₦airaland Forum

LAGOS — The traditional ruler of Agbowa-Ikosi, Oba Owolabi Saheed Momson, has filed a motion at the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, seeking to nullify the May 30, 2025 judgment that sacked him from the throne.

In a motion of appeal filed by his lawyer, Gbenga Ojo, the monarch also asked the court to halt the execution of that judgment and reinstate him as the duly recognised monarch pending the determination of his application.

Oba Momson, who was installed as the Abowa of Agbowa-Ikosi by the Lagos State Government in May 2023, said in an affidavit that he was never informed of the appeal that led to his removal and only learned of the judgment through town gossip.

According to the affidavit filed in support of his application, Oba Momson said he was neither served with the Notice of Appeal nor notified of the hearing by the appellants — Prince Babatunde Adenusi and three others — who challenged his emergence as Oba.

He stated that the first time he became aware of any appeal was on June 1, 2025, when some members of the Adenusi family danced around Agbowa town, boasting that he had been removed from office.

The monarch said he was in his palace holding a meeting with his chiefs and Baales when he heard the news. Out of concern, he instructed his lawyers, led by Gbenga Ojo, to conduct an investigation.

They later confirmed that the Court of Appeal had delivered a judgment via Zoom without his knowledge or representation.

He said the judgment, which reversed the 2023 High Court judgment in his favour, was obtained without his participation, thereby violating his right to fair hearing.

He emphasized that his palace is centrally located in Agbowa Town and is well known to the appellants who reside in the same town. Despite this, no legal documents were ever served on him personally.

Oba Momson had secured a favourable judgment from the High Court of Lagos State on March 23, 2023, which affirmed his nomination and selection as the Abowa of Agbowa-Ikosi.

The court declared that his installation followed the 1957 Chieftaincy Declaration and the Obas and Chiefs Law of Lagos State 2015. Based on that judgment, the Lagos State Governor formally installed him on May 28, 2023.

He argued that having defended the case for over eight years at the High Court, he had every reason to appear at the Appeal Court had he been served, and insisted he had no knowledge of the proceedings.

In the grounds of his motion, Oba Momson is contending that the Court of Appeal lacked the jurisdiction to hear the case due to several procedural breaches.

Chief among them is the alleged failure of the appellants to serve him the Notice of Appeal personally, as required by the 2021 Court of Appeal Rules.

He also faulted the transmission of the Records of Appeal, which he said was done more than five months after the notice was filed, contrary to the timeline stipulated by the rules.

According to him, the records were not regularised before the appeal was heard, making the entire proceedings invalid.

Another striking claim made in the affidavit is that the originating court processes — including the Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim — were signed by one S.O.K. Shillings, who, he argued, was not a recognised legal practitioner in Nigeria at the time.

He backed his claim with a letter from the Supreme Court confirming that Shillings was not enrolled to practise law in Nigeria. Copies of the disputed documents and the Supreme Court’s letter were tendered as exhibits in support of his application.

Oba Momson, through his legal team maintains that the Court of Appeal’s judgment was delivered without jurisdiction and in breach of due process.

The monarch is therefore urging the court to invoke its inherent powers under the principle of ex debito justitiae to set aside the judgment in the interest of justice.

He has also applied for an injunction to restrain the appellants and relevant government officials from enforcing the judgment pending the outcome of his application.

LAGOS — The Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, on Friday, adjourned till September 26 the hearing in the case involving celebrated gospel music executive, Dr. Ezekiel Onyedikachukwu ThankGod, popularly known as EeZee Tee, in a development that suggests a possible amicable resolution of the matter.

Mr. ThankGod, who has played a key role in shaping Nigeria’s gospel music industry through his company, EeZee Global Concepts Limited, is standing trial on an amended seven-count charge preferred against him by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), over alleged infractions relating to foreign exchange transactions and money laundering amounting to $397,106.

The alleged transactions, which date back to June 2023, stem from technical interpretations of regulatory frameworks governing foreign exchange transactions rather than any intent to defraud.

One of the charges alleges that Mr. ThankGod engaged in a foreign exchange transaction with a private individual, Mr. Oladotun Olaobaju Mureke, without the requisite authorization from the Central Bank of Nigeria. Specifically, the charge alleges that a sum of $52,895 was exchanged contrary to the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Monitoring and Miscellaneous (Provisions) Act, Cap F34, LFN 2004.

At Friday’s proceedings, the prosecution, led by counsel Bilkisu Buhari-Bala, called its first witness, Mohammed Timta.

However, the hearing took a significant turn when the defence counsel, Chief Chikaosolu Ojukwu (SAN), informed the court that both parties were “on the verge of reaching an agreement” and requested one final opportunity to conclude ongoing discussions aimed at resolving the matter out of court.

“If we are unable to reach a resolution, the prosecution will commence full trial,” the defence counsel assured.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, in response, granted the request and adjourned the matter to September 26, 2025, to allow both sides conclude talks.

BENIN CITY — Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Dr. Monday Onyekachi Ubani, has condemned what he described as a deliberate and baseless smear campaign against Honourable Justice Inyang Okoro, JSC, CFR, following the Justice’s recent visit to Benin City.

In a strongly worded statement, Ubani dismissed social media reports linking Justice Okoro’s presence in Benin to the ongoing political dispute over the Edo State governorship election, which is said to be heading to the Supreme Court. He described such insinuations as false, mischievous, and intended to malign the judiciary.

According to Ubani, Justice Okoro was in Benin as a personal guest of Mr. Hannibal Uwaifo, former President of the African Bar Association, to attend the burial of his late mother, Mrs. Caroline Uwaifo.

“I was involved in planning the burial ceremonies and attended every event,” Ubani stated. “Justice Okoro was present at the service of songs on Thursday, June 12, and the funeral on Friday, June 13. He only missed the reception that followed the interment.”

He expressed shock that anyone would attempt to associate such a personal visit with judicial manipulation. “It is asinine to link His Lordship’s visit to an appeal that has not even reached the hearing stage at the Supreme Court,” Ubani said. “Has the Chief Justice of Nigeria constituted the panel for the appeal? What sense does it make to suggest that Justice Okoro travelled to lobby for inclusion?”

Ubani suggested the motive behind the false reports could be a preemptive attempt to disqualify the respected jurist from participating in the eventual hearing. “Could this be a calculated move by political actors or their agents to keep Justice Okoro off the panel? Are they so afraid of his reputation for fairness and independence?” he asked.

He further praised Edo State’s Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Dr. Samson Osagie, for promptly debunking the false claims. “Dr. Osagie made it clear that he did not meet with any judicial officer, completely discrediting the rumour,” Ubani noted.

The senior advocate criticized the purveyors of the falsehood for deliberately omitting the real purpose of Justice Okoro’s visit. “His attendance at the burial was public, open, and witnessed by many. He did not come in secret or in disguise,” Ubani affirmed.

He also expressed disappointment that Prof. Chidi Odinkalu, a respected legal scholar and friend to Mr. Uwaifo, did not verify the facts before engaging with the story. “One would have expected Prof. Odinkalu to confirm the real reason for the visit from his friend, Hannibal,” Ubani said.

Concluding, Ubani cautioned legal professionals and the general public against joining in unfounded attacks on judicial officers. “We all lose when we recklessly denigrate the judiciary without proof. This is a clear case of unjustified character assassination aimed at a respected Supreme Court Justice,” he said.

LAGOS — A landlord in Banana Island, Lagos State, Dr. Ifeanyi Odii, has raised an alarm over what he describes as a clandestine plot to sell a disputed property located at Plot B-7, 327 Close, Zone B, Banana Island, Ikoyi, despite an ongoing court case.

The property in question is the subject of a legal battle pending before the High Court of Lagos State in Suit No. LD/12277GCMW/2024.

Dr. Odii, through his legal team at Samuel N. Agweh (SAN) & Associates, had sued the Lagos State Ministry of Physical Planning and others, challenging the approval and construction of a six-storey building on the land by Fandago Properties Ltd.

Odii in his court filings, alleged violation of the Ikoyi-Victoria Island Model City Plan (Banana Island) 2013–2033 and the original building approval granted by the state government.

According to court documents, the structure far exceeds the allowable building height, setbacks, and density for the area.

Despite a stop-work order reportedly issued by the authorities on September 2, 2024, Odii in the court papers claimed that construction allegedly continued in defiance of government directives.
He maintain that the building poses a threat to the environment and violates the rights and privacy of adjoining homeowners.

According to him, “The structure is illegal. It violates everything the Banana Island urban master plan stands for — from airspace obstruction to loss of privacy for neighbouring homes, and clear deviation from approved residential density.”
With the case still before the court, the landlord is now raising the alarm over alleged attempts by the developers to discreetly sell the property.

In a statement signed by his lawyer, Mr Joseph Igwe, Principal Partner, M.O Ubani, SAN & Co, Odii warned unsuspecting buyers and real estate agents to be cautious, stressing that the matter is sub judice and any transaction at this stage could result in future legal complications.

The statement reads: “It has come to our notice that there are ongoing clandestine efforts to sell off the disputed property to unsuspecting Nigerians, some of whom may or may not be aware of the pending suit and the serious violations involved.

“‎We state that any transaction involving the purchase of the said property while litigation is pending is fraudulent, reckless, and legally dangerous.

“‎The principle of lis pendens clearly establishes that any purchaser who buys a property under litigation steps into the shoes of the seller and cannot escape the consequences of the ongoing court proceedings.

‎”We categorically state that we are not amenable to any settlement that disregards compliance with the approved building plan. Any purported buyer should be aware that they may face litigation consequences, and no form of indemnity or ignorance will shield them from the legal implications.”

LAGOS — Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Dr. Monday O. Ubani, has issued a stark warning to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), declaring that the unchecked operations of Point of Sale (POS) agents across the country are now aiding kidnappers and criminal syndicates in laundering billions of naira with impunity.

In a strongly worded statement titled “The Urgent Need to Regulate POS Transactions in Nigeria’s Financial Ecosystem”, Ubani accused regulatory authorities of negligence, warning that the lack of proper oversight has turned POS terminals into anonymous financial gateways for crime.

“POS machines, meant to bring banking closer to the people, have now become the preferred tools for kidnappers and fraudsters,” Ubani said. “Ransom payments, fraud proceeds, and other criminal funds are now being routed through POS agents who demand no identification, keep no records, and leave no trail.”

Ubani’s call for action was triggered by a conversation with a High Court Judge in Eastern Nigeria who, according to him, is deeply troubled by the growing number of criminal cases collapsing due to the untraceability of POS transactions.

“The Hon. Judge confided that several multimillion-naira cases have come before him where the money trail vanished into thin air. In one particularly harrowing case, a family paid ₦90 million in ransom through POS transfers, but investigators couldn’t trace a single beneficiary. That is how broken the system has become,” he said.

Ubani lamented the lack of KYC enforcement among POS agents, many of whom operate informally without proper licensing, identification, or a fixed business address.

“We are dealing with a financial network that functions completely outside the law. There are no rules, no accountability, and no protection for victims of financial crime. It’s a haven for criminals,” he said.

He called on the CBN to immediately enforce licensing, operational monitoring, and mandatory data capture for all POS operators. He also urged that all POS machines and their linked bank accounts be connected to operators’ Bank Verification Numbers (BVN) and National Identification Numbers (NIN).

“This linkage is non-negotiable. If the authorities cannot trace who owns a POS machine or who received large sums of money, then we have lost control of our financial system,” he said.

Ubani insisted that every POS withdrawal involving transferred funds must be backed by verifiable identity. “A national ID, voter’s card, driver’s licence, or international passport must be presented before any money is disbursed. POS agents must record and store these IDs along with a photo of the customer,” he said.

He didn’t stop there. “Agents who disburse funds without identity checks must be held liable. If their carelessness helps a crime, they should answer for it. That’s the only way to enforce discipline.”

Ubani also called for a secure, centralised POS transaction database accessible to security agencies such as the EFCC, DSS, Police, and the Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU). He said such integration would allow for early detection of abnormal patterns and support real-time tracking of suspicious transactions.

“This is not just about fraud anymore — it is a national security issue. POS machines are being used to finance terrorism, facilitate kidnapping, and undermine our justice system. We cannot be silent while this happens under our watch,” he warned.

Ubani advocated the deployment of artificial intelligence and geo-fencing tools to monitor POS activity in high-risk areas, especially rural zones where kidnappings and cash-based transactions are prevalent.

He further called for national public education campaigns to teach communities the dangers of anonymous POS use. “The average Nigerian must learn to demand proper verification. It’s not enough to trust the agent — the system must be secure.”

In a direct message to financial authorities, Ubani declared: “The justice system cannot work when evidence disappears. If POS agents continue operating without rules, we will keep losing criminals to technicalities. The law needs data, and without it, justice dies.”

He concluded with a call to action. “This is a wake-up call to the CBN, lawmakers, law enforcement, and all stakeholders. We must bring transparency and accountability back into our financial system before the damage becomes irreversible.”

A storm of controversy has erupted in Nasarawa State as Tiv leaders accuse the state government of orchestrating a state-sanctioned campaign of forced evictions and community destruction under the guise of agricultural reform.

At a press briefing in Abuja, prominent legal figure and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Jerry Aondo, became the voice of anguish for thousands of Tiv people reportedly displaced across multiple Local Government Areas including Awe, Obi, Keana, and Doma.

Aondo described the state government’s “Agricultural Mandate Initiative” as nothing more than a smokescreen to uproot Tiv communities and erase their presence from their ancestral lands.

He painted a dire picture of villages being razed under the supervision of state operatives and security agents, allegedly working in tandem to clear land for unnamed private interests.

“This is not about agriculture; it is a war on identity,” Aondo said, his voice trembling with emotion. “Homes, churches, schools, even cemeteries—destroyed in broad daylight. My people are now squatters in their own homeland.”

The legal luminary cited the example of Udugh village, where he claimed bulldozers, accompanied by armed escorts, flattened entire communities shortly after Governor Abdullahi Sule visited the area on May 4.

He described the episode as emblematic of a larger strategy of “state-engineered displacement,” which he said has rendered many Tiv villagers homeless and landless.

Aondo went further to allege that this aggressive expansion has the tacit support of traditional rulers who are allegedly denying Tiv residents certificates of indigeneity and facilitating the dismantling of their settlements.

“Development cannot be built on the ruins of justice,” Aondo

---Files New Charges Without Mercy Chinwo's name .

The EFCC has dropped the fraudulent conversion charge it filed against music producer Ezekiel Onyedikachi popularly known as EeZeeTee.

Get more details: https://thevoicenigeria.com.ng/gospel-music-executive-eezeetee-arraigned-by-efcc-over-255000-forex-violations/

UMUAHIA — Renowned legal practitioner and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, Dr. Monday Ubani, has lashed out at the embattled former National Chairman of the Labour Party, Julius Abure, over his recent disparaging remarks against the Governor of Abia State, Dr. Alex Otti.

Abure had stirred controversy after referring to Governor Otti as “a dwarf both in appearance and in knowledge,” a comment that has since drawn sharp criticism from within and outside the political circle.

In a strongly worded rejoinder issued on Saturday, Dr. Ubani condemned the statement as “shameful, irresponsible, and driven by envy and political desperation,” insisting that Otti's track record speaks volumes and cannot be reduced by petty insults.

“Such an unguarded statement is not only reckless but reeks of envy, pettiness, and desperation,” Ubani said. “Dr. Alex Otti, by all standards, stands tall—physically, intellectually, morally, and in terms of leadership delivery.”

He hailed Governor Otti’s achievements in less than two years in office, pointing to massive road reconstruction, revival of health institutions, regular payment of salaries, and a general infrastructural renaissance across Abia State.

“These are not the actions of a ‘dwarf,’ but of a giant in intellect and purposeful governance,” he added.

Turning his criticism directly at Abure, the senior advocate did not mince words.

He accused the former party chairman of dragging the Labour Party into disrepute through alleged corrupt practices, internal party chaos, and disobedience to the rulings of the Supreme Court regarding party leadership.

“Julius Abure is a man whose image has been battered by allegations of corruption and financial mismanagement. His outburst against Governor Otti is the cry of a drowning man desperate to stay relevant,” Ubani declared.

He also described Abure’s insistence on retaining his position in defiance of judicial pronouncements as “mind-boggling and dangerous for party unity.”

Ubani reaffirmed the unwavering support Governor Otti enjoys from the people of Abia State, stating that his popularity is rooted in performance rather than party affiliation.
“Whether he chooses to run under the Labour Party or any other platform in 2027, Abians will follow him—not because of party colouration but because of the substance of his leadership,” he said.

He concluded by advising Abure to “bury his face in shame and stop being an agent of destabilization,” stressing that Governor Otti would not be distracted but will continue to govern Abia with integrity and vision.

Abuja, Nigeria – April 29, 2025 — Prominent legal practitioner, Dr. Monday O. Ubani, SAN, has come to the defense of the Supreme Court of Nigeria following sharp criticism from the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA).

The group recently accused the apex court of "cowardice" and deliberate delay in adjudicating the constitutional challenge over the purported emergency rule in Rivers State.

In a statement, Dr. Ubani described HURIWA's allegations as "untrue" and a misrepresentation of the judicial process, particularly regarding grave constitutional matters such as the declaration of a state of emergency, the removal of an elected governor, and the dissolution of a state legislature.

He stressed that such cases demand a meticulous adherence to legal procedures, including proper service of court processes, responses from all parties, possible amicus briefs, and full procedural compliance before any panel is constituted or hearing date fixed.

“Rushing a matter of such constitutional significance without following due process could undermine justice, bring disrepute to the Court, and attract unwarranted criticism,” Dr. Ubani stated.

He emphasized the independence of the judiciary, arguing that the Supreme Court cannot be dictated to by political or civil society groups, nor swayed by media pressure. “Constitutional adjudication is not an exercise in activism. It requires dispassionate and careful legal scrutiny,” he said.

Responding to concerns over the court's pace, Dr. Ubani noted that the Supreme Court is burdened with a heavy docket that includes election petitions, constitutional matters, and final appeals. “The fact that a date has not been fixed within a month of filing does not imply bias or conspiracy,” he explained, pointing to the need for preliminary filings and motions to be resolved beforehand.

He also warned against dragging the judiciary into political battles, describing HURIWA’s insinuations of judicial manipulation to favor political parties as "wild, unsubstantiated, and injurious."

In conclusion, Dr. Ubani urged civil society groups and political stakeholders to show restraint and respect for judicial processes. He recommended that concerns over delays be addressed through proper legal channels such as applications for accelerated hearing, rather than public campaigns that could damage public confidence in the judiciary.

“The integrity, dignity, and independence of the judiciary must be preserved if Nigeria’s constitutional democracy is to survive,” Dr. Ubani affirmed.

----Hit Back At Criticism

A senior advocate and respected voice in Nigeria’s legal community, Dr. Monday Ubani, SAN, has issued a rejoinder addressing concerns raised by Dr. Ope Banwo over the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, recent acceptance of a N300 million donation from the Rivers State Government.

In his widely circulated article titled “The NBA and the N300 Million ‘Donation’ Mess”, Dr. Banwo questioned the ethical propriety of the donation, suggesting it risked compromising the Bar’s independence.

However, Dr. Ubani, in his counter-piece, described the criticism as “overly idealistic” and “disconnected from operational realities.”

No Legal or Moral Breach

Dr. Ubani argued that no law or professional regulation prohibits such donations, especially when aimed at facilitating the NBA’s Annual General Conference.

He emphasized that similar practices occur across professional bodies nationwide and labeled Dr. Banwo’s position as “emotive, not evidential.”

State Support Is Routine

Highlighting economic realities, Dr. Ubani defended the NBA’s decision, pointing out that most professional associations rely on both public and private sector support for large-scale events. “Is it realistic to fund a multimillion-naira national conference solely from members’ dues in today’s Nigeria?” he queried.

Donations Are Not Bribes

He further asserted that unless evidence proves otherwise, the intention behind the donation was neither politically motivated nor conditional.

“To suggest otherwise without proof is misleading,” Dr. Ubani stated.

Don’t Demonize Benefactors

Dr. Ubani cautioned against demonizing public officials offering support, arguing that partnerships with state governments, handled ethically and transparently, do not inherently threaten the Bar’s independence.

Realism Over Rhetoric

While acknowledging the importance of institutional integrity, Dr. Ubani advocated for a balanced approach combining principle with pragmatism.

“The NBA has not sold its conscience. It has simply accepted a donation, without strings, to advance its professional goals. That, in itself, is not a sin,” he concluded.

A Call for Responsible Engagement

Dr. Ubani urged the NBA to establish clear guidelines for future collaborations while maintaining ethical boundaries.

He described the ongoing debate as a healthy conversation rather than a crisis, encouraging continuous dialogue on institutional independence and professional integrity.

The ongoing controversy surrounding the N300 million donation made by the Rivers State Government under Governor Siminalayi Fubara to the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has captured national attention, with renowned legal practitioner and public affairs analyst, Dr. Monday Onyekachi Ubani, SAN, describing it as a defining moment for Nigerian jurisprudence.

In a detailed commentary, Dr. Ubani highlighted that while it is not unusual for state governments to offer financial support to the NBA’s Annual General Conference, this year’s incident has taken a different turn. The Rivers State Government, under the now-suspended Governor Fubara, had made a N300 million donation to support the 2025 conference, traditionally seen as a gesture of goodwill.

However, following political upheaval in Rivers State — which saw President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR dissolve the democratically elected state structures and appoint a sole administrator, Mr. Ibas — the NBA took a bold stance. The association condemned the federal action, calling for the reinstatement of the elected government and relocating its annual conference from Port Harcourt to Enugu in protest.

According to Dr. Ubani, the new emergency government in Rivers State subsequently demanded a refund of the N300 million, arguing that the money was meant specifically for hosting the event in Port Harcourt. The NBA, however, insisted that the donation was an unconditional act of goodwill, not tied to any location, and therefore not subject to refund.

Dr. Ubani observed that this dispute raises important legal and ethical questions about the propriety of professional associations like the NBA receiving financial support from government entities. He asked: Was the donation conditional or unconditional? Was it a contractual obligation or a voluntary public gesture? Does a change of venue frustrate the original intention behind the donation? Can a successor government reclaim public funds donated by a predecessor without clear proof of fraud or misuse?

He further noted that the Sole Administrator’s allegations of bias against the NBA, based on the financial support it received, introduce a delicate ethical dimension to the matter. The threat of legal action against the NBA, he added, would likely test the legal boundaries of government patronage to professional bodies in Nigeria.

Dr. Ubani emphasized that if the matter proceeds to court, it could create a lasting judicial precedent on the obligations and boundaries of professional bodies in their dealings with government institutions. “This moment will be remembered as one that helped shape jurisprudence on the obligations and boundaries of professional bodies in relation to government patronage,” he stated.

The Senior Advocate of Nigeria also pointed out that clarity from Governor Fubara, the original donor, could be pivotal in resolving the issue. He noted that the ongoing public and legal debates could intensify until the former governor breaks his silence, a move which may serve as a turning point in the controversy.

In conclusion, Dr. Ubani urged the NBA to maintain professionalism, legal integrity, and calmness in its response, stating that the association’s handling of the matter will not only affect its reputation but also influence how future professional associations in Nigeria manage financial relationships with government bodies.

Umuahia, Nigeria — Legal luminary and public advocate, Dr. Monday Onyekachi Ubani, SAN, has issued a firm response to what he described as an unwarranted attack and rebuttal from Hon. Sam Onuigbo, following his consistent calls for the completion of the Ikwuano-Ikot Ekpene federal road project.

In a strongly worded statement made available to the press, Dr. Ubani reaffirmed that his persistent advocacy for the road’s completion is driven by genuine concern for the welfare and development of the Ikwuano people, not political ambition or personal vendetta.

“If my advocacy is motivated by selfish political reasons, may it never be well with me and my generations. But if it is driven by a sincere desire for my people to enjoy the dividends of democracy, may God bless me and my family beyond measure,” Ubani declared.

He criticized the slow pace of work by the contractor, Hartland Company, and raised alarm over reports suggesting that the project would exclude some communities such as Ekebedi, Awomukwu, and Ariam. Ubani disclosed that this information was relayed to him by the President General of Awomukwu and the Mayor of Ikwuano, who visited the contractor for an update.

“This revelation is both heartbreaking and unacceptable,” Ubani said. “Not only is the pace and quality of work grossly inadequate, but the exclusion of entire communities cannot be allowed to stand.”

In response, he has filed a petition with the Senate Committee on Public Petitions to summon both the contractor and its alleged political backers to explain the delay and the reasons behind the exclusion of certain areas.

Ubani further questioned the silence of the contractor and criticized Hon. Sam Onuigbo, who claims credit for attracting the project, for allegedly speaking on behalf of Hartland Company instead of allowing them to address the public directly.

“With due respect, Hon. Onuigbo must understand that this project is not about him. It’s about the people of Ikwuano. It’s a matter of life, development, and access for our people — not political relevance,” Ubani maintained.

He emphasized that his only desire is to see a functional and durable road linking Umuahia to Ikot Ekpene, benefiting every community along the corridor.

“My happiness will be complete the day it takes me just 25 minutes to drive from Umuahia to Awomukwu. That is the future I envision and what I’m fighting for,” he stated.

Ubani concluded by urging Hon. Onuigbo to provide regular and transparent updates on the project to avoid further confrontations, and demanded a clear timeline for the completion of the road, ensuring that no Ikwuano community is left out.

“May God judge everyone involved according to the purity, or otherwise, of their intentions,” Ubani added.

---Seeks urgent intervention

Prominent legal practitioner and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, Dr. Monday Ubani, has written an open letter to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, urging his urgent intervention in the long-abandoned Ikwuano/Ikot Ekpene Road project, which links communities in Abia and Akwa Ibom States.

In the letter dated April 7, 2025, Dr. Ubani lamented the continuous neglect of the road, describing it as a "death trap" and a major hindrance to economic and social activities in the region.

The project, originally awarded in 2019 during the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari, has been stalled for years despite intermittent funding interventions, including by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

Dr. Ubani recounted multiple visits to the project's contractor, Hartland Construction Company, who gave varying excuses including funding constraints and weather conditions.

"After the rainy season of last year, they promised full resumption of work, but the pace not only slowed, it eventually halted," he wrote.

Highlighting the strategic importance of the road as a critical link between Abia, Akwa Ibom, and Cross River States, Ubani emphasized the devastating impact of its poor state on commerce, agriculture, education, and general livelihood.

"For over twenty years, our people have endured unbearable suffering on this route," he noted, adding that the region now feels "clearly disadvantaged and neglected."

Calling on President Tinubu to activate the Renewed Hope Agenda in the region, Dr. Ubani urged the President to direct the Minister of Works, Senator Dave Umahi, to investigate and ensure immediate resumption and completion of the road project.

"The people of Ikwuano will be eternally grateful if your administration addresses this critical matter before the rains return and worsen an already dire situation," he concluded.

The letter was also copied to the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio, and the Minister of Works, Senator Dave Umahi.

The plea comes amid growing frustration from affected communities, who say they can no longer remain silent as similar projects in other regions receive faster attention.

Justice Adedayo Oyebanji of a Lagos High Court sitting at Tafawa Balewa Square, TBS, has referred to Multudoor Court House, the suit filed by Ojukwu Transport Limited (OTL) over an alleged N12million rent owed it by West African Offshore Limited for 13 years.

OTL in the suit claimed that the lease of West African Offshore Limited expired in 2012 and that the company has not paid rent to it since then.

At the resumed sitting of the court on March 10, Justice Oyebanji took all pending applications .

Justice Oyebanji however referred to the multi-door, the issue of West African Offshore Limited (Uche Obilor) whose lease expired in 2012 and had not paid OTL since then.

In the suit, Maple Petrochemicals (owned by Kwara Governor Abdurahman Abdurazak) which is also a party in the dispute, filed an application requesting the court to restrain OTL who had executed warrant on its 14 Probyn Road, Ikoyi property in 2022.

The warrant was executed on the property following a 2018 judgment delivered by the court.

Afamefuna and Nwachukwu Ojukwu through their best friend, Chief (Mrs) Bianca Ojukwu who had filed an application to withdraw an earlier one seeking to join were not in Court. Neither were their lawyers.


However, OTL Director,
Dr P Ike Ojukwu, the company's counsel, Chief Ifeanyi Okumah and Chief Massey Udegbe, OTL Estate agents were in Court.

In another case, Bianca and sons had instituted Form 49 contempt proceedings against the Ojukwus/OTL and some tenants before Justice A.M. Lawal.

The matter which came up on the March 13, 2025 at Ikeja had to be adjourned to 16 June 2025.

The lawyer that appeared for Bianca and sons who were not present in court, had requested for more time to respond to applications before the court.

The case, LD/1539/2012 in which judgment was delivered in 2022 had Bianca suing OTL on behalf of her sons who at time were minors.

Ojukwu Transport Limited following judgment on 1 June 2018 in suit LD/794/2011 by Justice Adedayo Oyebanji executed warrant on its properties in Lagos including the five suits before Justice A.M. Lawal.

Renowned legal luminary, Dr. Monday Ubani, SAN,has lost his mother, Mrs. Gladys Nsomma Ubani.

She passed away at the age of 90.

The late Mrs. Ubani was a native of Ekebedi but was married to Mr. Egbedubi Ubani of Awomukwu village, both in Ikwuano LGA of Abia State.

She is survived by her only son, Dr. Ubani, as well as numerous grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

It is worth recalling that Dr. Ubani's father, Mr. Egbedubi Ubani, passed away in 2021 at the remarkable age of 101.

The family will announce funeral arrangements in due course.

Music producer, Ezekiel Onyedikachi popularly known as EeZee Tee on Monday affirmed his readiness to prove his innocence in the fraudulent conversion charge filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.

Onyedikachi gave the assurance through his lawyer, Dr Monday Ubani, SAN, when the matter came up for hearing before a Federal High Court in Lagos.

When the case was called, Ubani announced appearance for the defendant, while Mr Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN) appeared for the prosecution.

Ubani, then informed the court he had filed two seperate preliminary objections to the charge but would be withdrawing.

When the Presiding Judge, Justice Alexander Owoeye inquired about the whereabout of the defendant,
Ubani told the court that he received a call from the defendant, who said he had a terrible accident this morning.

He however assured the court that his client will be available at the next date to take his plea and prove his innocence.

When Ubani sought to move his preliminary objection to the charge, the court declined on the grounds that he cannot be heard, until the defendant appears before the court.

Justice Owoeye held that the court had not assumed jurisdicton over the case, since the plea of the defendant had not been taken.

On his part, the prosecutor, citing provisions of sections 396(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, as well as judicial authorities of State vs Achara and Frn vs Yahaya Bello, urged the court not to hear the defence.

"My lord, it is a show of shame and outright disrespect for this court, for the defendant to be absent on three different occasions in a criminal trial," he said

Besides, he told the court that if actually the defendant was indisposed as represented by counsel, then it ought to be deposed by way of affidavit, to be shown as proof before the court.

In the circumstance, Oyedepo prayed the court to issue a bench warrant to compel the attendance of the defendant before the court, adding that same is important to protect the integrity of the court.

Although defence counsel objected to the grant of a bench warrant by the court, and undertook to personally produce the defendant on his honour, the prosecution argued that defence's honour or intergrity was not in issue.

Oyedepo, maintained that the court issue a legal instrument, compelling the appearance of the defendant.

In a short ruling, the court held that from the court's record, the earlier bench warrant by the court still subsist as it had not been withdrawn.

The court consequently, held that the defendant is to appear in court on the next adjourned date for his arraignment, either by the subsisting bench warrant, or by production by his defence counsel.

Based on agreement of counsel, the court adjourned the case until March 6, for arraignment.

--- Seeks Intervention of PFN, Christian Elders

A Christian youth advocacy group, the Nigerian Christian Youth Network (NCYN), has denounced what it described as the meddling of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in the contractual dispute between music producer Ezekiel Onyedikachi, popularly known as EeZee Tee, and gospel singer Mercy Chinwo.

In a statement signed by its National Coordinator, Michael Ekwere, the group also appealed to the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) and notable Christian leaders to intervene in the matter, which it said is unhealthy for the Christian music industry.

The group noted that, from its findings, the issue between EeZee Tee and Mercy Chinwo is purely a contractual dispute, which does not in any way fall within the mandate of the EFCC.

It, however, expressed dismay that the commission would neglect its core mandate of combating the huge economic and financial crimes plaguing the country and instead give serious attention to a dispute between a gospel artist and her label company due to personal interest.

The statement reads:

"As a faith-based organization, we are concerned with the current dispute between EeZee Tee and Mercy Chinwo because they are our brethren in the faith. We have carefully examined the issue, which has generated much uproar in the Christian and secular communities, and concluded that it is purely a contractual dispute.

"On the one hand, Mercy Chinwo is alleging that her legitimate earnings are being withheld byEeZee Tee Concept, owned by EeZee Tee. On the other hand, the record label is also demanding an unbiased account reconciliation, claiming that Mercy Chinwo failed to remit the company's share from her public engagements.

"Clearly, this is a simple contractual dispute that either party can seek to resolve in a civil court.

"We are, however, worried that the EFCC has now become a tool in the hands of one party to intimidate and harass the other.

"From our findings, acting on a petition, the EFCC, without any valid court order, last year froze the domiciliary account of EeZee Tee, detained him in Ilorin, Kwara State, for nine days, and further compelled him to pay Mercy Chinwo $274,000.

"When EeZee Tee challenged his illegal detention through a fundamental rights enforcement suit against the EFCC, the commission quickly ran to another court to obtain an arrest warrant against him.

"In a three-count charge now before the Federal High Court, Lagos, the EFCC is accusing EeZee Tee of 'fraudulent conversion' of the legitimate earnings of Chinwo and another artist, Judikay.

"From what is ongoing, it is clear that the EFCC is acting on a script, either for personal or pecuniary interest, and we urge the commission's chairman to call his officers to order.

"We see no reason why the commission would allow itself to be used as a tool to harass, intimidate, and embarrass someone in a clear civil dispute.

"We call on the Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, to look into this case and many other similar cases for which the EFCC has been accused of pursuing merely to embarrass and intimidate respectable Nigerians.

"We also use this medium to appeal to the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) and Christian leaders to look into the matter, which we believe is unhealthy for the Christian music industry."

Lagos, Nigeria – The Centre for Transparency and Defence of Human Rights has demanded for a total scrapping of the proposed 4% Free-on-Board (FOB) charge by the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), describing it as an unjustifiable financial burden on Nigerians already grappling with economic hardship.

While the government has currently suspended the charge, the group insists that its potential implementation remains a significant threat to the livelihood of millions.

In a statement signed by its Executive Director, Barrister Ifeoluwa Ajay, the organization emphasized that the charge, if imposed, would drastically increase the cost of imported goods, exacerbating inflation and deepening the economic crisis across the country.

Ajay highlighted that Nigeria records an average of ₦72 trillion in yearly import transactions. If the proposed charge were enforced, it would generate an estimated ₦2.8 trillion in additional revenue for the NCS—an agency that already receives trillions of naira from the Federation Account.

“This raises a fundamental question,” the statement read. “Why does an agency with such substantial funding need more revenue at the expense of suffering Nigerians?”

The group further argued that beyond its impact on consumers, the 4% FOB charge would have devastating effects on local manufacturers who rely heavily on imported raw materials. With existing import duties of 5% or higher, the additional charge would significantly raise production costs, making it harder for industries to remain competitive.

“Manufacturers in Nigeria are already grappling with multiple economic challenges, including rising energy costs, foreign exchange volatility, and a harsh business environment,” Ajay noted.

“This additional burden will push many struggling industries to the brink of collapse, stifle investment, force businesses to scale down operations, and worsen the already alarming unemployment rate.”

The group further argued that the proposed charge contradicts the government’s stated commitment to industrial growth and economic recovery. They warned that policies like this would only drive up manufacturing costs and discourage investment.

“If the government is serious about economic recovery, it must not pursue policies that drive up costs for manufacturers and consumers,” Ajay stated. “This charge is not only anti-people but also anti-business and anti-development. The economy cannot afford such a policy when industries are struggling to stay afloat.”

The statement also highlighted the severe economic hardship that Nigerians are currently facing due to government policies. The cost of essential goods, including food, fuel, and rent, has surged, leaving many citizens barely able to survive.

“Rather than introducing policies that cushion the economic downturn, the government seems intent on piling more financial burdens on the people,” Ajay lamented.

The organization called on the government to focus on alternative ways to improve revenue generation rather than imposing additional charges on imports.

It also recommended that the Nigeria Customs Service should prioritize closing revenue leakages, improving efficiency, and tackling corruption within its operations.

“The trillions already allocated to the NCS should be sufficient for modernization and operational improvements,” the group stated. “The government must recognize that the economic survival of its people is more important than any revenue-generation target.”

The statement concluded with a strong demand for the government to go beyond suspending the policy and instead permanently scrap it.

“The Nigerian people cannot afford it. What they need are policies that reduce the cost of living, promote business growth, and create jobs—not more taxes disguised as modernization fees,” Ajay asserted.

“The government must listen to the voice of reason and prioritize the welfare of Nigerians over expanding revenue for an already well-funded agency. Anything less is unacceptable.”

A Lagos landlord, Dr. Ifeanyi Chukwuma-Odii has dragged the Lagos State Government Building and Planning Agencies before the State High Court for allegedly approving a permit for a six-storey building on Plot B-7, Banana Island, contrary to the original building model specification of the area.

The landlord is also suing the state and its agencies for failing to stop a developer from contravening the approval given to him on the building specification.

Joined as co-defendants in the suit are the Attorney-General of Lagos State, the Lagos State Ministry of Physical Planning and Urban Development, the Lagos State Physical Planning Permit Authority, the Lagos State Building Control Agency, and the Developer, Fandago Properties Ltd.

In his statement of claim, Dr. Chukwuma-Odii averred that he owns a property located at 327 Close, Plot 8, Zone B, Banana Island, Ikoyi, Lagos State, which was built in strict compliance with the Ikoyi-Victoria Island Model City Plan (Banana Island) 2013–2033 for low-residential density.

According to the plaintiff, the Banana Island Master Plan for Zone B specifies low-residential density with a maximum property height not exceeding 25 meters and a total dwelling limit of 40 family units per 10,000 sqm, with building coverage limited to 50% of the land mass. The plan also requires a minimum of two parking spaces per family unit and developments not exceeding four floors.

He further claimed that his property shares a common boundary with Plot B-7, 327 Close, owned by Fandago Properties Ltd which the Lagos State Physical Planning Permit Authority, LSPPPA, issued an approval in 2021 for residential development on the plot, with a total of six family units and setback/airspace restrictions of 9 meters at the front and 6 meters on both sides.

Dr. Chukwuma-Odii alleged that Fandago deviated from the approved plan by reducing the left-side setback to less than 25 meters and the airspace to less than 18 meters from the boundary.

According to him, the building contains multiple flats directly overlooking his single-dwelling premises, which has caused significant discomfort, including exposure to the views of strangers, the risk of falling objects, constraints on airspace, and increased heat due to the building's proximity.

He further claimed that the development has breached his family's constitutional right to privacy, defaced the area's planned aesthetics, and altered the skyline within the zone.

Dr. Chukwuma-Odii stated that he reported the matter to the Banana Island Property Owners and Residents Association, BIPORAL, and the Lagos State Ministry of Physical Planning and Urban Development, which twice sealed the site but later reopened it.

Following a petition by his solicitor, Samuel N. Agweh (SAN) & Associates, on August 20, 2024, the fourth, fifth, and sixth defendants visited the site and issued a stop-work order on September 2, 2024.

The claimant alleged that Fandago has disregarded the stop-work order and continues construction in a brazen and defiant manner.
Dr. Chukwuma-Odii is seeking the following reliefs from the court:

"A declaration that the development commenced by the developer on Plot B-7, 327 Close, Banana Island, Lagos State, with Registration No. IKV/EPPID/2020/75m and Approval No. DCB/DO/2900IV contravenes the building model specification approved in the permit and constitutes a breach of the approval order, warranting revocation.

"An order revoking and nullifying the planning permit and approval with Registration No. IKV/EPPID/2020/75m and Approval No. DCB/DO/2900IV issued to the seventh defendant by the fourth, fifth, and sixth defendants on behalf of the first and second defendants for the building located at Plot B-7, 327 Close, Banana Island, Ikoyi, Eti-Osa LGA, Lagos State.

"An order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from further developing or maintaining the building on Plot B-7, 327 Close, Banana Island, Ikoyi, Eti-Osa LGA, Lagos State, in its current form, which breaches the approval granted.

"An order for the demolition of the building and development on Plot B-7, 327 Close, Banana Island, Ikoyi, Eti-Osa LGA, Lagos State."

The matter has been assigned to Justice A.O. Opesanwo for commencement of hearing.

---Case Adjourned till March 10


Ojukwu Transport Limited, OTL, has insisted that Maple Petrochemicals, a company owned by Governor Abdulrahman Abdulrasak of Kwara state, must meet certain conditions before it would be allowed to continue to occupy its present business office at 14 Probyn Road, Ikoyi, Lagos.

14 Probyn road, Ikoyi, Lagos was a subject of litigation until a Lagos High Court affirmed OTL as the rightful owner of the property whereas and an estate firm, Ogbonna Ojukwu &  Associates had leased the property to Maple Petrochemicals from 2017 to 2027 at N4million per annum.


Speaking on the dispute, OTL said it has no problem with Maple Petrochemicals remaining in their property till 2027, provided that they legitimize their stay and pay the appropriate rent  for the period 2017 to 2027.

OTL Director, Dr Ike Ojukwu stated that attempts by the company to resolve the issue amicably initially were rebuffed, with lawyers acting for the Governor and his company playing 'hide and seek', even after it was evident that there was no agreement with OTL, owners of the property. 

He however, stated that the matter was before Justice Oyebanji of the Lagos High Court and added that the company's processes speak for themselves, especially the counter affidavit he swore to.

The 'agent' in question,
Ogbonna Ojukwu &  Associates(Mrs Victoria Ojukwu and her husband, Sylvester Debe Odumegwu-Ojukwu, who died in 2018) ceased to work for them in 2007, notices were placed in national dailies to that effect and OTL states without equivocation that the so-called 'lease' is both fraudulent and of no consequence. 

The 'agent',OTL also claim,
is fraudulent and has not remitted any money to the company since 1995, adding that they have been referred to the Police for investigation and prosecution.

Based on a petition to the police over 2 years ago,Mrs Victoria Ojukwu is said to have been invited by the Police.

OTL claims that not only did she not honour the invitation but believe that she absconded to the United States where they believe that she has been for almost two years.

They said 'agent' had never been shareholders, Directors or officers of the company according to OTL.

In processes filed in court,
Maple Petrochemicals claims that the property is the 'Official residence of their Chairman' and that they have 'enjoyed peaceful tenancy since 1997.'

OTL however stated that they have not received any money in respect of the property and others, 'managed' by the agent from 1995 till date!

OTL further stated that warrant was duly and validly executed in April 2022, that there is no agreement between them and Governor Abdurahman Abdurazak or his company. 

At a sitting on December 11, 2024,
the matter was adjourned till March 10, 2025 for hearing.

Present in court were Dr Ike Ojukwu, Chief Massey Udegbe of Massey Udegbe & Co, Estate agents/valuers for OTL.

A legal practitioner, Dr Anthony Iwowo has urged the Inspector General of Police, IGP, and Deputy Inspector General of Police, DIG, Force Headquarters, Abuja, to expedite the investigation and prosecution of one Godwin Awoke who was arrested last week in Abia state in connection with an alleged armed robbery and attempted murder case in Ebonyi state.

In a statement made available to journalists on Monday, Dr. Iwowo stated that Awoke has been on the run since last year over his alleged role in an armed robbery and attempted murder on Ezekiel Iwowo at Obomalegu in Ukwagba Community, Ohaukwu Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, until he was arrested last week.

Dr. Iwowo noted that he had last year petitioned the Police over an incident where Awoke was alleged to have led some persons to rob Ezekiel Iwowo and inflicted serious physical injuries on him.

Dr. Iwowo alleged that Awoke using his personal Toyota Sienna bus, fully armed with AK-47 rifles, pistols, cutlasses and other offensive weapons, violently attacked Ezekiel Iwowo and dispossessed him of his valuables, motor cycle, phones, money and inflicted deep matchet cuts on him with various degrees of serious physical injuries which left him nearly dead.

After several unsuccessful attempts to arrest him, Dr Iwowo stated that Awoke was eventually arrested in Abia state by a team of police officers from DIG Force Headquarters, Abuja.

A member of the Police team that effected the arrest confirmed his arrest to journalist stating that he would be charged to court once investigation is concluded.

Urging the IGP and DIG Force Headquarters to expedite investigations and prompt prosection of the suspect, Dr. Iwowo cautioned that the police must not bow to any pressure to unjustly release the suspect.

He said: 'This is a distress call to the IGP and DIG Force Headquarter, Abuja who should beam their search light on this criminal suspect now that he has been arrested and ensure that he and his cohorts are prosecuted in the court of law deservedly to serve as deterrent to others.

"The general public is interested in knowing how this matter is handled by the Nigeria police whose duty it is under the law to arrest, investigate and adequately prosecute criminal suspects in the court of law as empowered by the 1999 Constitution and the Police Act, 2020.

"Awoke must never be allowed by the police henceforth to continue in his criminal activities. He has to face the consequences of his alleged criminal actions against his victim as stipulated by the law. "

By NAIRALAND

Afamefuna and Nwachukwu, sons of Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, wife of late Biafra leader, Chief Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu have withdrawn their earlier application before a Lagos High Court seeking to be joined as parties in a 2011 suit filed by Ogbonna Ojukwu and others against the Ojukwu Transport Limited, OTL, and others in which judgment had been delivered in 2018.

Justice Adedayo Oyebanji had while delivering judgment in the suit marked LD/794/2011, granted possession of Ojukwu Transport Ltd properties in Lagos to Ojukwu Transport Ltd including No 29 Oyikan Abayomi Drive, Ikoyi Lagos.

Late Chief Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu was a party to the suit until his demise in 2011.

Based on the judgment, OTL, executed a warrant of possession on all its properties in Lagos with certificate of completion of execution of warrant’ obtained in July 2022. Last year, Afamefuna and Nwachukwu applied before the court to be joined as “Interested parties in the matter” and also be exempted from the already executed warrant in a case in which judgment was delivered in June 2018.

In a new twist, the duo has filed a 'Notice of withdrawal' of their earlier application. The application dated December 16, 2024, seeks to “wholly withdraw their motion for joinder in the suit against the claimants/respondents.

At the last hearing for the fresh application for the joinder on April 22, 2024, OTL Director, Dr P Ike Ojukwu, their agent, Mr Massey Udegbe and lawyer, Chief Ifeanyi Okumah were in court while Bianca, her sons and their lawyers were absent.

The case is slated for hearing on March 10, 2025.

Recall that Justice A. M. Lawal had in the 2022 judgment granted a restraining order against interference with Afamefuna and Nwachukwu’s possession of the properties pending the harmonization of Ojukwu properties by OTL.

Claiming to be unaware of the matter before Justice Onyebanji, Afamefuna and Nwachukwu last year served a ‘Notice of Disobedience of Court order’ on OTL, the Ojukwu and other tenants of the property.

In their application seeking to be joined in the case before Justice Onyebanji, the Bianca sons claimed that they were not aware of the pendency of the suit and were not included as interested parties in the case.


They argued that it would amount to a miscarriage of justice for the matter to be conclusively decided without their input as the issues in the case affect their interest.

Meanwhile, OTL had last year, following the judgment of Justice Lawal harmonised the management of its assets and reaffirmed Massey Udegbe and Co as its estate agent and published the same in two national newspapers.

Of the five properties in Bianca and son's 2012 suit, OTL claims that it had not been paid rent for 12 years (N144m) by Uche Obilor/West African Offshore Limited, occupants of 30 Gerard Rd,Ikoyi, Lagos.

It also claimed that the occupants of 32a Commercial Avenue,Yaba, Foursquare Gospel Church, has not paid OTL any rent since 2017 while 4 Macpherson Rd,Ikoyi has been under Police ‘lock and key’ since July 2015.

It also insisted that 29 Oyinkan Abayomi Rd, Ikoyi has been unoccupied for over 20 years while 13 Ojora Rd, Ikoyi is in good condition with good tenant-landlord understanding.

An Arbitration Tribunal sitting in Lagos has ordered SANEF Creatives Ltd, a company owned by Bankers' Committee of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, to pay the sum of N19.4 billion to Hanson Dredging and Marine Service Ltd, HDMS, for the unlawful termination of its contract for the dredging and reclamation work of Lagos Creative Entertainment Centre, LCEC, popularly known as the National Theatre.

Sole Arbitrator of Tribunal, Engr Ayo Fanimokun gave the order on December 30, 2024 in his final arbitral award in the settlement of the contractual dispute between HDMS and SANEF Creatives- a special purpose vehicle of the Bankers’ Committee, which is composed of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN and the Body of Banks in Nigeria.

HDMS had dragged SANEF Creative before the Council for the Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria, COREN's constituted Arbitration Tribunal in 2023 after its contract for the dredging and reclamation of LCEC was unlawfully terminated in May 2022.

In its claims before the Tribunal through a team of lawyers led by Dr. Charles Mekwunye, SAN, HDMS averred that having signed the contract for the dredging and reclamation of LCEC with SANEF on November 11, 2021, it mobilised to site and had completed over 60 per cent of the contract when SANEF suddenly cancelled the contract on the ground that the 36 weeks completion date stated in the contract terms had elapsed.

The firm further stated that following some unanticipated risk factors and prevailing economic situation in the country compounded by the Covid-19 pandemic, which delayed the execution of the contract, it requested for a review of the contract sum but that instead of conceding to its request, SANEF Creatives unlawfully terminated the contract and the CBN unlawfully interferred with the contract between HDMS and SANEF by directly debitting the full amount of N4. 2billion made to HDMS.

Among the 13 reliefs sought by HDMS before the Tribunal include, a declaration that the purported termination of the contract for the dredging and reclamation works for LCEC was unlawful, premature and against the spirit and letters of the contract documents executed by the parties.

HDMS also sought for a declaration that SANEF Creatives having wilfully elected not to insist on the time frame stipulated for the completion of the first phase of the contract within 12 weeks after advance payment, as a clear indication that it realised that there are obvious challenges that delayed the project, is therefore estopped from subsequently terminating the contract prematurely while citing time provision in the contract.

The firm also sought a declaration that the decision of SANEF Creatives acting through CBN to withdraw the N4.2billion advance payment for the project was unlawful and further order directing SANEF to pay it, N35billion and N9.1billion as general and special damages respectfully for the unlawful termination of the contract.

SANEF through its team of lawyers led by former Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, President, Mr Paul Usoro, SAN, in its response insisted that its decision to terminate the contract was lawful and made N70billion counterclaim against HDMS for the alleged losses it suffer following the breach of the contract and HDMS's refusal to remove its equipment from National Theatre ground to enable the execution of a landscaping contract with another company.

Delivering verdict on the dispute after eight sittings and tendering of about 46 exhibits, with two expert witness testimonies, Engr Fanimokun raised six issues for determination and resolved five in favour of HDMS award against SANEF.

On the issue of whether SANEF can insist on time being the essence of the contract in view of its conduct and condoning action before and after its purported termination letter dated May 26, 2023, Engr Fanimokun held that SANEF's failure to terminate the contract on the actual due date of February 11, 2022, was a clear waiver of its right to insist that time was of the essence.

He held: "The Articles of Agreement on the Dredging and Reclamation Works did stipulate in Clause 8(ii) that 'Time shall be of the essence to this contract'. Clause 3 required the Claimant to execute the said works within a period of 36 weeks (with Phase 2A not exceeding a total of 12 weeks).

"The advance payment was made on November 19, 2021 and the Claimant would have been expected to conclude the execution and delivery of Phase 2A by February 11,2022.

"The Claimant did not conclude the Phase 2A of the Contract as at this date and the Respondent did not issue Notice of Default or Notice of Termination in accordance to the Contract.

"But, on May 11, 2022, the Respondent issued a Notice of Default in the terms of Clause 12.1 of the Contract to the Claimant, and demanded immediate remediation from the Claimant within 14 days from the date of this letter of May 11, 2022. Respondent's letter of May 26, 2022 to the Claimant subsequently terminated the Contract.

"..... From the foregoing, if time was strictly of the essence of the Contract as Claimed by the Respondent, then the Respondent's failure to terminate the Contract on February 11, 2022 was a breach of the Clause 8(ii) by the Respondent, but also a waiver of the Respondent's right to insist that time was of the essence."

Referring to the General Conditions of the contract which took cognisance of risks, exceptional events, variations and extension of time as expressed in Clause 6, 13, 13.4, 10 and 7.3, Fanimokun held: "The Claimant was delayed in the completion of the Works through the Risks factors that arose during the execution of the Contract and which are known to the Respondent through the Agents/Consultants/Engineers who were on Site at all material times with the Contractor.

"Significant in these factors are the Covid 19 pandemic and the re-routing of the pipes four times which is as a result of the erroneous initial Site route given by the Respondent about the SIFAX route. Also, Community compensation/relocation issues and various approval delays with stop work order given by the Government Agencies cannot be discounted.

"The Respondent rightly stated that the Claimant never applied for extension of time, but the report of its agent on March 25, 2022 — Exhibit D8 clearly tabulated an extended timeline for the completion of the Contract. A new Work programme was agreed by the Parties at a meeting held on  April 1, 2022 at Access Bank and hosted by a Director of the Respondent.

"The provisions for Risks, Exceptional Events and Variation in the FIDIC Blue Book has make time to be of no more essence once these events occur. The Respondent kept their Agents/Consultants/Supervisors on Site to continue to supervise the Claimant's works till November 15, 2022 that is even after the termination of the Contract on May 26, 2022 for a Contract that should have been completed on February 11, 2022.

"The Courts have held that where time is of essence and the Respondent has compromised the time element by not terminating the contract at the alleged agreed time, it is a waiver."

Having held that time was no longer of essence in the contract since it was deemed waived by SANEF, the Tribunal declared the termination of the contract solely on that ground as premature and unlawful.

The Tribunal also faulted the abuse of power by the CBN under its former governor, Godwin Emefiele in interfering with the contract by unlawfully recalling the advance payment made to HDMS by SANEF in the custody of Globus Bank .

"The CBN interfered with the Contract by debiting the account of Globus Bank Limited with the total amount of the APG,N4,228,530,000:00 only on August 8, 2022 and which caused the Bank to debit same amount into the Claimant's account making it liable to the full sum of the APG.

"The Respondent definitely abused its relationship with the CBN to have resulted to this action, without minding the level of work already executed by the Claimant and against the express provisions of the APG. This is unlawful and gross abuse of power," it held.

The Tribunal went on to award special and general damages of N9.1billion and N5billion respectfully against SANEF in favour of HDMS for damages it suffered due to the contract termination.

On whether HDMS was entilted to the value of the over 60 per cent job it had already done assessed as N5.33billion, the Tribunal held: "The Claimant, having already executed and or completed the contract job to over 60 per cent stage as at the time the Respondent unlawfully terminated the Parties’ Contract by forceful collection of the APG sum through the CBN, and ordered the Claimant to demobilise out the Site.

"The Claimant is entitled to be paid by the Respondent for all the unpaid balance of the value of the work already executed by the Claimant under Clause 12.4 of the Parties’ Dredging Agreement accessed at the total sum of N5,331,532,738,13 plus acruing interest, and this Tribunal so hold."

In its final conclusion, the Tribunal held that HDMS was able to prove the existence of fact to warrant the grant of the reliefs sought and granting HDMS N19.4billion and 25 per cent interest per annum from the date of the arbitral award.

‘Professor’ Jide Josiah Jisos has been sentenced to six months in prison for impersonating his daughter during the 2019 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME).

READ FULL REPORT: https://dataxpat.com/nigerian-professor-jailed-6-months-for-utme-impersonation/

An Ikeja Magistrates Court sitting Ogba, Lagos has struck out a sexual assault charge by the Police against a 42-year-old man, Mr Emmanuel Emeruwa.

Emeruwa was initially arraigned on a holden charge before the court in June for allegedly sexually assaulting his five years old daughter in his Lagos residence.

Emeruwa pleaded not guilty to the charge and was remanded in Police custody as the presiding Chief Magistrate, Mr B.O.Osunsanmi ordered that the case file be sent to the office of the Directorate of Public Prosecution, DPP, Lagos State for legal advice.

Following a legal advice issued by the DPP on June 24, 2024, Magistrate Osunsanmi held that the defendant has no case to answer and struck off the one-count charge against him.

The judgement of the court made available to our reporter stated: “Based on the advice of the DPP dated June 24, 2024, Reg No LIP/MISC/R/2024/114/8, it advised non-prosecution of the defendant. The defendant, Emmanuel Emeruwa is hereby struck out. Case dismissed.”

A copy of the legal advice signed by Lagos DPP, Dr Babajide Martin and sighted by our reporter showed that Police investigation didn't not established any prima facie case against the defendant.

The legal advice cited a family meeting in the duplicate case file where the mother of the victim had accused the suspect of sexually assaulting their daughter and later turned around to apologise stating that she made up the allegation out of anger.

The document reads: “After carefully considering the facts available in the duplicate case file, this office is of the view that a prima facie case of sexual assault by penetration contrary to Section 261 of the Criminal Law Cap. C.17, Vol.3, Laws of Lagos State 2015, is not disclosed against the suspect, PG B1-Emmanuel Emeruwa.

‘’”The facts as contained in the duplicate case file revealed that the suspect and the complainants are constantly having issues in their marriage leading to physical assault on the suspect.

“The complainant during one of the various meetings held by the family alleged the suspect of sexually assaulting the victim where the complainant eventually apologised that she made the allegation out of anger.”

The legal advice also stated that there was a gross contradiction between the medical examination carried out on the victim by Mirabel Centre and another medical examination conducted by WARIF.

Part of the document reads: “"The medical report from Mirabel Centre revealed blunt force penetration of the victim's Instruments (excluding penetration into her introitus) while the anal examination was found to be normal. The medical report from WARIP on the other hand found that the external female genital was normal, vagina was hyperemic and the hymenal membrane was not intact.

“The report further found that the anal was bruised at position 12 O'Clock and there were anal abrasions. It is the law that the guilt of a Defendant may be proved by direct eye witness account, confessional statement or circumstantial evidence which is direct, positive, compelling and unequivocal.

“There are none of these modes available in this case. The eye-witness account of the victim relates to touching of her front bumbum, the circumstantial evidence relating to the examination of the victim are contradictory, while one found blunt force penetration of the victim's Instruments (excluding penetration into her introitus) and also finding the anal to be normal, the other report found the genital normal, the vagina hyperemic and the hymenal membrane was not intact.

“It is important to note that even the victim did not mention that the Suspect or anyone touched or penetrated her anus. The Suspect did not confess to the crime.

“There is material contradiction that casts serious doubt on the allegation against the suspect especially as it relates to the offence. The law is that if there are contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution and the contradictions go materially to the charge, doubt will be created and the benefit of it must be given to the accused person in which case he will be discharged.”

---Demands thorough investigation

A chieftain of Labour Party, LP, in Anambra State, Paul Orajiaka has condemned last Sunday's killings in Nibo, a suburb community in Akwa South Local Government, saying that the horrible incident is a sad reflection of the worsening insecurity in the State.

In a statement on Wednesday, Orajiaka, a former governorship aspirant condoled with grieving families who lost their loved ones in the attack by unknown gunmen and called on the state government and security agencies to ensure a thorough investigation which will not only lead to the arrest of the perpetrators but also unravel the real motives behind the attacks.

The statement reads: “ I received with shock on Sunday the gruesome killing of some of our youths by unknown gunmen. I condemn in the strongest terms this type of mindless killings which has become a reoccurring thing in our once peaceful state. I express my heartfelt condolences to families that lost their loved ones to the senseless killing and pray that God will comfort them.

“Unfortunately, this recent killing is another stark reminder of how terribly bad the security situation in our beloved Anambra State has become. Under the current administration of Governor Charles Soludo, no week passes without reports of killings and kidnapping of innocent residents of our state.

“The core objective of any government is the protection of lives and properties of indigenes and residents. What happened in Nibo and many other reported and unreported cases is a pointer that the people currently running the affairs of our state are grossly incompetent and incapable of protecting our people.

“It is not too late for the All Progressives Grand Alliance led government to wake up to its responsibility of safeguarding lives and properties. I urge Governor Soludo and his team to immediately fish out those behind the killings in Nibo. Besides ensuring that justice is served, the government must also go after sponsors of insecurity in the state. Nibo killing is one too many and must not be swept under the carpet.

‘I also appeal to our security agencies to leave no stone unturned in unmasking those behind Nibo killing. There must be no sacred individuals too powerful to engage in criminality without being made to answer to their evil deeds. I sincerely hope that our security agencies will live up to their responsibilities this time. “

Lagos State, Nigeria – October 17, 2024 –


Segilola Resources Operating Limited (SROL), Nigeria’s pioneering gold exploration and production company, has been recognized by the Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC) as one of Nigeria's top 10 non-oil exporters in 2023.

This prestigious accolade was presented at a ceremony acknowledging the nation’s leading non-oil exporting companies, where the Minister of Industry, Trade, and Investment, Hon. (Dr.) Doris Nkiruka Uzoka-Anite MD, CFA, commended their contributions to driving economic growth beyond the traditional oil sector.

The recognition underscores SROL’s ongoing commitment to supporting Nigeria's economic diversification through robust export initiatives. Mr. Austin Menegbo, Country Manager for SROL, expressed pride in this achievement, stating, “This acknowledgment is a testament to our efforts in driving sustainable development and supporting local employment. We are proud to contribute to the nation’s export landscape, and it is encouraging to see our efforts recognized at this level.”

In addition to this honour, SROL’s dedication to excellence has also been celebrated with the CIPM Oscar Award for HR Best Practice in the Mining Sector, further solidifying the company’s leadership in innovative labour practices.

This award recognizes SROL’s commitment to diversity, inclusion, and talent development, setting benchmarks in the industry for employee engagement and strategic HR.

SROL’s flagship project, the Segilola Gold Mine, has set a precedent for commercial gold mining in Nigeria. Located in Osun State, it commenced production in 2022 and achieved an impressive output of 98,006 ounces of gold in its first year. In 2023, the mine produced an additional 84,609 ounces.

Beyond contributing to Nigeria’s solid minerals sector, the mine has provided significant employment opportunities, with 44% of the workforce drawn from Osun State and 28% from local host communities.

SROL remains steadfast in its mission to drive economic growth, create local employment, and advance the mining value chain within Nigeria.

The NEPC recognition and the recent CIPM award affirm SROL’s role as a leader in non-oil export, sustainable development, and innovative labour practices. As the company looks to the future, it continues to set high standards in responsible sourcing, capacity building, and ethical practices, solidifying its position as a model for the mining industry in Nigeria and beyond.

PHOTO CAPTION: L-R Austin Menegho, Country Manager, Segilola Resources Operating Limited; Hon. (Dr.) Doris Nkiruka Uzoka-Anite MD,CFA, Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment at the award ceremony, recognising Segilola Resources Operating Limited as one of the Top 10 non-oil exporters in Nigeria by the Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC) in Abuja, Nigeria.

A U.S based Nigerian medical doctor,
Dr. Ijeoma Nduka-Nwosu, has dragged Major Joseph Adebiyi of the Nigerian Army before the Lagos State High Court for allegedly trespassing on her property located at Olugborogan Village, Lekki, Lagos State.

In the Suit No. LD/14323LMW/2023, Dr. Nduka-Nwosu, averred that she is the rightful owner of the parcel of land measuring 2912.150 square metres which she purchased from the Sule Olusesi Chieftaincy Family in 1992

The medical doctor claimed that she had maintained uninterrupted possession of the property since the purchase and made substantial investments on the property including constructing a residential building that had reached a habitable stage until December 2021 when some thugs allegedly acting under Major Adebiyi's direction invaded the property resulting in extensive damage valued at over N25 million.

She claimed that the attackers destroyed the perimeter walls and stole construction materials, all while threatening her workers and asserting that Major Adebiyi had taken over the land.

Dr Nduka-Nwosu further claimed that the incident was reported to various law enforcement agencies including the Lagos Task Force on Land Grabbing but that the matter escalated after Major Adebiyi allegedly attempted to misrepresent ownership of the land through a questionable Deed of Assignment, which was later confirmed as fraudulent by the Authorities after investigations, with key signatories denying any association with it.

The plaintiff also claimed that Major Adebiyi at some point tried to twist the matter by petitioning the police over an alleged harassment on him but that the police after a thorough investigation dismissed the allegation.

The plaintiff is seeking multiple reliefs, including a declaration of her ownership of the land, an injunction to prevent further trespass by Major Adebiyi and his agents, and N50million in damages for the alleged destruction, emotional distress, repair costs, and general trauma caused by the attacks.

In a statement issued on her behalf yesterday by the Head of Chambers, Ubani & Co, Legal Practitioners, Mr Joseph Igwe, Dr. Nduka-Nwosu claimed that despite the ongoing legal proceedings and evidence against him, Major Adebiyi has continued to harass her and disrupt her lawful possession of the property.

Igwe in the statement noted that Major Adebiyi has not filed any defence to the suit against him but has rather continued to lay claim to the property and is presently attempting to resurvey the property.

Part of the statement reads: "This suit has since 2023 been served on Major Adebiyi, with an application for interlocutory injunction, but till date, he has been unable to file any defence to the suit, and rather than filing a defence, he continued trespassing on the land as if no legal action has been instituted against him.

"When the two persons he allegedly sold the land to, discovered that his claim to ownership was fraudulent; they reported the matter to EFCC. The agency promptly arrested him and commenced an investigation which confirmed that he is not the owner of the plots of land.

"He has presently re-surveyed the land and is attempting to sell to other gullible prospective buyers.

"We are using this means to warn all prospective buyers to beware as they will be defrauded and lose their money as Major Adebiyi does not have an entitlement to the land. The matter is lis pendes."

The Lagos State Government has advised organisers of the October 1 protest not to disrupt the social and economic activities in the state during their protest saying that the directives of the governor of the State to the Commissioner of Police of Lagos State for maintenance and securing of public safety and public order during the protest stands

The state government also said that a Lagos High Court order which restricted the protest to Freedom and Peace Parks in the Ojota and Ketu areas of the state is still binding.



Recall that the organisers of the October
1 protest at a press briefing last Thursday had stated that the protest in Lagos will commence at Ikeja under bridge at 7:30am, with participants marching through various streets to raise awareness on what they described as 'anti poor policies' of the federal government.
They also requested the Lagos state Commissioner of Police, Olanrewaju Ishola, to provide adequate security for all protesters in line with the Police Establishment Act 2020.

Responding to questions by some journalists on the issue on Sunday, the Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr Lawal Pedro, SAN, noted that the state Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu is not opposed to any group of residents expressing their view about any government by way of public protest, but that such expression must be done within the confines of the law.

Pedro stated that a Lagos High Court had restricted the protest in the state to Freedom and Peace Parks in the state and urged the protesters to respect the court order by confining themselves to the two venues.

He said: "We have and shall continue to engage the civil societies and NGOs in Lagos who are genuinely interested in the development of Lagos State to explain and enlighten them that the Governor of Lagos State Babajide Sanwo-Olu is not opposed to any group of residents to express their view about any government by way of public protest as it is their fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of Nigeria 1999.

"However the fundamental rights to freedom of speech, association and assembly is not absolute and by virtue of section 45, section 215 (4) of the Constitution of Nigeria (as amended) and section 4 & 10(2) of the Police Act, it is lawful for the Governor of Lagos State or the Attorney General of Lagos on his behalf to give the Commissioner of Police of Lagos State directive for maintenance and securing of public safety and public order that may impact on the exercise of these fundamental rights.”

Pedro insisted that the state government would not permit any street protest that can be hijacked by criminal elements whose agenda is destruction of government or other residents’ properties.

"In that respect we advise that the organisers should utilise the designated venues in the State for public protest to wit; Freedom Park and Peace Park for adequate protection and coverage of the protest by members of the press," he said.

Continuing, Pedro said; "It is the same set or group of people that organised the last protest that are planning the Oct 1st protest, so they should be guided by the interim preservative order of injunction of court restricting public protest in the State to designated venues for the purpose.

"More so a substantive action is pending in court against them wherein an order of Interlocutory and perpetual injunction are being sought to permanently restrict any person or group of persons that wish to organise public protest in Lagos State to do so at designated venues.

"It is settled principle of law that a defendant who is aware of a pending claim or application for injunction against him in a court of law, has an obligation to respect the court process and not engage in the same act sought to be restrained.

“Therefore whether the interim preservative order is subsisting or not, by the subsisting suit, it will be unlawful for any body, civil society or NGO in Lagos to convene any public protest outside the designated venue.

"They should use the designated venues for their protest so that adequate security protection and traffic management can be provided for them to exercise their recognised fundamental right to freedom of speech, association and assembly without fear of the protest being hijacked and turned violence as experienced during the #EndSARS protest.

“The last End bad governance protest in Lagos was violence-free and successful because it was held in designated venues for public protest in the State.

"I believe that if the real intention and plans of the organisers of the protest is to air their views and resentment against government policies and hunger in the land, making use of the designated venue will not be prejudicial to them unless of course they have a different and hidden agenda.

"I would also advise a rethink of the idea of taking over the streets of Lagos for the purpose of the protest bearing in mind that the fundamental rights of other people not interested in the protest should not be infringed upon and that the properties or businesses of other people may be destroyed if the protest is hijacked on the streets."

The Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Lagos State, Mr. Lawal Pedro, SAN, has refuted the claim by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, that while in private practice he was responsible for several adjournments in the trial of an American, Marco Ramirez, who was convicted last week in Lagos for a $1.2 million EB-5 visa scam.

Ramirez, an American businessman was sentenced to 68 years in prison on Tuesday last week by a Lagos High Court along with his companies, USA NOW LLC, Eagle Ford Group LP and USA Now Energy Capital Group LP, for defrauding some Nigerians through the Employment-Based Fifth Preference (EB-5) US Investor Programme.

Ramirez who was first arraigned by the EFCC on June 22, 2017, before Justice Josephine Oyefeso of the Ikeja High Court, Lagos, was later re-arraigned before Justice Mojisola Dada of the Special Offences Court in 2019 on an amended 12-count charge of conspiracy and obtaining under false pretence.

Following his re-arraignment, Ramirez engaged the services of Mr Pedro, SAN, who handled his defence until 2023 when he was appointed Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Lagos state.

In a statement issued by the EFCC after Ramirez's conviction last week, the Commission had claimed that Ramirez's trial "suffered several adjournments occasioned by Mr Pedro, SAN, and the inability of the defence to file its own final written addresses in good time, even after the  prosecution counsel, M.S. Owede and S.O. Daji, had filed theirs."

But reacting to the statement, Mr Pedro in an interview with some journalists, denied the allegation and claimed that the record of the court show that he concluded the trial diligently.

He said: "Yes the report was brought to my attention by my son who is also in legal practice and wondered why I made the case suffered several adjournments as reported despite my frequent admonition of counsel to avoid delay of cases.

"I have read the report and it is mischievous. It is in respect of the judgment in favour of EFCC. The report is a one sided story of the case as usual. But giving a wrong and misleading reports to disparage me is most unfortunate, disappointing and least expected from the Commission

"It is on record that after my appointment as Attorney General & Commissioner for Justice in September 2023, I ceased to represent the Defendant and another counsel, David Odde of Seagate Partners took over the defense.

"The counsel appeared several times in the matter and I was reliably informed that he appeared on the day of the judgment. My question is why is his name not mentioned in the report but mine.

"Also the defence of the defendant made in court backed with documents to the effect that at the time money was collected for the Visa from the complainants he had approval and license of the US Home Office to process the Visa on behalf of applicants, was not included in the report for a balanced story.

According to him the report was an attempt to misled the public and cast aspersion on him.