patrickmuf:
Raumdeuter, if Lampard's goal in 2006 had stood, Germany wouldn't have beaten England...Before you respond, think we'll...

airmark:




See useless and senseless comparison.

''Tallness is not a talent'' is like saying ''2+2≠0''. The statements are correct from nursery to university, from Malawi to Australia. Any eruditor that opposes those two statements should be slapped out of existence.

patrickmuf:
Raumdeuter, if Lampard's goal in 2006 had stood, Germany wouldn't have beaten England...Before you respond, think we'll...

Leyqute:
Nihilstjnr do you still have McGinn in your FPL team?

airmark:




See useless and senseless comparison.

''Tallness is not a talent'' is like saying ''2+2≠0''. The statements are correct from nursery to university, from Malawi to Australia. Any eruditor that opposes those two statements should be slapped out of existence.

thorrvik55:
Swissh good ebening o..

Long time no see

Hope u are okay sha

nihilistjnr:


No. My team construction is pretty poor this year tbh

NewDelhi:
But why do these guys come to this thread to lament about hazard scoring or not? Make una go Madrid thread go lodge your complaint now abi weytin still concern Chelsea with Eden hazard again.. the club has moved on .

TalabiAudu:





Or if there was VAR during Ovrebo's wonder moment, you think Fraudiola would have had 2 UCL titles?

Eruditor:


When you were in Nursery school, square root (-4) = not possible.

When you got to university (if you did), square root (-4)= 2i

The child who told his teacher in Nursery that SQRT(-4)= 2i will be laughed at. Years later, when his classmates get to University, they will say "Ah, Eruditor was right".

My PM is your AM.

A40:
I respect Fury's heart and skills and also feel he should have nicked the decision vs Wilder but you can't underplay the Champions advantage especially when said Champion put you on the floor twice.

Whether Wilder should be scared or ashamed of not beating a sluggish and overweight Fury is immaterial. Fury is a professional athlete and it's his problem if he chooses not to keep himself in peak mental and physical condition to convincingly win fights. He's 3 years younger and fought almost 20 fights less than Wilder. He has no excuse

Godx:

Fury will end him come feburary that's even if he's man enough to face him. Wilder won't be lucky like the last time.

afrodoc2:


You can't be so sure about that. Fury is the better boxer and has the reach advantage so he will be able to dictate pace and distance better, thereby scoring points while protecting himself as much as possible. You however seem to underestimate the significance of single punch knock out power in the heavyweight division. As a heavyweight 2 crucial things that can't be taught but are very important are having a strong chin and having real knockout power.

Everybody gets hit during the course of a fight. The problem is trying to go 12 rounds without getting hit by a man who is walking around with a murder weapon disguised as a right hand. Wilder can afford to make 2, 3, 4 or even more mistakes in a fight and still win, but his opponents can't afford to make any mistake at all.

That right hand is top 5 all time and unlike Foreman and Tyson he has stamina and retains the power till the late rounds, and unlike Shavers he appears to have a chin.
His major flaw which he shares to an extent with Shavers (probably due to their late start in boxing) is his lack of boxing skill. However he has the ultimate equalizer.

Godx:

Fact is there is nothing special about Wilder apart from his freakish KO ability. He is a one trick pony who couldnt lay a glove on a 56 year old fighter until the superb right hand. Wilder is 6 foot 7 with very long arms and he has no jab or any boxing skills whatsoever. He just uses a jab as a range finder for the right hand and other shitty fighters with limited skills and slow reactions end up getting caught. I don't see Wilder getting a chance against Fury if the fight eventually happens.

Godx:


I will say Wilder is a fitter, more athletic version of Shavers. The Black Acorn could KO a charging rhino when he landed. Mind you, Shavers was a much better boxer than Wilder!


Fury should be licking his lips after Wilder fight with Ortiz. . Fury has the size, skill and chin to beat Wilder. The big advantage Wilder used to have is his height and reach. Fighters have to be wary, as Wilder can usually hit them before they can hit him. Fury doesnt have to jump through that hurdle. Ortiz is also a southpaw, which worked in Wilder's favor and he still hardly landed any Punch. The straight right is always there when facing a southpaw. Much more than a conventional fighter.

I see Fury boxing from the outside, circling to Wilder's left, nullifying that right hand. Just needs to make sure he doesnt trade with him, even if he looks hurt. I am just so confident about Fury chances.

nihilistjnr:


Did you watch the first fight between both men?

Fury outboxed Wilder in all 12 rounds.

Most people had Fury ahead on points....but Fury was sent to the canvass 3 times.

The last time, Fury went to meet his maker but was sent back at gate to go and finish the round

You sound like you're trying to provide some sort of insight with this post.

Let me give you the real gist now. Nobody is beating wilder on points...it's not going to happen.

Your only hope is to KO the Mofo, or you accept the KO. And many e.g Ortiz and Stiverne have rattled the man, buzzed him well, rung his bell, but his chin is terminator like.

If you think you're going to circling or setting traps for a nigga that doesn't even care about foot placement, stance or ring control, you're on a long thing.

Wilder has changed the game.

patrickmuf:
Rumdeuter, if Lampard's goal in 2006 had stood, Germany wouldn't have beaten England...Before you respond, think well...

thorrvik55:


I guess we can say a player that suffered a season ending knee injury "faked a fall". Anything goes when it comes to licking that bald Apari's ass

raumdeuter:


Very possible. Germany might not have won as the scores would be 2-2 instead of 2-1

thorrvik55:



Mane did not dive vs Leicester or vs Spurs. U can check YouTube for the Chelsea game vs Watford and watch the Deulofeu penalty which was awarded despite the fact that it was a clear dive. The infield referee was already going to give Deulofeu a yellow card b4 VAR stepped in and gave Watford a penalty. That Mane's penalty is legit. Blame Chillwell's stupidity for making such needless tackle in his box in the dying minutes of the match not mane.


First handball already touched Silva's arm b4 it touched Trent's so it is not a penalty In any universe. Second handball was ball to hand.. Sterling played the ball straight to Trent's hand in a bid to use the referee's head. If they start given suchpenalty, every team would be getting a penalty every week because it's very easy to do what Sterling did.


Lol. This is what we call grasping at straws


It could have gone either way. Such goals get given everyday so it's not something new.


Which Palace goal was ruled offside bros??

patrickmuf:
Airmark see wetin Liverpool done make Dayo talk...

CAPdan21:
the L for ramdeuter this season has potential 2 be more than last yr own...

raumdeuter:


When did you become this intellectually lazy that you are seeking the support of one of the least intelligent people to make your own point

Do you know if Jorginho hadnt slipped its possible Chelsea could have won and its also Chelsea could have lost? What is the novel idea in this?

patrickmuf:
Lol you're only saying it's possible because you have a running argument here that Liverpool first goal had an impact in the outcome of their game with Arsenal thus should have been canceled for Van Dijk's foul even though Liverpool went on to win 3 vs 1...

raumdeuter:


I said England COULD win, You said Germany WOULD lose

Which one sounds reasonable to you?

Arsenal settled to defend from the beginning, conceding meant they had to come out and play. If that goal had been rightly ruled off, they can continue defending like they were doing and hoping on a counter

patrickmuf:
In other words Arsenal were robbed just like England were robbed abi?

raumdeuter:


Arsenal had a decision go against them just like England had a decision go against them

raumdeuter:


When did you become this intellectually lazy that you are seeking the support of one of the least intelligent people to make your own point

Do you know if Jorginho hadnt slipped its possible Chelsea could have won and its also possible Chelsea could have lost? What is the novel idea in this?

If Messi had scored his chance at Anfield its possible Barcelona could have progressed and its also possible they could have lost

You are telling us with certainty that Germany WOULDNT have won, I am saying its a possibility not certainty

KingTom:

JESUS o strong gan