cybertron88:

You are looking at it from the wrong perspective. For example this season about 553 goals has been scored. 38 of those goals were pk, about 16 free kicks, 43 headed goals. If u remember ur probability calculation in secondary school probability=required outcome/total outcome. If u do the small maths and convert the probability to odds u LL see that the odds are actually in d favor of goal via shooting. Am a data analyst and have done a lot of simulation with football data on PYTHON and other programs The truth is the odds the bookmakers give for straight win and ov1.5 are not in ur favor. Especially for football. Those odds are not a true reflection of the probability of that option. In summary we need an element of luck in punting but to say straight win and over 1.5 is a better option is totally false. The surest straight win would give u an average of 1.2 odds thats if u are lucky which takes about 5 wins to break even. In goal type method the least is 1.45 I just need two wins to break even. On d long run the goal type market is more profitable than the regular straight wins.

jerrythafinisher:

are you using the old-bet9ja site

Ayaba444:

I've seen them already
The date started counting from the 5th

babyfaceafrica:
alabi should employ this guy

twicenoni:
Pls can someone check for me B98AWSSQWEPTT-252052 is it still active or bursted?

Ayaba444:
Excuse me please

Does bet9ja delete tickets??

Because there are some of my games running since the 4th of this month and i cant find them on my betlist

Help o biko

twicenoni:
Pls can someone check for me B98AWSSQWEPTT-252052 is it still active or bursted?

Chidexter:


Share the games na

decub:

I love your analysis.

The tendency of losing with goal type method (shot) will only increase if you accumulate so many games.

A ticket of 10 games split into 3 tickets has a very high tendency of breaking even. At least 1 ticket would likely come out green if all doesn't come out.

I like being around data analysts. Permit me to ask if you are a statistician?

cybertron88:

You are looking at it from the wrong perspective. For example this season about 553 goals has been scored. 38 of those goals were pk, about 16 free kicks, 43 headed goals. If u remember ur probability calculation in secondary school probability=required outcome/total outcome. If u do the small maths and convert the probability to odds u LL see that the odds are actually in d favor of goal via shooting. Am a data analyst and have done a lot of simulation with football data on PYTHON and other programs The truth is the odds the bookmakers give for straight win and ov1.5 are not in ur favor. Especially for football. Those odds are not a true reflection of the probability of that option. In summary we need an element of luck in punting but to say straight win and over 1.5 is a better option is totally false. The surest straight win would give u an average of 1.2 odds thats if u are lucky which takes about 5 wins to break even. In goal type method the least is 1.45 I just need two wins to break even. On d long run the goal type market is more profitable than the regular straight wins.

Chidexter:
Alexistaiwo when you go post games na

Firefox01:
You dey mind am? E sure me say he dey part of those wey no want make people eyes open to that market make bet9ja no commot am or bastardize the odds

alexistaiwo:
Bro, I presently dey hibernation mode till all leagues resume fully.

Alabi still get many winnings to pay us this season.

9PBLIVE:
betking has goals in a row



madddo

Fucklove:
He's taken already please. Tolu121 and israelp are available for hookup

Crownbefitsme:


Tolu121
Go kill me for house
I like Israelp also

worthybet:
With Cristiano Ronaldo's form, I think he may score tonight. Ronaldo to score odds @ 2.0.

cybertron88:

You are looking at it from the wrong perspective. For example this season about 553 goals has been scored. 38 of those goals were pk, about 16 free kicks, 43 headed goals. If u remember ur probability calculation in secondary school probability=required outcome/total outcome. If u do the small maths and convert the probability to odds u LL see that the odds are actually in d favor of goal via shooting. Am a data analyst and have done a lot of simulation with football data on PYTHON and other programs The truth is the odds the bookmakers give for straight win and ov1.5 are not in ur favor. Especially for football. Those odds are not a true reflection of the probability of that option. In summary we need an element of luck in punting but to say straight win and over 1.5 is a better option is totally false. The surest straight win would give u an average of 1.2 odds thats if u are lucky which takes about 5 wins to break even. In goal type method the least is 1.45 I just need two wins to break even. On d long run the goal type market is more profitable than the regular straight wins.

israelp:
laslas na race to 3goals to sure pass

worthybet:
With Cristiano Ronaldo's form, I think he may score tonight. Ronaldo to score odds @ 2.0.

Joezinho:
Lille sha.

Better days ahead...

Viking007, can you cook 8 -10 odds for me tomorrow? Wana throw in a substantial amount. Please..