Leyqute:


No na . For the second game. There are 2 matches in GW19 . Sold H. Kane and Son cos of that. They play only once.

Once your captain plays first game, he is captain for the gameweek, including the second game

hensben:
He has been injured. He will start destroying la Liga soon.. inter Milan is leading

When is soon. He has been in Madrid for 18months already

Who is Inter Milans opponents in the CL second round?

Ibime:


Once your captain plays first game, he is captain for the gameweek, including the second game

And it doesn't matter if he doesn't even feature for that game?

Na wa o. Hope he has a great game versus you guys.

Inter really play Juve today sha. That 2-0 self flatter Juve

raumdeuter:


Any attacker leading the scorers chart is doing great

You must be answering a wrong question.

My question : How was Salah's performance in today's game?

Leyqute:
Airmark A. Conte Dey beat Juve o. 2-0.

Only an idiot will say Conte is not a good handler.

He used Lukaku to torment Juve all night and the defence didn't lose concentration too. Ronaldo and Morata were frustrated such that the Spanish had to start kicking opponents.

I am just happy your team didn't pick Conte as coach, he would have brought the best out of Lukaku.

airmark:


You must be answering a wrong question.

My question : How was Salah's performance in today's game?

He is the top scorer in the entire league. That explains it all

airmark:


Only an idiot will say Conte is not a good handler.

He used Lukaku to torment Juve all night and the defence didn't lose concentration too. Ronaldo and Morata were frustrated such that the Spanish had to start kicking opponents.

I am just happy your team didn't pick Conte as coach, he would have brought the best out of Lukaku.

Juve lucky sef say na 2-0. They had numerous chances to score.

If he wins that league ehn...

airmark:


Only an idiot will say Conte is not a good handler.

He used Lukaku to torment Juve all night and the defence didn't lose concentration too. Ronaldo and Morata were frustrated such that the Spanish had to start kicking opponents.

I am just happy your team didn't pick Conte as coach, he would have brought the best out of Lukaku.

Only an idiot will rate a coach who has been knocked out of the CL group stages twice in a row

Even 100yrs old Ribery tormented Juve some weeks ago

If you want your team to be useless in the CL, go for Cuntay

raumdeuter:


Only an idiot will rate a coach who has been knocked out of the CL group stages twice in a row

Even 100yrs old Ribery tormented Juve some weeks ago

If you want your team to be useless in the CL, go for Cuntay

Only an idiot will not rate a coach that won Epl in his first attempt, destroying your greatest coach ever, Fraudiola, home and away on the road.

Fraudiola had no choice than to call him MASTER.

Leyqute:


Juve lucky sef say na 2-0. They had numerous chances to score.

If he wins that league ehn...

Yes, Lautaro, Lukaku, Hakimi were culprits.

If he doesn't have injury issues with key players, he may win it.

The way they swiftly turned defence to attack, was marvellous. That Barella is a baller.

raumdeuter:


He is the top scorer in the entire league. That explains it all

How did that influence his performance rating in today's match?

airmark:


Only an idiot will not rate a coach that won Epl in his first attempt, destroying your greatest coach ever, Fraudiola, home and away on the road.

Fraudiola had no choice than to call him MASTER.

The first coach in the history of football to surrender before kickoff. No wonder he is useless in Europe

Luka jovic had 2 goals for Frankfurt today,hmmmm

Who is awake

Skimpledawgg:

I used to think you were a child of God o

When you go forgive that airmark's fav line of hyping VVD na?

Airmark don hype this VVD too much.

airmark:




When without VVD, Alison conceded against Sheffield, West ham, Fulham, Brighton, West brom, Spurs and lost to Southampton, you didn't type this kind of epistle o.

Timbros, tell me why you shouldn't be covering your face with Mendy's towel?

Did Alisson concede 7 goals against any of those teams you listed?

timbros:


Did Alisson concede 7 goals against any of those teams you listed?

When Liverpool conceded 7 goals, VVD was their best defender on the pitch. So you should blame those in that defence that performed woefully.

Meanwhile, Liverpool never lost to Southampton when VVD was on the field for Liverpool. In his absence, Southampton beat them with Alison.

timbros:




Airmark don hype this VVD too much.

So na Rudiger i for hype before?

VVD has proved me right by winning team's trophies and individual awards to show that he is not a hype job.

When will any governing body honour your Rudiger?

Football stats can be crazy sha.

Bruno yesterday was arguably their best player on the pitch but taking a look at the stat below that talks about 6 games against top teams and almost 0 stat to show for it one would think he ghosted the game yesterday

airmark:


When Liverpool conceded 7 goals, VVD was their best defender on the pitch. So you should blame those in that defence that performed woefully.

Meanwhile, Liverpool never lost to Southampton when VVD was on the field for Liverpool. In his absence, Southampton beat them with Alison.

When you were hailing a "VVD led Liverpool defence", did you itemise who did well or not in the defence? Or did all of them perform well but you choose to credit VVD by calling team effort "VVD led defence"?

Why are you itemising this "VVD led defence" that swallowed 7 goals?

When Liverpool kept clean sheet in UCL final, you never mentioned that Matip made 14 clearances (and provided assist for the second goal.) and Alisson made 8 saves. It was a "VVD led Liverpool defence" that kept the clean sheet. Now the table is turned and you are trying to itemise who did well or not.

Did you watch Alisson in the final 10mins yesterday?

Chelsea reportedly willing to break the bank for Haaland

Werner is still safe though. Assuming the rumour holds true, Abraham is in greater danger.

BlueMann:
Chelsea reportedly willing to break the bank for Haaland

Werner is still safe though. Assuming the rumour holds true, Abraham is in greater danger.

Haaland is a good addition to our striking force but it will create another issue which is squad imbalance, how will he fit in without clogging the space? He likes arriving at the box via the inside-right channel and this is where Ziyech and Havertz do occupy, and how do we pair him with Abraham and Werner?

Amoto94:

Haaland is a good addition to our striking force but it will create another issue which is squad imbalance, how will he fit in without clogging the space? He likes arriving at the box via the inside-right channel and this is where Ziyech and Havertz do occupy, and how do we pair him with Abraham and Werner?

Haaland's potential addition will definitely cause some problems in terms of balance and team selection. And frankly, our attack - based in quality - is already fierce as it is.

I like Haaland, but his addition isn't necessary.

But if they sign him, fine.

More work for Lampard then.

timbros:


When you were hailing a "VVD led Liverpool defence", did you itemise who did well or not in the defence? Or did all of them perform well but you choose to credit VVD by calling team effort "VVD led defence"?

Why are you itemising this "VVD led defence" that swallowed 7 goals?

Even in loss he still led in performance as usual. So you would have made a point if he didn't outperform other defenders on that day. So blame others for letting him down.

timbros:


When Liverpool kept clean sheet in UCL final, you never mentioned that Matip made 14 clearances (and provided assist for the second goal.) and Alisson made 8 saves. It was a "VVD led Liverpool defence" that kept the clean sheet. Now the table is turned and you are trying to itemise who did well or not.

Direct your anger to Uefa, the organisers of the tournament that saw what you didn't see. Tell them you are Mr. Timbros from Nigeria, representing Aparisports LLC and fighting for your African brother, Matip.

BlueMann:


Haaland's potential addition will definitely cause some problems in terms of balance and team selection. And frankly, our attack - based in quality - is already fierce as it is.

I like Haaland, but his addition isn't necessary.

But if they sign him, fine.

More work for Lampard then.

Amd you think Lampard will still be around by then.

BlueMann:


Haaland's potential addition will definitely cause some problems in terms of balance and team selection. And frankly, our attack - based in quality - is already fierce as it is.

I like Haaland, but his addition isn't necessary.

But if they sign him, fine.

More work for Lampard then.

Haaland is more than necessary. We don't have a no9 fit for purpose for any serious team.

They all create serious tactical imbalance in our attacking play. You can't play any ball in behind with Giroud, only cutbacks and crosses. You can't play ball into Abraham and Werner's feet or in the air without them losing it, and none of them can take on a defender one-on-one.

I will even recommend them going to get Arnautovic who is available on loan from China until the summer.

Ibime:


Haaland is more than necessary. We don't have a no9 fit for purpose for any serious team.

They all create serious tactical imbalance in our attacking play. You can't play any ball in behind with Giroud, only cutbacks and crosses. You can't play ball into Abraham and Werner's feet or in the air without them losing it, and none of them can take on a defender one-on-one.

I will even recommend them going to get Arnautovic who is available on loan from China until the summer.

If not injuries I would say we swoop ings, his contract is almost finished and doesn’t look like signing.

Ibime:


Haaland is more than necessary. We don't have a no9 fit for purpose for any serious team.

They all create serious tactical imbalance in our attacking play. You can't play any ball in behind with Giroud, only cutbacks and crosses. You can't play ball into Abraham and Werner's feet or in the air without them losing it, and none of them can take on a defender one-on-one.

I will even recommend them going to get Arnautovic who is available on loan from China until the summer.

I think Haaland is not a priority we have more pressing issues in CB, DM, and even right and left-backs.
Our CB depth is low Christensen, Rudiger cannot be relied upon they are simply not consistent enough, Thiago silva is 36 he is not a long-term prospect at all. we need at least two new CB'S.
Kante is getting old and the workload is much, we need a quality DM as a backup. Jorginho and Kovacic are simply not good enough, Gilmour is not yet ripe.
Azpilicueta's time at Chelsea is over we need a quality RB to challenge James, James himself is not the finished product yet.
As for LB, ask your self if Chilwell gets injured will your mind be at peace knowing that Emerson and Alonso are our backup's, we need to offload them both and use the money to get a new quality backup LB.

Our attack is sufficient enough at least for the nearest future : abraham, werner, ziyech, pulisic, giroud, hudson-odoi they just need time.

airmark:


Even in loss he still led in performance as usual. So you would have made a point if he didn't outperform other defenders on that day. So blame others for letting him down.



Direct your anger to Uefa, the organisers of the tournament that saw what you didn't see. Tell them you are Mr. Timbros from Nigeria, representing Aparisports LLC and fighting for your African brother, Matip.

For a team of Liverpool's calibre, 2 goals is more than enough to win a match especially when playing against a relegation threatened team.

Liverpool attackers did exactly that. But a "VVD led defence" made sure they lost the game woefully by conceding 7 goals. SEVEN GOALS!

So shameful.

VVD really missed Alisson that day.

Amoto94:
Donjazet read this article and relate it to what I said when you argued that Trump hate Muslims.


https://hussainabdulhussain.substack.com/p/identity-politics-and-the-muslim?

But Trump has made no secret of the fact that he hates Muslims. Both in words deeds and policies.
I must say I really like and appreciate the articles you do post here. They're illuminating.
Did you also read the subsequent article under this one?
https://hussainabdulhussain.substack.com/p/lets-talk-about-christianity-and

I wish say we fit defeat Leicester tomorrow, na must win but it's looking unlikely. We should even be happy with a draw. Lampard's record against big teams and slightly above average teams is abysmal, crummy, execrable, shoddy, tatty and egregious.

If we want to keep having such performances, then keep lampard in.