NextD18:
Fraudvertz fans now hate Tuchel, supporting Marina's political shiits.

All because Tuchel did what any reasonable manager will do to Fraudvertz--Benching him.

If they don't want him to work as a manager, they should sack him, another manager will come, bench Fraudvertz again and get sacked.

Them go sack tire because of that lazy German flop called Fraudvertz.

Look at how hardworking and committed Werner has been since the start of this season, despite the fact he hasn't been giving what was expected, but he's been playing well and giving his all.

If you be flop, you be flop. A new manager can't change that. Fraudvertz Na flop!!! That's why Bayern Leverkusen didn't miss him.

To be honest, Kai Havertz is a big time flop.

even Timo Werner put more effort in his game. What Timo Werner is lacking is goals and when he gets that form back he will shine in EPL but Kai Havertz, I see a loan deal next season.

"West Ham slam £100m price tag on Declan Rice" LMAO

BlueMann:
"West Ham slam £100m price tag on Declan Rice" LMAO

Chelsea should look at Ligue 1 and raid them for cheap alternatives

Amoto94:

Before Roman Abramovich there were Chelsea fans in the mid-90s and early 2000s Ibime said it the other time he was a supporter of Chelsea because of Babayaro. An uncle of mine was supporting Chelsea he even received a signed jersey from Gianluca Vialli back then, I remember him also gifting a friend of his' George Weah's jersey he bought. You shouldn't dismiss the concerns of fans with the talk of where were they before Roman because we have experience fans who have witnessed the ups and downs of our modern history and how terrible transfer decisions occasioned them

are our transfers as bad as barca? Or city? Or united self

No team dey perfect, even nba with just 5 players on the court, some players don't gel together, some take time, patience and insight is the difference between kdb leaving and staying, it's not easy to move from old players to young players and maintain your quality, very hard

Chelsea case is like this, managers will come and go, the club has to maintain an idea that will lead to long term growth for the club, we don't have a big stadium, we don't make enough money from other means like united, barca and madrid, that's why they built a loan army, it's like hedging, one way or the other, profit will be made or we get a good player that can be sold


Chelsea's policy is to buy young players with potential and make a profit tomorrow with them, if some become stars they will help the team grow and when they get to 28 the club will sell them make a profit and start again

Someone like havertz that was bought for 81m he is a long term player, if he becomes a star and excels at chelsea they will sell him for double the figure paid but they can't do that with mount

Its this policy that helps us to make huge transfers that most teams wouldn't do, compared to most premier league teams, chelsea have been very conservative self, how many players have barca bought for above 100m


Every top team will need 2 transfers every season to keep up, if you want to compete at the top with the best, 1 huge transfer each year, it's not cheap, stamford bridge can only hold 40k people, camp nou 100k, chelsea have found a way to make money and una dey wail, fans are ungrateful

iamJ:
are our transfers as bad as barca? Or city? Or united self

No team dey perfect, even nba with just 5 players on the court, some players don't gel together, some take time, patience and insight is the difference between kdb leaving and staying, it's not easy to move from old players to young players and maintain your quality, very hard

Chelsea case is like this, managers will come and go, the club has to maintain an idea that will lead to long term growth for the club, we don't have a big stadium, we don't make enough money from other means like united, barca and madrid, that's why they built a loan army, it's like hedging, one way or the other, profit will be made or we get a good player that can be sold


Chelsea's policy is to buy young players with potential and make a profit tomorrow with them, if some become stars they will help the team grow and when they get to 28 the club will sell them make a profit and start again

Someone like havertz that was bought for 81m he is a long term player, if he becomes a star and excels at chelsea they will sell him for double the figure paid but they can't do that with mount

Its this policy that helps us to make huge transfers that most teams wouldn't do, compared to most premier league teams, chelsea have been very conservative self, how many players have barca bought for above 100m


Every top team will need 2 transfers every season to keep up, if you want to compete at the top with the best, 1 huge transfer each year, it's not cheap, stamford bridge can only hold 40k people, camp nou 100k, chelsea have found a way to make money and una dey wail, fans are ungrateful

Some people don't understand that there is also a business side of this club to run.

They think it is to sit in viewing centre and be shouting A-gol.

I have no doubt we will run ATM tonight.
least is a draw.

KingAlabi:

Finish at your current position and see if you will play on Tuesdays and Wednesdays

Who says you will finish at your own position? I will suggest you watch your back.

I don’t want to see Kai in the first XI tonight sha, this game means a lot. He can start playing next month.

BikeMan:
I don’t want to see Kai in the first XI tonight sha, this game means a lot. He can start playing next month.

But then, does he deserve to play in this system?

Tuchel might have to change formation to accommodate him.

Abraham Don suffer.. Chai

BikeMan:
Who says you will finish at your own position? I will suggest you watch your back.

That's more like what Everton and Liverpool are saying to you.

kalan:
Abraham Don suffer.. Chai

So harvetz earn more than Bruno and cavani combined

Abi what am I seeing

kalan:
Abraham Don suffer.. Chai

these figures are wrong, Chelsea highest earner is chilwell at 190/week.
Havertz earn 170/week.

airmark:
Mkhitaryan never had Ibra's records and individual honours.
Meanwhile, let blueraydick complete his internship with you.

I am asking who did Zlatan beat to 2nd in this best Swedish massage striker award?

iamJ:
are our transfers as bad as barca? Or city? Or united self

No team dey perfect, even nba with just 5 players on the court, some players don't gel together, some take time, patience and insight is the difference between kdb leaving and staying, it's not easy to move from old players to young players and maintain your quality, very hard

Chelsea case is like this, managers will come and go, the club has to maintain an idea that will lead to long term growth for the club, we don't have a big stadium, we don't make enough money from other means like united, barca and madrid, that's why they built a loan army, it's like hedging, one way or the other, profit will be made or we get a good player that can be sold


Chelsea's policy is to buy young players with potential and make a profit tomorrow with them, if some become stars they will help the team grow and when they get to 28 the club will sell them make a profit and start again

Someone like havertz that was bought for 81m he is a long term player, if he becomes a star and excels at chelsea they will sell him for double the figure paid but they can't do that with mount

Its this policy that helps us to make huge transfers that most teams wouldn't do, compared to most premier league teams, chelsea have been very conservative self, how many players have barca bought for above 100m


Every top team will need 2 transfers every season to keep up, if you want to compete at the top with the best, 1 huge transfer each year, it's not cheap, stamford bridge can only hold 40k people, camp nou 100k, chelsea have found a way to make money and una dey wail, fans are ungrateful

Our transfers are as bad as Barca and worse than that of ManCity because we penny-pinch when we are supposed to go for top targets and spend wasteful amount of money on downgrades, Barcelona and ManCity have a big stadia and inflated sponsorship deals to cover for their losses plus trophies to show for it in comparison to our abysmal records in recent years.
I'm not against developing talents and selling them for profits because the likes of Benfica, Ajax, Monaco, Schalke, and other clubs do this to some extent but are we really good at that? Imagine allowing Tariq Lamptey to go for 3m, Tomori the 2nd best defender owned by Chelsea will soon be going for 30m or so €, Salah sold for peanuts, Jamal Musiala whom we should have fast-tracked gone for next to nothing. I can go on and on about lack of squad planning and the impact on the growth of the club the successes we have made in transfer dealings are flukes not a testament of detailed planning. The Oscar deal was a maga something, likewise Mata, Hazard, and Costa

kalan:
Abraham Don suffer.. Chai

if abraham isn't comfortable with the current arrangement, he can get out

Kai isn't first on the list I think he's 3rd after chilwell and timo

iamJ:
are our transfers as bad as barca? Or city? Or united self

No team dey perfect, even nba with just 5 players on the court, some players don't gel together, some take time, patience and insight is the difference between kdb leaving and staying, it's not easy to move from old players to young players and maintain your quality, very hard

Chelsea case is like this, managers will come and go, the club has to maintain an idea that will lead to long term growth for the club, we don't have a big stadium, we don't make enough money from other means like united, barca and madrid, that's why they built a loan army, it's like hedging, one way or the other, profit will be made or we get a good player that can be sold


Chelsea's policy is to buy young players with potential and make a profit tomorrow with them, if some become stars they will help the team grow and when they get to 28 the club will sell them make a profit and start again

Someone like havertz that was bought for 81m he is a long term player, if he becomes a star and excels at chelsea they will sell him for double the figure paid but they can't do that with mount

Its this policy that helps us to make huge transfers that most teams wouldn't do, compared to most premier league teams, chelsea have been very conservative self, how many players have barca bought for above 100m


Every top team will need 2 transfers every season to keep up, if you want to compete at the top with the best, 1 huge transfer each year, it's not cheap, stamford bridge can only hold 40k people, camp nou 100k, chelsea have found a way to make money and una dey wail, fans are ungrateful

You know fans are emotionally whip because the money nor Dey come from their pocket. Club management look at the business side more. The earlier they know every club have policy that work for them the better for their sanity. The coach should try Havertz warner upfront against mid table team.

KingAlabi:

So harvetz earn more than Bruno and cavani combined

Abi what am I seeing

wetin bruno and cavani done accomplish for this life?

Late bloomer like bruno and failure like cavani

hensben:
You know fans are emotionally whip because the money nor Dey come from their pocket. Club management look at the business side more. The earlier they know every club have policy that work for them the better for their sanity. The coach should try Havertz warner upfront against mid table team.

it's too early to cancel havertz the way una dey do, Torres flopped for 2years and chelsea fans still had hopes

Havertz hasn't really played, most times he was used out of position, guy is the most creative player in that team

Havertz was short as a teen, he grew into that tall guy under a short period of time, he has said many times that he is still adaptating to his new size, covid is a respiratory disease, he is 21, in a new league, new competition and country, he isn't an established player yet, chelsea bought him cause so many teams were chasing him and we had the kind of money leverkusen wanted

He can't just add weight, players have to maintain of very low level of fat to muscle ratio, if he eats anyhow so he can be more strong for english football, he will lose speed and have injuries, see hazard for instance

Guy just needs time to adapt, if una think say chelsea football club will dump havertz project for mount una no know the club when una dey support

Havertz10:
it's too early to cancel havertz the way una dey do, Torres flopped for 2years and chelsea fans still had hopes

Havertz hasn't really played, most times he was used out of position, guy is the most creative player in that team

Havertz was short as a teen, he grew into that tall guy under a short period of time, he has said many times that he is still adaptating to his new size, covid is a respiratory disease, he is 21, in a new league, new competition and country, he isn't an established player yet, chelsea bought him cause so many teams were chasing him and we had the kind of money leverkusen wanted

He can't just add weight, players have to maintain of very low level of fat to muscle ratio, if he eats anyhow so he can be more strong for english football, he will lose speed and have injuries, see hazard for instance

Guy just needs time to adapt, if una think say chelsea football club will dump havertz project for mount una no know the club when una dey support

If it is so why not sign established player instead of waiting for a generational talent to generate.

Havertz10:
wetin bruno and cavani done accomplish for this life?

Late bloomer like bruno and failure like cavani

k

KingAlabi:

So harvetz earn more than Bruno and cavani combined

Abi what am I seeing

Na clowns full shekpe.. Marina issa clown

Skimpledawgg

Leeds vs Soton. Watching?

Can't believe Raphinha blew that.
Brilliant tackle from Romeu though.

We Don dey arrive.

Up Shelsea!!!

Omo if we beat ATM tonight, the kind noise I go make both online and offline ehn

I thought they said tuchel comes with a lot of formation.

OVA200:
I thought they said tuchel comes with a lot of formation.

Lol, you suddenly want him to change system ahead of a UCL knockout game?

Why are fans like this?

OVA200:
I thought they said tuchel comes with a lot of formation.

When a team is in terrible state you shore them up by stabilizing the defense variations can come up later. To play to the strengths of the team defensively he needs to play 3atb to provide the defensive stability

Chelsea team to face Atletico Madrid: Mendy; Azpilicueta, Christensen, Rudiger; Hudson-Odoi, Jorginho, Kovacic, Alonso; Mount, Werner, Giroud.

iamJ:
owner of the club is talking una dey vex


Without roman, we wouldn't be where we are today, all these ungrateful fans


If he wants to play cech as striker, I support him, he made the club successful and renouned, coaches destroy clubs more than owners, see mourinho that was allowed to sell valuable players because he was trusted.

Nobody is downplaying his investment & passion for the club but he should tone it down on personal transfer dealings. All the players (Schevchenko, Fernando Torres, Yuri Zhirkov & Kai Havertz) Abrahamovic single handedly bought and foisted on coaches have flopped bar Kevin Debruyne, who didn't get his chance.
Money spent on these ones could have gotten better players who would fit in & hit the ground running.