₦airaland Forum

Amayabor1:
If not for nuclear weapons, Russia wouldn't be in a discussion where military might is being discussed.

Amayabor1:
You are stating what is not part of the argument.
Nobody said US Minuteman missiles (MMM) are not land based. Even the MMM have received advanced upgrades.
Nobody said the Tsar bomb was not the most powerful nuclear weapon detonated in history.

The summary of what I want you to know is this;
1. When it comes to nuclear weapons, the US beats Russia in nuclear weapons that are more advanced and precised. It is not about detonating the most powerful nuclear bomb that you can't use today. How advanced and precise are Russia's nuclear weapons?
2. Under the sea, the US has more deadly and more powerful submarines (all nuclear powered) than Russia.
3. In the air, the US is the only country that has stealth nuclear bombers (the B-2). And a new nuclear bomber (B-21 raider) to replace the B-2 is underway.

All these are not up for debate. They are facts that even Russia knows.

When it comes to conventional warfare, the US beats Russia hands down; advanced fighter jets, nuclear powered aircraft carriers and surface battle ships.

When it comes to encirclement, the US has been encircling Russia since the days of USSR. There are constant nuclear submarines under the sea that are at striking distance from Russia. The US has access to land and sea through Nato that are very close to Russia. This is why they will do anything not to allow Ukraine join Nato because the encirclement is now too much for them.

Did you read about the Cuban missile crisis?

Even with all of these, there is a current 1.5 trillion dollars nuclear weapons modernisation program going on in the US as we speak. Can't even delve into this here.

However, the only area Russia is ahead of the US is in hypersonic missiles. Even at that, the US army long range hypersonic weapon, the navy's conventional prompt strike and the airforce hypersonic attack crusie missile are all expected to enter service in 2027.

Amayabor1:
You are stating what is not part of the argument.
Nobody said US Minuteman missiles (MMM) are not land based. Even the MMM have received advanced upgrades.
Nobody said the Tsar bomb was not the most powerful nuclear weapon detonated in history.

The summary of what I want you to know is this;
1. When it comes to nuclear weapons, the US beats Russia in nuclear weapons that are more advanced and precised. It is not about detonating the most powerful nuclear bomb that you can't use today. How advanced and precise are Russia's nuclear weapons?
2. Under the sea, the US has more deadly and more powerful submarines (all nuclear powered) than Russia.
3. In the air, the US is the only country that has stealth nuclear bombers (the B-2). And a new nuclear bomber (B-21 raider) to replace the B-2 is underway.

All these are not up for debate. They are facts that even Russia knows.

When it comes to conventional warfare, the US beats Russia hands down; advanced fighter jets, nuclear powered aircraft carriers and surface battle ships.

When it comes to encirclement, the US has been encircling Russia since the days of USSR. There are constant nuclear submarines under the sea that are at striking distance from Russia. The US has access to land and sea through Nato that are very close to Russia. This is why they will do anything not to allow Ukraine join Nato because the encirclement is now too much for them.

Did you read about the Cuban missile crisis?

Even with all of these, there is a current 1.5 trillion dollars nuclear weapons modernisation program going on in the US as we speak. Can't even delve into this here.

However, the only area Russia is ahead of the US is in hypersonic missiles. Even at that, the US army long range hypersonic weapon, the navy's conventional prompt strike and the airforce hypersonic attack crusie missile are all expected to enter service in 2027.


Let's be sincere with ourselves. Russia doesn't have the kind of money US has to spend on their military. Imagine Iran helping Russia with drones to fight Ukraine. 🤣😅. North Korea helping with soldiers. 😅🤣.

If not for nuclear weapons, Russia wouldn't be in a discussion where military might is being discussed.

Every living former head of Israel’s army, police, Shin Bet, Mossad, and military intel just issued a joint call to end the war in Gaza, saying it’s "no longer just and threatens Israel’s very identity." pic.twitter.com/fhogrrGfOz

— Clash Report (@clashreport) August 4, 2025

DiasGodinHeaven:
Russia cannot save a terrorist regime from Israel long arm

Amayabor1:
Let's not derail the discuss with two many talk here and there. We are on which country have more advanced warheads. Just mention me once and I will respond. No need mentioning me 4 times. It makes responding to your points difficult. I will discuss all other things you said, but let me start with this.


Also, we are talking about land based systems now. When we are done, we will talk about air based (nuclear bombers) and sea based (submarines) and compare between the US and Russia.

🇷🇺 Russian aviation used a massive FAB-3000 glide bomb to destroy a key bridge in Kherson.

With a 3-ton warhead and satellite guidance, the FAB-3000 is designed to obliterate hardened targets. pic.twitter.com/zWtLfoDW7J

— DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) August 2, 2025

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
UK and her cunning diplomacy. They now want to pit India against China.

penearth:
Guy man no fit show because em da fear make international court no catch am. Na only from Russia him da throw bomb

Baxilexi:
Nigerians should go live in Russia or speak with natives from the Baltic countries to understand who Russia really is.

They have no known consumer end product lines, but it’s all about weaponry/death/faux-piety. AK the Russian flagship.

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/russian-president-vladimir-putin-dismisses-transport-minister-starovoit-2025-07-07/

jaydeeking:
That is serious and I hope it is used for lawful purposes.

RollinTNDA:
in July 2024. Continue carrying old news.
Gtfo carrying July 2024 news shame no dey catch you

RollinTNDA:
China and India are the only ones buying Russian oil.
The profit of Russian oik goes to the war in Ukraine.

That is why any oil ceo that was against this idea was either found falling out a window or dead mysteriously. Google it

Trump want to sanction India to stop buying Russian oil to stop helping Russia fund the war against Ukraine.

Ukrainian intel chief Budanov:

Russia wants to be ready to fight NATO by 2030. That is their number one objective, which is outlined in their official documents.

A successor to Putin will not change anything – the system is fully prepared for everything. pic.twitter.com/Ck80O3pFxf

— Clash Report (@clashreport) August 2, 2025

23jerryking:
It's gone on for far too long. It's crazy how this once powerful empire declined so rapidly and became a shadow of her former self.