DrFestus:
Please doctors in the house to help with perfect solution for my 2months old baby, the rashes in his body is increasing everyday.. I have bought Romcin cream, coconut oil, methylated powder but all to no avail. It keeps increasing. Pls help with solution

Penguin2:
Nairaland, stop giving this idiot relevance by pushing his many vituperations to front page except you guys are tacitly telling us you subscribe to his ideas.

tonexman18:
Islamic Cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi on Sunday warned that declaring bandits as terrorists will mark the end of Nigeria as a sovereign and united entity.

Mr Gumi, a retired army military officer and mufti, admitted that the devastation inflicted by rampaging bandits in Nigeria’s northwest amounts to terrorism, but President Muhammadu Buhari’s labelling them as such will invite additional consequences that will consume the entire country.

“The acts the bandits are committing now in NW have gradually over time become tantamount to terrorism because wherever innocent people are fatal victims it’s pure terrorism,” Mr Gumi said in a Facebook post on Sunday night.

The cleric warned that the moment bandits are designated as terrorists, “Islamic for that matter, the direct foreign Jihadist movements will set in in force.”


https://gazettengr.com/nigeria-will-end-if-buhari-declares-bandits-as-terrorists-sheikh-gumi

AchalugoNwa:
yes most of you here knows me as a die hard pro igbo and unapologetic terrorist buhari hater.

But I can't sit back and watch some so called people who claim to fight for Igbos destroy the same people they're fighting for.

yes I'm talking about ipob and their careless decisions that affects igbos directly.
I wonder who advise these people sef.

first you declared every Monday sit at home and igbos gladly complied.
even though some where against it.
you later withdraw it but it was too late because hoodlums and politicians have highjacked it for their own personal interests.
today you guys have disassociated yourselves from the sit at home but igbos still bears the effects of your miscalculations.
now you want to impose a week lock down.
tomorrow politicians and criminals will highjack it too and all you will do is to disassociate yourselves from it again and let the Igbos bear the consequences thereby leaving us at the mercy of those that highjacked it just like what we're having today with the meaningless Monday sit at home.

enough of that already.
we say NO to grounding of economic activities in the east.
we igbos are mainly business people who survives on daily income.
we cannot follow you guy's useless miscalculations again.
ezi di unu ezi sef (dem send una come destroy us)

to me I think Ipob has been highly compromised by Nigerian government because ever since Kanu detention, they've been making so many anti Igbo moves.
this is not Kanu's ipob i know what I'm saying.
it takes nothing to bribe those in charge with hard currency to distabilize everything and it seems to be working.

enough is enough
we say no to any sit at home henceforth.

I can't be calling Buhari supporters zombies and be acting like one.
I can't be atulu sogwalu ewu.

Biodun556:
Biafra will be worst than Nigeria, be warned!

insidelife22:
Yes why do you people carry Igbo Matters for head,while the north is getting it hot hot from bandits?
Remove the planks in your eyes first then you can see well to remove the speck from the SE's eyes.

Even common sense is not common again.

OyigboUpdate:
The only thing I understand from innocent and unarmed IPOB is that they are the ones giving the threats day in day out then it is Buhari government enforcing all their orders.

IPOB, leadership just declared a one week sit at home as a human rights activist Deji supported it. Since it is their will. Well the umu bingos are not finding it funny with Deji

Biodun556:


May God bless you. You are the real Igbo. Seun should put this in front page

Abdul05:
Big time terrorist

SecretAgent770:
Throw back post of nnamdi kanu ordering his minions to trap and eliminate Nigeria Soldiers.

Extracted from his official Facebook page that was locked: https://www.facebook.com/353375415834143/posts/419976165840734/

udele1:
Same here.

SATANICALLY:


https://dailypost.ng/2021/10/24/2023-primate-ayodele-sends-warning-to-uzor-kalu-on-igbo-presidency/

udele1:
All hail the Biafra, the land of the rising CRIME.

Fulani and DSS again.

udele1:
All hail the Biafra, the land of the rising CRIME.

Fulani and DSS again.

Veryfoolishboy:
Omo just like that 3 bread winner of 3 families are gone
If you are among those hailing Nnamdi Kanu and his foot soldiers, know that you will also reap from whatever evil they sow. No matter how long.

DeltaFire:
WHY SUBMISSIONS BY NNAMDI KANU’S LAWYERS WILL FALL LIKE PACK OF CARDS
By Clifford Iroanya
Elombah News
24 Oct 2021


Of all the submissions put up by lawyers to the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the only one that will be irrefutably in their favour is submission number xviii, considering that there is no such law as “CAP C77” as quoted in Counts #1 & #2 on the charge sheet.

The remaining submissions by Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyers will fall like a pack of cards.

However, if the Department of State Services (DSS) quickly changed the law they cited from “CAP C77” to “CAP C38” and the Judge allows that change to be made, then even the submission number xviii by Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyers will be irrelevant.

Here are the submissions of Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyers:

According to Kanu in a preliminary objection filed by his lawyers led by Ifeanyi Ejiofor, the charge as constituted does not disclose a ‘prima facie’ case against him.

1. AN ORDER striking out/quashing and or dismissing the 7-count Amended Charge, specifically, counts 1 to 7 preferred against the Defendant/Applicant in the Amended Charge No: FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015, for the reason that the counts, as constituted, are incompetent and thus, deprives the Honourable Court of jurisdiction to entertain the same.

2. AN ORDER of the Honourable Court discharging and acquitting the Defendant/Applicant of all the counts in the 7-Count Amended Charge preferred against the Defendant/Applicant, upon the same being struck out/quashed and or dismissed.

FURTHER TAKE NOTICE THAT THE OBJECTION is predicated on the following grounds, namely;

i. That the 7 Counts preferred against the Defendant/Applicant in the Amended Charge is incompetent, and consequently the Honourable Court lacks the requisite jurisdiction to entertain the same.

ii. That allegations in the 7-count Amended Charge, particularly counts 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7, is that the Defendant/Applicant made a broadcast in London, United Kingdom, but that same was monitored in Enugu and in other parts of Nigeria.

iii. That no allegation was made in any of the Counts of the Amended Charge that the alleged sundry acts of the Defendant/Applicant were physically carried out by him, within the geographical space or territorial boundaries of Nigeria.

iv. That the only element requisite to constitute and found liability for incitement is the actual words allegedly uttered by the Defendant/Applicant.

v. That the alleged acts ascribed to the Defendant/Applicant as constituting offences, were not made up of several elements. See Section 12 of the Criminal Code Cap 38 LFN 2004. That the element of alleged inciting statements did not occur anywhere within the territorial boundaries of Nigeria. Further, that the only element requisite to constitute liability for incitement allegedly occurred wholly and entirely in London, United Kingdom, and not anywhere within Nigeria.

vi. That jurisdiction is extrinsic to adjudication. It is conferred on a Court, aliunde. It is not intrinsic. See SYLVESTER OKONKWO v. HON. EBELE OBI & ORS (2019) LPELR-48183(CA); ALL PROGRESSIVES CONGRESS v. HON. GODWIN ETIM JOHN & ORS (2019) LPELR-47003(CA).

vii. That the principal legislation that governs the trial of offences in Nigeria, namely, the Criminal Code Act, Cap C38, LFN, 2004, in Section 12 thereof, clearly delineates the jurisdiction of a Court adjudicating over a crime. That the provisions of Sections 93-96 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, does not purport to displace any part of Section 12 of the Criminal Code Act. Neither does the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act of 2013.

viii. That as the whole elements necessary to constitute incitement in the alleged several broadcasts of the Defendant/Applicant occurred in London, United Kingdom, and Not in Nigeria, the Court in Nigeria has no jurisdiction to try the Defendant/Applicant on any charge founded on any such alleged incitement, even if the Defendant/Applicant enters the geographical boundaries of Nigeria.

ix. That although the Terrorism (Prevention Amendment) Act, 2013 purports to invest the Act with extra territorial jurisdiction, it in no way clothes the Honourable Court with the jurisdiction to try the Defendant for the said offences allegedly committed in London. For the extra territorial jurisdiction of the Terrorism (Prevention Amendment) Act, 2013 to apply, the principle of double criminality must be established.

x. That the alleged acts for which the Defendant was charged, do not constitute terrorism offences in London, United Kingdom, where they were allegedly committed.

xi. That Section 1(A)(2) of the Terrorism (Prevention Amendment) Act, 2013, imposes an obligation on the Attorney General of the Federation, to maintain International co-operation for compliance with International Treaties on terrorism.

xii. That the international co-operation and compliance envisaged in the said Section 1(A)(2) of the Act, presupposes, amongst other things that due process of law must be followed at all times, which also includes, that the Defendant in the instant charge must be rendered lawfully from any territory outside Nigeria.


xiii. That the Defendant was abducted from Kenya and consequently extraordinarily rendered to Nigeria, without firstly subjecting him to extradition proceedings in Kenya, in violation of all known international conventions and treaties on extradition.
xiv. That the Defendant cannot be arraigned and tried on the 7-count Amended Charge, when he was not lawfully rendered to Nigeria and, consequently brought before the Court.

xv. That prosecuting the Defendant on the 7-count Amended Charge, would amount to allowing the Complainant to benefit from their illegality and wrongdoing.

xvi. That he who comes to equity must come with clean hands, and no party should be allowed to benefit from his wrong doing.

xvii. That the extraordinary rendition of the Defendant, robs the Honourable Court of the requisite jurisdiction to try him on the 7-Count Amended Charge.

xviii. That counts 1, 2 and 3 of the Amended Charge were brought under a non-existent law.

xix. That Count 2 of the Amended Charge is legally deficient because it rests on freedom of speech protected by the Nigerian Constitution, section 39, and international law, Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 19 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights.

xx. That count 3 of the 7-count Amended Charge relates to an offence allegedly committed in Ubuluisiuzor, in Ihiala Local Government Area of Anambra State, outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Honourable Court.

xxi. That counts 5, 6 and 7 of the Amended Charge are ambiguous and do not disclose any offence known to law.

xxii. That Count 6 of the Amended Charge is also fatally deficient because it fails to allege any acts or words by Defendant/Applicant in furtherance of an act of terrorism as defined by the Terrorism Prevention Act of 2011. Additionally, the allegedly wrongful words uttered by Defendant/Applicant constitute free speech protected by the Nigerian Constitution, Article 39, and by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 39 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

xxiii. That Count 7 of the Amended Charge is further fatally deficient because it fails to allege any acts or words by Defendant/Applicant in furtherance of an act of terrorism as defined by the Terrorism Prevention Act of2011. Additionally, the allegedly wrongful words uttered by Defendant/Applicant constitute free speech protected by the Nigerian Constitution, Article 39, and by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 39 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

xxiv. That there is no proof of evidence attached to the Amended Charge filed against the Defendant.

xxv. That the even the purported proof of evidence to be relied upon by the prosecution does not disclose any prima facie case against the Defendant.

xxvi. That from the list of Exhibits and witnesses attached to the 7-Count Amended Charge, there is nothing relating to or linking the Defendant to the 7-Count Amended Charge, particularly counts 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Charge.

xxvii. That no final pronouncement has been made on the purported proscription of the Indigenous People of Biafra, as the said purported proscription, is a subject matter of Appeal in Appeal No: CA/A/214/2018, pending before the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal.

xxviii. That by virtue of Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution as amended, the Defendant/Applicant cannot be arraigned or tried for an offence which its validity or otherwise is the subject matter of an appeal.

xxix. That it will be most unjust, painful, wicked and unfair for the Applicant to undergo the rigors of a full trial, when the charge as constituted, does not disclose a prima facie case against him.

Bleep. That there is no ground for this Honorable Court to proceed with the trial against the Applicant, in the circumstance of this case.

xxxi. That the Court has the powers and a duty to stop a prosecution which on the facts creates abuse and injustice.


Addendum:
The Law cited in Count #3 on Nnamdi Kanu’s charge sheet is correct.
Hence, part of his lawyers’ submission in number xviii which included Count #3 is wrong. This is because the notion that “CAP C45” is a non-existent Law is false.



https://news.band/why-submissions-by-nnamdi-kanus-lawyers-will-fall-like-pack-of-cards/

AdvocateWriter:
Let Tinubu decamp to PDP today and you will see all of them supporting him.... this was crystal clear in the case of obaseki

Stalwert:
THROWBACK: In 2014 Bishop Kukah Criticised Nigerians For Criticising Government Calling Them Cynics

Nigerians love to criticize their country perhaps far more than any nation I know of in the world. Yes, we have all earned the right to be cynical and even contemptible about the way we have been governed, and about how the resources of our nation have been frittered away mindlessly.

“I am even more amused by the criticisms of some of our brethren in the Diaspora especially those who think that simply being abroad has set them apart from their fellow countrymen and women, those who believe that those of us who are here are so because we are not good enough to be abroad.

“… It is about time we took off the gloves and speak honestly to ourselves about our future as a country, our mistakes, our fears, anxieties and deep hope. We are not the worst people on earth nor is our country the worst piece of God’s real estate. We have to seize this narrative and re-define ourselves…

[b]The measure of the greatness of a people or even individuals is based on how or where they stand in moments of trials and tribulations. Nigeria is going through such a phase now. Since the outbreak of the tragedy that is Boko Haram, one has seen another side of our citizens that is quite tragic. Rather than trying to stand together to rise beyond this in hope together, I find some of my fellow citizens creating more confusion and using the insurgency as weapons of politics.

“…The President and the security agencies have become the objects of attacks and vilification and yet, there is very little that is being done to point at the way forward. I know that as day follows night, we shall pull out of this tragedy that we face as a nation. But the least we can do is to stand in the comforts of highways and homes that someone else constructed and thrown stones at ourselves and our people simply because we are living off someone else’s sweat.”

Bishop Mathew Hassan Kukah speaking at a lecture organized by the members of the Pyrates Confraternity to mark the 80th Birthday anniversary of Nigeria’s Nobel Laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka in 2014. [/b]

https://dailyconcordnews.com/2020/12/27/throwback-in-2014-bishop-kukah-criticised-nigerians-for-criticising-government-calling-them-cynics/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Cc. Mynd44 lalasticala

Amoto05:
Am not surprised. Americans love mad men

moseskalu555:


It is alleged that Davido and Chioma are currently not on good terms.

According to a popular Instagram blogger Cutie Julls, Davido and his favorite baby mama, Chioma, traded blows before he went to Ghana to continue trading the blows with Damini Ebunoluwa Ogulu, known professionally as Burna Boy.

The self-acclaimed African giant attacked the CEO of DMW Records on sight, and that resulted in a brawl inside a Twist Night club in Accra, Ghana, while Wizkid was sitting unconcerned drinking wine after the three current biggest Nigerian artists clashed in the same club.

Well, Cutie Julls has taken to Instagram and alleged that Davido is currently not on good terms with Chioma Avril Rowland because they traded blows before the singer went to Ghana.

SEE POST HERE: https://celebrity-profile.com/chioma-allegedly-caught-davido-cheating-before-he-went-to-ghana/

,

5hanklee:

I can't recall sir.
I have the feeling that your babe Toto go soon join the list Sha.
Guess who did this sub for me.

5hanklee:
If you never fûck till blood commot your babe Toto, forget am, you no Sabi fuçk.