oluwaseyi000:
I'm sure even inec is shocked by the new result collated and announced by supreme Court

Confirmedzombie:
Poor and fake news. Certificate of return already issued.

Igbos can lie so much. See how Igbos fabricated the news.

Shameless pigs and idiots

Nonsense

Mandeyy:
Imolites cannot give Uzodinma such outrageous votes. What did Ihedioha get in those polling units or was it only Uzodinma that they all voted for? Let's be reasonable.

Advocate500:
Is obvious that in Nigerian supreme court are not supreme ,their judgment are becoming confusing as dey keep passing by.

garfield1:

Elections held. Polling unit results were declared and issued to agents and police. At Ward collation, valid results from 388 polling units where Uzodinma got over 200k votes were not collated in the Ward results without any legal basis. So it is basically, votes in 388 valid Form EC8As were not included in preparing Form EC8Bs, which greatly affected the final result and placed him 4th. At the Tribunal, these original duplicate copies given to the party agents and the police were tendered and spoken to by persons who witnessed the unlawful exclusion.

The case at the Tribunal was simply for the Court to exercise its power to include votes from these 388 polling which were ignored at the point of collation without a legal basis, in the final result.

That is all the Supreme Court did. When you add the excluded votes, Uzodinma had over 300k votes. That makes him the winner.

The last time the Supreme Court gave a decision like this is in Omoboriowo v Ajasi and Nwobodo v Onoh in 1984. So I'm not surprised that it's sounding new.

As a lawyer, I don't speak to the politics behind decisions. I speak to the legal basis behind decisions. There was legal basis for this decision. But let the politics continue.

Advocate500:
Can the sharia George start looking at atikus valid votes that was not collected in their various polling unit?

nameo:


Just ShUT it!!!

You are NOT a lawyer. That you are equating those cases with this particular one clearly shows so.

And every other thing written in your comment does not make any sense

garfield1:

Oga,the law globally and especially our electoral law has a lot of flaws and an intelligent hope took advantage of these loopholes.imolites may not have given him those votes but like all politicians who rig,he crafted means of rigging in those polling units using original inec result sheets,found a way to authenticate them at the units bearing in mind that you canjot cancel results emanating from units.
He got a smart lawyer who proved and convinced the apex court that the results were genuine and unlawfully excluded.that's the summary.
In those 388 units,votes from other parties doesnt matter because they didnt petition plus it will not stop hope from winning.you grab it?

garfield1:

Yes,i copied it for ignorant fellows like you.you are one of those spreading hate and falsehood here.you are the one always inflicting yourself with pains.from presidential polls where i rubbished you to kogi and now in imo,you dont learn your lessons.if you read those cases,it will clearly show that the are almost the same.solid facts ofcourse never makes sense to intellectually inept fellows.ihedioha has recovered,please follow suit

nameo:


Just a bunch of NONSENSE

LaIabobo:
Sadly, it is a tale of the more you look, the less you see.

But this same supreme court ruled against APC in Rivers, Bauchi and Zamfara state... Now they ruled in favour of APC and no one seems to understand the basis of the ruling. Crazy old men and women.

Politics in this nation is mad, insane, and crazy.

nameo:


You are speaking the truth little by little now.

No matter how you danced before, the above ia close to what happened. No other explanation possible.

The Supreme Court for whatever reason(and this will be know soon) just perpetuated possibly the greatest assault to the electoral process in Nigeria.

By the way, I dislike the PDP before now. But I will regard them as totally USELESS if they accept the nonsense that just happened in Imo. By now, they should be leading protest every where including Abj and Imo. They should boycott the national assembly, the Presidency till further notice.

We have Clowns for politicians in this country.

Am so pained!!!

garfield1:

Like you and ihedioha.losing is now part of your nature

nameo:


Am losing? You think am losing here? You call this "victory" for you or Hope or the APC??

You do really have a small mind. And short eyes too.

You have no idea who is losing here!!!

garfield1:

Oga,the law globally and especially our electoral law has a lot of flaws and an intelligent hope took advantage of these loopholes.imolites may not have given him those votes but like all politicians who rig,he crafted means of rigging in those polling units using original inec result sheets,found a way to authenticate them at the units bearing in mind that you canjot cancel results emanating from units.
He got a smart lawyer who proved and convinced the apex court that the results were genuine and unlawfully excluded.that's the summary.
In those 388 units,votes from other parties doesnt matter because they didnt petition plus it will not stop hope from winning.you grab it?

vanunu:


Do U mean the fake result that he wrote in his house.

garfield1:

This is a simple matter,why are you confused? It is very distinguishable fr that of atiku.atiku never claimed that his votes were not collated in various units.he agreed that all the votes were intact but that inec reduced his votes and increased that of buhari without any evidence.he failed to provide polling unit result sheets like hope uzo.he talked about an imaginary server with scanty facts.he claimed of widescale rigging and malpractices without calling witnesses from all polling units.
Hope's case was very simple,bordering on excluded votes and wrong collation.

garfield1:

If you are confused,why not ask questions and clear your doubts?
Elections held. Polling unit results were declared and issued to agents and police. At Ward collation, valid results from 388 polling units where Uzodinma got over 200k votes were not collated in the Ward results without any legal basis. So it is basically, votes in 388 valid Form EC8As were not included in preparing Form EC8Bs, which greatly affected the final result and placed him 4th. At the Tribunal, these original duplicate copies given to the party agents and the police were tendered and spoken to by persons who witnessed the unlawful exclusion.

The case at the Tribunal was simply for the Court to exercise its power to include votes from these 388 polling which were ignored at the point of collation without a legal basis, in the final result.

That is all the Supreme Court did. When you add the excluded votes, Uzodinma had over 300k votes. That makes him the winner.

The last time the Supreme Court gave a decision like this is in Omoboriowo v Ajasi and Nwobodo v Onoh in 1984. So I'm not surprised that it's sounding new.

As a lawyer, I don't speak to the politics behind decisions. I speak to the legal basis behind decisions. There was legal basis for this decision. But let the politics continue.

Seventy7kings:

Ihedioha the demolisher has been demolished. Iberiberism go dey cool off with Henessy righ now

Advocate500:
Brother Atiku have more evidence and also took a better evidence to court than hope me and u knows that, whatever hope took to court the outcome would have been in his favour, have border to ask what was the total number of the registered votes?is not 900000 votes, void votes is about 109,000,cancelled is about 27000,the difference between ihedioha and hope is about 176000,do the maths, u will be convinced that the so called supreme court judgement is jamboree, our children are growing up ooo,supreme judgment supposed to serve as reference points.

Advocate500:
and he could not win one state house of assembly seat in imo state? at times we should learn to tell our self some simple truth it won't hurt.

ArmaniUhuru:
Because the figures doesn’t add up.

Total Accredited Voters in Imo for gov election: 823,743.

After Supreme Court's ruling: 950,952.

garfield1:

To you,atiku had prima facie evidences but in the eyes of the law,he had no evidences.dont denigrate the supreme court justices.it is not a must that you must always win.there are not concerned with layman calculations or trying to add up figures.there are concerned about the position of the law in relation to votes and election.
In the eyes of the law,uzodinma's votes are lawful and valid.your figures are all from inec card readers which has no legal backing and does not concern the court.what the supreme court looks at is voters register,valid votes,results sheets.total voters register in imo is over 2 million.acvording to the constitution,for you to get proper account of the vote statistics,you must use the voters register not card readers.as far as the votes are not more than 2 million as recorded in the register,they are deeemed lawful and regular.to disprove it,use the voters register.so all your maths has no legal standing