₦airaland Forum

Confirmedzombie:
Poor and fake news. Certificate of return already issued.

Ipobs can lie so much. See how ipobs fabricated the news.

Shameless pigs and idiots

Nonsense

sofiscatedmoron:
who voted for uzo?

XANDERBOY85:
Looks like the numbers are refusing to add up.

Caleb17:
It doesn't remove the fact that Hope Uzodimma is now governor of Imo State.

surgical:
There is no perfect crime something will give you away
Now the total votes is more than the number of people that voted how will the supreme Court explain that,they behaved in I don't care manner,once we say it that is it and nobody can do anything about it.

jaxxy:
And it doesn’t remove the fact dat it is disgraceful. Even INEC is ashamed.

garfield1:
Elections held. Polling unit results were declared and issued to agents and police. At Ward collation, valid results from 388 polling units where Uzodinma got over 200k votes were not collated in the Ward results without any legal basis. So it is basically, votes in 388 valid Form EC8As were not included in preparing Form EC8Bs, which greatly affected the final result and placed him 4th. At the Tribunal, these original duplicate copies given to the party agents and the police were tendered and spoken to by persons who witnessed the unlawful exclusion.

The case at the Tribunal was simply for the Court to exercise its power to include votes from these 388 polling which were ignored at the point of collation without a legal basis, in the final result.

That is all the Supreme Court did. When you add the excluded votes, Uzodinma had over 300k votes. That makes him the winner.

The last time the Supreme Court gave a decision like this is in Omoboriowo v Ajasi and Nwobodo v Onoh in 1984. So I'm not surprised that it's sounding new.

As a lawyer, I don't speak to the politics behind decisions. I speak to the legal basis behind decisions. There was legal basis for this decision. But let the politics continue.

LaIabobo:
Sadly, it is a tale of the more you look, the less you see.

But this same supreme court ruled against APC in Rivers, Bauchi and Zamfara state... Now they ruled in favour of APC and no one seems to understand the basis of the ruling. Crazy old men and women.

Politics in this nation is mad, insane, and crazy.

LaIabobo:
Sadly, it is a tale of the more you look, the less you see.

But this same supreme court ruled against APC in Rivers, Bauchi and Zamfara state... Now they ruled in favour of APC and no one seems to understand the basis of the ruling. Crazy old men and women.

Politics in this nation is mad, insane, and crazy.

garfield1:
Elections held. Polling unit results were declared and issued to agents and police. At Ward collation, valid results from 388 polling units where Uzodinma got over 200k votes were not collated in the Ward results without any legal basis. So it is basically, votes in 388 valid Form EC8As were not included in preparing Form EC8Bs, which greatly affected the final result and placed him 4th. At the Tribunal, these original duplicate copies given to the party agents and the police were tendered and spoken to by persons who witnessed the unlawful exclusion.

The case at the Tribunal was simply for the Court to exercise its power to include votes from these 388 polling which were ignored at the point of collation without a legal basis, in the final result.

That is all the Supreme Court did. When you add the excluded votes, Uzodinma had over 300k votes. That makes him the winner.

The last time the Supreme Court gave a decision like this is in Omoboriowo v Ajasi and Nwobodo v Onoh in 1984. So I'm not surprised that it's sounding new.

As a lawyer, I don't speak to the politics behind decisions. I speak to the legal basis behind decisions. There was legal basis for this decision. But let the politics continue.

Confirmedzombie:
Poor and fake news. Certificate of return already issued.

Ipobs can lie so much. See how ipobs fabricated the news.

Shameless pigs and idiots

Nonsense

manontree:
The country has gone to the dogs. The above questions is proof that The SC did a hatchet job for their paymasters and to save their skin

The decision insults the sensibilities of or common sense and takes everyone for fools. They are getting so brazen they actually believe they can do just about anything and nothing would happen

This particular judgement which started when the already prepared decision was leaked to mbaka to make his nonsensical prophesy and ended with a crazy decision which a week ago the same SC claimed Atiku cannot complain about INEC cancelled votes, is the start of a precedent our democracy may never recover from.Those cheering today would gnash their teeth tomorrow

moruphb:
have u seen the number of accredited voters?

Racoon:
You nailed it sir.INEC, Supreme Court, APC govt have bastardized our judicial and democratic processes.

garfield1:
Elections held. Polling unit results were declared and issued to agents and police. At Ward collation, valid results from 388 polling units where Uzodinma got over 200k votes were not collated in the Ward results without any legal basis. So it is basically, votes in 388 valid Form EC8As were not included in preparing Form EC8Bs, which greatly affected the final result and placed him 4th. At the Tribunal, these original duplicate copies given to the party agents and the police were tendered and spoken to by persons who witnessed the unlawful exclusion.

The case at the Tribunal was simply for the Court to exercise its power to include votes from these 388 polling which were ignored at the point of collation without a legal basis, in the final result.

That is all the Supreme Court did. When you add the excluded votes, Uzodinma had over 300k votes. That makes him the winner.

The last time the Supreme Court gave a decision like this is in Omoboriowo v Ajasi and Nwobodo v Onoh in 1984. So I'm not surprised that it's sounding new.

As a lawyer, I don't speak to the politics behind decisions. I speak to the legal basis behind decisions. There was legal basis for this decision. But let the politics continue.

nairalee:
With the supreme court ruling, there seem to be more questions than answers regarding the drama in Imo including how the supreme court came about the votes it tallied. How many votes were left out, enough to make up for the gap of 176,946 votes between Ihedioha and Uzodinma?
Was it only Uzodinma that was affected in the 388 polling units? On what ground did INEC nullify the votes from the polling units? What Could it be the apex court faulted INEC’s decision? What happens in subsequent elections when the commission decides to void votes from some polling units as it deems fit? The litany of questions continues.

This is the highlight of this post.

Who can answer
Who will answer?
When will it be answered?
Are they answerable to us?
Do we deserve an answer?

Or do they just feel we're all irrelevant thereby the can take any decision without caring minding how sane or reasonable it sounds.

Mightyhaiz:
How do you update abracadabra? It can never be explained !

LaIabobo:
Sadly, it is a tale of the more you look, the less you see.

But this same supreme court ruled against APC in Rivers, Bauchi and Zamfara state... Now they ruled in favour of APC and no one seems to understand the basis of the ruling. Crazy old men and women.

Politics in this nation is mad, insane, and crazy.