₦airaland Forum

syncACE:
i've been wondering about why we have a president and a vice president, as we also have a governor and deputy governor,
But why don't we have a chancellor and vice chancellor

There is Chancellor in person of Alh sa'ad Abubakar(Sultan of Sokoto) and even Pro-Chancellor(Chairman Governing Council UI) in person of Nde Joshua Mutka Waklek

Bobola07:
Final year dentist??

Boss, I'm prostrating right now oh...

Please tell me when to standup..

lol..you are yning me..we will see one day..congrats on your admission

Diamondville:
so medicine and dentistsy have the same time range in UI

Yes ma

Diamondville:
medicine?

Dentistry

holuwajobar:
medicine?

Dentistry

Diamondville:
what year are you in?

600level

Diamondville:
staylite or aspirant??

staylite

rexzivyson:
Any physiotherapy aspirant?...ur agg?
Mine is 69.625....pls share

Congratulations bro...you are in already....cut off for physiotherapy is 63

pls,add me on the UI aspirants Whatsapp group.. 07034584028

UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN, IBADAN.
2016/2017 ADMISSIONS EXERCISE
PRE-ADMISSION SCREENING OF CANDIDATES
1. The University of Ibadan, Ibadan, hereby requests all candidates who made the University their most preferred Institution of choice and scored 200 or above in the 2016 UTME to submit their bio-data and WAEC/NECO SSCE O’L Results ONLINE through http://www.admissions.ui.edu.ng from Monday, 05 September to Friday, 23 September, 2016. A scanned copy of the result should also be uploaded.
2. Candidates should note that any results not released before 23 September, 2016 will not be considered for the 2016/2017 Admissions Exercise.
3. Instructions:- �
(i) �Candidates should ensure that the online forms are carefully filled, following ALL necessary instructions, as "mistake(s)" may lead to disqualification.
(ii) Candidates can return to the portal, up till 23 September 2016 to edit/complete their previous entries or otherwise review and print their submissions. Please ensure that you click "FINAL SUBMISSION" before printing. Candidates should note that no further editing CAN be done after final submissions.
(iii) �Candidates are advised to use functional e-mail addresses and telephone numbers to enable the University reach them in the course of the Admission exercise or whenever the need arises.
(iv) �Candidates are expected to upload their passport photographs and signatures. The image format for the passport and signature is JPEG and must not exceed the specification. The photographs must be on white background showing both ears, without glasses, cap or headgear.
(v) An online help desk platform on http://www.admissions.ui.edu.ng/helpdesk will be �available to handle all genuine enquiries.
4. �Candidates should please note that it is only when an 'O' level result is deficient for a course of choice that another result may be presented to complement. Candidates presenting two 'O' level results (6 credits at 2 Sittings) should ensure that the comprehensive details of both results are submitted.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND FACULTY OF PHARMACY ACCEPT 5 CREDITS AT 1 SITTING ONLY.
5. �The deadline for the submission of bio-data / 'O' level results may not be extended. Any candidate whose data is not submitted within the stipulated time may not be considered for the Pre-Admission Screening exercise and for admission.
6. �Misrepresentation/falsification of documents is a serious offence. Candidates are therefore advised to submit genuine documents only. Anyone found guilty of this offence will be disqualified automatically and in appropriate cases, be handed over to the Law Enforcement Agencies.
7.�Candidates are requested to note that payment of the Admission Portal Access Fee of N2, 500.00 is for processing of each candidate’s application. This does not guarantee admission.
8. �Candidates are strongly advised to adhere strictly to the guidelines stipulated above for successful completion of the online submissions.


Signed
Olujimi I. Olukoya, MNIM, FPA
Registrar

0393:
LES MISERABLES
‘Good afternoon sir, we are the new students rotating through your unit and we just want to tell you we are sorry!’
‘Sorry for what?’
‘For anyway we might offend you in this posting’
The above scene should be the ideal introduction given by any group of medical students through a new unit and indeed, it might not even be enough to pacify some ‘malignant’ consultants (ref: a particular neurosurgeon).
In my ‘short’ (ref: ASUU, NMA and JOHESU strikes) stay so far in medical school, I have added so many facies to my God given repertoire that sometimes, I even amaze myself. (Facies such as the ‘puppy dog look’, for when I want to make a request, the ‘wide eye look’, for surprise and denial, the ‘quivering lip’, to show fear and hence garner some sympathy, and my personal favourite, the ‘slack-jaw’, which seems to work well for some reason when being percussed).
The reason for this is not so far-fetched, because for some reason, it seems I always have to beg for forgiveness from some consultant I offended in some way or the other in practically every department or unit I rotate through. I have prostrated thrice (particularly in the department of otorhinogbogbocalamity), been the recipient of two queries (honestly, I never would have believed that students received queries if I didn’t get them myself) and once, I even had to write a letter describing how foolish and terribly short-sighted I am, all in bid to placate my ‘teachers’.
Thankfully, I have not been asked to write a letter to the Provost, copying the Deputy Provost, Secretary to the College, Faculty Officer, Head of Department, my parents, relatives and the forces from the village that always seem to be getting me in all this trouble….well, at least not yet anyway.
For more articles like this and other interesting articles, visit www.klatschkrew.. Or follow@theklatschkrew. KLATSCHKREW is made up of medical, dental, physiotherapy, nursing, medical laboratory scientists and all health related field students and writers who are determined to add something new to their lives apart from going to the library.
GO TO https://klatschkrew./2015/07/13/les-misrables/ AND COMMENT ON YOUR WARDROUND EXPERIENCE(S)

Definitely,this is from a UI student....I hail thee

University of Ibadan will soon start its post- UTME admission exercise.Kindly check the Admissions menu of the university website (admissions.ui.edu.ng) on Monday 27 July 2015. Please note that payment will be online . check out www.ui.edu.ng

Walexz02:
ok thank you, I couldn't locate a dentist clinic here in ibadan, you can help me with an address if you have one please.

You can go to the Dental Clinic,UCH...or Smile Dental Clinic at Bodija

morgang:
Hi all,

UI past questions and answers is available for free.... No fee charges or whatsoever! just drop your mails, and it'll be dully forwarded to you.

As for the folks who thought that we're on strike, we ain't on strike yet...probably, after first semester exam!

Incase of any piece of information, u can still reach on this platform...although not too frequent on this forum.... I presume some of u have my contact for Whatapps...

Goodluck fellas..

I will like to get it....qassy4all@gmail.com.......thanks bro

netmoneywizard: Boss mi! Ur face scarce 4 campus o

na exam tinz bro...longest tym..ao r u doing?...I don't think we have met physically before

Dr. Lomaxx....I reall need those textbooks...u can send it to qassy4all@yahoo.com......thanks

[color=#006600][/color]nyc one @amiablejay...long tym..ao r u doing

The University of Ibadan will be re-opened
on January 4 according to the Governing
Council of the institution which sat based
on the directives of the Committee of Pro-
Chancellors of Federal Universities and the
National Universities Commission. But
Academic Staff Union of Universities said
strike still on.
In the official bulletin of the university,
which was signed by its registrar and
secretary to the council, Mr. Olujimi
Olukoya,
and released on Friday, the governing
council explained that the re-opening
became necessary in view of the
consideration of all matters relating to the
on-going Academic Staff Union of
Universities strike, at its recent meeting.
The bulletin stated that, “Consequent upon
the directives of the CPC which directed
the
Vice-Chancellors to re-open universities for
academic and allied activities to
commence,
the management on Tuesday, directed the
deans and directors to open resumption
register for academic staff willing to
resume work to sign, on or before
December 4, 2013.
“At its extra-ordinary meeting held on
Wednesday, December 4, the school’s
governing council deliberated on all the
actions taken and ratified by the
Committee
of Provost, Deans and Directors and
ratified
them. The Senate at its special meeting
held
on December 4, also considered the
revised
academic calendar for the remaining part
of
the second semester of 2012/2013 session
proposed by the Committee of Provost,
Deans and Directors and approved.”

The Truth About The Current State Of The
ASUU Strike
By Dr. Segun Ajiboye
Following the protracted strike action by
ASUU to enforce
the funding agreement of 2009 with the
Yar'Ardua/
Jonathan Administration there have been
attempts to shift
the focus of the public from the real issues
and portray
ASUU as an insensitive organization. We
have tried to
explain how we tried desperately to avoid
the strike by
virtually begging for meetings with the
Federal
Government for over three years to no
avail.
As a last option to draw attention to our
plight and get the
government to talk, ASUU has had to
devise an
instrument of warning strike to force a
dialogue and
hopefully avoid the need for a strike. We
believe that
Nigerians remember that a warning strike
was applied
without the desired attention from
government. Over and
over again, we have been advised to adopt
alternative
methods to strike actions. ASUU has a
permanent lobby
in Abuja and regularly seeks the help of
traditional rulers
and influential individuals to persuade
government to
talk to her. Nigerians should not forget
that governance in
Nigeria is a big racket and leadership has
one focus;
unbridled appetite for power and money.
Those who talk
about the need for dialogue to resolve
labour issues need
to understand how the Nigerian
Government and political
environment functions. ASUU does not
have the financial
means to induce support of officials and
mobilize the
political apparatus. Even if we had the
means, it is against
our policy to give or accept bribe.
Those who accuse ASUU of being
insensitive need to
realize that it is easier for ASUU to
concentrate on its
conditions of service alone (as some have
repeatedly
suggested) and leave the government to
do what it likes
with the Universities. We have ready
examples of national
assets such as NITEL, RAILWAY, and
NIGERIAN AIRWAYS
among many others that collapsed because
the workers
paid attention only to their narrow
interests. Members of
ASUU often go without salaries for months
during strikes
and are subjected to untold hardships and
indignities.
Wouldn’t it just be easier to take our
salaries and leave
Nigerians to decide the fate of their
institutions? Is this
what Nigerians want? Do they want to
finish off the
Universities as was done to public primary
and
secondary schools? Will there be
opportunities for the
poor to have university education if we fold
our hands
and allow the public universities to be
destroyed? Will
the poor be able to send their children
abroad or pay the
exorbitant fees of private universities
owned by
politicians and their friends?
IS ASUU DISRESPECTFUL TO THE
PRESIDENT?
There have been insinuations that ASUU
has come up
with new demands following the meeting
with Mr
President. In spite of the fact that we
believe that Mr
President could have thrown his weight
behind a
resolution of the crisis very early in the
strike and in fact,
he could have prevented the strike from
happening, ASUU
was very appreciative of his intervention.
It is important
to note that while the political machinery
of government
was more interested in the resolution of
the current
strike, ASUU, in addition, was more
concerned about
ending strikes for the foreseeable future in
order to bring
the university system to stability. Perhaps,
government
did not see the need to find a sustainable
solution to the
problem. Following the discussions with Mr
President, a
number of decisions were taken. Out of
respect for Mr
President, ASUU did not insist that the
minutes of the
meeting and decision extracts be
produced, vetted and
signed before leaving the venue of the
meeting. ASUU’s
experience in its dealing with government
has been that
Civil Servants routinely doctor minutes of
meeting for
political and selfish ends. We are also quite
familiar with
the fact that successive governments
starting with the
Abacha era have consistently disowned
agreements with
ASUU at the slightest opportunity.
Nigerians are familiar
with the burden of history and the
“integrity challenge”
which those in the highest offices in the
land bear. The
spoken promise of a President should
normally be cast
in stone. However, is that our experience
in Nigeria? If
agreements are not important then what
is? If leaders
violate agreements entered into with the
cream of its
intelligentsia, then the mass populace is
doomed. We
should not turn against the man whose
rights have been
violated because we think it is the fastest
way to peace.
It is important for Nigerians to know that
nothing new
was demanded by ASUU. In fact, we were
simply winding
down the strike when our former
president, Professor
Iyayi was killed by the Governor of Kogi
State. What was
left after the meeting with the President
was mere paper
work and implementing our constitutional
process for
calling off a strike. The paper work was
simply to ensure
that ASUU and Government were on the
same page. ASUU
wanted the government to deliver on its
promise by
releasing immediately the 200 billion naira
it promised
earlier in the strike. It also requested that
a high- ranking
government official be assigned to sign the
resolutions
reached at the meeting with the
President. Please note
that one of the grounds given by the SSG
Chief Pius
Anyim for repudiating the 2009 agreement
was that it was
signed by a person of inconsequential
status, a mere
Permanent Secretary.
We had been reliably informed that
Government was
not really interested in fulfilling its
agreement
notwithstanding our meeting with Mr
President.
Nevertheless, ASUU did not think that the
highest
office in the land will be involved in
gimmickry and
politicking with the destiny of our youths.
Moreover,
we had been advised even by some of the
vociferous
critics of ASUU that it was unlikely that any
funds not
released by the end of this year will ever
be available
next year because government will be
mobilizing all
available resources for the elections.
What Nigerians do not know was that
there are some
influential officials in power who actually
hoped that
ASUU will not respond positively to Mr
President.
Remember that soon after the death of
Iyayi, it was stated
in some circles that ASUU will not call off
the strike until
2014. It was a rude shock to these
individuals that ASUU
went ahead to start the process of calling
off the strike.
Is ASUU engaged in subversion?
Was government truly interested in ending
the strike? If
indeed, it was serious, the frantic
escalation of the crisis
at a point where only paper work was left
to call off the
strike is very suspicious. Does the minister
of Education
have another agenda or is it just a case of
immaturity and
power intoxication on his part? Is ASUU
engaged in
subversion as suggested by the President?
Over the
years, ASUU has been accused of playing
politics and
acting like an opposition because of its
principled
position on the funding of education in
Nigeria. It is yet
unclear to Nigerians what constitutes
subversion in
ASUU’s insistence on minimum
requirements of civilised
conduct. An agreement is a sacred
document which
should be respected and not treated as a
mere text in a
sheet of paper. The same mindset that has
led to the
breaching of ASUU’s agreement also has
informed the
impunity with which the constitution of the
Federal
Republic of Nigeria has been treated over
the years. It
also explains why laws of the land are not
respected and
why the nation has become a fiefdom of a
few powerful
individuals who must maintain power and
relevance at all
cost. These individuals think that
governance is about
wearing a bowler hat, talk tough and take
inspiration from
Africa Magic. Leadership is not a movie.
Those who are engaged in subversion are
those who use
state apparatus to do oil bunkering, who
fail to tackle
corruption and are profiting from
terrorism. They are the
ones who fail to fund the educational
system adequately,
but send their own children to schools
abroad. These
individuals go to cure a headache overseas
while leaving
the poor to die in derelict health facilities
at home.
Is ASUU also responsible for the crisis in
the health and
power sectors? Are we to blame for the
fact that in all
development indicators we are at the
bottom of every
positive indicator and at the top of every
negative
one? Nigerians should not be deceived. In
the 80s, the
heroic actions of the NUT were subverted
and today we
have the kind of primary and secondary
schools that turn
out illiterates.
The NEEDS Assessment report of
government shows
clearly that ASUU is not crying wolf. What
we hear from
critics is that we should relent and pray for
divine
intervention. ASUU believes in work and
pray. While
some people closed their eyes, they
allowed the vultures
to build nests over our heads. While we
slept, the enemy
sowed tares in our field. And now at the
apex of national
affairs, have emerged agents of midnight!
We implore all Nigerians to hold their
future in their
hands and rise up to challenge every form
of oppression
and corruption. We cannot afford to let the
privilege few
who have cornered our common wealth to
turn our
children to slaves in their own country. If
the nation lacks
resources , let it affect everyone down the
line. If we need
to tighten our belt, let the leaders give
example. If they
truly believe in our country, let them show
patriotism by
withdrawing their children from foreign
schools to
Nigerian Universities. If these schools are
not good
enough for their children, why must we be
the ones to
carry the burden always?
ASUU is resolved to see an end to this
strike, and other
strikes in the foreseeable future. Hence,
we need the
support of all Nigerians to ensure a
sustainable
resolution of the current crisis so that
strikes will
become a thing of the past in the
university system.
Thank you.
(Being the Text of a Press Briefing issued
at Congress by
the Chairman, Academic Staff Union of
Universities
(ASUU), University of Ibadan Chapter, Dr.
Segun Ajiboye,
today Monday, 02 December

The Truth About The Current State Of The
ASUU Strike
By Dr. Segun Ajiboye
Following the protracted strike action by
ASUU to enforce
the funding agreement of 2009 with the
Yar'Ardua/
Jonathan Administration there have been
attempts to shift
the focus of the public from the real issues
and portray
ASUU as an insensitive organization. We
have tried to
explain how we tried desperately to avoid
the strike by
virtually begging for meetings with the
Federal
Government for over three years to no
avail.
As a last option to draw attention to our
plight and get the
government to talk, ASUU has had to
devise an
instrument of warning strike to force a
dialogue and
hopefully avoid the need for a strike. We
believe that
Nigerians remember that a warning strike
was applied
without the desired attention from
government. Over and
over again, we have been advised to adopt
alternative
methods to strike actions. ASUU has a
permanent lobby
in Abuja and regularly seeks the help of
traditional rulers
and influential individuals to persuade
government to
talk to her. Nigerians should not forget
that governance in
Nigeria is a big racket and leadership has
one focus;
unbridled appetite for power and money.
Those who talk
about the need for dialogue to resolve
labour issues need
to understand how the Nigerian
Government and political
environment functions. ASUU does not
have the financial
means to induce support of officials and
mobilize the
political apparatus. Even if we had the
means, it is against
our policy to give or accept bribe.
Those who accuse ASUU of being
insensitive need to
realize that it is easier for ASUU to
concentrate on its
conditions of service alone (as some have
repeatedly
suggested) and leave the government to
do what it likes
with the Universities. We have ready
examples of national
assets such as NITEL, RAILWAY, and
NIGERIAN AIRWAYS
among many others that collapsed because
the workers
paid attention only to their narrow
interests. Members of
ASUU often go without salaries for months
during strikes
and are subjected to untold hardships and
indignities.
Wouldn’t it just be easier to take our
salaries and leave
Nigerians to decide the fate of their
institutions? Is this
what Nigerians want? Do they want to
finish off the
Universities as was done to public primary
and
secondary schools? Will there be
opportunities for the
poor to have university education if we fold
our hands
and allow the public universities to be
destroyed? Will
the poor be able to send their children
abroad or pay the
exorbitant fees of private universities
owned by
politicians and their friends?
IS ASUU DISRESPECTFUL TO THE
PRESIDENT?
There have been insinuations that ASUU
has come up
with new demands following the meeting
with Mr
President. In spite of the fact that we
believe that Mr
President could have thrown his weight
behind a
resolution of the crisis very early in the
strike and in fact,
he could have prevented the strike from
happening, ASUU
was very appreciative of his intervention.
It is important
to note that while the political machinery
of government
was more interested in the resolution of
the current
strike, ASUU, in addition, was more
concerned about
ending strikes for the foreseeable future in
order to bring
the university system to stability. Perhaps,
government
did not see the need to find a sustainable
solution to the
problem. Following the discussions with Mr
President, a
number of decisions were taken. Out of
respect for Mr
President, ASUU did not insist that the
minutes of the
meeting and decision extracts be
produced, vetted and
signed before leaving the venue of the
meeting. ASUU’s
experience in its dealing with government
has been that
Civil Servants routinely doctor minutes of
meeting for
political and selfish ends. We are also quite
familiar with
the fact that successive governments
starting with the
Abacha era have consistently disowned
agreements with
ASUU at the slightest opportunity.
Nigerians are familiar
with the burden of history and the
“integrity challenge”
which those in the highest offices in the
land bear. The
spoken promise of a President should
normally be cast
in stone. However, is that our experience
in Nigeria? If
agreements are not important then what
is? If leaders
violate agreements entered into with the
cream of its
intelligentsia, then the mass populace is
doomed. We
should not turn against the man whose
rights have been
violated because we think it is the fastest
way to peace.
It is important for Nigerians to know that
nothing new
was demanded by ASUU. In fact, we were
simply winding
down the strike when our former
president, Professor
Iyayi was killed by the Governor of Kogi
State. What was
left after the meeting with the President
was mere paper
work and implementing our constitutional
process for
calling off a strike. The paper work was
simply to ensure
that ASUU and Government were on the
same page. ASUU
wanted the government to deliver on its
promise by
releasing immediately the 200 billion naira
it promised
earlier in the strike. It also requested that
a high- ranking
government official be assigned to sign the
resolutions
reached at the meeting with the
President. Please note
that one of the grounds given by the SSG
Chief Pius
Anyim for repudiating the 2009 agreement
was that it was
signed by a person of inconsequential
status, a mere
Permanent Secretary.
We had been reliably informed that
Government was
not really interested in fulfilling its
agreement
notwithstanding our meeting with Mr
President.
Nevertheless, ASUU did not think that the
highest
office in the land will be involved in
gimmickry and
politicking with the destiny of our youths.
Moreover,
we had been advised even by some of the
vociferous
critics of ASUU that it was unlikely that any
funds not
released by the end of this year will ever
be available
next year because government will be
mobilizing all
available resources for the elections.
What Nigerians do not know was that
there are some
influential officials in power who actually
hoped that
ASUU will not respond positively to Mr
President.
Remember that soon after the death of
Iyayi, it was stated
in some circles that ASUU will not call off
the strike until
2014. It was a rude shock to these
individuals that ASUU
went ahead to start the process of calling
off the strike.
Is ASUU engaged in subversion?
Was government truly interested in ending
the strike? If
indeed, it was serious, the frantic
escalation of the crisis
at a point where only paper work was left
to call off the
strike is very suspicious. Does the minister
of Education
have another agenda or is it just a case of
immaturity and
power intoxication on his part? Is ASUU
engaged in
subversion as suggested by the President?
Over the
years, ASUU has been accused of playing
politics and
acting like an opposition because of its
principled
position on the funding of education in
Nigeria. It is yet
unclear to Nigerians what constitutes
subversion in
ASUU’s insistence on minimum
requirements of civilised
conduct. An agreement is a sacred
document which
should be respected and not treated as a
mere text in a
sheet of paper. The same mindset that has
led to the
breaching of ASUU’s agreement also has
informed the
impunity with which the constitution of the
Federal
Republic of Nigeria has been treated over
the years. It
also explains why laws of the land are not
respected and
why the nation has become a fiefdom of a
few powerful
individuals who must maintain power and
relevance at all
cost. These individuals think that
governance is about
wearing a bowler hat, talk tough and take
inspiration from
Africa Magic. Leadership is not a movie.
Those who are engaged in subversion are
those who use
state apparatus to do oil bunkering, who
fail to tackle
corruption and are profiting from
terrorism. They are the
ones who fail to fund the educational
system adequately,
but send their own children to schools
abroad. These
individuals go to cure a headache overseas
while leaving
the poor to die in derelict health facilities
at home.
Is ASUU also responsible for the crisis in
the health and
power sectors? Are we to blame for the
fact that in all
development indicators we are at the
bottom of every
positive indicator and at the top of every
negative
one? Nigerians should not be deceived. In
the 80s, the
heroic actions of the NUT were subverted
and today we
have the kind of primary and secondary
schools that turn
out illiterates.
The NEEDS Assessment report of
government shows
clearly that ASUU is not crying wolf. What
we hear from
critics is that we should relent and pray for
divine
intervention. ASUU believes in work and
pray. While
some people closed their eyes, they
allowed the vultures
to build nests over our heads. While we
slept, the enemy
sowed tares in our field. And now at the
apex of national
affairs, have emerged agents of midnight!
We implore all Nigerians to hold their
future in their
hands and rise up to challenge every form
of oppression
and corruption. We cannot afford to let the
privilege few
who have cornered our common wealth to
turn our
children to slaves in their own country. If
the nation lacks
resources , let it affect everyone down the
line. If we need
to tighten our belt, let the leaders give
example. If they
truly believe in our country, let them show
patriotism by
withdrawing their children from foreign
schools to
Nigerian Universities. If these schools are
not good
enough for their children, why must we be
the ones to
carry the burden always?
ASUU is resolved to see an end to this
strike, and other
strikes in the foreseeable future. Hence,
we need the
support of all Nigerians to ensure a
sustainable
resolution of the current crisis so that
strikes will
become a thing of the past in the
university system.
Thank you.
(Being the Text of a Press Briefing issued
at Congress by
the Chairman, Academic Staff Union of
Universities
(ASUU), University of Ibadan Chapter, Dr.
Segun Ajiboye,
today Monday, 02 December

Osasu99:

Thanks man
But when will the list pop out?
Is it during or after the clearance?
With reference to 2011

...i cant rememba sha....buh it's not dat long...buh d second list clearance started d following monday dat d list was released b4 our oga at d top-ASUU came out wit dere strike

Osasu99:

I just tire o but since them neva give COC,I still get small hope
Maybe them go release 2nd list during this clearance period#my thought though#
But if it isn't released during the clearance period then na january things
O lord pls let me not be an aspirant come 2014
Amen

....my boss....be rest assured dat anoda list is on its way...d logic behind d first list clearance is to know d no of peepz dat r nt willing to accept dere admission so as to fill d spaces...

Leystra: Sure...

oga lheye...see u on fb

laryom1: Oga mi sir! I see yu o

na u be boss na...

Leystra: Abi na me sef just dey think am...

This is happening for the first time...
When they are yet to release the second list...

Make dey no shall fall my guyz/gurlz hand because me must surely see dem for UI...

....it's not d first time bro.....it happened during 2011/2012 admissions exercise.....i know dat dere wld b a comprehensive list for d second choice and coc peepz.....

#20,000 ACCEPTANCE FEE UNACCEPTABLE
Greatest UItes! The attention of the
students' Union has been drawn to the
announcement of #20,000 acceptance fee
to be paid by the newly admitted students
of the university of Ibadan by the
university management. We have also
patiently examined the unpleasant
reactions of students towards this ultra-
geometric increase in the acceptance fee
and the fear it portends against next
session's school fees. Hence we wish to
make some clarification about our stand.
First, we wish to correct the egregiously
erroneous impression expressed from
some quarters that our sponsored trip to
the UK spells doom for subsequent
defense and protection of students right
and welfare. On the contrary, our sojourn
to be better leaders has only further
impressed the uncompromising 'students
first' stand at all time on us.
It should also be noted that at no point did
the management inform us about the
increment before they eventually
announced it, so to us too, it was a
shocker! Therefore, on our own part, even
beyond the demand of some students for
the justification of the increment, we see,
at least from our current understanding,
acceptance fee as arbitrary and accounting
for nothing that directly touch the welfare
of students. Thus, the tradition of
increasing such fee yearly is ungodly, and
becomes more dangerous to humanity
when such increase is as astronomical as
100%. Justifying the increment becomes
harder again when we note the recent
injection of billions into the university by
the FG for infrastructural development and
runnings of the institution.
Nevertheless, on our own part, and given
the complexity of our current circumstance
we have resolved to approach the issue at
hand pragmatically, involve the students
legislators, council of faculty presidents,
Hall Chairmen/chairpersons, past Union
leaders around and other stake holders
with a view to find a collective way
forward, while we open a line of dialogue
with the management.
We are encouraged by the resilience
against exploitation that you have strongly
expressed so far and we do solemnly
pledge that the representation of your
interest will continue to come first in our
priorities.
While we commend the University
Management for the support and
understanding granted this administration
so far, we do hope they will understand
our stand yet again and bring down to
status quo ante, the extraneous fee in the
interest of humanity and continuous
peaceful, harmonious and corporate
existence of our university community.
Viva Aluta, Viva Struggle PRINCE BABATUNDE BADMUS STUDENTS' UNION PRESIDENT, UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN.

okorocha22: Pls boss....I need ur 2go id of whatsapp numba.
I need 2 clearify sumtins n u might be of gr8 help..... Thanx in advance

na u be boss my broda...my 2go id-adeq

laryom1: Or cn 1 cros frm zoology or vet.med to mbbs?

U can cross frm zoology/chemistry to mbbs buh dat of ved med is impossible since it is a professional course...just aim to be on a first class cadre and work towards it and am sure dat u ll cross successfully....AMIABLEJAY,u are sighted..bin a long tym

Of d greatest bellites!....#nobility is our pride#

Deekaydadon: I'm a student of the dept

boss,wot of Prof.A.O Osofisan...ur HOD

Attah Ojoma :
My eyes av failed me.. Tears aint comin down. Anyways, had 65. Wat cn I say? Far frm xpectation buh al dsame, TNK U LORD! Congrats to al d geniuses here, fynest, taylor, isaolamide nd d rest.

Congrats Sister