₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,056 members, 8,420,074 topics. Date: Thursday, 04 June 2026 at 10:54 AM

Toggle theme

TheJustPath's Posts

Nairaland ForumTheJustPath's ProfileTheJustPath's Posts

1 2 (of 2 pages)

PoliticsRe: Sandra Duru Paid Me To Manipulate Senator Natasha's Voice - Francess Ogbonnaya by TheJustPath: 3:36am On May 13, 2025
CreativeOrbit:
Thank you for bringing this critical information to light. The admission by Francess Ogbonnaya that Sandra Duru paid her to manipulate Senator Natasha’s voice is a significant development. It underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in public discourse.

I commend the courage it took to make this disclosure and trust that the appropriate authorities will ensure justice is served in line with the facts now established.
CreativeOrbit, well done!
PoliticsRe: Oby Ezekwesili Asks Akpabio To Submit Himself For Investigstion by TheJustPath: 11:31am On May 12, 2025
emkz:
Oby, you inserted yourself in this matter when you appeared in the senate ethics committee when they wanted to start investigations into Natasha's accusations without a clear reason for your appearance. You ended up disrupting the hearing by launching a verbal assault on Senator Onyekachi Nwaebonyi whom you had described with vile words and he responded to you in kind. That led to the indefinite adjournment of the hearing.

Natasha later praised you for the show you put up.

Sandra Duru, also known as Professor Mgbeke, surfaced and said Natasha claimed to have paid you to mobilize to go and disrupt the hearing in the senate. Neither you nor Natasha has denied that there was payment. They said Natasha described you as a "useful heeeediot". Are you Natasha's "useful heeediot"? Can you also let us know how much you were paid?

What did you do with the money?

Finally, you said Akpabio must submit himself to an independent panel as requested by the accuser. Is the court and code of conduct tribunal not independent? You were minister for education, what education do you demonstrate when it is the accuser who recommends how trial should be done?

Does Natasha actually want an independent investigation or she wants Akpabio to step down with her faulty narrative?

Your mentor, Natasha, commenced a media trial on Arise News, Brekete Radio, Channels TV, DW News, BBC and Sky News. She even went to Interparliamentary Union in United Nations. Are those not independent bodies? They have asked for proof and to hear from the other side. The only proof we have heard is that: "Akpabio scratched my hand".

Oby, Natasha is an emotive person and acts before and/or without thinking. If she wanted to make accusations like that, she could have first gone to the seat she was re-allocated. Lure Akpabio and secure evidence. Then nail him. Because she behaved abruptly, she had to bring up accusations and you are asking an Investigative panel to investigate. What can be investigated without evidence? Recall there is a video where she spoke to Akpabio as follows when she was making noise in the senate:



So that if the panel does not rule in her favour, she'd accuse the chairman of being disbarred in the US and ask the legal disciplinary committee to suspend him as a lawyer. She did same to Senator Neda Imasuen who headed the committee that recommended her suspension.

One thing is clear: she is serving her suspension.
What a disgraceful heap of cowardly, condescending drivel. It takes a special kind of desperation to write this much and still manage to say absolutely nothing of substance. Since you’ve decided to parade your ignorance in public, allow me to reply as a third party—with the clarity and fire your hollow monologue never had.

First, your entire tirade about Oby “inserting” herself into the matter is laughable. Are you under the delusion that citizens with a conscience need your permission to speak on issues of national integrity? Oby walked into that committee with more credibility than the entire panel put together. If her words disrupted your cozy, choreographed charade, then that’s because truth has a way of setting fire to lies.

Your idol, Senator Nwaebonyi, was rightly called out for the spineless puppet he is. His only real talent is playing attack dog for a rotten system that protects predators and punishes whistleblowers. He got scorched by a superior intellect and responded with the only thing mediocrity knows how to do: lash out and retreat.

Now, let’s talk about Sandra Duru — a walking tabloid headline masquerading as a “Professor.” Her allegations are worth as much as a fake doctorate in a WhatsApp group. No proof. No receipts. Just noise, amplified by the desperate and the morally bankrupt. You and your ilk hide behind phrases like “neither Oby nor Natasha denied it” because you have no evidence to prove it. You think gossip replaces facts. News flash: it doesn’t.

“Useful heeediot”? Really? That’s the intellectual level you’re operating on? Recycling playground insults like a drunk parody of Femi Fani-Kayode? The fact that you consider standing up for justice as idiocy says more about you than it does about Oby.

And then your weak defense of Akpabio — pure comedy. You want Nigerians to trust the same compromised tribunals that have turned selective justice into a national pastime? No. When the system is rigged, it’s absolutely right to demand an independent process — one that doesn't answer to the same political cartel enabling abuse. Your warped idea of “independence” is a tribunal run by the accused’s drinking buddies.

As for Natasha — she went to the global stage because local justice was rigged. And it’s working. That’s what terrifies you. She didn’t beg for sympathy; she put names, dates, and power structures under scrutiny. Now the walls are shaking, and your camp is trembling.

You say all we have is “Akpabio scratched my hand.” That’s a lie, and you know it. The actual complaint was detailed. The problem is you never cared to read it. All you’ve done is deflect, minimize, and attack — classic tactics of men who defend abusers because they see themselves in them.

Finally, your twisted suggestion that Natasha should’ve “lured” her alleged abuser into a trap is vile, disgraceful, and exposes the kind of perverse logic that keeps predators safe. You don’t want justice. You want silence. You want submission. And you’re angry that these women are refusing to give you either.

So here’s your answer: Oby doesn’t owe you civility. Natasha doesn’t owe you subtlety. And the people demanding accountability will not be bullied back into silence by your gutter-level propaganda.

Sit down. You’ve already embarrassed yourself enough.

1 2 (of 2 pages)