₦airaland Forum

This is NIJA.
You have the opportunity of being elected by :
INEC or SUPEC(Supreme Court Electoral Commission).

Oh yes!!! INEC or SUPEC.

More DRAMA to unfold.

Soon, we may have to review our JUDICIAL LAW and come out with a court HIGHER than Supreme Court.

........Maybe Superior Supreme Court........

Oga, e no dey tire you? Wetin I do you self?

2020 a year of reviewing,all thanks to INEC and SC incompetence.

The same INEC Ihedioha bribed to excluded APC vote so he can be declared victorious ?! I am sure you have no idea or knowledge on what you are commenting about but but thank God the Supreme Court gave victory to whom it is due rectifying INEC gaffe.

CanadaOrBust:
Actually sir, you’d seem to be the fool here.
All INEC personnel is appointed by the government in power (and therefore the ruling party) who also provides all their funding and also controls all state machinery and money. INEC is, therefore, controled by whichever party is in power. Yet someone managed to convince you that INEC is controlled by Ihedioha! That same INEC gave clear and convincing reasons why no results were generated from those polling units and swore under penalty of perjury that they never issued the Uzodinma documents, that they are fake!

It is obvious INEC leaned towards APC. Case in point: they carefully made sure NOT to release final tally of votes - which would have made it obvious how ridiculous that judgment is and also show the SC as being wrong or compromised or both!
eagleu

Tanko is not done with is yet.

End of the road party Pin Di Pin. is trying everything to destroy the country.

valentineuwakwe:
https://punchng.com/apc-fumes-as-pdp-demands-review-of-buhari-scourt-victory/

Honestly, the intransigence and idiocy of this contraption called PDP sucks to the deepest depths.

Which party approached the Supreme Court for the review of a judgement first? Which was first: Imo or Bayelsa?

PDP is most definitely fidgety regarding Bayelsa hence resorting to ‘rough tactics’. Precedents are an important element of judgements from the courts. If the Supreme Court called for new elections in Bauchi over 20 years ago, why should the case of Bayelsa be different?

I think this President in his very annoying usual laid-back approach has emboldened the opposition to such an extent that they are now no longer playing opposition politics but rascality and fine-line incitement to insurrection.

This government needs to get its acts together. It should not only in government but also demonstrate it's in power.

helinues:
Sorry what is Pdp?

Sorry I too I'm still searching google what the hell is apc?

tricksters:
The same INEC Ihedioha bribed to excluded APC vote so he can be declared victorious ?! I am sure you have no idea or knowledge on what you are commenting about but but thank God the Supreme Court gave victory to whom it is due rectifying INEC gaffe.

Do u ever step back and look at what u believe sir? Is Ihedioha richer than or have more access to INEC than Uzodinma or Rochas (Nwosu), who was in control of state money and machinery?? INEC gave clear snd compelling reasons why NO RESULTS WERE GENERATED from those units. Not only that, PDP won a re-run held in that same ”stronghold” not long ago, an area Hope gave himself 98% of the votes, with 150% turnouts. Not only that, Uche Nwosu is from same area, yet he got no votes according to Hope’s result sheets! Try to think sometimes sir.

Anyway, luckily, there are people who are paid to dig up and analyze this stuff. The following is from the actual summary of trial materials as presented in a major reputable newspaper. It answers all your questions.
Pay special attention to the bolded.
———————————————-

That Supreme Court Magic Judgment
This Day (Lagos) 17 FEBRUARY 2020

... According to summary of trial materials, no ward collation agent was called to show that at the collation center results were brought from the 388 polling units where the alleged exclusion took place...

The petitioner, rather called 28 polling unit agents who came to identify some of the results tendered by the petitioner from the bar. All the electoral documents were tendered from the bar and thus dumped on the court without anybody giving evidence correlating the contents of the result forms with the tabulation done by the petitioner himself.

Each of the 18 polling unit agents under cross-examination, manifested ignorance of the contents of the documents and never convinced anybody of being present in their claimed polling units...

Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had in their reply to the petition disowned those result sheets and averred emphatically that NO RESULTS WERE GENERATED from those polling units as elections in those polling units were cancelled by presiding officers as a result of violence, over voting, snatching of electoral materials, etc. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) stated that any result from those polling units presented by any of the candidates, in this case, the petitioners, must be fake.

When confronted with the purported result sheets tendered by the petitioners, each of the witnesses admitted as follows:
i. The names and signatures of the Presiding Officers are not well found on those results.
ii. The names and signatures of other party agents did not appear on the result sheets, neither could they mention even one party agent of the other political parties in those booths.
iii. The result sheets do not contain the total number of ballot papers used and number of ballot papers unused or invalid. The scores of political parties are not clear on the face of the documents.

Based on the above, it appears the Supreme Court was desperately working to an answer in favour of the ruling party... and the only opening to do that was to accept the fictitious results of the 388 polling units willy-nilly. And instead of doing substantial justice on the matter, it ended up delivering one of judiciary's greatest infamies which even a kid learning arithmetic can see through. The judgment turned logic on its head, rewrote the basic universal laws of arithmetic and did grave and substantial injury to our democracy and the power of the people to choose who governs them. With this judicial precedent, the Supreme Court has inevitably rubber-stamped political rascality and the judgment could shape our democratic future.

The court has widened the opening which politicians exploit and manipulate to get into elective offices. All one needs to do is to stay somewhere, maybe in one's room, probably with one policeman or so, write one's own results, submit to INEC for counting and if it refuses, don't worry, bid your time till you get to the court. With supreme arrogance, the final court of appeal will recognise the results as legitimate, credible and authentic and pronto, you will be declared duly elected.

...Even more perplexing was the fact that in some of the polling units, voter turnout was more than the registered voters. How is this possible?
In Uzodinma's result sheets, there was no voided vote and only two parties, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and APC participated and were reflected in the election results of the 388 polling units. Yet, 70 political parties participated in that election and were all reflected in the INEC declared results of other polling units all over the state. ..,Does it mean that other parties such as All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), Action Alliance (AA), etc., did not participate in the election in those 388 polling units contrary to INEC's results in other areas of the state?
Why did the result sheets reflect only two parties when so many parties participated in the said election? Apparently, Senator Uzodinma concocted those results that fly in the face of the basic laws of arithmetic and common sense between the PDP and the APC after the fact that the PDP had won the election and he only scored his party a vote figure higher than the PDP vote. The corollary to that is that if it was any other party that was on the cusp of victory, Uzodinma's results would have been between just the APC and that party! Yet our almighty Supreme Court glossed over all these fundamental anomalies in Uzodinma's result sheets which had been rejected by even INEC... and accepted same as authentic.
A further assessment of the result sheets of the disputed 388 polling units showed that the said units are all in the Orlu Senatorial Zone where Uzodinma and the candidate of the Action Alliance Ugwumba Uche Nwosu come from. So even if the 388 polling units were concentrated mostly in Uzodinma's ancestral home, surely, Nwosu who emerged second in the March 9, 2019 election in Imo State and was backed by the incumbent governor at the time, Rochas Okorocha, his father in-law, must have amassed some votes from the units. But these votes were curiously missing, for the simple reason that they forged the results, and very badly at that.
Furthermore, Uzodinma of the APC scored an average of 98% of the total votes cast in the 388 units, whereas he scored an average of 13% in the remaining polling units in the state. How could this be? Why was it that it was only in these 388 units throughout the state that the voter turnout was either more than the registered voters or achieved 98 to 100 percent of the registered voters? Please note that emphasis is NOT on the number of accredited voters which is usually far less than the number of registered voters. Uzodinma's fake results validated by our Supreme Court defy reason. The pattern of the results from the disputed 388 polling units clearly shows the improbability of such an occurrence. And on the basis of the testimony of one policeman, and 28 discredited polling units' agents who gave contradictory statements at trial, the Supreme Court accepted the results.

In declaring Uzodinma governor of Imo State, the Supreme Court simply annulled a valid mandate freely given to an individual and transferred it to another person who came fourth in the election.

Judeerons32:
How unserious can a party be? They want a review of all election cases they lost at the Supreme Court because Apc is seeking a review of Bayelsa.
They should save enough money for lawyers. If they feel they have good grounds that is wonderful. They cannot blackmail the Apc or the Supreme Court. Or Bayelsans.

because APC started it

Simplebeauty:


A precedence has been set in Bayelsa. We must review all Supreme court Election Cases since 1999







Do you need quick loans?

I need quick loan

Lettings in Surulere

Newly renovated 3bedroom flat wit pop, water heater n al round tiled at Oladimeji str Aguda Surulere. 1m

Lovely 3bedrm flat very spacious 3t3b talaso water upstairs at Asiri acover str, off brown rd aguda for 900k 1yr but 850k can fly

3bedrm flat 1t/1b upstairs at Arogundade str off Ademola Ojomu upstairs 500k 1yr Yoruba preferable renovations Done by client

3bedroom flat 3t/2b upstairs at Asiri Akofa str off brawn rd Aguda surulere. 800k

3bedroom flat 1t/1b upstairs at Asiri Akofa str off brawn rd aguda surulere. 600k

Lovely Mini Flat @ Nnobi Street Kilo, With Water And Tiles 350k

Room Self at Nnobi str Kilo. 250k

Mini flat off brawn rd aguda surulere. 350k

Mini flat at Coker Aguda upstairs. 300k

WhatsApp or call 08181931642