deserve to lose.

EruditorII:


Because points Mark is not the motivation. They only needed to have more points than Liverpool which is why they had 98.

They will have at least 2 more points than Liverpool in May 2020.

36,000 Nigerian naira wager
take it.

raumdeuter:


So if City won despite bias last season, they should win again with bias?

If you are fighting a person and your hand was hep yet you won first round, means its justified for your hand to be hald 2nd round?

although, the VAR analysis of last season games was made earlier this season and liverpool came top of the league, but we know that there can still be a problem with interpreting the rules of the game even with the var. That is btw though.

But, there is no way you can blame the FA of making a team not to win a league title because, it consists of 38 matches. If you are good, you are good. Chelsea beat soton 4 1 today, no how FA would have helped soton today to stop Chelsea from winning them.

So, whether there is a campaign for Liverpool or not, if city are good enough to win the league this season, they will win. Stop making advanced defence wall for yourself in case city fail to win the league this season.





I am happy now that you agree that there can be a campaign against or for a team.
So, do you now agree that there was a campaign against mourinho's Chelsea in 2014/2015?

raumdeuter:


Is this contact a foul? remember a foul is a foul

Have no idea why it wasn't given, but I'm not the ref.

Ibime:


They did VAR check on all incidents last season and said Liverpool would have won by one point. So all this talk is based on small sample size.

Actually this is a lie.

They did VAR on City vs Tottenham where City won 1-0 and said Son deserved a penalty which could have made the game 1-1. That is all. You did not read the report.

Funny thing is, ESPN had published an article a week before that rubbish one showing that City could have won the league with 96 points to LFCs 90 or so.

Ibime:


Go and argue with the experts

https://www.sportbible.com/football/football-liverpool-would-have-won-the-league-last-season-if-var-was-used-20190809

Read that article and then look for the ESPN one as well. I am surprised you called this rubbish a talk from experts that analyzed one game. And claimed all Salah's dives happened when LFC were already leading. Lol

They did not mention that Boly used his had to score and with VAR that is a 1-0 City win.

Ibime:


They checked everything. They would have deducted some and added others

Lie. Read the article. The article was written a week after ESPN did theirs and claimed City we're harddone by and that one of Aguero's goals should have been taken away last season.

raumdeuter:


Which one did they deduct and add for Liverpool to remain at 97points while it was Citys own that was reduced

Lol

NinjaMetahuman:
answer the question

how many players did norwich or wolves pull before sodomizing your apari just like everton did on his first season?


so you are already making excuse for the bald headed fraud. you can already see failure on the horizon.

the fraud that couldn't get past ucl quarter final with close to a billion dollar team.
same team that was in semis just a year before.

Same team that was 4th as well.

HewlettPackard:


36,000 Nigerian naira wager
take it.

I accept.

raumdeuter:


I hope you are right

I actually will prefer City going beyond quarters in the CL than winning the league but if City isnt going to win the league let it be a fair contest

Please, stop making ready made excuse for yourself incase they lose the league.

No matter the campaign, if city are good enough to win it, they will win it, just like last season

Greatihex:
although, the VAR analysis of last season games was made earlier this season and liverpool came top of the league, but we know that there can still be a problem with interpreting the rules of the game even with the var. That is btw though.

But, there is no way you can blame the FA of making a team not to win a league title because, it consists of 38 matches. If you are good, you are good. Chelsea beat soton 4 1 today, no how FA would have helped soton today to stop Chelsea from winning them.

So, whether there is a campaign for Liverpool or not, if city are good enough to win the league this season, they will win. Stop making advanced defence wall for yourself in case city fail to win the league this season.





I am happy now that you agree that there can be a campaign against or for a team.
So, do you now agree that there was a campaign against mourinho's Chelsea in 2014/2015?

I am not joining issues with you I want to correct the first part.

VAR was used (together with the new rules) to analyze one game City vs Tottenham and that was the basis of that rubbish article. You people can do some research and read alternate views sometimes. That article was rubbished online factually step by step to prove it was bogus.

EruditorII:

I accept.

We in.

raumdeuter:


Assuming without conceding that you are right, add 2 points and remove all the fake penalties Salah got last season plus offside plus penalties not given to opponent and see where things stand

so, city never got wrong calls that went in their favour last season?

NinjaMetahuman:
answer the question

how many players did norwich or wolves pull before sodomizing your apari just like everton did on his first season?


so you are already making excuse for the bald headed fraud. you can already see failure on the horizon.

the fraud that couldn't get past ucl quarter final with close to a billion dollar team.
same team that was in semis just a year before.

that was how he was making excuses for city crashing out to Tottenham last season

NinjaMetahuman:
local league that local coach like conte won with his hands tied on first try without breaking the bank. the fraud had to spend nigeria's defense budget to win it.

when he is gonna go past quarter final again in the big boys league?

You told him to come prove himself in the EPL, he came and broke the points record

Una don bring this una bet thing this season..

Las las na lamentations and deactivation go settle am

EruditorII:


They hate Pep.

I am not superstitious. I don't do all those getting lucky wins like LFC did last season will mean they will win league which is the same thing people said last season. At 3-0 nobody thought Barca will make the same mistakes of the previous season and crash out to Liverpool but that happened. Then the next day Totttenham did something similar.

Just the way Liverpool have won games they did not deserve to win. They will lose games they don't deserve to lose.

so, city will not lose games that they do not deserve to lose?

Unlimited22:

Have no idea why it wasn't given, but I'm not the ref.

That's an example of the campaign to help Liverpool

raumdeuter:


FA don decide the winner

Your May 2020 excuse loading.

No English FA influence in UCL, he must win that one.

Greatihex:


Please, stop making ready made excuse for yourself incase they lose the league.

No matter the campaign, if city are good enough to win it, they will win it, just like last season

A league when 2 teams are close and one enjoy FA support will never be balanced

BMW is close to Mercedes will the result be same if I deflate the tyre of one car?

Greatihex:
so, city never got wrong calls that went in their favour last season?

So if I favour your opponent 10 times and favor you twice it is the same

Truth is, pulisic looks like our most creative player currently. He has the vision. He is just lacking in consistency.

I just dey look that mount with one eye o. He looks to not offer much aside goals and pressing.


Tammy is just playing ahead of bats because he is a chelsea product and a lampard boy. Apart from that, he does nothing better than bats. There are just the same thing.

I just hope lampard knows what he is doing with his player selections.

raumdeuter:


A league when 2 teams are close and one enjoy FA support will never be balanced

BMW is close to Mercedes will the result be same if I deflate the tyre of one car?

they were close last season, why did all the FA influence not help liverpool last season?

Remember, at that time it was hot, FA helping one team like Leicester to draw city would have given Liverpool the title, but city were still good enough to win the title and they did.



You have not answered my question though.

Do you now agree that chelsea of 2014/2015 won against the odds of a campaign against them?
FA is not the reason city lost to wolves and norwich.

Greatihex:
Truth is, pulisic looks like our most creative player currently. He has the vision. He is just lacking in consistency.

I just dey look that mount with one eye o. He looks to not offer much aside goals and pressing.


Tammy is just playing ahead of bats because he is a chelsea product and a lampard boy. Apart from that, he does nothing better than bats. There are just the same thing.

I just hope lampard knows what he is doing with his player selections.

At the bolded, wot brought u to this conclusion? Wot and wot did u consider?

Tammy might not be better than Bats, but he is working hard by giving his all on the pitch. If Bats wants to start, he has to do more. Tammy holds up the ball better than Bats, presses and keeps opposition defenders on their toes more than Batshuayi too.

thorrvik55:


At the bolded, wot brought u to this conclusion? Wot and wot did u consider?

Tammy might not be better than Bats, but he is working hard by giving his all on the pitch. If Bats wants to start, he has to do more. Tammy holds up the ball better than Bats, presses and keeps opposition defenders on their toes more than Batshuayi too.

okay. let me say, most visionary attacker.


Leave the bats and tammy matter.
So, bats does not give his all? Mind you, I am not saying that bats is better or that he should be starting, no. But, i think tammy is getting the edge ahead of bats because of the reasons I stated earlier and it is not a bad thing

Greatihex:
they were close last season, why did all the FA influence not help liverpool last season?

Remember, at that time it was hot, FA helping one team like Leicester to draw city would have given Liverpool the title, but city were still good enough to win the title and they did.
You have not answered my question though.

Do you now agree that chelsea of 2014/2015 won against the odds of a campaign against them?
FA is not the reason city lost to wolves and norwich.

The FA helped Liverpool only that City was too hot for them, it ended up being 1 point gap when it should have been like 6

So is it every season City have to lead with 6 points to cater for the FA rigging? The years City leads with 3, what will happen

Give examples of decisions that favoured Chelsea rivals in 2014/15