SalamRushdie: I would be the last person to support Tinubu but truth be told he won fair and square..of we repeat the race today he will win if the Obidients are still short-sighted
I was in the Obidients camp immediately Prof Osinbajo lost APC primaries....but I quickly discovered that the Obidient movement was powered by extreme hatred. Hence my choice of the best alternative among the terrible availables.
ambale: The court will decide that, inec needs to get serious, they need to explain their process clearly to the nation
Is that too much to ask?
They don't owe you nothing. The court consisting of sane judges will listen and exonerate and commend INEC for the freest and fairest African presidential election in history
If you don't want to believe it so! Doesn't change the fact that he did.
On the issue of Tinubu not winning the FCT, INEC argued that going by the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, “the FCT has the status of a state and ought to be recognised as one of the states of the federation.”
Section 299(1) of the Constitution provides that the provisions of the Constitution shall apply to the Federal Capital Territory as if it were one of the states of the Federation. It means that the FCT is the 37th state.
So section 134 of the Constitution which provides that “not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in EACH of at least two-thirds of ALL THE STATES AND the FCT” means 25 states or 24 states plus the FCT. Winning the FCT by a candidate is not compulsory.
The Independent National Electoral Commission has asked the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal in Abuja to dismiss all the petitions challenging the declaration of Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress as the winner of the February 25 presidential election.
INEC had declared that Tinubu polled 8,794,726 votes to win the election.
The commission declared that the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar, came second with 6,984,520 votes, while it announced Labour Party’s Peter Obi as the second runner-up with 6,101,533 votes.
But Atiku, Obi and some other parties rejected the results announced by INEC and heeded for the tribunal with prayers that the election should be nullified.
All the opposition parties challenging Tinubu’s victory joined INEC as a co-defendant.
In its defence to the various petitions, filed through its team of lawyers led by A. B. Mahmoud (SAN), INEC described Atiku’s petition as “grossly incompetent, vague and academic, saying it was an abuse of the court process.”
INEC affirmed that having scored at least one-quarter of the valid votes cast in 29 states, which is over and above the 24 states threshold required by the constitution in addition to scoring the highest number of the lawful votes cast at the election, Tinubu was properly declared winner and returned as the President-elect.
On the issue of Tinubu not winning the FCT, INEC argued that going by the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, “the FCT has the status of a state and ought to be recognised as one of the states of the federation.”
INEC insisted that it declared Tinubu as winner of the election, considering that he “scored highest valid votes cast at the election and at least 25 per cent of the votes cast in not less than two-thirds of the states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.”
“The 1st respondent pleads and shall at the trial of this suit rely on all the Electoral Forms including but not limited to Forms ECSA, BCSB, ECSC, ECSD and ECBE used in the course of the Presidential Election held on the 25th day of February 2023,” INEC said.
“The FCT, beyond being the capital of Nigeria, has no special status over and above the other 36 states of the federation to require a candidate in the presidential election to obtain at least 25 per cent of the votes cast in the FCT before being declared winner of the presidential election.
43Ronin: So the crime for public nuisance is max prison? These judges & politicians will not rest untill the army comes and kills all of them in a coup
Dreamer.... Hottest part of kuje for the miscreant terrorist
Court denies anti-Tinubu protester bail A Zuba Magistrate Court in Abuja on Tuesday refused to grant bail to one Obiajulu Uja, who protested against the president-elect, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, while onboard an Ibom Air Abuja-Lagos bound flight.
Uja, who was debarked from the plane and handed over to the police, had filed an application for bail through his counsel, Barr. Ejike Ugwu. However, Senior Magistrate Mohammed Abdulazeez Ismail dismissed the application, holding that the application was premature
He held that the exhibits attached to the application did not say the defendant was unfit to for trial but rather indicated he was of unsound mind.
He also held that while the constitution guarantees every person’s liberty, a court can deprive a person of their liberty based on health grounds.
Citing the provisions of Section 35(1)(e) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and Section 278 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, the Magistrate held that Uja cannot be granted bail.
He held that where the mental capacity of a defendant is an issue, the court has the duty to ascertain the medical situation of such defendant.
He added that the exhibits attached to Uja’s bail application raised the issue of his medical capacity.
He subsequently turned down the bail application and ordered that Uja be held at the Kuje Correctional Centre of Nigerian Correctional Service.
He further ordered the head of the centre to take the defendant to a government hospital to ascertain his mental capacity.
He then adjourned until April 20 for report and hearing.
News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Uja had held up the aircraft for over an hour, and it took the efforts of six airport security officers to evacuate him after he started the protest.
The police accused Uja of threatening violence and causing a breach of peace with his actions.
press9jatv: Federal high Court In Benin has restricted any Lp members or leaders to suspend. Abure remains Lp national chairman. no Appeal on the judgement of the high court in Benin
This was the first judgement. The Benin court erred in law
press9jatv: APC response in the Presidential election petition tribunal will be dismissed for lacking merit. It’s only Lp that can take a candidate to the court and not other political parties . Supreme Court of justice have ruled on that. APC will suffer another defeat in the tribunal court of justice.
Are you aware that LP is already in court challenging the substitution of candidate names using forged FCT court documents? Or why do you think Abure was disgraced out of office as national chairman?