lordfalcao:
mumu that’s why you are now watching with a relaxed mind.

Yes while you are not relaxed that Chelsea is in first 4.

Lordfalcao a member of Aparisports and the Frameworkers.

A40:
That tells me there are better teams in Europe than in England but still does not diminish the fact that they are the best team in Europe.

So if they are good enough for Europe and still dominate the league. Why then are you making excuses instead of giving due credit

When they are not as dominant in Europe as they are in the league then questions will be raised how good the team is or are they just being helped by the massive gap in quality in the league which Liverpool tally in the ucl and league points too.

A40:
And they are reigning Champions of Europe. No?

This league argument would be valid if they are not winning the CL or reaching the Finals in the last two years

It only shows that they face more competition in Europe than what they face in the league where they can lose 1 game in 64

raumdeuter:


The credit will be befitting if they are coasting in Europe the same way they are doing locally

If you are 4 losses in 19 in Europe but 1 loss in 64 in the league should tell us the competition locally is not comparable to what they are facing in Europe

They don't need to coast in Europe since we universally acknowledged the CL is the toughest competition of all.

However with the increased difficulty they have still won or gotten to the Finals and lost in the most unfortunate circumstances.

Based on the last two and a half seasons they have been consistent and the best team in Europe

lordfalcao:
are you not the same person who said man city won 18 straight games?? Liverpool were evening doing well if not for that type of massive win which saw man city gap them.

Yes. For a team to need 18 straight wins it simply means Liverpool with one more win would have made it more difficult for City but failed because they drew so many games

A40:
You are not giving any credit at all.

That's why you are still drumming on this weak league line for a team that is quite clearly the best in Europe

I will like to know on what basis you proclaiming them the best team in Europe? If it's because they won the champions league last season then they are loopholes to that.

raumdeuter:


What I posted is Barcelona dropped points in 7 games, Liverpool has dropped points in just 1 game

Now draw your correlation

Stick to this line. You didnt check drawn games here and i didnt.

raumdeuter:


In that same time, since January 2019 in europe they have lost twice to Barca and Napoli playing 13 games

So don't you think the 1 loss in 64 games is due to weaker opponents?

1 loss in 38 games is due to weaker opponents in laliga that season, if Rubin Kazan could beat them at home, and your overrated Mourinho completed the routing in Ucl.

Laliga was weak that season.

Ibime:


Are you no longer a Chelsea fan?

Your use of language referring to us as una is disturbing

Welcome back Unc.

Afrodoc can you please play Reggae Blues for our very own Harrysongs

airmark:


Stick to this line.



1 loss in 38 games is due to weaker opponents in laliga that season, if Rubin Kazan could beat them at home, and your overrated Mourinho completed the routing in Ucl.

Laliga was weak that season.

Tell those who went to school to calculate 1/64 vs 1/38 and give you their opinion

Godx:

You keep combining both seasons in order to make them what they are not. Last season is gone and they finished as the best losers. When they meet a team capable of matching them in accumulating wins upon wins the ended up as losers. Now that there is no competition they are running away with it. This should tell you something now imagine if the rest top teams were up for a title challenge.

Nyet Nyet.

I am combining both seasons to highlight their consistency. They went one better in England and in Europe after previous failures. I see a team that learned from previous mistakes. You are making excuses for the rest of the field

In Europe and England over the last 4 iterations the only constant has been Liverpool. They have raised the bar to the level that other teams can't cope. The games they drew last year they are winning this year

What happened in Europe? Why was no team up for the challenge as well?

Stop making excuses. Give credit where it's due

Godx:

I will like to know on what basis you proclaiming them the best team in Europe? If it's because they won the champions league last season then they are loopholes to that.

Which team are you tipping as the best?

Godx:

You can only match your nearest competitor. If I am in a title race and my nearest opponent can only attain 80 to 90 points that will also be my objective. One can say Liverpool only reached 95points because that's what it will take to catch City. If the previous past winners were up against a team guaranteed to reach 96points then that will also be their objective.

So what is Liverpool's objective now that they are 25 points ahead of the rest? They can lose 7 matches in a row and still win the league.

Your argument is neither here nor there

raumdeuter:


Tell those who went to school to calculate 1/64 vs 1/38 and give you their opinion

Why are you ignoring the losses in ucl considering the quality of Rubin Kazan and the clueless Mourinho that did the flogging on Barcelona that year in Ucl?

Godx:

I will like to know on what basis you proclaiming them the best team in Europe? If it's because they won the champions league last season then they are loopholes to that.

What other basis do you need? Who is better than them?

They are running away with the league that had the best coefficient. They have played in the last two CL Finals. So who is the better team.

Show me those loopholes let me slam dunk on them

chic2pimp:


Welcome back Unc.

Afrodoc can you please play Reggae Blues for our very own Harrysongs

By popular demand.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4nT3Od5cxI


Bonus track


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFDFtSfccWM

raumdeuter:


It only shows that they face more competition in Europe than what they face in the league where they can lose 1 game in 64

But we already know the competition in Europe is higher than in the league for every team. So?

A40:
Nyet Nyet.

I am combining both seasons to highlight their consistency. They went one better in England and in Europe after previous failures. I see a team that learned from previous mistakes. You are making excuses for the rest of the field

In Europe and England over the last 4 iterations the only constant has been Liverpool. They have raised the bar to the level that other teams can't cope. The games they drew last year they are winning this year

What happened in Europe? Why was no team up for the challenge as well?

Stop making excuses. Give credit where it's due

Liverpool have lost so many matches in Europe during the past 2 seasons. When the got to their first final they meet a Madrid who thoroughly defeated them. They meet a challenge as equal to them and lost. They meet a city team in the league equal to them and also lost. Infact the only time time Liverpool have won either the champions league or the Europa league just for the sake of illustration is when they meet an English team.

Godx:

When they are not as dominant in Europe as they are in the league then questions will be raised how good the team is or are they just being helped by the massive gap in quality in the league which Liverpool tally in the ucl and league points too.

What do you mean by not as dominant? Even prime Barca needed Ovrebo to reach their first Final.

The important thing is getting the job done. They have finished 1st or 2nd over the last two seasons in Europe. They lost the league last year by 1 and are currently leading by 25

Yet all you keep doing is making excuses.

A40:
So what is Liverpool's objective now that they are 25 points ahead of the rest? They can lose 7 matches in a row and still win the league.

Your argument is neither here nor there

Who is their competition? Your argument is the one neither here or there. I specifically stated nearest competitor in a title race.

airmark:


Why are you ignoring the losses in ucl considering the quality of Rubin Kazan and the clueless Mourinho that did the flogging on Barcelona that year in Ucl?

Why are you ignoring the 4 losses Liverpool had in Europe since last season considering the quality of Red Star Belgrade while they have 1 loss domestically at the same time

airmark:


Yes while you are not relaxed that Chelsea is in first 4.

Lordfalcao a member of Aparisports and the Frameworkers.

when you were typing rubbish, you didn’t know the league just started and there’s lot to play coupled with players available. You typed without reasoning immediately. Below are some of the rubbish you always type whenever you are drunk.

airmark:


Now, i'm watching Chelsea's matches with relaxed mind as against what most times i was subjected to last season.

Long may this continue, to shame those thinking the doomsday is near.

airmark:
Chelsea is gradually getting to a stage, where opponent already get the L before the kick-off. No more looking for skimpled for prayers before winning matches.

Thank God for Lampard.

Godx:

Liverpool have lost so many matches in Europe during the past 2 seasons. When the got to their first final they meet a Madrid who thoroughly defeated them. They meet a challenge as equal to them and lost. They meet a city team in the league equal to them and also lost. Infact the only time time Liverpool have won either the champions league or the Europa league just for the sake of illustration is when they meet an English team.

UCL is a tougher competition than the league just ask Juve, Bayern and PSG so I don't get your point and why you keep going back to Europe.

They lost thanks to a complete basketcase of a goalie. They rectified that and voila they are back in the Finals again and this time they won.

They met a City equal to them and lost. Why was this same City not equal to them this year? Who banned them from being equal this year? Story for the gods

I've forgotten Barca and Bayern Munich are English teams as well.

Stop making excuses!!

Godx:

Who is their competition? Your argument is the one neither here or there. I specifically stated nearest competitor in a title race.

Why will they have competition when they don't slip up? Had they slipped up like last season they would have had a competitor.

Who was Pep's competitor when he and City reached 100 points in 2018. My argument is your initial premise of wanting to finish or accumulate a certain number of points based on your competition is erroneous and complete fahrvegnugen

Seems like the Citadel don finish burning

raumdeuter:


WHy are yoiu ignoring the 4 losses Liverpool had in Europe since last season while they have 1 loss domestically in the same time

Because they didnt lose at home in Ucl to a low quality team like Rubin Kazan. One wouldnt expect your popularly maligned Mourinho to beat that great Barcelona.

Laliga was too weak for such debacles to have happened to Barca, while they enjoyed easy ride in Spain.

lordfalcao:
when you were typing rubbish, you didn’t know the league just started and there’s lot to play coupled with players available. You typed without reasoning immediately. Below are some of the rubbish you always type whenever you are drunk.

So in your eyes now, 4th position is poor, when we refused to strenghten, having Kante and Abraham injured. Your head needs hammering. Ode.

A40:
Why will they have competition when they don't slip up? Had they slipped up like last season they would have had a competitor.

Who was Pep's competitor when he and City reached 100 points in 2018. My argument is your initial premise of wanting to finish or accumulate a certain number of points based on your competition is erroneous and complete fahrvegnugen

My initial premise is that saying Liverpool with their point tally of 95 would win every league title except 2 is technically correct but when context is added it's not possible because their is a possibility of them not matching that tally in other previous seasons. I basically said Liverpool gaining 95 points in 2019 doesn't mean they will do that in 2002 or 2009 . The way you prepare against a car that covers 20km/s is not the same way you prepare against a car that covers 50km/s.

A40:
All 4 EPL teams came out of their groups in the CL, All 3 EPL Europa League teams also got out of their groups.

7 of the remaining 48 teams in Europe are English. So I disagree with una argument in Large Fonts

If the other leagues had their teams thriving in Europe as well then no one of sound mind will ridicule their achievements.

Liverpool's point tally reflects their quality. They would lead any other league in Europe as we speak

20 points for you on Citadel scorecard

donjazet:


myself and nihilist share a nasty history on this platform, so it's no surprise when I see him jump in quickly to castigate me at any given opportunity, irrespective of the validity of my stance.

Okay. I understand now.

lordfalcao:
I am a Chelsea fan. But this constant bickering of referee is disturbing..... We are not the first team to experience officiating like this, this season

The una am using here referes to those who think var is why we lost

So in other words, Nihilist === una

Console.log(una + “no well”);

airmark:


Because they didnt lose at home in Ucl to a low quality team like Rubin Kazan. One wouldnt expect your popularly maligned Mourinho to beat that great Barcelona.

Laliga was too weak for such debacles to have happened to Barca, while they enjoyed easy ride in Spain.

Liverpool lost to lowly Red Star Belgrade yet in the EPL for 2 seasons only 1 team could beat them

Godx:

My initial premise is that saying Liverpool with their point tally of 95 would win every league title except 2 is technically correct but when context is added it's not possible because their is a possibility of them not matching that tally in other previous seasons. I basically said Liverpool gaining 95 points in 2019 doesn't mean they will do that in 2002 or 2009 . The way you prepare against a car that covers 20km/s is not the same way you prepare against a car that covers 50km/s.

At this point you have to pick a struggle. Unless you're telling me the EPL under Pep is at its weakest level yet which is why Pep was able to dominate his 2nd and 3rd season.

Or give Klopp and Liverpool credit for displaying arguably the finest stretch in recent memory.

We will never know if 2019 Liverpool would gather the same amount of points in that era but your context cannot prove that they wouldn't. Why is that so hard to understand??