₦airaland Forum

jln115:
Don't believe the earth is flat for a start

Idiot everyone in here knows that I engaged you in a flat earth debate for three consecutive days in which I floored you ruthlessly. All the globeheads ended up insulting you for being a disgrace to science and being the first human to lose a flat earth debate. It seems you never learn your lesson.

Same as all the other theories I've brought forward which you haven't debunked even one. Don't be looking for debates on subject you know nothing of. Stick to butterflies and selling forex.

jln115:
You think a country can be communist and socialist at the same time bru!! .............Clearly you are confused!!

I just give you an example of the number one communist country that was core socialist.

Again you dont know much

jln115:
Clearly you didn't listen in class because Socialism is only possible by means of democracy!!

who told you that ?

Socialism is possible under any form of governance

Just40:
kid dont get confused
Socialism is practised even in a feudalism.

Again until you you differentiate economic systems from systems of government, you'll keep being confused

DUDE!!! Socialism realise on democratic control..........What part of that dont you understand?

jln115:
You think socialism and communism go hand in hand when in fact socialism is impossible in a communist state

Look both are in a way similar ..same way capitalism is also closer to socialism in a way..Socialism is a bridge to Communism..

Communism, sometimes referred to as revolutionary socialism, also originated as a reaction to the Industrial Revolution, and came to be defined by Marx’s theories—taken to their extreme end. In fact, Marxists often refer to socialism as the first, necessary phase on the way from capitalism to communism. Marx and Engels themselves didn’t consistently or clearly differentiate communism from socialism, which helped ensure lasting confusion between the two terms.

Anyway most socialist states tend to be closer to communist countries...

jln115:
You think socialism and communism go hand in hand when in fact socialism is impossible in a communist state

I just give you socialist state that was core communist

Next joke

Just40:
who told you that ?

Socialism is possible under any form of governance

Nope!! Socialism realise on democracy.........No democratic control = not socialism!

Just40:
I just give you socialist state that was core communist

Next joke

No you gave me an example of a communist state

leQubit:
Look both are in a way similar ..same way capitalism is also closer to socialism in a way..Socialism is a bridge to Communism..

Communism, sometimes referred to as revolutionary socialism, also originated as a reaction to the Industrial Revolution, and came to be defined by Marx’s theories—taken to their extreme end. In fact, Marxists often refer to socialism as the first, necessary phase on the way from capitalism to communism. Marx and Engels themselves didn’t consistently or clearly differentiate communism from socialism, which helped ensure lasting confusion between the two terms.

Anyway most socialist states tend to be closer to communist countries...

Read the bolded

And yes I agree most socialist states tend to be closer to communist countries....

jln115:
DUDE!!! Socialism realise on democratic control..........What part of that dont you understand?

you must be confusing democratic socialism being preached by Bernie Sanders for socialism.

This is my take..

Capitalism (far Right) .................socialism( Centre ) ................Communism (Far left)

Just40:
you must be confusing democratic socialism being preached by Bernie Sanders for socialism.

NO!! just normal socialism!

leQubit:
This is my take..

Capitalism (far Right) .................socialism( Centre ) ................Communism (Far left)

Nope

jln115:
Nope!! Socialism realise on democracy.........No democratic control = not socialism!

carry your confusion somewhere else

I dont have the time to drag this with you.

Next time, pay attention in class.

Understudy USSR to clear all your confusions.

Learn why the USSR collapsed.

There's almost an encyclopedia size book in any library in SA. Go and read it

jln115:
Nope

Ok ..ths what i meant..For a Capitalist society to become a Communist,it must pass the rituals of Socialism..its the bridge to both systems...

Actually all ths systems are same but just different degrees of doing stuff...

jln115:
No you gave me an example of a communist state

I gave you a communist state that was socialist on their economic front

Just40:
carry your confusion somewhere else

I dont have the time to drag this with you.

Next time, pay attention in class.

Understudy USSR to clear all your confusions.

Learn why the USSR collapsed.

There's almost an encyclopedia size book in any library in SA. Go and read it

You are confused boet!!! Socialism requires democratic control!! something that is not possible in a communist state

Just40:
I gave you a communist state that was socialist on their economic front

It wasn't socialist since there was no democratic control!! the USSR was simply a communist state!

jln115:
NO!! just normal socialism!

The man basically named is theory and economics policy as Democratic socialism

In the US, once you are branded a socialist, that is the end of your political career.

No apertheid was Boer Idea. British gave the Boer independence in after the world war II. And shortly the rest of Africa - as this was key condition that US had forced on colonial European powers to benefit from Marshall Plan so they can rebuild their destroyed continent. Africans started getting their independence in 1950s and the South Africans black similarly demanded the same from their new colonizers the Boer; the Boer as minority dug in; and enacted apartheid as means to preserve their newly found power.

AmenhotepZuid:
Kikuyu BRITISH IMMIGRANTS were better EDUCATED than boers in 1795-1900 they earned HIGHER than HALFSLAGS (products of rape sex between freeburghers and non white slaves=afrikaners of today).

Kikuyu let me school you IDIOT these photos explain the idea behind apartheid in SA from 1875-1940s SA had AFRIKANER POVERTY PROBLEM. This worried boer politicians who begged the Brits who controlled SA then and begged them to help them end boer POVERTY. Guys like Rhodes heard their cry and came up with a race based idea called apartheid. APARTHEID was a British idea boers were later IMPLEMENTING AGENTS. Apartheid was about cutting COMPETITION between boers and blacks,coloureds, asians who had access to EDUCATION during the BRITISH ERA in SA 1795-1930.

If you know your BOOKS boy you learn that then boers were a RURAL VOLK/PEOPLE who struggled to adapt to URBANIZATION and INDUSTRIALIZATION that was introduced by the BRITISH COLONISTS. The ARCHITECTS,ENGINEERS, ACCOUNTS etc..that BUILT S.A. INFRASTRUCTURE then were EDUCATED in the UK. Example the UNION BUILDINGS & SA PARLIAMENT were design by a BRITISH ARCHITECT SIR HEBERT BAKER these 2 look similar to other BRITISH IMPERLIST BUILDINGS in INDIA and other former British colonies. Those buildings have nothing to do with boers were an OPPRESSED RACE just like non whites.

leQubit:
Ok ..ths what i meant..For a Capitalist society to become a Communist,it must pass the rituals of Socialism..its the bridge to both systems...

Actually all ths systems are same but just different degrees of doing stuff...

According to Just40 this is impossible since capitalism is an economic system and communism is a Government

jln115:
You are confused boet!!! Socialism requires democratic control!! something that is not possible in a communist state

socialism has no system of government requirements.

Socialism in it pure form were mostly practiced by communist states.

Go and learn

Just40:
The man basically named is theory and economics policy as Democratic socialism

In the US, once you are branded a socialist, that is the end of your political career.

Democratic socialism is just normal socialism with less state control!

jln115:
It wasn't socialist since there was no democratic control!! the USSR was simply a communist state!

you have no idea

It was a core socialist society and socialism does not require democracy as a system of government to exist.

Socialism thrives in monarchies, feudalism, communism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism and etc

Just40:
socialism has no system of government requirements.

Socialism in it pure form were mostly practiced by communist states.

Go and learn

Socialism requires democratic control!! that's what sets it apart from communism.......

jln115:
According to Just40 this is impossible since capitalism is an economic system and communism is a Government

dont misquote me dumb kid

Just40:
you have no idea

It was a core socialist society and socialism does not require democracy as a system of government to exist.

Socialism thrives in monarchies, feudalism, communism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism and etc

It literally does:

"Socialism is a political, social and economic philosophy encompassing a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production and democratic control"

jln115:
Democratic socialism is just normal socialism with less state control!

You are a confused kid

Just40:
dont misquote me dumb kid

That's what you said bru!!

jln115:
Socialism requires democratic control!! that's what sets it apart from communism.......

most Democrats shy away from socialism

Have you asked yourself why ?

Just40:


You are a confused kid

No kid that would be you

jln115:
According to Just40 this is impossible since capitalism is an economic system and communism is a Government

He wrong on that..both are economic an political systems..