₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,329,408 members, 8,440,454 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 July 2026 at 05:07 AM

Toggle theme

Sekzy99's Posts

Nairaland ForumSekzy99's ProfileSekzy99's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 (of 58 pages)

Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 5:54pm On Aug 18, 2014
ademega: All the same ,they can't be classify as fools like the billions in d world
Tru talk
Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 5:49pm On Aug 18, 2014
kelitacliff: Ok.i'll be right back let me do a little research
Still waiting for ur findings.
Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:58am On Aug 18, 2014
EMEKA1MILLION: 48 laws of power
Law 7

Get others to do the Work for you, but Always Take the Credit.
That the case of Thomas Edison...
It also takes a genius to pull off such tricks.
Wow!!! U tuk me bak memory lane into dat book
BusinessRe: Steve Jobs' 13 Most Inspiring Quotes by sekzy99(m): 8:54am On Aug 18, 2014
icebot: Obviously he was! His intuition and imagination were not based on conventional learning but on experimental wisdom just like Einstein. This explains the reason how he was able to revolutionize home computing at 30.
Hmmmmm
Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:52am On Aug 18, 2014
#1– Leonardo da Vinci
So who’s the most super-overrated genius of all time? It’s Leonardo da Vinci.
Da Vinci is universally hailed as one of the greatest geniuses of all time. He is celebrated for his art, inventions, science, and being multi-talented.
Leonardo da Vinci is the most overrated genius of all time mainly because of the many outlandish claims made about how much of a genius he was.
Many different sources have“estimated”Da Vinci’s IQ to be over 200. This however is quite impossible. It’s literally impossible that Da Vinci had an IQ of 200+. Whenever asked for legitimate reasons as to how Da Vinci could of had an IQ of 200+ people will usually respond with an appeal to authority saying something like“this expert said so”or“this person said so”.
Da Vinci himself said“Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory”.
In order to correctly estimate IQ you have to estimate how well someone would be able to answer the most difficult IQ-style questions.
I know that Da Vinci’s IQ would not be any higher than 160 based on some simple observations:
–At least half of Da Vinci’s inventions failed when tested, this does not show high IQ at all
–Da Vinci tried to learn mathematics but didn’t really get very far
–Da Vinci was not a super-fast learner (the main sign of high IQ)
–Da Vinci’s works do not require a high IQ
Nothing Da Vinci did demonstrates that he had an IQ of 200 or higher or even close to that. Da Vinci is so overrated that people think his IQ was higher than Newton’s. But how could that be possible? Newton did things like solving thebrachistochrone problemin a few hours, but what did Leonardo da Vinci do to demonstrate his intelligence? I would be surprised if Da Vinci had an IQ higher than 140.
Da Vinci’s inventions have also been grossly exaggerated. Da Vinci drew drawings and different people have personally interpreted some of the same drawings to mean different things. This has been the case with Da Vinci’s supposed calculator. Objectors once again claim this device wouldn’t actually work and isn’t actually a drawing of a calculator, but people personally interpret it to be so.
This is also the case with Da Vinci’s supposed helicopter. It’s not really a helicopter, it’s just an aerial screw. Helicopters are closer to Chinese bamboo toys than they are to Da Vinci’s sketches. The media and others simply overrated Da Vinci so much they decided to call it a helicopter (some how).
Da Vinci never actually built or tested most of his inventions and at least half of them failed when tested. The vast majority of the models of Da Vinci’s designs that really do work are modified versions of Da Vinci’s designs or strange interpretations of what Da Vinci’s designs mean. In order to get most of Da Vinci’s designs to work modifications are necessary.
The more people test out Da Vinci’s designs the more people find that his designs don’t work. What’s genius about coming up with failed designs? Basically anyone who has artistic talent, an IQ of 130 or higher, and spends all their time focusing on inventing new machines would be able to come up with lots of inventions (and having half of them fail).
Da Vinci being far ahead of his time is also an exaggerated claim. Da Vinci was born in the year 1452 AD, not the year 287 BC like Archimedes. Basically everything Da Vinci had done had been independently re-discovered without much effort by others within 200 years or less or had been done prior to Da Vinci. Since at least half of Da Vinci’s designs didn’t work I’m not sure how much it would have mattered if Da Vinci’s writings had been discovered much earlier. During Da Vinci’s time being ahead of your time didn’t take much.
Other much better engineers like Heron, Archimedes, Al-Jazari, and Tesla are ignored in the media.
Al-Jazari for instance pre-dates Da Vinci by more than 200 years, he invented one of the first programmable analog computers, camshaft, segmented gears, and more. His book is much more detailed than Leonardo da Vinci’s drawings, all of his designs work, and even though he pre-dates Da Vinci he is completely ignored in the media.
Or what about the super-genius engineer and mathematician Archimedes, who pre-dates Da Vinci by more than 1600 years. He is also ignored in the media.
Da Vinci is perhaps one of the greatest genius idiots of all time. For Da Vinci being so super-overrated that people think his IQ was 200+, for at least half of Da Vinci’s designs not working, for his inventions being grossly overrated, and for the media and many others super-overrating him he ranks as the #1 very most overrated person of all time.
There doesn’t even exist one other genius in all of human history as overrated as Da Vinci.
From my list we can see that the media is full of lies and exaggerations. Those are all my thoughts on who’s overrated. I wonder how controversial my claims may become…

Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:47am On Aug 18, 2014
#3–Albert Einstein
So who’s the person who’s so associated with the word genius that the image or thought of him comes in mind when the word“genius”is mentioned? It’s got to be Einstein.
Einstein is overrated for many reasons. Many people seem to believe that Einstein was a great mathematician. They probably saw on TV“E=mc2”and thought he must have been a great mathematician but in reality Einstein was not a mathematician at all. Mathematicians make mathematical contributions, Einstein applied already existing mathematics (in this case Riemannian geometry).
Another reason that Einstein is overrated is because many people think his ideas were original, but they were not. Einstein seems to have gotten a lot of his ideas directly from Michael Faraday, who Einstein was a fan of. Faraday who is ignored in the media tried to unify gravity with other forces long before Einstein. Faraday had long emphasized his belief that everything was unified as one (magnetism, light, gravity, etc…) primarily because of his religion. The main difference between Einstein’s ideas and Faraday’s is that Einstein added in the space-time dimension, but this idea is not original either since it had already appeared in science fiction novels.
Einstein is also overrated for being known by many as the smartest person ever. Some people have“estimated”his IQ to be over 200 (which is most likely impossible). People like Newton, Archimedes, Gauss, and others were likely much smarter than Einstein but they are not portrayed as such in the media.
Since the mathematics for General Relativity came from Riemann, a lot of Einstein’s ideas are inspired from Faraday, and for Einstein being so synonymous with the word“genius”he ranks as the 3rd most overrated genius.
#2–Pythagoras of Samos
When non-mathematicians think of the best mathematicians Pythagoras likely comes to mind. Most non-mathematicians probably think Pythagoras was the #1 mathematician or close to #1, but mathematicians don’t.
In reality Pythagoras is not the best mathematician or even close. People like Newton, Euler, Gauss, Riemann, and many other mathematicians who are completely ignored in the media for their mathematical brilliance were much better much mathematicians than Pythagoras by far.
Euler and Gauss (the mathematicians that are arguably the two best of all time) are virtually ignored in the media. I wonder what things would be like if Euler and Gauss were mentioned in the media as much as Pythagoras is.
The Pythagorean theorem and a proof of the Pythagorean theorem are not difficult things to discover. There exists literally hundreds of different proofs of the Pythagorean theorem. Most of what Pythagoras and his students did are not difficult to discover or re-discover. Just compare re-discovering the Pythagorean theorem to rediscovering Euler’s identity and it’s easy to see which requires more ingenuity.
Even though it’s true that Pythagoras and his students made some contributions Pythagoras is still far from ranking within the top 10 or top 20 best mathematicians, which is why he is one of the most super-overrated figures.
Since the vast majority of Pythagoras’s contributions are easy to re-discover and since Pythagoras is synonymous with the word“mathematician”despite being far from the best mathematician he ranks as the 2nd most overrated genius.

Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:40am On Aug 18, 2014
#5–Benjamin Franklin
When people who have no knowledge of science think about who made electrical technology possible they probably think of Benjamin Franklin.
The only problem is that Benjamin Franklin contributed very little to science and has very little to do with the advent of electrical technology.
The“key”story about Benjamin Franklin may also be a myth. He like other overrated geniuses on this list is just another media figure.
The actual scientists that were primarily responsible for making electrical technology possible were Michael Faraday and James Clerk Maxwell who are both completely ignored in the media.
For Benjamin Franklin being so falsely associated with electrical technology he ranks as the 5th most overrated genius.


#4–Thomas Edison
When people think of inventors Thomas Edison almost always come to mind. They probably think of a light bulb or a phonograph. He is a very celebrated figure in the media.
So why is Edison overrated? Edison has over 1000 patents (the 3rd most prolific inventor) but Edison bought many patents and was not the originator of many of the ideas. Edison had setup many different labs and had many others working on inventions. So the vast majority of Edison’s inventions do not independently come from Edison.
Edison was not even the first one to invent the incandescent light bulb. Edison and his team invented an improved version of the incandescent light bulb, many had existed before. Fluorescent light bulbs though are much more efficient and an overall better invention than incandescent light bulbs.
Other genius engineers like Nikola Tesla are almost ignored in the media.
Edison was not the genius inventor as portrayed by the media but instead a businessman.
Since Edison did not work independently and was mostly a businessman he ranks as the 4th most overrated genius.

Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:37am On Aug 18, 2014
#6–William James Sidis
When people talk about prodigies William J. Sidis is almost always mentioned. He was an extraordinarily fast learner and had an estimated IQ of 250-300.
There are many web sites dedicated to Sidis and his supposed“genius”. They will always mention how fast Sidis learned this, what he calculated, etc….but what about Sidis’s contributions?
William Sidis doesn’t have any significant contributions. That’s why he’s overrated. What’s so special about being a super-fast learner and contributing nothing significant? There is nothing special about it.
So what’s Sidis’s most significant contribution? A perpetual calendar?

Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:20am On Aug 18, 2014
7–Stephen Hawking
Stephen Hawking is overrated in the same manner that Michio Kaku is. People who watch TV probably think he’s one of the best living physicists even though he isn’t.
Just like Michio Kaku, Stephen Hawking is a media figure. Other physicists like Steven Weinberg andEd Wittenare completely ignored in the media.
Just as with Michio Kaku there’s probably no working physicist who considers him to be the best physicist or even close even though the media portrays him to be the best physicist.

Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:18am On Aug 18, 2014
#8–Michio Kaku
People who watch TV probably think Michio Kaku is one of the greatest living physicists, but physicists don’t. There’s probably not even one physicist who would rank Michio Kaku within the top 50 or even the top 100 best living physicists.
Michio Kaku has made some contributions, but he still isn’t even close to being one of the best physicists in modern times.
Michio Kaku is more of a media figure who writes on popular science and appears on radio and TV shows a lot.
Other physicists who are regarded as the best living physicist like Edward Witten are virtually ignored in the media.

Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:17am On Aug 18, 2014
#9–James D. Watson
James  D. Watson and Francis Crick are universally hailed by biologists as great geniuses for being the DNA co-discoverers.
So why is he overrated? Firstly, the data Watson and Crick used was collected by Rosalind Franklin who is basically ignored. Secondly, proposing a double helix structure for DNA given x-ray data requires little ingenuity or intelligence. I guess this explains why Watson’s IQ is only 124 (Crick’s IQ was supposedly only 115). Thirdly, according to Watson himself Crick was more clever than him.
There are contributions that require little intellect but lots of ingenuity, there are contributions that require lots of intellect but little ingenuity, and there are contributions that require both intellect and ingenuity. This contribution however, doesn’t require neither ingenuity nor intellect, just simple observations.
If Watson and Crick didn’t discover the double-helix structure of DNA then virtually any other biologist(s) would have given the data. It’s a contribution based off simple observations that would’ve happened by virtually any biologist, not a special kind of contribution.

Science/TechnologyRe: The Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:08am On Aug 18, 2014
#10–Bill Gates
I don’t know why anyone would consider Bill Gates to be a genius, it’s a mystery to me.
I’m not sure if Bill Gates belongs on this list since I don’t consider him to be a genius of any kind. Since some atheists keep saying that“Bill Gates invented the computer”or something foolish like that I decided to put him on this list.
Bill Gates never invented the computer, the keyboard, the mouse, the GUI desktop concept, or anything like that. Yet for some reason many people really believe that he did.
The actual pioneers of the computer were people like Charles Babbage, Alan Turing, and John von Neumann.
The first computer to use the desktop mouse GUI was the Xerox Alto.

Science/TechnologyThe Top 10 Most Overrated“geniuses” by sekzy99(op): 8:05am On Aug 18, 2014
Here is my top 10 list of the most overrated geniuses. The rankings are based upon how overrated the“geniuses”starting from the lesser overrated geniuses ending with the most overrated genius.
Science/TechnologyRe: Top 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op): 8:03am On Aug 18, 2014
macsika: This list is outdated. There are some Child prodegee's with Much higher I.Q.
Kindly post d update bro
Science/TechnologyRe: How To Be A Computer Genius by sekzy99(op): 7:58am On Aug 18, 2014
To become an computer genius you should have a great interest and passion with computers.

Take a break from time to time, go out and exercise! Excessive computer use can be bad for your health!

Network with other computer enthusiasts and nerd! You can learn more from others than you would have learned on your own!

Becoming a computer genius will not happen over night! It takes hard work and dedication!
Science/TechnologyRe: How To Be A Computer Genius by sekzy99(op): 7:55am On Aug 18, 2014
Take computer classes

Explore everything with your computer and make an effort to learn something new every time that you get behind the computer.

Science/TechnologyRe: How To Be A Computer Genius by sekzy99(op): 7:18am On Aug 18, 2014
Study programming languages such as HTML, JavaScript, PHP, SQL,Visual basic and Java.Every computer genius knows at least one or two programming languages. And at the very least, you should know HTML.

Science/TechnologyRe: How To Be A Computer Genius by sekzy99(op): 7:17am On Aug 18, 2014
Experiment with what you know and thus learn what you don't know.

Science/TechnologyRe: How To Be A Computer Genius by sekzy99(op): 7:16am On Aug 18, 2014
Go to the Internet and type in something on Google like "computers for beginners" or go to the store and buy the book, "Computers for Dummies".Most of your answers about computers can be answered on the computer using Google. If you can't find your answer on Google, try consulting online forums or social networking websites such as StackOverFlow.

Science/TechnologyRe: How To Be A Computer Genius by sekzy99(op): 7:15am On Aug 18, 2014
First, you should learn the basics of computer hardware.Open up your PC and check out the internals. Next, you should learn about computer operating systems; Windows/Linux/Android/Mac. If you have a friend who is good with computers, feel free to ask him/her for tips or explanations on certain components on the computer or operating system that you are wondering about.

Science/TechnologyHow To Be A Computer Genius by sekzy99(op): 7:12am On Aug 18, 2014
We all think that we know everything about computers but this doesn't necessarily mean that you're a computer genius. You must be willing to work hard every day in order to truly become a wizard behind the computer. Read this wikiHow article in order to learn what it takes to truly become a computer genius!
Science/TechnologyRe: Top 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op): 7:07am On Aug 18, 2014
1. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe IQ: 210
Goethe, German poet, playwright, novelist, scientist, statesman, theatre director, critic, and amateur artist, is considered the greatest German literary figure of the modern era. Goethe is the only German literary figure whose range and international standing equal those of Germany’s supreme philosophers (who have often drawn on his works and ideas) and composers (who have often set his works to music). In the literary culture of the German-speaking countries, he has had so dominant a position that, since the end of the 18th century, his writings have been described as “classical.” In a European perspective he appears as the central and unsurpassed representative of the Romantic movement, broadly understood.
Science/TechnologyRe: Top 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op): 7:06am On Aug 18, 2014
2. Leonardo Da Vinci IQ: 205
Leonardo Da Vinci, Italian painter, draftsman, sculptor, architect, and engineer whose genius, perhaps more than that of any other figure, epitomized the Renaissance humanist ideal. His Last Supper (1495–98) and Mona Lisa (c. 1503–06) are among the most widely popular and influential paintings of the Renaissance. His notebooks reveal a spirit of scientific inquiry and a mechanical inventiveness that were centuries ahead of their time. The unique fame that Leonardo enjoyed in his lifetime and that, filtered by historical criticism, has remained undimmed to the present day rests largely on his unlimited desire for knowledge, which guided all his thinking and behaviour
Science/TechnologyRe: Top 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op):
5. John Stuart Mill IQ: 200
John Stuart Mill was an English philosopher, economist, and exponent of Utilitarianism. He was prominent as a publicist in the reforming age of the 19th century, and remains of lasting interest as a logician and an ethical theorist. Mill was a man of extreme simplicity in his mode of life. The influence that his works exercised upon contemporary English thought can scarcely be overestimated, nor can there be any doubt about the value of the liberal and inquiring spirit with which he handled the great questions of his time. Beyond that, however, there has been considerable difference of opinion about the enduring merits of his philosophy.

>4. Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz IQ: 205

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (also Leibnitz or von Leibniz (July 1 (June 21 Old Style) 1646 – November 14, 1716) was a German philosopher of Sorbian origin who wrote primarily in Latin and French. Educated in law and philosophy, and serving as factotum to two major German noble houses (one becoming the British royal family while he served it), Leibniz played a major role in the European politics and diplomacy of his day. He occupies an equally large place in both the history of philosophy and the history of mathematics. He discovered calculus independently of Newton, and his notation is the one in general use since. He also discovered the binary system, foundation of virtually all modern computer architectures. In philosophy, he is most remembered for optimism, i.e., his conclusion that our universe is, in a restricted sense, the best possible one God could have made.

>3. Emanuel Swedenborg IQ: 205

Emanuel Swedenborg was a Swedish scientist, Christian mystic, philosopher, and theologian who wrote voluminously in interpreting the Scriptures as the immediate word of God. Soon after his death, devoted followers created Swedenborgian societies dedicated to the study of his thought. These societies formed the nucleus of the Church of the New Jerusalem, or New Church, also called the Swedenborgians.

Science/TechnologyRe: Top 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op):
7. Ludwig Wittgenstein IQ: 190
in full–Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein was an Austrian-born English philosopher, regarded by many as the greatest philosopher of the 20th century. Wittgenstein’s two major works, Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung (1921; Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1922) and Philosophische Untersuchungen (published posthumously in 1953; Philosophical Investigations), have inspired a vast secondary literature and have done much to shape subsequent developments in philosophy, especially within the analytic tradition. His charismatic personality has, in addition, exerted a powerful fascination upon artists, playwrights, poets, novelists, musicians, and even filmmakers, so that his fame has spread far beyond the confines of academic life.

>6. Blaise Pascal IQ: 195
Blaise Pascal was a French mathematician, physicist, religious philosopher, and master of prose. He laid the foundation for the modern theory of probabilities, formulated what came to be known as Pascal’s law of pressure, and propagated a religious doctrine that taught the experience of God through the heart rather than through reason. The establishment of his principle of intuitionism had an impact on such later philosophers as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Henri Bergson and also on the Existentialists.

Science/TechnologyRe: Top 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op):
8. Bobby Fischer IQ: 187
Bobby is the byname of Robert James Fischer, an American chess master who became the youngest grandmaster in history when he received the title in 1958. His youthful intemperance and brilliant playing drew the attention of the American public to the game of chess, particularly when he won the world championship in 1972. Fischer learned the moves of chess at age 6 and at 16 dropped out of high school to devote himself fully to the game. In 1958 he won the first of many American championships. In world championship candidate matches during 1970–71, Fischer won 20 consecutive games before losing once and drawing three times to former world champion Tigran Petrosyan of the Soviet Union in a final match won by Fischer. In 1972 Fischer became the first native-born American to hold the title of world champion when he defeated Boris Spassky of the Soviet Union in a highly publicized match held in Reykjavík, Iceland. In doing so, Fischer won the $156,000 victor’s share of the $250,000 purse.

Science/TechnologyRe: Top 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op):
9. Galileo Galilei IQ: 185
Galileo was Italian natural philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who made fundamental contributions to the sciences of motion, astronomy, and strength of materials and to the development of the scientific method. His formulation of (circular) inertia, the law of falling bodies, and parabolic trajectories marked the beginning of a fundamental change in the study of motion. His insistence that the book of nature was written in the language of mathematics changed natural philosophy from a verbal, qualitative account to a mathematical one in which experimentation became a recognized method for discovering the facts of nature. Finally, his discoveries with the telescope revolutionized astronomy and paved the way for the acceptance of the Copernican heliocentric system, but his advocacy of that system in support of his view that the Bible contained errors, eventually resulted in an Inquisition process against him.

Science/TechnologyRe: Top 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op):
10. Madame De Stael IQ: 180
In full–Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, Baronne (baroness) de Staël-Holstein, byname Madame de Staël. Madame de Stael was a French-Swiss woman of letters, political propagandist, and conversationalist, who epitomized the European culture of her time, bridging the history of ideas from Neoclassicism to Romanticism. She also gained fame by maintaining a salon for leading intellectuals. Her writings include novels, plays, moral and political essays, literary criticism, history, autobiographical memoirs, and even a number of poems. Her most important literary contribution was as a theorist of Romanticism. Madame de Stael is on an equal level with René Descartes but I chose to include her rather than him in order to put at least one woman on this list.

Science/TechnologyTop 10 Geniuses by sekzy99(op): 6:58am On Aug 18, 2014
First off, you may be surprised to find that Albert Einstein is not included on this list. The reason is that I have used a table of IQ estimates for historical geniuses to determine the members and order of this list, and Einstein’s IQ (around 160) did not make the grade. Despite that, he is still the first person to pop in to most people’s minds when thinking of a genius. Having said that, here is a list of the ten greatest geniuses in history.
BusinessRe: Steve Jobs' 13 Most Inspiring Quotes by sekzy99(m): 6:44am On Aug 18, 2014
icebot: The most inspirational speech ever from the computer genius.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1R-jKKp3NA
Do correct me!!! Was he a computer geniushuh
Jobs/VacanciesRe: Dragnet Aptitude Test by sekzy99(op): 8:19pm On Aug 17, 2014
No I don't
Jobs/VacanciesRe: Dragnet Aptitude Test by sekzy99(op): 6:43pm On Aug 17, 2014
1Dray: .

Which location please?
Chams ikeja

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 (of 58 pages)